Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:594-8 - Vol. 64 Num.07 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2011.03.010

Changing Epidemiology of Native Valve Infective Endocarditis

Juan C. Castillo a,, Manuel P. Anguita a, Martín Ruiz a, Luisa Peña a, Marta Santisteban a, Miguel Puentes a, José M. Arizón a, José Suárez de Lezo a

a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain

Keywords

Endocarditis. Epidemiology. Native valve.

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

The aim of our study is to assess changes in the epidemiologic features of patients with native valve infective endocarditis.

Methods

We analyzed a prospective series of 228 cases of native valve infective endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users attending our center between 1987 and 2009. We compared three subperiods: 1987-1994 (67 cases), 1995-2002 (74 cases) and 2003-2009 (87 cases).

Results

The mean age of patients has progressively increased (38±22 years in the first subperiod vs 60±16 years in the third; P<.001), as has the proportion of cases without predisposing heart disease (25%, 46% and 67%; P<.001). Incidence of mitral valve prolapse remained stable (12%, 18% and 11%). Percentages of patients with predisposing heart disease and who were aware of their condition have fallen in recent years (45%, 27% and 21%; P<.001). A portal of entry for the infection could not be identified in 64%. Overall, Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent causative organism (26%) whereas the percentage of cases caused by Streptococcus viridans remains unaltered (22%, 20% and 24%).

Conclusions

We found significant changes in the epidemiology of native valve infective endocarditis. The incidence of patients without predisposing heart disease has increased significantly and staphylococci are the most frequent causative organisms.

Article

.

INTRODUCTION

Historically, infective endocarditis (IE) affected patients with predisposing valvular heart conditions caused by rheumatic disease, and streptococcus of the viridans type were the most frequent pathogens.1 This continues to be the principal form of presentation in emerging countries where prevalence of rheumatic diseases remains high. In the developed world, mitral valve prolapse is currently considered the most frequent predisposing illness in patients with IE.2, 3 Many recent studies point to Staphylococcus aureus as the most frequent causative organism in IE.4, 5, 6, 7 However, these clinical observations come from tertiary centers and may not reflect the real changes affecting IE epidemiology.

The objective of our study is to analyze the clinical, epidemiologic and microbiologic characteristics of patients with native valve IE over a long period and the changes that occur.

METHODS

In our center, 331 consecutive cases of IE in non-intravenous drug users (IVDU) were diagnosed between January 1987 and December 2009. Our hospital is a tertiary center which during the study period was the referral center for cardiovascular surgery in the Spanish provinces of Córdoba and Jaén (the area includes 2 regional hospitals in Córdoba and 4 hospitals in Jaén). At our center, patients diagnosed with IE are traditionally admitted to the cardiology service only. Patients enrolled in this study came from the emergency room, internal medicine, or echocardiography. Thirty patients (9%) were referred from other hospitals. The incidence of patients from other centers remained constant during the study period. We excluded 23 IVDU patients, 7% of all those diagnosed with IE, because their characteristic clinical profile has a greater proportion of tricuspid valve IE, an infection usually caused by S. aureus; their prognosis tends to be more positive than that of other native valve IE patients; and in most cases cardiac surgery is not required. Until 1994, IE diagnosis was based on criteria described by Von Reyn et al.8 Post-1994, criteria proposed by Durack et al.9 were used and, later, modified Duke criteria.10 Since 2004, we have applied the European Cardiology Society's new diagnostic criteria.2 In this series, 228 patients had native valve IE and these were selected for analysis in the present study. Diagnosis of predisposing heart disease (rheumatic, congenital, or degenerative) was obtained from clinical case histories and was essentially based on echocardiography. To analyze variation in clinical and epidemiologic profiles, we arbitrarily divided the 23-year study period into 3 more or less equal subperiods (including 8, 8, and 7 years, respectively): 1987-1994 with 67 cases, 1995-2002 with 74 cases, and 2003-2009 with 87 cases. To analyze trends in variables over time, we needed at least 3 comparison periods. We decided to use this minimum number because 4 or more would have made the number of cases in each subgroup very small. Transesophageal echocardiography has been available in our center since 1990. We considered hospitalization for antibiotic treatment, which generally lasted 4 weeks, as the active phase of the illness. Indications for surgery during the active phase (early surgery) were the appearance of severe heart failure due to valve or prosthesis dysfunction; persistent sepsis despite correct antibiotic treatment; appearance of local complications such as abscesses, pseudoanaeurysms and fistulas; repeated embolisms; and cases caused by aggressive organisms that generally did not respond to antibiotics, such as fungi, Coxiella spp, and Brucella spp. Indications for surgery did not differ over the study period. We defined urgent surgery as that which could not be postponed>24h without putting the patient's life at risk, and elective surgery as that which could be delayed a few days without increasing the risk to the patient's life. Early death was defined as that occurring inhospital, prior to discharge. Deaths following discharge were considered as late.

Statistical Analysis

All baseline and follow-up data were recorded in an SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, Illinois, United States) database. Normal distribution of quantitative data was confirmed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables with a normal distribution are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Qualitative variables are expressed as number (percentage). Comparisons between subperiods were with analysis of variance, with linear polynomial contrast for quantitative variables, and chi squared for trend (linear-by-linear association) in qualitative variables. We established P<.05 as significant.

RESULTS

During the study period, 228 non-IVDU patients with native valve IE were diagnosed and treated at our center. Figure 1 shows the number of patients with IE in the study period. The principle clinical characteristics of the cohort are shown in Table 1; 150 patients (66%) were men and 78 (34%) women, with a male:female ratio of 1.9:1. Mean age increased from 38±22 years in the first subperiod to 60±16 years in the third (P<.001).

Distribution of the number of cases of native valve infective endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users during the study period.

Figure 1. Distribution of the number of cases of native valve infective endocarditis in non-intravenous drug users during the study period.

Table 1. Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of 228 Patients With Native Valve Infective Endocarditis

Age (years) 50±20
Sex (male/female) 1.9/1
Site of infection  
Mitral 100 (44)
Aortic 89 (39)
Tricuspid 24 (10)
Pulmonary 6 (3)
Other 9 (4)
Vegetation size (mm) 12±6
Vegetations in TTE 180 (79)
Vegetations in TOE a 165 (97)

TOE, transesophageal echocardiography; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography.
Data are expressed as n (%) or mean±standard deviation.

a Performed on 170 patients.

Table 2 summarizes the distribution of predisposing heart disease and risk factors for infection. During the study period, incidence of predisposing rheumatic heart disease fell significantly, from 24% of patients in the first subperiod to 3% in the third (P<.001). Incidence of congenital heart disease also fell, from 28% to 7% (P<.001). However, incidence of degenerative heart disease showed no difference: 22% in the first subperiod, 24% in the second, and 23% in the third (P=.95). Mitral valve prolapse was the most frequent predisposing heart condition (13%) but was not statistically significant (12%, 18%, and 11%; P=.69). The percentage of patients with IE and aortic valve disease fell (30%, 16% and 11% respectively; P=.05). The percentage of patients with no predisposing heart disease increased considerably, rising from 17 (25%) in the first subperiod to 34 (46%) in the second and 58 (57%) in the third (P<.001).

Table 2. Risk Factors and Lesion Predisposing Infective Endocarditis

  1987-1994 (n=67) 1995-2002 (n=74) 2003-2009 (n=87) P
Portal of entry       .008
Dental 7 (10) 7 (9) 9 (10)  
Respiratory 0 0 2 (2)  
Digestive 0 4 (5) 7 (8)  
Genitourinary 4 (6) 0 2 (2)  
Other 8 (12) 20 (27) 12 (14)  
No 48 (72) 43 (58) 55 (63)  
Predisposing heart disease        
Mitral valve prolapse 8 (12) 13 (18) 9 (11) .69
Aortic valve disease a 20 (30) 12 (16) 10 (11) .05
Other 22 (33) 15 (20) 10 (11) .05
No 17 (25) 34 (46) 58 (67) .001
Awareness of lesion 30 (45) 20 (27) 18 (21) .001

Data are expressed as n (%).

a Includes aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation and bicuspid valve.

The proportion of patients who were aware they had a heart disease predisposing them to IE fell significantly: from 45% in the first subperiod to 21% in more recent years (P<.001).

We identified a possible entry portal for infection in 82 patients (36%). Dental origin of infection was similar in the 3 sub-periods (10%). The trend towards a greater number of IE cases with a possible digestive portal of entry increased in the later subperiods (P<.067). Variation in genitourinary cause of infection was not statistically significant.

Table 3 summarizes the causative organisms of infection during the study. Streptococcus was the cause in 40% of cases and staphylococcus in 37%. S. aureus was isolated in 59 patients (26%) and was the most frequent organism, followed by Streptococcus viridans in 51 patients (23%). Infection caused by S. viridans, S. aureus, or enterococcus did not vary significantly over the 3 subperiods but infection caused by Staphylococcus epidermidis did increase significantly (from 4.5% in the first subperiod to 17% in the last; P<.01).

Table 3. Infective Endocarditis Causative Organism

  1987-1994 (n=67) 1995-2002 (n=74) 2003-2009 (n=87) P
Organism type        
Streptococcus viridans 15 (22) 15 (20) 21 (24) .76
Enterococcus 7 (10) 17 (23) 14 (16) .42
Staphylococcus aureus 19 (28) 22 (30) 18 (21) .25
Staphylococcus epidermidis 3 (4) 5 (7) 15 (17) .01
Fungi 2 (4) 0 1 (1) .37
Coxiella burnetii 2 (3) 3 (4) 3 (3) .89
Others 10 (15) 4 (5) 5 (6) .001
Unknown 9 (13) 8 (11) 10 (11) .73

Data are expressed as n (%).

Vegetation size increased significantly from 10±2mm in the first subperiod to 12±5mm in the second and 15±7mm in the third (P<.001).

More than half of the patients with IE underwent active phase interventions. Over the 24 year period period, the rate of active phase surgery increased significantly, from 45% in the first subperiod to 65% in the last (P<.01), even though the rate of severe complications during the active phase remained stable (76%). The most frequent indications for active phase surgery were heart failure (37%) and persistent sepsis (13%). The percentage of patients operated for heart failure increased (22%, 32%, and 46%; P<.002) but the percentage operated for persistent sepsis remained stable (13%, 12%, and 14%; P=.93). Only 5 patients underwent surgery indicated for repeated embolisms. The increased rate of surgery affected elective interventions only; the urgent surgery rate did not change significantly (Table 4). Early mortality (19%) remained unchanged in patients undergoing interventions (20%) and in those receiving medical treatment only (18%). Mortality in patients undergoing active phase interventions fell (27% in the first subperiod, 21% in the second, and 16% in the last), although differences were nonsignificant (P=.23).

Table 4. Surgery and Early Mortality due to Infective Endocarditis

  1987-1994 (n=67) 1995-2002 (n=74) 2003-2009 (n=87) P
Severe complications 53 (79) 51 (69) 70 (80) .74
Cardiac 24 (36) 35 (47) 52 (60) .012
Embolisms 25 (37) 15 (20) 14 (16) .007
Neurological 15 (22) 12 (16) 18 (21) .62
Persistent sepsis 14 (21) 14 (19) 27 (31) .14
Renal 5 (7) 6 (8) 6 (7) .96
Perivalvular abscesses 10 (15) 8 (11) 11 (13) .74
Early surgery 30 (45) 42 (57) 57 (65) .01
Urgent surgery 14 (21) 11 (15) 15 (17) .59
Elective surgery 16 (24) 31 (42) 42 (48) .003
Early mortality 15 (22) 12 (16) 17 (20) .73

Data are expressed as n (%).

DISCUSSION

The present study, conducted in a tertiary center, analyzed changes in IE epidemiology over a considerable period. By comparing 3 subperiods, we were able to analyze trends in these changes. Although other multicenter studies with larger numbers of patients have been published, both in Spain5 and elsewhere,11, 12, 13 the advantage of our series is that data collection was prospective and the data source was a single hospital department with a stable medical and surgical team throughout the study period.

Although IE incidence in the general population was not analyzed, results indicate that despite advances in healthcare in recent decades IE is an illness that, far from disappearing, remains a challenge for the cardiologist, especially as the current pattern of presentation differs substantially from that of some years ago. The greater number of patients diagnosed in recent years may be due to a positive detection bias as a consequence of improved techniques for isolating organisms and better resolution, especially in transesophageal echocardiograms, rather than a genuine increase in the number of cases. However, transesophageal echocardiography has been available in our center since its early years and is therefore unlikely to have influenced results.

We coincide with other authors6, 11, 13 in finding that IE remains an illness that primarily affects men and, increasingly, older men. The increased age of patients with IE coincides with other studies conducted in the last decade.5 This phenomenon may be explained by the greater life expectancy of the population at large and the increased number of cases related to invasive techniques and hospitalization. One of the most significant findings of our study is the progressive fall in rheumatic heart disease (both in mitral and aortic infection) as the predisposing lesion and, above all, the absence of predisposing heart disease. In fact, in the last 7 years, IE mainly occurred in patients without predisposing heart disease (64%). This has been reported elsewhere.3, 12, 13, 14 Prevalence of mitral valve prolapse has remained stable. The increasing number of patients with no predisposing heart disease, or unaware of having predisposing heart disease which is potentially subsidiary to prophylaxis, could justify the substantial modification to IE prophylaxis found in recent European clinical practice guidelines.15

Published studies differ over which causative organism is most frequent.3, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18 Results vary greatly as a function of the study population. Some series include IVDU patients, leading to a greater number of cases caused by S. aureus,4, 13 and others include patients with prosthetic valve IE, which makes the series not really comparable. We have systematically excluded IVDU patients because they have a highly specific clinical, epidemiologic, and prognostic profile that differs notably from the rest. In our study, incidence of IE due to S. viridans and S. aureus did not vary substantially, and the frequency of both types of IE are practically equal. S. aureus was the more common cause of infection in patients without and S. viridans in patients with predisposing heart disease. Although we do not know the prevalence of IVDU patients in our region, the incidence of IE due to staphylococcus surely would have been greater had our series not excluded IVDU patients.

The percentage of patients undergoing active phase interventions has increased significantly in recent years but we have been unable to reduce mortality due to IE. Although the rate of severe complications in the active phase has not changed, the rate of cardiac complications–often requiring active phase surgery–has increased significantly. In fact, the main cause of surgery was heart failure. This increase in cardiac complications may be related to later diagnosis of IE and, therefore, the greater chance of valve destruction or the appearance of perivalvular complications, given that a greater percentage of those diagnosed are patients with no predisposing heart disease in whom IE is less commonly suspected and consequently diagnosis is delayed. However, although seemingly paradoxical, the rate of embolisms fell despite the fact that prevalence of IE with mitral infection was similar and vegetation size has increased in recent years. One possible explanation is that, thanks to the widespread use of transesophageal echocardiography, patients are operated earlier once the diagnosis has been made. As other authors indicate, the larger vegetations may have contributed to a greater need for active phase surgery.19

In-hospital mortality has remained high and has not varied substantially. We suppose that in recent years the patient risk profile has increased–despite greater use of surgery–and contributed to a continuing high mortality rate. In addition to heart failure on admission, authors have identified patient referral from another center or infection due to S. aureus as variables affecting poor prognosis.20 In our series, although the percentage of patients with infection due to S. aureus did not change, the rate of cardiac complications increased significantly in recent years (36% in the first sub-period vs 60% in the third), as did patient age, which undoubtedly contributed to keeping in-hospital mortality high.

The principle limitation of our study is the obvious bias of being conducted in a tertiary hospital that is the cardiovascular surgery referral center, so that the study included patients diagnosed in our center and those transferred from other hospitals for intervention; therefore, we are unaware of patients not referred either because of their good clinical course or because their condition may have been compromised and surgery discounted due to high surgical risk. Although the opening of new hospitals has brought substantial changes to the healthcare map of Spain over the last decade, our center's area of influence has remained the same over these years because new cardiovascular surgery centers have not been added. We remain the referral center for cardiovascular surgery and assume that the referral policy in patients with IE has not changed. Another possible limitation might be differences in managing these patients over the 23 years of the study, although there was no change in staff attending patients and indication for surgery criteria have not differed substantially. On the other hand, our team has always been especially sensitive to this disease, so the level of suspicion when faced with a patient presenting a persistently high temperature has always been great. Bearing in mind that our study aims to analyze the epidemiologic changes in native valve IE, it would have been interesting to know how much the presence of other comorbidities might have influenced prognosis and how patients evolved over the study period. However, these variables were not included in our initial database so we had insufficient information to conduct this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that IE epidemiology has undergone significant changes in recent years. In our area at least, the incidence of IE without predisposing heart disease is increasing significantly and in this increase staphylococci are the most frequent causative organism. The fact that this form of IE increased in recent years while the proportion of S. viridans remained stable brings into question the value of IE prophylaxis in patients undergoing dental, digestive, or genitourinary procedures.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

Received 19 January 2011
Accepted 11 March 2011

Corresponding author: Gondomar 9-11, 2.o A, 14003 Córdoba, Spain. jcastillod@medynet.com

Bibliography

1. Griffin MR, Wilson WR, Edwards WD, O’Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Infective endocarditis: Olmsted County. Minnesota, 1950 through 1981. JAMA. 1985;254:1199-202.
Medline
2. Horstkotte D, Follath F, Gutschik E, Lengyel M, Oto A, Pavie A, et al. Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis. The task force on infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:267-76.
Medline
3. Tleyjeh IM, Steckelberg JM, Murad HS, Anavekar NS, Ghomrawi HM, Mirzoyev Z, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis. A population-based study in Olmsted County. JAMA. 2005;293:3022-8.
Medline
4. Hogevik H, Olaison L, Andersson R, Lindberg J, Alestig K. Epidemiology aspects of infective endocarditis in an urban population: a 5-year prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 1995;74:324-39.
5. López J, Revilla A, Vilacosta I, Sevilla T, Villacorta E, Sarriá C, et al. Age-dependent profile of letf-sided infective endocarditis. A 3-center experience. Circulation. 2010;121:892-7.
Medline
6. Hill EE, Herijgers P, Claus P, Vanderschueren S, Herregods MC, Peetermans WE. Infective endocarditis: changing epidemiology and predictors of 6-month mortality: a prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:196-203.
Medline
7. Cabell CH, Jollis JG, Peterson GE, Corey GR, Anderson DJ, Sexton DJ, et al. Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:90-4.
Medline
8. Von Reyn CF, Levy BS, Arbeit RD, Friedland G, Crumpaker CS. Infective endocarditis: an analysis based on strict case definitions. Ann Intern Med. 1981;94:505-18.
Medline
9. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Brighta DK. Duke Endocarditis Service. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med. 1994;96:200-9.
Medline
10. Li SJ, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG, Ryan T, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30:633-8.
Medline
11. Ferreiros E, Nacinovich F, Casabé JH, Modenesi JC, Swieszkowski S, Cortl C, et al. Epidemiologic, clinical and microbiologic profile of infective endocarditis in Argentina: a national survey. The Endocarditis Infecciosa en la República Argentina-2 Study. Am Heart J. 2006;151:545-52.
Medline
12. Hoen B, Alla F, Selton-Suty C, Béginot I, Bouvet A, Briançon S, et al. Changing profile of infective endocarditis: results of a 1-year survey in France. JAMA. 2002;288:75-81.
Medline
13. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG, Bayer AS, et al. Clinical presentation, etiology and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospectvie Cohort Study 2009. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:463-73.
Medline
14. Nissen H, Nielsen F, Frederiksen M, Helleberg C, Nielsen JS. Native valve infective endocarditis in the general population: a 10-year survey of the clinical picture during the 1980's. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:872-7.
Medline
15. Habib G, Hoen B, Tornos P, Thuny F, Prendergast B, Vilacosta I, et al. Guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2369-413.
Medline
16. Fowler VG, Miro JM, Hoen B, Cabell CH, Abrutyn E, Rubinstein E, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. A consequence of medical progress. JAMA. 2005;293:3012-21.
Medline
17. Fernández-Hidalgo N, Almirante B, Tornos P, Pigrau C, Sambola A, Igual A, et al. Contemporary epidemiology and prognosis of health care associated infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1287-97.
Medline
18. López J, San Román JA, Revilla A, Vilacosta I, Luaces M, Sarriá C, et al. Perfil clínico, ecocardiográfico y pronóstico de las endocarditis izquierdas por Streptococcus viridans. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005;58:153-8.
Medline
19. Luaces M, Vilacosta I, Fernández C, Sarriá C, San Román JA, Graupner C, et al. Vegetation size at diagnosis in infective endocarditis: influencing factors and prognostic implications. Int J Cardiol. 2009;137:76-8.
Medline
20. San Román JA, López J, Vilacosta I, Luaces M, SarriáC, Revilla A, et al. Prognostic stratification of patients with left-sided endocarditis determined at admission. Am J Med. 2007;120:369.e1-7.

1885-5857/© 2011 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved

Cookies
x
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.
Cookies policy
x
To improve our services and products, we use cookies (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.