.
Volumen , Número ,
|
|
|
Lipid and Metabolic Profiles in Adolescents Are Affected More by Physical Fitness Than Physical Activity (AVENA Study)
Enrique García-Arteroa; Francisco B Ortegaa; Jonatan R Ruiza; José L Mesaa; Manuel Delgadob; Marcela González-Grossc; Miguel García-Fuentesd; Germán Vicente-Rodrígueze; Ángel Gutiérreza; Manuel J Castilloa
a Grupo EFFECTS-262, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain b Departamento de Educación Física y Deportiva, Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, Granada, Spain c Grupo EFFECTS-262, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain. Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain d Departamento de Pediatría, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain e Departamento de Fisiatría y Enfermería, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60:581-8.
Palabras clave: Physical activity. Aerobic capacity. Muscle strength. Lipids. Adolescents. AVENA.
INTRODUCTION
Regular physical activity is considered one of the most effective
strategies in preventing the leading causes of morbidity and
mortality in western countries.1 The North American
Health Department has identified increased physical activity as its
primary aim by 2010.2 This was motivated by the serious
risk to individual and social health due to the lack of physical
activity.3 It has been known , even for early ages, that
the level of physical activity seems to be related to specific
cardiovascular risk factors.4,5
Physical activity is defined as any body movement produced by the
skeletal muscles that requires a certain amount of energy
expenditure. This refers to the type of physical effort that is
practiced regularly, and its duration, and frequency. Although
related, physical fitness is a concept different from physical
activity. This refers to the ability to perform exercise,
understood as an integrated measure of all the functions and
structures that are involved (skeletal-muscle, cardiorespiratory,
hematocirculatory, psychoneurological, and
endocrine-metabolic).6
Recent research has clearly shown that physical fitness, mainly
aerobic capacity, is an important predictor of cardiovascular and
all-cause morbidity and mortality in both men7-9 and
women.8-10 Similarly, muscle strength, in
men11-13 and in women,13 can be a different
and independent predictor of morbidity and mortality.
However, the evidence shows that these do not originate in
adulthood, but at much earlier ages. Longitudinal studies have
confirmed that the level of physical fitness and cardiovascular
risk factors in adults are directly related to the level of
physical fitness during adolescence.14,15 Although the
clinical characteristics of cardiovascular disease normally appear
in adults, their pathogenic origin can be found in adolescence and
even in childhood.16-19
Cross-sectional studies have shown the close relationship, during
childhood and adolescence, between specific cardiovascular risk
factors and the level of physical fitness, as measured by aerobic
capacity20-22 and muscle strength.23 However,
no in-depth analysis has investigated how both components of
physical fitness together affect the lipid-metabolic profile in
adolescents.
Therefore, the aims of this work were: a) to study which
variable, physical activity, or physical fitness, has the greatest
influence on the lipid-metabolic profile in Spanish adolescents;
and b) to study the independent effect of aerobic capacity
and muscle strength on the lipid-metabolic profile.
METHODS
Subjects and Experimental Design
This work is part of the AVENA project (Alimentación y
Valoración del Estado Nutricional en Adolescentes) (Food and
Assessment Nutritional Status in Adolescents). This was a
multicenter study designed to evaluate the state of health, as well
as the nutritional-metabolic situation and level of physical
fitness, of a representative sample of Spanish adolescents aged
13-18.5 years. The general methodology of the study has already
been published.24-26 From a total of 2859 adolescents,
460 (248 male and 212 female; mean age 15.2 [1.4] years) were
randomly chosen for biochemical-metabolic analysis, forming a
representative sample of the total study
sample.27
The
project followed the ethical standards recognized by the
Declaration of Helsinki (reviewed in Hong-Kong in September 1989
and in Edinburgh in 2000) and the EEC Good Clinical Practice
recommendations (document 111/3976/88, July 1990), and current
Spanish legislation regulating clinical research on humans (Royal
Decree 561/1993 on clinical trials). The study was approved by the
Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Marqués de
Valdecilla (Santander, Spain).
Anthropometric Characteristics
All
anthropometric measurements were performed with the subjects
barefoot and in underwear. Weight was measured with a Seca platform
scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany) (range, 0.05-130 kg; accuracy, 0.05
kg). Height was measured with the same device (range, 60-200 cm;
accuracy, 1 mm). Body Mass Index was calculated. The anthropometric
measurements in the AVENA project were standardized and
intraobserver and interobserver reliability strictly
monitored.25
Sexual Maturation
We
assessed the different stages of maturational development were
assessed following the methodology described by Tanner and
Whitehouse.28 Five stages were recognized for each of
the following characteristics: genital development and pubic hair
in males, and breast development and pubic hair in
females.
Physical Activity
Physical activity was assessed through questionnaires designed in
line with the Yesterday Activity Checklist,29 translated
and validated for the Spanish population.30 The level of
physical activity outside school (and in different situations:
school days, weekends, and summer vacation) was assessed with these
questionnaires. These included a list of activities normally
practiced by adolescents. The participants were asked to mark only
those activities they actually practiced. Based on previous
classifications,31 each activity was assigned a value in
metabolic equivalents (MET) according to its estimated energy
expenditure. A physical activity index was calculated based on the
total MET of each activity, through principal components factor
analysis (varimax rotation).32 Thus, a single factor was
obtained representing the level of physical activity of each
subject. The physical activity index had an eigenvalue >1 (2.23)
and explained 55.9% of the variance in physical
activity.
A
dichotomous question (yes/no) was included in one of the
questionnaires to establish which physical activities were
practiced outside the school schedule. This was answered by each
adolescent and a classmate for greater objectivity. This
dichotomous variable was compared with the physical activity index.
The sensitivity (S) and specificity (E) of the index were
calculated and the cut-off point obtained via receiver operating
characteristic curves.33 The cut-off point was expressed
with the maximum value of the Youden index34 (Y),
(Y=S+E1), which provides information on the value of
diagnostic tests. Thus, the optimal cut-off value was set at
0.44 to distinguish between "active" and
"non-active."32 The area below the curve was 0.766, with
a standard error of 0.011.
The
time spent in sedentary activities, including watching television
and playing video games, was recorded via
questionnaire,35 classifying the subjects into two
groups (¾2 h/day and >2 h/day). Information was also
collected on the time spent by the adolescents in actively
traveling (walking or cycling) to school, distinguishing between
0-15 min/day and >15 min/day.
Physical Fitness
Aerobic Capacity
Aerobic capacity was assessed via the Course-Navette test or 20-m
shuttle run test, an indirect-incremental-maximum field
test.36 This test has been validated in children and
adolescents (r=0.7 for young people aged 8-19
years).37,38 The following formula was used to calculate
maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) based on the result
of the Course-Navette test38:
VO2max=31.025+3.238V3.248E+0.1536VE
where V is the final speed reached in the test (V=8+0.5
last completed stage) and E is
age in years.
Muscle Strength
Muscle strength was measured via 3 tests: a) standing broad
jump with feet together to measure lower limb explosive strength;
b) hand dynamometry test to measure maximum hand grip
strength via the Takei TKK 5101 digital dynamometer (range 5-100
kg, accuracy 0.1 kg); and c) bent-arm hang test to measure
upper-limb muscle endurance.
All
these tests are included in the EUROFIT battery which has been
validated and standardized by the Council of Europe.39
Each variable was transformed by dividing each observed value by
the maximum value of the variable. The average of the three
transformed variables was used to establish a single variable
called the general strength index (GSI), having values between 0
and 1.
Biochemical Analysis
Blood samples were taken between 08.00 and 09.00, after fasting for
10 h. Subjects were asked not to engage in any prolonged exercise
during the previous 48 h. In all cases, blood was extracted from an
antecubital vein (20 mL).
Glucose, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
(HDL-C) concentrations were measured by enzymatic colorimetric
assay via a Hitachi 911 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Basel,
Switzerland). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol was measured
after precipitating out the remaining circulating lipoproteins,
before the analysis, via the phosphotungstate precipitation method.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated via the
Friedewald formula40 adjusting for serum triglyceride
concentrations.41 The results of the analytical
procedures underwent quality control, according to the regulations
governing hospitals in the Spanish public health system.
A
lipid-metabolic cardiovascular risk index was derived
from22 triglyceride, LDL-C, HDL-C, and glucose
concentrations. Each of these blood variables was standardized as,
for example, Z=([valuemean]/SD). The standardized variable for
HDL-C was multiplied by [1] since its relation to
cardiovascular risk stands in contrast to the remaining variables.
The lipid-metabolic cardiovascular risk index was calculated as the
total of the 4 standardized variables, so that lower values of this
parameter reflect a more beneficial lipid-metabolic profile in
terms of cardiovascular health. By definition, its mean is
0.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 12.0.1
software. Between-sex differences were analyzed by one-way analysis
of variance (one-way ANOVA) for continuous variables, and the
Pearson χ
2 test for discrete variables. The relationships
between independent variables (physical activity, aerobic capacity,
and muscle strength) were studied via partial correlation adjusted
for age and maturational development. All of these independent
variables were recoded as terciles to study their relationship to
the lipid-metabolic index via analysis of covariance (one-way
ANCOVA), separately by sex, and adjusting for age and maturational
development. A linear trend analysis was performed via polynomial
contrast. The P value for post-hoc hypothesis testing was
determined via the Bonferroni correction for multiple
comparisons.
RESULTS
Descriptive Analysis
Table shows that weight and height were greater in males
(P<.001), whereas Body Mass Index was similar in both
sexes. The physical activity index and the percentage of physically
active adolescents was greater in males. However, females spent
less time in sedentary activities (P<.001) and the
percentage of adolescents spending more than 2 h in such activities
was lower among females (P<.001). Both aerobic capacity
and muscle strength were significantly greater in males
(P<.001). Male adolescent showed higher triglyceride
(P=.042) and glucose (P<.001) concentrations.
Females presented greater concentrations of LDL-C and HDL-C
(P=.002 and P<.001, respectively).
Relationship Between Physical Activity, Aerobic Capacity, and
Muscle Strength
The
physical activity index showed a significant correlation with
aerobic capacity in both sexes (males, r=0.182,
P=.009; females, r=0.259, P<.001), but not
with the general strength index. On the other hand, there was a
correlation between aerobic capacity and the general strength
index, both in males (r=0.262; P<.001), and
females (r=0.289; P¾.001).
Relationship of the Lipid-Metabolic Index to Physical Activity,
Aerobic Capacity, and Muscle Strength
There was no relationship between the physical activity index and
the lipid-metabolic index. Aerobic capacity was related to the
lipid-metabolic index in males (P=.003) after adjusting for
age, maturational development, physical activity, and muscle
strength. A linear relationship was found in males via polynomial
contrast (P=.001), whereas the post-hoc study showed
significant differences between the 1st and 3rd terciles
(P=.003) and 2nd and 3rd terciles (P=.027) (Figure
1). In females, there was a relationship between the general
strength index and the lipid-metabolic index (P=.048) after
adjusting for age, maturational development, and aerobic capacity.
A linear relationship was also observed between the general
strength index and the lipid-metabolic index (P=.014) in
females, and a significant difference between the 1st and 3rd
terciles (P=.042) (Figure 2).
Figure 1.
Relationship between aerobic
capacity and lipid-metabolic cardiovascular risk index in male and
female adolescents. VO2max indicates maximum oxygen
consumption. Minimum and maximum values are indicated for each
category (low, medium, and high representing the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd
terciles, respectively). The error bars represent the standard
error of the mean.
aP<.05.
bP<.01.
Figure 2.
Relationship between the general
strength index and the lipid-metabolic cardiovascular risk index in
male and female adolescents. Minimum and maximum values are
indicated for each category (low, medium, and high representing the
1st, 2nd, and 3rd terciles, respectively). The error bars represent
the standard error of the mean. *P<.05.
DISCUSSION
According to our results, aerobic capacity and muscle strength in
Spanish adolescents are significantly associated with their
lipid-metabolic profile. High aerobic capacity in males
(VO2max >51.6 mL/kg/min) is associated with a lower
lipid-metabolic cardiovascular risk index (Figure 1), independently
of the level of physical activity and muscle strength. On the other
hand, the adolescents who have a high level of muscle strength (3rd
tercile) have a healthier lipid-metabolic profile than those with a
low level (1st tercile) of muscle strength (Figure 2),
independently of their aerobic capacity. Previous studies have
reported a relationship between aerobic capacity and given
cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents.20-22 Taken
together with this, our results show that muscle strength in the
adolescents (at least in females) is also independently associated
with cardiovascular risk factors, which we have not consistently
found in previous literature.
The
combined analysis of aerobic capacity and muscle strength (Figure
3) shows that low aerobic capacity corresponds to a high
lipid-metabolic index, except when the level of strength is high. A
low level of muscle strength corresponds to a high lipid-metabolic
index, except when aerobic capacity is high. High aerobic capacity
corresponds to a low lipid-metabolic risk, whatever the level of
strength. At the same time, a high level of muscle strength
corresponds to a low lipid-metabolic risk at any level of aerobic
capacity.
Figure 3.
Combined effect of aerobic capacity
and muscle strength on the lipid-metabolic profile in male and
female adolescents.
VO2max indicates maximum oxygen
consumption.
A
person´s physical fitness (expressed in the present work as
aerobic capacity and muscle strength) is mainly determined by 2
components. One of these is the genetic constitution of the
individual.42 The other includes the set of stimuli
encountered by the organism, among which are the physical
activities the person performs. Thus, it is reasonable to assume
that there would be a relationship, although modest, between the
level of physical activity and aerobic capacity (males,
P=.009, r=0.182; females, P<.001,
r=0.259).
Previous works have reported a positive relationship between the
level of physical activity and cardiovascular health in
adults,43,44 and also in children and
adolescents.5 The absence of this finding in our work,
together with the positive relationship established between the
level of physical activity and aerobic capacity, suggests that
aerobic capacity is the variable that really determines the
relationship between physical activity and cardiovascular health
reported by previous studies. As other studies on adolescents have
demonstrated,45,46 physical fitness is associated with
cardiovascular risk factors to a greater extent than the level of
physical activity. This leads us to conclude that the level of
physical activity may not be a cardiovascular health indicator with
high discriminatory power. In fact, engaging in more physical
activity does not seem to be sufficient to achieve a healthy
lipid-metabolic profile. Such physical activity should involve an
improvement in physical fitness, especially in aerobic capacity and
muscle strength.
The
subjective nature of assessment via questionnaires hinders the task
of accurately measuring the quantity and intensity of physical
activity performed by the adolescent. This limitation may have
negatively influenced the analysis of a possible association
between physical activity and lipid-metabolic profile. A recent
study using accelerometry reported that vigorous physical activity
(>6 MET), but not moderate or total physical activity, seems to
be a predictor of the degree of obesity in
adolescents.47 However, and despite using accelerometry,
the aerobic capacity of adolescents is associated with
cardiovascular risk factors to a greater degree than the level of
physical activity.48
CONCLUSIONS
The
results show that, in Spanish adolescents, low physical fitness is
associated with a less healthy lipid-metabolic profile in terms of
cardiovascular risk, regardless of the level of physical activity
performed. Lipid-metabolic risk was related to aerobic capacity in
males, whereas muscle strength was the associated in females
quality of physical activity. The results indicate that
improvements in physical fitness, especially aerobic capacity in
males and muscle strength in females, can have a protective role in
cardiovascular risk in adolescents. Cross-sectional studies with a
greater sample size and specially longitudinal prospective studies,
are needed, to confirm the results of the present work.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
To
all who made the AVENA study possible: adolescents, parents,
teachers, institutions and, of course, researchers, and co-workers.
To María Teresa Miranda León, for her expert advice
on statistics. To the group: the strongest links join with the
weakest such that the entire chain may be strengthened.
ABBREVIATIONS
AVENA:
Alimentación y Valoración del Estado Nutricional en
Adolescentes (Food and Assessment of Nutritional Status in
Adolescents)
HDL-C: high-density
lipoprotein cholesterol
LDL-C: low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol
GSI: general
strength index
MET: metabolic
equivalents
VO2max:
maximum oxygen consumption
See editorial on pages 565-8
*The researchers participating in the AVENA study are listed in the
Annex.
This study was financially supported by the Spanish Ministry of
Health and Consumption (FCI No.00/0015), FEDER-FSE funds, the
Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (AP2002-2920;
AP2003-2138; AP2004-2745; AP2005-4358), the Higher Sports Council
(Ref: 05/UPB32/01, 109/UPB31/03, and 13/UPB20/04), and Panrico
S.A., Madaus S.A., and Procter & Gamble S.A.
Correspondence: Dr. E. García Artero.
Departamento de Fisiología. Facultad de Medicina.
Universidad de Granada.
Avda. Madrid, s/n. 18012 Granada. España.
E-mail: artero@ugr.es
Received October 6, 2006.
Accepted for publication March 15, 2007.
References
1. U.S. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity fundamental to preventing disease (material electrónico) 2002 [accesed 25 Oct 2005]. Available from: http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/ reports/physicalactivity/index.shtml 2. Healthy People 2010. Leading health indicators (material electrónico) 2000 [accesed 25 Oct 2005]. Available from: http://www. healthypeople.gov/ 3. Colditz GA. Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31:s663-s7.[Medline] 4. Barnekow-Bergkvist M, Hedberg G, Janlert U, Jansson E. Adolescent determinants of cardiovascular risk factors in adult men and women. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29:208-17.[Medline] 5. Eisenmann JC. Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents: an overview. Can J Cardiol. 2004;20:295-301.[Medline] 6. Castillo MJ, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR. La mejora de la forma física como terapia anti-envejecimiento. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;124:146-55.[Medline][Artículo] 7. Myers J, Prakash M, Froelicher V, Do D, Partington S, Atwood JE. Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:793-801.[Medline] 8. Carnethon MR, Gidding SS, Nehgme R, Sidney S, Jacobs DR Jr, Liu K. Cardiorespiratory fitness in young adulthood and the development of cardiovascular disease risk factors. JAMA. 2003;290:3092-100.[Medline] 9. LaMonte MJ, Barlow CE, Jurca R, Kampert JB, Church TS, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness is inversely associated with the incidence of metabolic syndrome: a prospective study of men and women. Circulation. 2005;112:505-12.[Medline] 10. Mora S, Redberg RF, Cui Y, Whiteman MK, Flaws JA, Sharrett AR, et al. Ability of exercise testing to predict cardiovascular and all-cause death in asymptomatic women: a 20-year follow-up of the lipid research clinics prevalence study. JAMA. 2003;290:1600-7.[Medline] 11. Metter EJ, Talbot LA, Schrager M, Conwit R. Skeletal muscle strenght as a predictor of all-cause mortality in healthy men. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57:359-65. 12. Jurca R, Lamonte MJ, Barlow CE, Kampert JB, Church TS, Blair SN. Association of muscular strength with incidence of metabolic syndrome in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1849-55.[Medline] 13. Hulsmann M, Quittan M, Berger R, Crevenna R, Springer C, Nuhr M, et al. Muscle strenght as a predictor of long-term survival in severe congestive heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2004;6:101-7.[Medline] 14. Eisenmann JC, Wickel EE, Welk GJ, Blair SN. Relationship between adolescent fitness and fatness and cardiovascular disease risk factors in adulthood: the Aerobics Center Longitudinal Study (ACLS). Am Heart J. 2005;149:46-53.[Medline] 15. Ferreira I, Twisk JW, Stehouver CD, van Mechelen W, Kemper HC. The metabolic syndrome, cardiopulmonary fitness, and subcutaneous trunk fat as independent determinants of arterial stiffness: the Amsterdam growth and health longitudinal study. Arch Intern Med. 2005;25:875-82. 16. Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. Childhood lipoprotein profiles and implications for adult coronary artery disease: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Med Sci. 1995;310:S62-S7.[Medline] 17. McGill HC, McMahan CA, Malcom GT, Oalmann MC, Strong JP. Effects of serum lipoproteins and smoking on atherosclerosis in young men and women. The PDAY Research Group. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:95-106.[Medline] 18. Berenson GS, Srinivasan SR, Bao W, NewmanWP, Tracy RE, Wattigney WA. Association between multiple cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerosis in children and young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1650-6.[Medline] 19. Strong JP, Malcom GT, McMahan CA, Tracy RE, Newman WP 3rd, Herderick EE, et al. Prevalence and extent of atherosclerosis in adolescents and young adults: implications for prevention from the Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth Study. JAMA. 1999;281:727-35.[Medline] 20. Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Meusel D, Harro M, Oja P, Sjöstrom M. Cardiorespiratory fitness is associated with features of metabolic risk factors in children. Should cardiorespiratory fitness be assessed in a European health monitoring system? The European Youth Heart Study. J Public Health. 2006;14:94-102. 21. Mesa JL, Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Hurtig-Wennlöf A, Sjöstrom M, et al. The importance of cardiorespiratory fitness for healthy metabolic traits in children and adolescents: the AVENA study. J Public Health. 2006;14:178-80. 22. Mesa JL, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Wärnberg J, González-Lamuno D, Moreno LA, et al. Aerobic physical fitness in relation to blood lipids and fasting glycaemia in adolescents. Influence of weight status. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16:285-93.[Medline] 23. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Gutiérrez A, Moreno LA, Tresaco B, Martínez JA, et al. and the AVENA Study group. Is physical fitness a good predictor of cardiovascular disease risk factors in normal-weight and overweight or obese adolescents? The AVENA Study [abstract]. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28:S120. 24. González-Gross M, Castillo MJ, Moreno L, Nova E, González-Lamuño D, Pérez-Llamas F, et al. Alimentación y valoración del estado nutricional de los adolescentes españoles (Proyecto AVENA). Evaluación de riesgos y propuesta de intervención I. Descripción metodológica del estudio. Nutr Hosp. 2003;18:15-28.[Medline] 25. Moreno LA, Joyanes M, Mesana MI, González-Gross M, Gil CM, Sarria A, et al. Harmonization of anthropometric measurements for a multicenter nutrition survey in Spanish adolescents. Nutrition. 2003;19:481-6.[Medline] 26. Ortega FB, Ruiz J, Castillo MJ, Moreno LA, González-Gross M, Wärnberg J, et al. Bajo nivel de forma física en los adolescentes españoles. Importancia para la salud cardiovascular futura (Estudio AVENA). Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58:898-909.[Medline][Artículo] 27. Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, Moreno LA, Wärnberg J, González-Gross M, Cano MD, et al. Serum lipid and lipoprotein reference values of Spanish adolescents; The AVENA study. Soz Praventiv Med (Int J Public Health). 2006;51:99-109. 28. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH. Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child. 1976;51:170-9.[Medline] 29. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz FE. Habitual physical activity and health-related physical fitness in fourth-grade children. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147:890-6.[Medline] 30. Tercedor P, López B. Validación de un cuestionario de actividad física habitual. APUNTS. 1999;58:68-72. 31. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2000;32:s498-s516. 32. Ortega FB, Tresaco B, Ruiz J, Moreno LA, Martín-Matillas M, Mesa JL, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and sedentary activities are associated with adiposity in adolescents. Obesity. 2006. In press. 33. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:2936. 34. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32.[Medline] 35. Mendoza R, Sagrera MR, Batista JM. Conductas de los escolares españoles relacionadas con la salud (1986-1990). Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas; 1994. 36. Léger L, Lambert A, Goulet A, Rowan C, Dinelle Y. Capacity aerobic des Quebecons de 6 a 17 ans: test navette de 20 metres avec paliers de 1 minute. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1984;9:64-9.[Medline] 37. van Mechlen W, Hlobil H, Kemper HCG. Validation of two running tests as estimates of maximal aerobic power in children. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1986;55:503-6. 38. Léger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 meter shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6:93-101.[Medline] 39. Committee of Experts on Sports Research EUROFIT. Handbook for the EUROFIT Tests of Physical Fitness. Strasburg: Council of Europe; 1993. 40. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499-502.[Medline] 41. Nakanishi N, Matsuo Y, Yoneda H, Nakamura K, Suzuki K, Tatara K. Validity of the conventional indirect methods including Friedewald method for determining serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: comparison with the direct homogeneous enzymatic analysis. J Occup Health. 2000;42:130e7. 42. Rankinen T, Pérusse L, Rauramaa R, Rivera MA, Wolfarth B, Bouchard C. The human gene map for performance and health-related fitness phenotypes: the 2001 update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1219-33.[Medline] 43. Cheng YJ, Macera CA, Addy CL, Sy FS. Effects of physical activity on exercise tests and respiratory function. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37:521-8.[Medline] 44. Endres M, Gertz K, Lindauer U, Katchanov J, Schultze J, Schröck H, et al. Mechanisms of stroke protection by physical activity. Ann Neurol. 2003;54:582-90.[Medline] 45. Hasselstrøm H, Hansen SE, Froberg K, Andersen LB. Physical fitness and physical activity during adolescence as predictor of cardiovascular disease risk in young adulthood. Danish youth and sports study. An eight-year follow-up study. Int J Sport Med. 2002;23:s27-s31. 46. Twisk JM, Kemper HC, van Mechelen W. The relationship between physical fitness and physical activity during adolescence and cardiovascular disease risk factores at adult age. The Amsterdam growth and health longitudinal study. Int J Sport Med. 2002;23:s8-s14. 47. Ruiz JR, Rizzo NS, Hurtig-Wennlöf A, Ortega FB, Warnberg J, Sjöström M. Relations of total physical activity and intensity to fitness and fatness in children; The European Youth Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:298-302. 48. Gutin B, Yin Z, Humphries MC, Barbeau P. Relations of moderate and vigorous physical activity to fitness and fatness in adolescents. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:746-50.[Medline]
|
|