ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2024 4.9
Vol. 78. Num. 12.
Pages 1088-1099 (December 2025)

Special article
Spanish catheter ablation registry. 24th official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2024)

Registro español de ablación con catéter. XXIV informe oficial de la Asociación del Ritmo Cardiaco de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología (2024)

Eduardo Arana-RuedaaJosé Manuel Rubio-CampalbBieito CamposcdFelipe Rodríguez-EntemeDavid Calvodf on behalf of the collaborators of the Spanish catheter ablation registry
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.08.009

Options

Imagen extra
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2025;78:1088-99
Abstract
Introduction

This report presents the results of the Spanish catheter ablation registry for 2024.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of ablation procedures performed at participating hospitals in Spain. Data were collected through the REDCap platform using a dedicated form.

Results

There was a significant increase in both the number of participating centers (117 centers,+12.5%) and the total number of ablations performed (32 406,+23%). The most common arrhythmogenic substrate was atrial fibrillation (13 395 cases,+35%, accounting for 41% of all cases), with the single-shot technique being the most widely used (55%). There was also a marked increase in the use of electroporation (21% in 2024 vs 10.3% in 2023). Other substrates showed smaller increases, with cavotricuspid isthmus ablation maintaining its position as the second most common procedure (6084 cases, 19%). Overall acute success rates remained high (95%), and complication (1.5%) and mortality (0.04%) rates were stable. The use of electroanatomical navigation remained consistent (54% of cases), with 17% of procedures performed without fluoroscopy. Outpatient procedures accounted for 18% of the total, with notable percentages for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (39%) and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (33%). A total of 523 pediatric ablations were performed in 44 centers, predominantly for accessory pathways (66.5%), with a 92.5% success rate. Accreditation activity showed 41 centers and 250 professionals involved.

Conclusions

The number of centers and procedures increased, mainly due to atrial fibrillation ablation. Despite the growing complexity of cases, the rates of success, complications, and mortality remained stable. The accreditation process for both centers and professionals is now firmly established, with steady annual accreditation numbers.

Keywords

Cardiac arrhythmia ablation
Spanish Heart Rhythm Association
National registry of Spain
INTRODUCTION

The Spanish catheter ablation registry systematically records the activity and resources of arrhythmia units in Spain. We present the official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) for 2024. This document provides an updated overview of changes in the interventional management of cardiac arrhythmias in Spain.1–11 The primary objective of the report is to provide detailed information on each of the ablation techniques used, as well as the specialized technological and human resources available in the Spanish health care system. In addition, relevant data are presented on the safety and effectiveness of the ablation procedures used for each ablation target. This year, we additionally report the status of the accreditation process for centers and professionals in interventional cardiac electrophysiology.

METHODS

The present work comprises a retrospective registry of the activity of electrophysiology laboratories in Spain in 2024. Data were voluntarily obtained from participating centers using a standardized form available on the REDCap online platform, which is part of the recording platform of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC. The registry is continuously compiled, updated, and maintained throughout the year with the collaboration of the SEC registries’ technical staff, their coordinator, and full members of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC. All members contributed to data cleaning and analysis and are responsible for this publication. The data were anonymized for the authors of the present report.

Information was collected on the specific technical and human resources of the participating arrhythmia units, the ablation technique and modality, and the type of ablation target treated, as well as the ablation outcomes and complications. Eleven ablation targets were analyzed: atrial fibrillation (AF), cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), accessory pathway (AP), atrioventricular node, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia (MAT), focal atrial tachycardia (FAT), idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (IVT), ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia (ICM-VT), nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia (NICM-VT), and cardioneuroablation.

The following variables were analyzed: the number of patients and procedures (specifying the number of pediatric patients, defined as those younger than 15 years), acute success (at the end of the procedure), the type of ablation catheter used, and the number and type of in-hospital complications, including periprocedural mortality. Other procedural characteristics were obtained, such as the use of electroanatomic mapping systems, the number of zero-fluoroscopy procedures, the type of anesthesia used, and outpatient procedures.

The present work was conducted in accordance with international recommendations on clinical research (Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association) and Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights.12

RESULTSTechnical and human resources

The specialized technical and human resources of the participating laboratories, as well as the other procedures (in addition to ablation) performed by the arrhythmia units, are detailed in table 1 and table 2.

Table 1.

Changes over time in human resources in Spanish electrophysiology laboratories from 2015 to 2024

Resource  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Staff physicians  3.0  3.0  3.2  3.5  3.2  3.5  3.3  3.5  3.7  3.9 
Full-time physicians  2.4  2.1  2.2  2.3  2.1  2.2  2.4  2.7  2.6  2.9 
Fellows/y  0.8  0.7  0.9  0.6  0.6  0.6  0.5  0.6  0.6  0.9 
RNs  2.7  2.7  2.8  2.7  2.8  2.9  2.8  3.4  3.4  3.5 
RTs  0.3  0.3  0.3  0.3  0.3  0.3  0.3  0.2  0.3  0.3 

RN, registered nurse; RT, radiologic technologist.

Data are expressed as means.

Table 2.

Technical resources and additional activity in participating laboratories from 2017 to 2024

Activity  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Pacemakers  92  91  93  91  92  96  95  92 
ICDs  90  89  90  89  90  93  93  90 
CRTs  92  92  93  90  89  91  90  87 
Holter monitor  95  95  97  95  94  98  98  99 
ECV  88  87  90  92  88  86  87  83 
Renal denervation 
Atrial appendage closure  18  17  18  22  22  16  19  12 
PFA  14  38 
Cardioneuroablation  12  25  41  36 

CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; ECV, electrical external cardioversion; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PFA, pulsed-field ablation.

Data are expressed as percentages.

The mean number of physicians per laboratory increased again to 3.9 (median, 4), with an average of 2.9 full-time physicians (median, 3) (table 1). Overall, 96% of centers had at least 1 full-time electrophysiologist. Nursing staff numbers were stable at 3.5 nurses per unit (median, 3). The percentage of centers with a training program for fellows was 38.5%, generally with 1 or 2 fellows per center.

Most centers (63%) were equipped with at least 1 dedicated cardiac electrophysiology laboratory, while 27 centers (23%) had 2 such laboratories and 1 center had 3. Similar to previous years, laboratories were available on 3.5 ± 1.7 days a week (median, 5).

The majority of centers (91.5%) reported having an electroanatomic mapping system. The most common systems were Ensite, Carto, Rhythmia, and Columbus. Almost half of the centers were equipped with intracardiac echocardiography. Among the alternative energy sources to radiofrequency, cryoablation was available in 74% of centers. Electroporation was available in 38.7%, showing considerable growth compared with 2023 (14% of centers). Regarding procedures other than ablation, most centers implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization devices, and Holter monitors (table 2).

Overall results

In 2024, considerable growth was recorded in the number of both ablations and participating centers, with a total of 32 406 ablations (a 23% increase vs 2023) and 13 new centers joining the registry (figure 1). The distribution of participating centers between publicly funded and private centers was similar to that of previous years (80 public and 37 private).

Figure 1.

A: distribution of catheter ablations recorded by autonomous community in 2024 and the corresponding rate per million population/total ablations. Mean rate: 693.1 ablations/million population. B: changes over time in the number of procedures and centers participating in the registry from 2015 to 2024.

(0.28MB).

The median number of ablations per center grew by 56%, increasing from 202 to 315 procedures (P25-75, 90-476). By type of funding, the median numbers of procedures were 70 in private centers (P25-75, 45-243) and 358 in public centers (P25-75, 195-676). Notably, 22 centers conducted more than 500 ablations per year (3 of these centers were private), of which 2 performed more than 850 (1 public and 1 private) (figure 2).

Figure 2.

Distribution of participating centers by annual number of procedures and by whether the center was publicly funded or private in 2024.

(0.19MB).

The distribution of ablation targets treated was similar to that of previous years, with AF predominating and showing consistent annual growth of 3% compared with the other ablation targets (35% in 2022, 38% in 2023, and 41% in 2024) (figure 3). AP ablation continued its downward trend vs the other ablation targets (7%), with a 1% decrease per year over the last 4 years.9–11

Figure 3.

A: distribution of the number of procedures per ablation target from 2021 to 2024. B: relative proportions of ablation targets in 2024. AF, atrial fibrillation; AP, accessory pathway; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia; CNA, cardioneuroablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; VT, ventricular tachycardia.

(0.2MB).

The overall acute procedural success rate (95%), complication rate (1.5%), and mortality rate (0.04%) were similar to those of previous years (figure 4). There were also no differences in the success and overall complication rates among the ablation targets (figure 5). However, despite the marked increase in the number of AF ablations, the number of complications recorded for this target fell again (2.4% vs 2.5% in 2023 and 2.8% in 2022).9–11

Figure 4.

Changes over time in success, complication, and mortality rates from 2015 to 2024.

(0.27MB).
Figure 5.

Changes over time in success and complication rates per ablation target in 2024. AF, atrial fibrillation; AP, accessory pathway; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CNA, cardioneuroablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; VT, ventricular tachycardia. Data are expressed as percentages.

(0.21MB).

The distribution of complications by ablation target is detailed in table 3, with most occurring in higher-complexity procedures, such as AF ablation and ventricular tachycardia ablation. The most frequent complications were vascular (n = 161), followed by pericardial effusion (n = 124). There were 12 procedure-related deaths (0.04%), 8 during ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease, 2 during AF ablation, and 2 during MAT ablation.

Table 3.

Complications recorded per ablation target in 2024

Ablation target  Ablations  AVB  Vascular complications  PE  Embolisms  AMI  HF  PNP  Other  By ablation target, n  By ablation target, % 
Total  32 406  28  161  124  45  16  81  34  496  1.5% 
AVNRT  4908  12  23  0.4% 
AP  2177  21  0.9% 
AVN  1400  0.3% 
FAT  739  0.8% 
CTI  6084  23  32  0.5% 
MAT  1166  18  1.5% 
AF  13 395  95  86  37  81  16  322  2.4% 
IVT  1362  0.5% 
ICM-VT  623  12  42  6.7% 
NICM-VT  367  19  5.1% 
CNA  185  0.5% 

AF, atrial fibrillation; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; AP, accessory pathway; AVB, atrioventricular block; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CNA, cardioneuroablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; HF, heart failure; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; PE, pericardial effusion; PNP, phrenic nerve palsy; NICM-VT, nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia.

For the first time, the registry has recorded the numbers of procedures performed in the outpatient setting, which represented 18% of all procedures. Outpatient use was highest for AVNRT (39%) and CTI (33%) (table 4).

Table 4.

Use of electroanatomic mapping systems, zero-fluoroscopy procedures, and outpatient procedures by ablation target

Ablation target  With mapping systemWithout fluoroscopyOutpatient 
  2023  2024  2023  2024  2024 
AVNRT  48  50  34  40  39 
AP  62  58.5  22  20  26 
AVN  4.2  2.7 
FAT  80  78  19  22.6  28.6 
CTI  52  58  26  30  33 
MAT  95  96  10  12.4 
AF  51  47.5  5.3  5.6  13 
IVT  88  96  18  19  20.5 
ICM-VT  92  97  8.8  2.7 
NICM-VT  87  90  7.1  11  4.4 

AF, atrial fibrillation; AP, accessory pathway; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; NICM-VT, nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia.

Data are expressed as percentages.

The following sections detail the results for each ablation target.

Atrial fibrillation

As in previous years, AF was the most commonly treated ablation target and even exhibited a marked increase in the number of procedures (13 395 procedures in 2024 vs 9942 in 2023, a 35% increase). In total, 83% of centers conducted AF ablation, with a median of 91 procedures (P25-75, 38-192). Specifically, 57% of patients had paroxysmal AF, 38% had persistent AF, and 5% had long-standing persistent AF. These percentages are similar to those of previous years. The acute success rate was 95%.

The predominant ablation strategy was pulmonary vein isolation (12 236 procedures; 91%), followed by posterior wall isolation (10.7%), left atrial linear ablation (6.3%), pulmonary vein antrum ablation (5.25%), vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (1.8%), ablation of fibrotic areas (1.5%), superior vena cava isolation (0.7%), complex fractionated electrogram ablation (0.2%), and left atrial appendage isolation (0.2%). In 163 procedures, an additional approach was used.

Single-shot techniques were the most commonly used, comprising 55.2% of procedures. In addition, 33.7% of procedures were performed using cryoablation (39.4% in 2023) and 21.5% were performed using pulse-field ablation (PFA) (10.3% in 2023). The point-by-point ablation technique was used in 44.8% of procedures, generally with an irrigated-tip catheter with contact forcesensing technology (figure 6).

Figure 6.

Changes over time in ablation techniques for atrial fibrillation (AF) via point-by-point and single-shot ablation from 2015 to 2024.

(0.19MB).

Mapping systems were used in 47.5% of procedures and 5.6% were fluoroscopy-free. As auxiliary instruments, steerable sheaths were used in 4885 procedures (a 22% increase vs 2023) and intracardiac echocardiography in 1509. A total of 5671 procedures were performed under general anesthesia (4511 in 2023) and 5544 with deep sedation. Finally, 1747 procedures (13%) were performed on an outpatient basis.

The incidence of complications was 2.4% (2.5% in 2023) (table 3). Two deaths were associated with the procedure: 1 from atrioesophageal fistula and 1 after cardiac surgery due to perforation.

Cavotricuspid isthmus

In total, 6084 CTI procedures were recorded, which represents a 20% increase vs 2023 and once again meant that CTI was the second most commonly treated ablation target. A success rate of 98.6% was achieved, with a complication rate similar to that of 2023 (0.5% in both years) (table 3). The most frequently used catheters were irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology (52% vs 41% in 2023), followed by standard irrigated catheters (32%). Nonirrigated catheters were used in 16% of procedures. The number of procedures performed with a mapping system increased (58% vs 52% in 2023), as well as those performed without fluoroscopy (30% vs 26% in 2023). Finally, 33% of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.

Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

AVNRT ablation was once again the third most commonly treated ablation target, after AF and CTI. Although the absolute number of procedures increased (4908 procedures, a 16% increase vs 2023), the relative percentage has tended to decrease in recent years (15%). The success rate was 97.9%, while the complication rate was 0.4% (table 3). The most frequently used energy source was radiofrequency, with just 3.7% of procedures performed using cryoablation. The use of mapping systems was maintained at 50%, and 40% of the procedures were fluoroscopy-free. Overall, 39% of AVNRT ablations were performed as outpatient procedures.

Accessory pathways

APs remained the fourth most commonly treated ablation target, with an 8.6% increase in procedures vs 2023 (2177 vs 2005 in 2023), representing 7% of all ablations performed. The success rate was 93.3%, while the complication rate was 0.9% (table 3). Left free wall pathways were the most frequent location (51.3%), followed by inferoseptal pathways (26.8%), para-Hisian/anteroseptal pathways (11.3%), and right free wall pathways (10.7%). Transseptal access was used more frequently than retroaortic access for the ablation of left pathways (63.9% vs 32.9%), and epicardial/coronary sinus access was required in just 3.2% of procedures. Mapping systems were used in 58.5% of procedures and 20% were fluoroscopy-free. Finally, 26% of these procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.

Atrioventricular node ablation

A total of 1400 AVN ablations were performed in 2024, 137 more than in 2023 (an 11% increase). The success rate was 98%, while the complication rate was 0.3%; all complications were vascular in nature.

The most frequently used catheters were 4-mm radiofrequency catheters (41%), followed by standard irrigated catheters (27%) and 8-mm catheters (23%). There were slight increases in procedures performed using a mapping system (7% vs 4.2% in 2023) and without fluoroscopy (5% vs 2.7%).

Macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia

In 2024, 1166 MAT ablation procedures were reported, 206 more than in 2023. The most common location was the left atrium. Overall, 107 patients had congenital heart disease, 114 had undergone atriotomy, and 646 had undergone AF ablation. In 44 cases, selective embolization of the vein of Marshall was conducted, representing a marked increase vs the 18 such procedures recorded in 2023.

Mapping systems were used in 96% of procedures and 8% were fluoroscopy-free. The acute success rate was 89%, similar to previous years. Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were used in 90% of procedures and PFA was applied in 54 (5 in 2023). In 2024, general anesthesia was used in 577 procedures, while deep sedation was used in 372. The complication rate was 1.5% (table 3). Two deaths were reported: 1 associated with sedation and 1 sudden death in the first 24hours after the intervention. Finally, 12.4% of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.

Focal atrial tachycardia

Overall, 739 FAT ablations were reported (a 15% increase vs 2023). Most were conducted in the right atrium (71%). The success rate was 91%, similar to that of previous years.

Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were the most commonly used catheters (70%); 10 procedures were performed with cryoablation and 8 with PFA. Six complications were recorded (table 3). Mapping systems were used in 78% of procedures and 22.6% were fluoroscopy-free. Finally, 28.6% of the procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia

In total, 1362 IVT procedures were performed (a 24% increase vs 2023). However, the proportion relative to the total in the registry remained unchanged at 4%. Increases were found in the number of centers conducting IVT ablation, from 85 to 93, and in the median number of cases per center (P25-75, 5-18). The most frequent location was the right ventricular outflow tract (44.4%), followed by the left outflow tract (33.2%). Less common sites were the papillary muscles (6.4%), fascicles of the conduction system (5.2%), the mitral annulus (4.5%), the moderator band (1.5%), the tricuspid annulus (1.3%), and the para-Hisian region (0.7%). The overall effectiveness was 91.8%. The most frequently used access routes were right ventricular endocardial (43.7%), retroaortic (38.9%), and transseptal (12.7%). Less frequently used access routes were epicardial (2.1%) and combined endocardial/epicardial (2.7%). Radiofrequency was the standard energy source, and irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology predominated (79.2%). Radioablation was used in 4.5% of procedures and PFA use was rare (2 cases). Other ablation modalities were also uncommon (cryoablation, 5 cases; ethanol ablation, 3 cases). The use of mapping systems predominated (96% of procedures) and 19% were fluoroscopy-free. Seven complications were recorded (0.5%) (table 3). No deaths were reported. General anesthesia was used in 9.6% of procedures, while deep sedation was used in 16.7% and circulatory support in 1 procedure. Finally, 20.5% of the patients were managed as outpatients.

Ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia

Despite the increase in centers (from 70 to 79; a 13% increase), the number of procedures (n = 623) and relative proportion (2%) were stable. The median number of procedures was 4 (P25-75, 1-8). Mapping systems predominated (97% of procedures) and 3% were fluoroscopy-free. The acute success rate was once again 85%. An exclusively ablation target-based ablation strategy accounted for 50% of procedures, whereas a combined strategy, guided by both ablation target and tachycardia induction, was used in 41%. Ablation guided solely by tachycardia induction was used in 9%. Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were the most commonly used catheters (82%). There was a slight increase in stereotactic radioablation (6.1%), as well as the first procedures performed using dual-energy catheters (radiofrequency and PFA), although they remained rare (just 2 cases). Steerable sheaths were used in 63% of procedures. The most frequently used access route was transseptal (58%), followed by retroaortic (32%), combined endocardial/epicardial (6.5%), and exclusively epicardial (1.6%). General anesthesia was used in 61% of procedures and deep sedation in 18%. Just 2.7% were outpatient procedures. Mechanical hemodynamic support was used in 6.6% of procedures. The complication rate was 6.7% (table 3). Six deaths were reported: 2 due to cardiogenic shock, 2 due to cardiac perforation, 1 due to electromechanical dissociation, and 1 due to acute myocardial infarction.

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia

This ablation target was treated in more centers than in 2023 (68 vs 59, a 15% increase). Although there was a slight increase in the number of procedures (367, an 8% increase), there were no changes vs the registry total (1%). The median number of procedures per center was 2 (P25-75, 1-7). The success rate was 82%. Mapping systems predominated (90% of procedures) and 11% were fluoroscopy-free. The main ablation targets were dilated cardiomyopathy (49%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (19%), and congenital heart disease (9%). Less commonly treated ablation targets were nondilated cardiomyopathy (6%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (4%), and bundle branch re-entrant tachycardia (3%). Other targets, such as sarcoidosis, valvular heart diseases, and those associated with muscular dystrophy, myocarditis, and Chagas disease, were very rare. Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were the most commonly used catheters (92%), followed by standard irrigated catheters and nonirrigated catheters. Although still rare, radioablation was more commonly used than in 2023, increasing from 9 procedures to 23. Ethanol ablation was applied in only 1 procedure, and the use of cryoablation was not reported. Retroaortic was the most common access route (39%), followed by transseptal (32%) and right ventricular endocardial (20%), with 12% exclusively epicardial and 18% combined endocardial-epicardial. In total, 59% of procedures were performed under general anesthesia and 18% with deep sedation. Hemodynamic support devices were used in 2% of procedures. Just 4.4% of the procedures were performed on an outpatient basis. Overall, 21 complications were recorded (5.1%) (table 3). Two patients died, 1 from hemorrhagic shock and 1 from arterial dissection.

Ablations in pediatric patients

A total of 522 ablations in pediatric patients were performed in 44 centers (38%), 1.6% of the total registry and a 12% increase compared with 2023. The median number of procedures was 4 (P25-75, 1-10) while the median age was 12 years. Once again, the most frequently treated ablation target was APs: 347 procedures (66%). The success rate was 92.5%. The second most commonly treated ablation target was AVNRT, with 127 procedures (24%) and a 91.3% success rate. This was followed by FAT, with 24 procedures (4.6%) and an 83.3% success rate, and IVT, with 14 procedures (2.7%) and a 100% success rate. The frequencies of the other ablation targets were much lower: NICM-VT (2 procedures), ICT (3 procedures), and MAT (3 procedures) (figure 7). The predominant energy source was radiofrequency (94%), with limited use of cryoablation (6%).

Figure 7.

Relative proportions of ablation targets in pediatric patients (< 15 years). AP, accessory pathway; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia.

(0.14MB).
Mapping systems and zero-fluoroscopy ablation

The percentage of ablation procedures performed using electroanatomic mapping systems was similar to that of previous years (54%). These systems were most commonly used for all types of ventricular tachycardias (95% overall), as well as MAT (96%) and FAT (78%) (table 4). They were used for just 47.5% of AF ablations.

In addition, 17% of the ablation targets were treated without fluoroscopy. In particular, 40% of AVNRT ablations and 30% of CTI ablations were fluoroscopy-free.

Cardioneuroablation

There was little change in the number of centers performing cardioneuroablation (42 vs 41 in 2023; table 2), with 185 procedures (a 30% increase). The acute success rate was 96%. In total, 78% of procedures were performed for syncope, and most (89%) involved treatment of both atria using irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology.

Accreditation process for interventional cardiac electrophysiologists in Spain

The changes over time in the accreditation system are shown in figure 8. A clear upward trend is evident in both indicators, although their behaviors differ. The number of centers grew steadily, from 17 in 2010 to 41 in 2024, which enabled the standard accreditation pathway to be established based on formal training. In contrast, individual accreditations exhibited some year-to-year variability, influenced by various factors, such as training capacity and extraordinary events. A notable example is 2022, when no examination was held due to a lack of candidates (figure 8), a situation attributed to the ongoing impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on clinical and training activity. However, the system has since shown a clear recovery, with a new rebound expected in 2025, reflecting renewed interest and operational capacity.

Figure 8.

Changes over time in the number of accredited professionals and centers. The line indicates the cumulative number of accredited centers, while the bars denote the number of accredited professionals per year.

(0.17MB).
DISCUSSION

The data from the Spanish catheter ablation registry for 2024 demonstrate growth in both the number of participating centers and the number of procedures, continuing the trend of the past 4 years.9–11 The consolidation of the REDCap platform for data collection, using rigorous and standardized parameters ensuring anonymous information processing, has helped to build the trust of participating centers and optimize both the quality and accuracy of the data obtained. This quality provides a robust basis for conducting analyses for both strategic and scientific purposes, under the auspices of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC.

The absolute number of procedures grew by 23% vs 2023 and, although a large proportion of this increase was due to AF ablation (a 35% increase), the remaining ablation targets also showed marked growth, particularly 29% in MAT, 22% in IVT, and 20% in ICT.1–11 In relative terms, AF ablation already represents 41% of all ablation targets treated, with constant growth of 3% in the last 3 years and corresponding relative reductions in other targets, such as AVNRT, APs, and atrioventricular node.10,11 Both the number of centers (17 new centers) and the number of procedures per center also grew again. Thus, the median number of procedures per center increased by 56% vs 2023 (from 202 to 315 procedures), and this growth is evident in both public and private health centers. Notably, the number of high-volume centers (> 600 ablations) has increased from 3 in 2023 to 12 in 2024, with 2 performing more than 850 ablations per year.11

Single-shot techniques were once again more frequent than point-by-point techniques for AF ablation. In addition, although the absolute number of procedures increased, there was a largely similar reduction in the use of both point-by-point ablation (from 49% to 44.8%) and cryoablation (from 39% to 33.7%) due to the expansion of PFA (from 10% to 21.5% of procedures). This change in trend is due to the implementation of PFA in more centers (from 14% in 2023 to 38% in 2024). Because several autonomous communities have not yet approved its use in the publicly funded health care system, a gradual rise in PFA use is expected in the coming years as implementation increases.

The relative percentages of other ablation targets were similar to those of 2023. CTI and AVNRT ablation remain stable in the second and third place, with established use of mapping systems and zero-fluoroscopy.

In 2024, the registry began recording procedures performed on an outpatient basis. This strategy has gained popularity worldwide due to health care challenges (particularly since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic) and economic pressures and in an attempt to increase procedure volume while reducing costs.13 The data show that the outpatient setting is more commonly used for conventional ablation targets (40% for AVNRT, 33% for CTI, and 26% for APs). However, it is also used for complex ablation targets, particularly AF, which accounts for 13% of procedures. Increasing evidence demonstrates the advantages of outpatient ablation in terms of accessibility, availability of facilities, optimization of health care resources, and cost reduction, making it likely that its use will grow in the coming years as a management strategy in arrhythmia units.

Despite the increase in the number of complex ablation targets, the overall procedural success rate was comparable to that of 2023 (95% vs 97% in 2023), as were the rates of complications (1.5% vs 1.6% in 2023) and mortality (0.04%).11

Another change is the recording of ablation outcomes for pediatric patients. The number of procedures increased by 12%, while the overall median age was 12 years, and there was high variability among centers and in activity. Both the techniques used and the results obtained are similar to those reported for the adult population.

Accreditation process

Since its implementation in 2003, the accreditation system for interventional cardiac electrophysiology in Spain has developed into a structured, exacting, and constantly evolving model. Thus far, 250 professionals and more than 40 teaching centers have received accreditation, creating a crucial national educational network for ensuring homogeneous, safe, and high-quality training. The regulatory strengthening in 2016 marked a turning point by tightening the requirements for both professionals and centers, with increases in the demands for practical experience, minimum procedural volume, use of advanced technologies, and active participation in national registries.

Accreditation has become established as an essential tool to ensure specialized, safe, and uniform care throughout the country. Accredited centers serve as training hubs and quality filters, enabling the structured education of new specialists, while periodic reaccreditation ensures that standards remain up to date. Data from the ablation registry, which show optimal outcomes and a continuous decline in complications, demonstrate the technical and clinical improvements achieved through the synergy between the accreditation process and the registry, which makes it possible to monitor and optimize outcomes.

Figure 8 also shows how the system has maintained a positive and resilient tendency. The projection for 2025 suggests that record figures will be achieved in both accreditations and teaching capacity, reinforcing the sustainability and excellence of the model. In this context, accreditation is now not only a mechanism for individual and institutional validation but also a strategic tool for facing the challenges of rapidly evolving clinical practice. The system must continue to adapt, incorporating new quality indicators, specific competencies, and objective metrics that reflect command of advanced techniques and the growing complexity of procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanish catheter ablation registry for 2024 showed growth in both the number of procedures and the number of participating centers. AF continued its steady upward trend as the predominant ablation target, with single-shot techniques standing out and a notable increase in PFA. A high proportion of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, particularly for conventional ablation targets, which clearly contributed to overall procedural volume and efficiency. Despite the increasing relative complexity of the ablation targets, success rates remained high, with stable complication and mortality rates.

The accreditation process for centers and professionals is well established, with a consistent number of accreditations awarded each year.

FUNDING

The registry receives funding from the Casa del Corazón Foundation, which is aimed at supporting the management and maintenance of the national registries of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The present work was conducted in accordance with international recommendations on clinical research (Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association) and Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Artificial intelligence has not been used in the preparation of this article.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors have fully contributed to both the design of the study and the data analysis, manuscript drafting, and manuscript revision.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the technical team of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC (Gonzalo Justes, Miguel Ángel Salas, Israel García, Raquel Chica, and Jesús V. de la Torre) for their excellent work in data management and integration that makes this work possible, as well as all the participants in the Spanish catheter ablation registry, whose selfless help every year permits the publication of this document.

APPENDIX
SPANISH CATHETER ABLATION REGISTRY CENTERS AND COLLABORATORS FOR 2024

Autonomous community  Locality  Center  Collaborator 
Andalusia  Cádiz  Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar  Lucas R. Cano Calabria 
  Málaga  Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria  Alberto Barrera Cordero 
  Málaga  Hospital QuirónSalud Málaga  Alberto Barrera Cordero 
  Marbella  Hospital QuirónSalud Marbella  Alberto Barrera Cordero 
  Málaga  Hospital Vithas Málaga  Alberto Barrera Cordero 
  Benalmádena  Hospital Vithas Xanit Internacional Benalmádena  Alberto Barrera Cordero 
  Sevilla  Hospital Vithas Sevilla  Ernesto Díaz Infante 
  Córdoba  Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía  Francisco Mazuelos Bellido 
  Sevilla  QuirónSalud Sagrado Corazón  Juan Manuel Fernández Gómez 
  Sevilla  Hospital QuirónSalud Infanta Luisa  Rafael Romero Garrido 
  Huelva  Hospital Juan Ramón Jimenez  Pablo Moriña Vázquez 
  Sevilla  Hospital Virgen Macarena  Pablo Bastos Amador 
  Sevilla  Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme  Ricardo Pavón Jiménez 
  Granada  Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves  Juan Jiménez Jáimez 
  Sevilla  Clínica HLA Santa Isabel  Alvaro Arce León 
  Granada  Hospital Clínico Universitario San Cecilio  José Miguel Lozano Herrera 
  Huelva  Hospital QuirónSalud Huelva  Pablo Moriña Vázquez 
  Sevilla  Hospital Virgen del Rocío  Alonso Pedrote Martínez 
  Granada  Hospital La Inmaculada - Granada  Miguel Álvarez López 
  Huelva  Hospital QuirónSalud Huelva - Neolaser  María Teresa Moraleda Salas 
  Jaén  Hospital Universitario de Jaén  Emilio Constán de la Revilla 
  Córdoba  QuirónSalud Salud Córdoba  Nick Paredes Hurtado 
Aragon  Zaragoza  Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa  Mercedes Cabrera Ramos 
  Zaragoza  Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet  Antonio Asso Abadía 
  Zaragoza  QuirónSalud Salud Zaragoza  Antonio Asso Abadía 
Principality of Asturias  Oviedo  Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias  José Manuel Rubín López 
  Gijón  Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes  Diego Pérez Díez 
Balearic Islands  Palma  Hospital Universitario Son Espases  Carlos Eugenio Grande Morales 
  Ibiza  Policlínica Nuestra Señora del Rosario  Bieito Campos García 
  Palma de Mallorca  Hospital QuirónSalud Palmaplanas  Nelson Alvarenga 
Canary Islands  Santa Cruz de Tenerife  Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria  Luis Alvarez Acosta 
  Las Palmas  Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín  Haridian Mendoza Lemes 
  San Cristóbal de la Laguna  Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias  Julio Jesús Ferrer Hita 
  Las Palmas de Gran Canaria  Hospital Perpetuo Socorro  Pablo M. Ruiz Hernández 
  Las Palmas de Gran Canaria  Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria  Federico Segura Villalobos 
  Santa Cruz de Tenerife  Hospital Parque Tenerife  Juan Diego Valdivia Miranda 
Cantabria  Santander  Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla  Felipe Rodríguez Entem 
Castile and León  Burgos  Hospital Universitario de Burgos  Francisco Javier García Fernández 
  León  Hospital de León  María Luisa Fidalgo Andrés 
  Salamanca  Hospital Universitario de Salamanca  Javier Jiménez Candil 
  Valladolid  Hospital Universitario Río Hortega  Benito Herreros Guilarte 
  Valladolid  Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid  María de Gracia Sandín Fuentes 
Castile-La Mancha  Albacete  Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete  Víctor M. Hidalgo Olivares 
  Toledo  Hospital Universitario de Toledo  Miguel Ángel Arias 
  Ciudad Real  Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real  Francisco Javier Jiménez Díaz 
Catalonia  Barcelona  Hospital Universitario Dexeus  Ángel Moya 
  Esplugues  Hospital Sant Joan de Déu  Georgia Sarquella-Brugada 
  Barcelona  Clínica Sagrada Familia  Andreu Porta Sánchez 
  Barcelona  Hospital del Mar  Jesús Jiménez López 
  Tarragona  Unidad Funcional Territorial de Electrofisiología Camp de Tarragona  Gabriel Martín Sánchez 
  Badalona  Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol  Axel Sarrias 
  Barcelona  Hospital Clínic  Eduard Guasch Casany 
  Barcelona  Clínica Corachan  Jose María Guerra Ramos 
  L’Hospitalet de Llobregat  Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge  Ignasi Anguera 
  Lérida  Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova  Diego Menéndez Ramírez 
  Barcelona  Hospital Santa Cruz y San Pablo  Enrique Rodríguez Font 
  Barcelona  Clínica Teknon  Julio Martí Almor 
  Gerona  Hospital Josep Trueta Girona  Eva María Benito Martín 
  Sabadell  Parc Taulí de Sabadell  Soledad Ascoeta 
  Barcelona  Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron  Alba Santos 
Valencian Community  Castellón  Hospital Universitario General de Castellón  Víctor Pérez Roselló 
  Alicante  Balmis de Alicante  Jose Luis Ibáñez Criado 
  Alicante  HLA Vistahermosa  Alicia Ibáñez Criado 
  Valencia  Hospital General Universitario de Valencia  Javier Jiménez Bello 
  Valencia  Hospital Universitario La Fe  Joaquín Osca Asensi 
  Alzira  Hospital Universitario de la Ribera  Bruno Bochard Villanueva 
  Manises  Hospital de Manises  Pau Alonso Fernández 
  Valencia  Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia  Eloy Domínguez Mafí 
  San Juan de Alicante  Hospital San Juan de Alicante  José Moreno Arribas 
  Valencia  Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset  Antonio Peláez González 
  Valencia  Hospital Arnau de Vilanova Valencia  Assumpció Saurí Ortiz 
  Benidorm  Hospital Clínica Benidorm  Vicente Bertomeu González 
  Alcoy  Hospital Virgen de los Lirios de Alcoy  Rafael Raso Raso 
Extremadura  Badajoz  Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz  José Manuel Durán Guerrero 
  Cáceres  Hospital de Cáceres  Javier Portales Fernández 
Galicia  Santiago de Compostela  Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela  Francisco Javier García Seara 
  Vigo  Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro  Pilar Cabanas Grandío 
  A Coruña  Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña  Enrique Ricoy Martínez 
  Lugo  Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti  Juliana Elices Teja 
  Pontevedra  Hospital Vithas Fátima Vigo  Elvis Teijeira Fernández 
  A Coruña  Hospital HM Modelo La Coruña  Ignacio Mosquera Pérez 
Community of Madrid  Majadahonda  Hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda  Víctor Castro Urda 
  Madrid  Hospital Ramón y Cajal  Vanesa Cristina Lozano Granero 
  Madrid  Hospital Clínico San Carlos  Nicasio Pérez Castellano 
  Leganés  Hospital Severo Ochoa  Ricardo Salgado Aranda 
  Alcorcón  Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón  Jose Amador Rubio Caballero 
  Madrid  Fundación Jiménez Díaz  José Manuel Rubio Campal 
  Madrid  Hospital Universitario General de Villalba  José Manuel Rubio Campal 
  Madrid  Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre  Daniel Rodríguez Muñoz 
  Madrid  Hospital La Luz  Juan Benezet Mazuecos 
  Móstoles  Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos  Federico Gómez Pulido 
  Pozuelo de Alarcón  Hospital Universitario QuirónSalud Madrid y Complejo Hospitalario Ruber Juan Bravo  Tomás Datino Romaniega 
  Getafe  Hospital Universitario de Getafe  Agustín Pastor Fuentes 
  Fuenlabrada  Hospital Universitario Fuenlabrada  Silvia del Castillo 
  Madrid  Hospital Universitario (General e Infantil) La Paz (U.E.R.)  José Luis Merino Llorens 
  Boadilla del Monte  Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe  Jesús Almendral Garrote 
  Torrejón de Ardoz  Hospital Universitario de Torrejón  Óscar Salvador Montañés 
  Alcalá de Henares  Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias  Juan José González Ferrer 
  Valdemoro  Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena  Federico Gómez Pulido 
  Madrid  Hospital Universitario La Paz (Sección de Arritmias y Electrofisiología)  Carlos Álvarez Ortega 
  Madrid  Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón  Ángel Arenal 
  Madrid  Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla  Sara Moreno 
  Madrid  Hospital Universitario Sanitas La Zarzuela  Álvaro Marco del Castillo 
  Cartagena  Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía  Ignacio Gil Ortega 
  Murcia  Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer  Francisco Jose García Almagro 
Region of Murcia  Murcia  Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía de Murcia  Pablo Ramos Ruiz 
  Murcia  Hospital IMED Virgen de la Fuensanta Murcia  Pablo Ramos Ruiz 
  El Palmar  Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca  Pablo Peñafiel Verdé 
  Murcia  HLA La Vega  Ignacio Gil Ortega 
Chartered Community of Navarre  Pamplona  Clínica Universidad de Navarra  Pablo Ramos Ardanaz 
  Pamplona  Hospital Universitario de Navarra  Óscar Alcalde Rodríguez 
Basque Country  Bilbao  Hospital de Basurto  María Fe Arcocha Torres 
  Vitoria  Hospital Universitario de Álava  Enrique García Cuenca 
  Barakaldo  Hospital de Cruces  Íñigo Sainz Godoy 
  Donostia  Hospital Universitario Donostia  Antonio Óscar Luque Lezcano 
La Rioja  Logroño  Hospital Universitario San Pedro  Pepa Sánchez Borque 

References
[1]
M. Álvarez, J.L. Merino, Spanish Registry on Catheter Ablation. 1 st Official Report of the Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (Year 2001).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2002), 55 pp. 1273-1285
[2]
I. Gil-Ortega, A. Pedrote-Martínez, A. Fontenla-Cerezuela, on behalf of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry collaborators.
Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry 14th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2014).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2015), 68 pp. 1127-1137
[3]
A. Pedrote, A. Fontenla, J. García-Fernández, on behalf of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry collaborators.
Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry 15th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2015).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2016), 69 pp. 1061-1070
[4]
A. Fontenla, J. García-Fernández, J.L. Ibáñez, on behalf of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry collaborators. Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 16th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2016).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2017), 70 pp. 971-982
[5]
J. García-Fernández, J.L. Ibáñez Criado, A. Quesada Dorador, on behalf of the collaborators of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 17th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2017).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2018), 71 pp. 941-951
[6]
J.L. Ibáñez Criado, A. Quesada, R. Cózar, on behalf of the collaborators of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 18th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias (2018).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2019), 72 pp. 1031-1042
[7]
A. Quesada, R. Cózar, I. Anguera, on behalf of the collaborators of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 19th Official Report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2019).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2020), 73 pp. 1049-1060
[8]
R. Cózar, I. Anguera, O. Cano, on behalf of the collaborators of the Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. Spanish Catheter Ablation Registry. 20th Official Report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2020).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2021), 74 pp. 1072-1083
[9]
I. Anguera, Ó. Cano Pérez, V. Bazán, Spanish catheter ablation registry collaborators. Spanish catheter ablation registry. 21st official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2021).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2022), 75 pp. 1029-1039
[10]
O. Cano, V. Bazan, E. Arana.
Spanish catheter ablation registry collaborators 22nd official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2022).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2023), 77 pp. 1026-1036
[11]
V. Bazan, E. Arana, J.M. Rubio-Campal, D. Calvo.
Spanish catheter ablation registry collaborators 23rd official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (2023).
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2024), 76 pp. 910-921
[12]
España. Ley Orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos Personales y garantía de los derechos digitales, BOE núm. 294, de 6/12/2018. Available at: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/lo/2018/12/05/3.
[13]
A.J. Shanker, S.O. Jones, J.C. Blankenship, et al.
HRS/ACC Scientific Statement: Guiding Principles on Same-Day Discharge for Intracardiac Catheter Ablation Procedures.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol., (2025),

The complete list of collaborators and participating electrophysiology laboratories is provided in Appendix.

Copyright © 2025. Sociedad Española de Cardiología