This report presents the results of the Spanish catheter ablation registry for 2024.
MethodsA retrospective analysis of ablation procedures performed at participating hospitals in Spain. Data were collected through the REDCap platform using a dedicated form.
ResultsThere was a significant increase in both the number of participating centers (117 centers,+12.5%) and the total number of ablations performed (32 406,+23%). The most common arrhythmogenic substrate was atrial fibrillation (13 395 cases,+35%, accounting for 41% of all cases), with the single-shot technique being the most widely used (55%). There was also a marked increase in the use of electroporation (21% in 2024 vs 10.3% in 2023). Other substrates showed smaller increases, with cavotricuspid isthmus ablation maintaining its position as the second most common procedure (6084 cases, 19%). Overall acute success rates remained high (95%), and complication (1.5%) and mortality (0.04%) rates were stable. The use of electroanatomical navigation remained consistent (54% of cases), with 17% of procedures performed without fluoroscopy. Outpatient procedures accounted for 18% of the total, with notable percentages for atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (39%) and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (33%). A total of 523 pediatric ablations were performed in 44 centers, predominantly for accessory pathways (66.5%), with a 92.5% success rate. Accreditation activity showed 41 centers and 250 professionals involved.
ConclusionsThe number of centers and procedures increased, mainly due to atrial fibrillation ablation. Despite the growing complexity of cases, the rates of success, complications, and mortality remained stable. The accreditation process for both centers and professionals is now firmly established, with steady annual accreditation numbers.
Keywords
The Spanish catheter ablation registry systematically records the activity and resources of arrhythmia units in Spain. We present the official report of the Heart Rhythm Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) for 2024. This document provides an updated overview of changes in the interventional management of cardiac arrhythmias in Spain.1–11 The primary objective of the report is to provide detailed information on each of the ablation techniques used, as well as the specialized technological and human resources available in the Spanish health care system. In addition, relevant data are presented on the safety and effectiveness of the ablation procedures used for each ablation target. This year, we additionally report the status of the accreditation process for centers and professionals in interventional cardiac electrophysiology.
METHODSThe present work comprises a retrospective registry of the activity of electrophysiology laboratories in Spain in 2024. Data were voluntarily obtained from participating centers using a standardized form available on the REDCap online platform, which is part of the recording platform of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC. The registry is continuously compiled, updated, and maintained throughout the year with the collaboration of the SEC registries’ technical staff, their coordinator, and full members of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC. All members contributed to data cleaning and analysis and are responsible for this publication. The data were anonymized for the authors of the present report.
Information was collected on the specific technical and human resources of the participating arrhythmia units, the ablation technique and modality, and the type of ablation target treated, as well as the ablation outcomes and complications. Eleven ablation targets were analyzed: atrial fibrillation (AF), cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), accessory pathway (AP), atrioventricular node, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia (MAT), focal atrial tachycardia (FAT), idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (IVT), ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia (ICM-VT), nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia (NICM-VT), and cardioneuroablation.
The following variables were analyzed: the number of patients and procedures (specifying the number of pediatric patients, defined as those younger than 15 years), acute success (at the end of the procedure), the type of ablation catheter used, and the number and type of in-hospital complications, including periprocedural mortality. Other procedural characteristics were obtained, such as the use of electroanatomic mapping systems, the number of zero-fluoroscopy procedures, the type of anesthesia used, and outpatient procedures.
The present work was conducted in accordance with international recommendations on clinical research (Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association) and Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights.12
RESULTSTechnical and human resourcesThe specialized technical and human resources of the participating laboratories, as well as the other procedures (in addition to ablation) performed by the arrhythmia units, are detailed in table 1 and table 2.
Changes over time in human resources in Spanish electrophysiology laboratories from 2015 to 2024
| Resource | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staff physicians | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.9 |
| Full-time physicians | 2.4 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
| Fellows/y | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| RNs | 2.7 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.5 |
| RTs | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
RN, registered nurse; RT, radiologic technologist.
Data are expressed as means.
Technical resources and additional activity in participating laboratories from 2017 to 2024
| Activity | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pacemakers | 92 | 91 | 93 | 91 | 92 | 96 | 95 | 92 |
| ICDs | 90 | 89 | 90 | 89 | 90 | 93 | 93 | 90 |
| CRTs | 92 | 92 | 93 | 90 | 89 | 91 | 90 | 87 |
| Holter monitor | 95 | 95 | 97 | 95 | 94 | 98 | 98 | 99 |
| ECV | 88 | 87 | 90 | 92 | 88 | 86 | 87 | 83 |
| Renal denervation | 7 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Atrial appendage closure | 18 | 17 | 18 | 22 | 22 | 16 | 19 | 12 |
| PFA | - | - | - | - | 1 | 8 | 14 | 38 |
| Cardioneuroablation | - | - | - | - | 12 | 25 | 41 | 36 |
CRT, cardiac resynchronization therapy; ECV, electrical external cardioversion; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; PFA, pulsed-field ablation.
Data are expressed as percentages.
The mean number of physicians per laboratory increased again to 3.9 (median, 4), with an average of 2.9 full-time physicians (median, 3) (table 1). Overall, 96% of centers had at least 1 full-time electrophysiologist. Nursing staff numbers were stable at 3.5 nurses per unit (median, 3). The percentage of centers with a training program for fellows was 38.5%, generally with 1 or 2 fellows per center.
Most centers (63%) were equipped with at least 1 dedicated cardiac electrophysiology laboratory, while 27 centers (23%) had 2 such laboratories and 1 center had 3. Similar to previous years, laboratories were available on 3.5 ± 1.7 days a week (median, 5).
The majority of centers (91.5%) reported having an electroanatomic mapping system. The most common systems were Ensite, Carto, Rhythmia, and Columbus. Almost half of the centers were equipped with intracardiac echocardiography. Among the alternative energy sources to radiofrequency, cryoablation was available in 74% of centers. Electroporation was available in 38.7%, showing considerable growth compared with 2023 (14% of centers). Regarding procedures other than ablation, most centers implanted pacemakers, defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization devices, and Holter monitors (table 2).
Overall resultsIn 2024, considerable growth was recorded in the number of both ablations and participating centers, with a total of 32 406 ablations (a 23% increase vs 2023) and 13 new centers joining the registry (figure 1). The distribution of participating centers between publicly funded and private centers was similar to that of previous years (80 public and 37 private).
A: distribution of catheter ablations recorded by autonomous community in 2024 and the corresponding rate per million population/total ablations. Mean rate: 693.1 ablations/million population. B: changes over time in the number of procedures and centers participating in the registry from 2015 to 2024.
The median number of ablations per center grew by 56%, increasing from 202 to 315 procedures (P25-75, 90-476). By type of funding, the median numbers of procedures were 70 in private centers (P25-75, 45-243) and 358 in public centers (P25-75, 195-676). Notably, 22 centers conducted more than 500 ablations per year (3 of these centers were private), of which 2 performed more than 850 (1 public and 1 private) (figure 2).
The distribution of ablation targets treated was similar to that of previous years, with AF predominating and showing consistent annual growth of 3% compared with the other ablation targets (35% in 2022, 38% in 2023, and 41% in 2024) (figure 3). AP ablation continued its downward trend vs the other ablation targets (7%), with a 1% decrease per year over the last 4 years.9–11
A: distribution of the number of procedures per ablation target from 2021 to 2024. B: relative proportions of ablation targets in 2024. AF, atrial fibrillation; AP, accessory pathway; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia; CNA, cardioneuroablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; VT, ventricular tachycardia.
The overall acute procedural success rate (95%), complication rate (1.5%), and mortality rate (0.04%) were similar to those of previous years (figure 4). There were also no differences in the success and overall complication rates among the ablation targets (figure 5). However, despite the marked increase in the number of AF ablations, the number of complications recorded for this target fell again (2.4% vs 2.5% in 2023 and 2.8% in 2022).9–11
Changes over time in success and complication rates per ablation target in 2024. AF, atrial fibrillation; AP, accessory pathway; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CNA, cardioneuroablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; VT, ventricular tachycardia. Data are expressed as percentages.
The distribution of complications by ablation target is detailed in table 3, with most occurring in higher-complexity procedures, such as AF ablation and ventricular tachycardia ablation. The most frequent complications were vascular (n = 161), followed by pericardial effusion (n = 124). There were 12 procedure-related deaths (0.04%), 8 during ablation of ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease, 2 during AF ablation, and 2 during MAT ablation.
Complications recorded per ablation target in 2024
| Ablation target | Ablations | AVB | Vascular complications | PE | Embolisms | AMI | HF | PNP | Other | By ablation target, n | By ablation target, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 32 406 | 28 | 161 | 124 | 45 | 7 | 16 | 81 | 34 | 496 | 1.5% |
| AVNRT | 4908 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23 | 0.4% |
| AP | 2177 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 21 | 0.9% |
| AVN | 1400 | - | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0.3% |
| FAT | 739 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0.8% |
| CTI | 6084 | 2 | 23 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 0.5% |
| MAT | 1166 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 1.5% |
| AF | 13 395 | 1 | 95 | 86 | 37 | 2 | 4 | 81 | 16 | 322 | 2.4% |
| IVT | 1362 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0.5% |
| ICM-VT | 623 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 42 | 6.7% |
| NICM-VT | 367 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 5.1% |
| CNA | 185 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.5% |
AF, atrial fibrillation; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; AP, accessory pathway; AVB, atrioventricular block; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CNA, cardioneuroablation; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; HF, heart failure; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; PE, pericardial effusion; PNP, phrenic nerve palsy; NICM-VT, nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia.
For the first time, the registry has recorded the numbers of procedures performed in the outpatient setting, which represented 18% of all procedures. Outpatient use was highest for AVNRT (39%) and CTI (33%) (table 4).
Use of electroanatomic mapping systems, zero-fluoroscopy procedures, and outpatient procedures by ablation target
| Ablation target | With mapping system | Without fluoroscopy | Outpatient | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 | |
| AVNRT | 48 | 50 | 34 | 40 | 39 |
| AP | 62 | 58.5 | 22 | 20 | 26 |
| AVN | 4.2 | 7 | 2.7 | 5 | - |
| FAT | 80 | 78 | 19 | 22.6 | 28.6 |
| CTI | 52 | 58 | 26 | 30 | 33 |
| MAT | 95 | 96 | 10 | 8 | 12.4 |
| AF | 51 | 47.5 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 13 |
| IVT | 88 | 96 | 18 | 19 | 20.5 |
| ICM-VT | 92 | 97 | 8.8 | 3 | 2.7 |
| NICM-VT | 87 | 90 | 7.1 | 11 | 4.4 |
AF, atrial fibrillation; AP, accessory pathway; AVN, atrioventricular node; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia; NICM-VT, nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia.
Data are expressed as percentages.
The following sections detail the results for each ablation target.
Atrial fibrillationAs in previous years, AF was the most commonly treated ablation target and even exhibited a marked increase in the number of procedures (13 395 procedures in 2024 vs 9942 in 2023, a 35% increase). In total, 83% of centers conducted AF ablation, with a median of 91 procedures (P25-75, 38-192). Specifically, 57% of patients had paroxysmal AF, 38% had persistent AF, and 5% had long-standing persistent AF. These percentages are similar to those of previous years. The acute success rate was 95%.
The predominant ablation strategy was pulmonary vein isolation (12 236 procedures; 91%), followed by posterior wall isolation (10.7%), left atrial linear ablation (6.3%), pulmonary vein antrum ablation (5.25%), vein of Marshall ethanol infusion (1.8%), ablation of fibrotic areas (1.5%), superior vena cava isolation (0.7%), complex fractionated electrogram ablation (0.2%), and left atrial appendage isolation (0.2%). In 163 procedures, an additional approach was used.
Single-shot techniques were the most commonly used, comprising 55.2% of procedures. In addition, 33.7% of procedures were performed using cryoablation (39.4% in 2023) and 21.5% were performed using pulse-field ablation (PFA) (10.3% in 2023). The point-by-point ablation technique was used in 44.8% of procedures, generally with an irrigated-tip catheter with contact forcesensing technology (figure 6).
Mapping systems were used in 47.5% of procedures and 5.6% were fluoroscopy-free. As auxiliary instruments, steerable sheaths were used in 4885 procedures (a 22% increase vs 2023) and intracardiac echocardiography in 1509. A total of 5671 procedures were performed under general anesthesia (4511 in 2023) and 5544 with deep sedation. Finally, 1747 procedures (13%) were performed on an outpatient basis.
The incidence of complications was 2.4% (2.5% in 2023) (table 3). Two deaths were associated with the procedure: 1 from atrioesophageal fistula and 1 after cardiac surgery due to perforation.
Cavotricuspid isthmusIn total, 6084 CTI procedures were recorded, which represents a 20% increase vs 2023 and once again meant that CTI was the second most commonly treated ablation target. A success rate of 98.6% was achieved, with a complication rate similar to that of 2023 (0.5% in both years) (table 3). The most frequently used catheters were irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology (52% vs 41% in 2023), followed by standard irrigated catheters (32%). Nonirrigated catheters were used in 16% of procedures. The number of procedures performed with a mapping system increased (58% vs 52% in 2023), as well as those performed without fluoroscopy (30% vs 26% in 2023). Finally, 33% of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.
Atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardiaAVNRT ablation was once again the third most commonly treated ablation target, after AF and CTI. Although the absolute number of procedures increased (4908 procedures, a 16% increase vs 2023), the relative percentage has tended to decrease in recent years (15%). The success rate was 97.9%, while the complication rate was 0.4% (table 3). The most frequently used energy source was radiofrequency, with just 3.7% of procedures performed using cryoablation. The use of mapping systems was maintained at 50%, and 40% of the procedures were fluoroscopy-free. Overall, 39% of AVNRT ablations were performed as outpatient procedures.
Accessory pathwaysAPs remained the fourth most commonly treated ablation target, with an 8.6% increase in procedures vs 2023 (2177 vs 2005 in 2023), representing 7% of all ablations performed. The success rate was 93.3%, while the complication rate was 0.9% (table 3). Left free wall pathways were the most frequent location (51.3%), followed by inferoseptal pathways (26.8%), para-Hisian/anteroseptal pathways (11.3%), and right free wall pathways (10.7%). Transseptal access was used more frequently than retroaortic access for the ablation of left pathways (63.9% vs 32.9%), and epicardial/coronary sinus access was required in just 3.2% of procedures. Mapping systems were used in 58.5% of procedures and 20% were fluoroscopy-free. Finally, 26% of these procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.
Atrioventricular node ablationA total of 1400 AVN ablations were performed in 2024, 137 more than in 2023 (an 11% increase). The success rate was 98%, while the complication rate was 0.3%; all complications were vascular in nature.
The most frequently used catheters were 4-mm radiofrequency catheters (41%), followed by standard irrigated catheters (27%) and 8-mm catheters (23%). There were slight increases in procedures performed using a mapping system (7% vs 4.2% in 2023) and without fluoroscopy (5% vs 2.7%).
Macrore-entrant atrial tachycardiaIn 2024, 1166 MAT ablation procedures were reported, 206 more than in 2023. The most common location was the left atrium. Overall, 107 patients had congenital heart disease, 114 had undergone atriotomy, and 646 had undergone AF ablation. In 44 cases, selective embolization of the vein of Marshall was conducted, representing a marked increase vs the 18 such procedures recorded in 2023.
Mapping systems were used in 96% of procedures and 8% were fluoroscopy-free. The acute success rate was 89%, similar to previous years. Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were used in 90% of procedures and PFA was applied in 54 (5 in 2023). In 2024, general anesthesia was used in 577 procedures, while deep sedation was used in 372. The complication rate was 1.5% (table 3). Two deaths were reported: 1 associated with sedation and 1 sudden death in the first 24hours after the intervention. Finally, 12.4% of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.
Focal atrial tachycardiaOverall, 739 FAT ablations were reported (a 15% increase vs 2023). Most were conducted in the right atrium (71%). The success rate was 91%, similar to that of previous years.
Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were the most commonly used catheters (70%); 10 procedures were performed with cryoablation and 8 with PFA. Six complications were recorded (table 3). Mapping systems were used in 78% of procedures and 22.6% were fluoroscopy-free. Finally, 28.6% of the procedures were performed on an outpatient basis.
Idiopathic ventricular tachycardiaIn total, 1362 IVT procedures were performed (a 24% increase vs 2023). However, the proportion relative to the total in the registry remained unchanged at 4%. Increases were found in the number of centers conducting IVT ablation, from 85 to 93, and in the median number of cases per center (P25-75, 5-18). The most frequent location was the right ventricular outflow tract (44.4%), followed by the left outflow tract (33.2%). Less common sites were the papillary muscles (6.4%), fascicles of the conduction system (5.2%), the mitral annulus (4.5%), the moderator band (1.5%), the tricuspid annulus (1.3%), and the para-Hisian region (0.7%). The overall effectiveness was 91.8%. The most frequently used access routes were right ventricular endocardial (43.7%), retroaortic (38.9%), and transseptal (12.7%). Less frequently used access routes were epicardial (2.1%) and combined endocardial/epicardial (2.7%). Radiofrequency was the standard energy source, and irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology predominated (79.2%). Radioablation was used in 4.5% of procedures and PFA use was rare (2 cases). Other ablation modalities were also uncommon (cryoablation, 5 cases; ethanol ablation, 3 cases). The use of mapping systems predominated (96% of procedures) and 19% were fluoroscopy-free. Seven complications were recorded (0.5%) (table 3). No deaths were reported. General anesthesia was used in 9.6% of procedures, while deep sedation was used in 16.7% and circulatory support in 1 procedure. Finally, 20.5% of the patients were managed as outpatients.
Ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardiaDespite the increase in centers (from 70 to 79; a 13% increase), the number of procedures (n = 623) and relative proportion (2%) were stable. The median number of procedures was 4 (P25-75, 1-8). Mapping systems predominated (97% of procedures) and 3% were fluoroscopy-free. The acute success rate was once again 85%. An exclusively ablation target-based ablation strategy accounted for 50% of procedures, whereas a combined strategy, guided by both ablation target and tachycardia induction, was used in 41%. Ablation guided solely by tachycardia induction was used in 9%. Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were the most commonly used catheters (82%). There was a slight increase in stereotactic radioablation (6.1%), as well as the first procedures performed using dual-energy catheters (radiofrequency and PFA), although they remained rare (just 2 cases). Steerable sheaths were used in 63% of procedures. The most frequently used access route was transseptal (58%), followed by retroaortic (32%), combined endocardial/epicardial (6.5%), and exclusively epicardial (1.6%). General anesthesia was used in 61% of procedures and deep sedation in 18%. Just 2.7% were outpatient procedures. Mechanical hemodynamic support was used in 6.6% of procedures. The complication rate was 6.7% (table 3). Six deaths were reported: 2 due to cardiogenic shock, 2 due to cardiac perforation, 1 due to electromechanical dissociation, and 1 due to acute myocardial infarction.
Nonischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardiaThis ablation target was treated in more centers than in 2023 (68 vs 59, a 15% increase). Although there was a slight increase in the number of procedures (367, an 8% increase), there were no changes vs the registry total (1%). The median number of procedures per center was 2 (P25-75, 1-7). The success rate was 82%. Mapping systems predominated (90% of procedures) and 11% were fluoroscopy-free. The main ablation targets were dilated cardiomyopathy (49%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (19%), and congenital heart disease (9%). Less commonly treated ablation targets were nondilated cardiomyopathy (6%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (4%), and bundle branch re-entrant tachycardia (3%). Other targets, such as sarcoidosis, valvular heart diseases, and those associated with muscular dystrophy, myocarditis, and Chagas disease, were very rare. Irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology were the most commonly used catheters (92%), followed by standard irrigated catheters and nonirrigated catheters. Although still rare, radioablation was more commonly used than in 2023, increasing from 9 procedures to 23. Ethanol ablation was applied in only 1 procedure, and the use of cryoablation was not reported. Retroaortic was the most common access route (39%), followed by transseptal (32%) and right ventricular endocardial (20%), with 12% exclusively epicardial and 18% combined endocardial-epicardial. In total, 59% of procedures were performed under general anesthesia and 18% with deep sedation. Hemodynamic support devices were used in 2% of procedures. Just 4.4% of the procedures were performed on an outpatient basis. Overall, 21 complications were recorded (5.1%) (table 3). Two patients died, 1 from hemorrhagic shock and 1 from arterial dissection.
Ablations in pediatric patientsA total of 522 ablations in pediatric patients were performed in 44 centers (38%), 1.6% of the total registry and a 12% increase compared with 2023. The median number of procedures was 4 (P25-75, 1-10) while the median age was 12 years. Once again, the most frequently treated ablation target was APs: 347 procedures (66%). The success rate was 92.5%. The second most commonly treated ablation target was AVNRT, with 127 procedures (24%) and a 91.3% success rate. This was followed by FAT, with 24 procedures (4.6%) and an 83.3% success rate, and IVT, with 14 procedures (2.7%) and a 100% success rate. The frequencies of the other ablation targets were much lower: NICM-VT (2 procedures), ICT (3 procedures), and MAT (3 procedures) (figure 7). The predominant energy source was radiofrequency (94%), with limited use of cryoablation (6%).
Relative proportions of ablation targets in pediatric patients (< 15 years). AP, accessory pathway; AVNRT, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia; CTI, cavotricuspid isthmus; FAT, focal atrial tachycardia; ICM-VT, ischemic cardiomyopathy ventricular tachycardia; IVT, idiopathic ventricular tachycardia; MAT, macrore-entrant atrial tachycardia.
The percentage of ablation procedures performed using electroanatomic mapping systems was similar to that of previous years (54%). These systems were most commonly used for all types of ventricular tachycardias (95% overall), as well as MAT (96%) and FAT (78%) (table 4). They were used for just 47.5% of AF ablations.
In addition, 17% of the ablation targets were treated without fluoroscopy. In particular, 40% of AVNRT ablations and 30% of CTI ablations were fluoroscopy-free.
CardioneuroablationThere was little change in the number of centers performing cardioneuroablation (42 vs 41 in 2023; table 2), with 185 procedures (a 30% increase). The acute success rate was 96%. In total, 78% of procedures were performed for syncope, and most (89%) involved treatment of both atria using irrigated-tip catheters with contact forcesensing technology.
Accreditation process for interventional cardiac electrophysiologists in Spain
The changes over time in the accreditation system are shown in figure 8. A clear upward trend is evident in both indicators, although their behaviors differ. The number of centers grew steadily, from 17 in 2010 to 41 in 2024, which enabled the standard accreditation pathway to be established based on formal training. In contrast, individual accreditations exhibited some year-to-year variability, influenced by various factors, such as training capacity and extraordinary events. A notable example is 2022, when no examination was held due to a lack of candidates (figure 8), a situation attributed to the ongoing impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on clinical and training activity. However, the system has since shown a clear recovery, with a new rebound expected in 2025, reflecting renewed interest and operational capacity.
DISCUSSIONThe data from the Spanish catheter ablation registry for 2024 demonstrate growth in both the number of participating centers and the number of procedures, continuing the trend of the past 4 years.9–11 The consolidation of the REDCap platform for data collection, using rigorous and standardized parameters ensuring anonymous information processing, has helped to build the trust of participating centers and optimize both the quality and accuracy of the data obtained. This quality provides a robust basis for conducting analyses for both strategic and scientific purposes, under the auspices of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC.
The absolute number of procedures grew by 23% vs 2023 and, although a large proportion of this increase was due to AF ablation (a 35% increase), the remaining ablation targets also showed marked growth, particularly 29% in MAT, 22% in IVT, and 20% in ICT.1–11 In relative terms, AF ablation already represents 41% of all ablation targets treated, with constant growth of 3% in the last 3 years and corresponding relative reductions in other targets, such as AVNRT, APs, and atrioventricular node.10,11 Both the number of centers (17 new centers) and the number of procedures per center also grew again. Thus, the median number of procedures per center increased by 56% vs 2023 (from 202 to 315 procedures), and this growth is evident in both public and private health centers. Notably, the number of high-volume centers (> 600 ablations) has increased from 3 in 2023 to 12 in 2024, with 2 performing more than 850 ablations per year.11
Single-shot techniques were once again more frequent than point-by-point techniques for AF ablation. In addition, although the absolute number of procedures increased, there was a largely similar reduction in the use of both point-by-point ablation (from 49% to 44.8%) and cryoablation (from 39% to 33.7%) due to the expansion of PFA (from 10% to 21.5% of procedures). This change in trend is due to the implementation of PFA in more centers (from 14% in 2023 to 38% in 2024). Because several autonomous communities have not yet approved its use in the publicly funded health care system, a gradual rise in PFA use is expected in the coming years as implementation increases.
The relative percentages of other ablation targets were similar to those of 2023. CTI and AVNRT ablation remain stable in the second and third place, with established use of mapping systems and zero-fluoroscopy.
In 2024, the registry began recording procedures performed on an outpatient basis. This strategy has gained popularity worldwide due to health care challenges (particularly since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic) and economic pressures and in an attempt to increase procedure volume while reducing costs.13 The data show that the outpatient setting is more commonly used for conventional ablation targets (40% for AVNRT, 33% for CTI, and 26% for APs). However, it is also used for complex ablation targets, particularly AF, which accounts for 13% of procedures. Increasing evidence demonstrates the advantages of outpatient ablation in terms of accessibility, availability of facilities, optimization of health care resources, and cost reduction, making it likely that its use will grow in the coming years as a management strategy in arrhythmia units.
Despite the increase in the number of complex ablation targets, the overall procedural success rate was comparable to that of 2023 (95% vs 97% in 2023), as were the rates of complications (1.5% vs 1.6% in 2023) and mortality (0.04%).11
Another change is the recording of ablation outcomes for pediatric patients. The number of procedures increased by 12%, while the overall median age was 12 years, and there was high variability among centers and in activity. Both the techniques used and the results obtained are similar to those reported for the adult population.
Accreditation processSince its implementation in 2003, the accreditation system for interventional cardiac electrophysiology in Spain has developed into a structured, exacting, and constantly evolving model. Thus far, 250 professionals and more than 40 teaching centers have received accreditation, creating a crucial national educational network for ensuring homogeneous, safe, and high-quality training. The regulatory strengthening in 2016 marked a turning point by tightening the requirements for both professionals and centers, with increases in the demands for practical experience, minimum procedural volume, use of advanced technologies, and active participation in national registries.
Accreditation has become established as an essential tool to ensure specialized, safe, and uniform care throughout the country. Accredited centers serve as training hubs and quality filters, enabling the structured education of new specialists, while periodic reaccreditation ensures that standards remain up to date. Data from the ablation registry, which show optimal outcomes and a continuous decline in complications, demonstrate the technical and clinical improvements achieved through the synergy between the accreditation process and the registry, which makes it possible to monitor and optimize outcomes.
Figure 8 also shows how the system has maintained a positive and resilient tendency. The projection for 2025 suggests that record figures will be achieved in both accreditations and teaching capacity, reinforcing the sustainability and excellence of the model. In this context, accreditation is now not only a mechanism for individual and institutional validation but also a strategic tool for facing the challenges of rapidly evolving clinical practice. The system must continue to adapt, incorporating new quality indicators, specific competencies, and objective metrics that reflect command of advanced techniques and the growing complexity of procedures.
CONCLUSIONSThe Spanish catheter ablation registry for 2024 showed growth in both the number of procedures and the number of participating centers. AF continued its steady upward trend as the predominant ablation target, with single-shot techniques standing out and a notable increase in PFA. A high proportion of procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, particularly for conventional ablation targets, which clearly contributed to overall procedural volume and efficiency. Despite the increasing relative complexity of the ablation targets, success rates remained high, with stable complication and mortality rates.
The accreditation process for centers and professionals is well established, with a consistent number of accreditations awarded each year.
FUNDINGThe registry receives funding from the Casa del Corazón Foundation, which is aimed at supporting the management and maintenance of the national registries of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONSThe present work was conducted in accordance with international recommendations on clinical research (Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association) and Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights.
STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEArtificial intelligence has not been used in the preparation of this article.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONSAll authors have fully contributed to both the design of the study and the data analysis, manuscript drafting, and manuscript revision.
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTNone of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
The authors would like to thank the technical team of the Heart Rhythm Association of the SEC (Gonzalo Justes, Miguel Ángel Salas, Israel García, Raquel Chica, and Jesús V. de la Torre) for their excellent work in data management and integration that makes this work possible, as well as all the participants in the Spanish catheter ablation registry, whose selfless help every year permits the publication of this document.
| Autonomous community | Locality | Center | Collaborator |
|---|---|---|---|
| Andalusia | Cádiz | Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar | Lucas R. Cano Calabria |
| Málaga | Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria | Alberto Barrera Cordero | |
| Málaga | Hospital QuirónSalud Málaga | Alberto Barrera Cordero | |
| Marbella | Hospital QuirónSalud Marbella | Alberto Barrera Cordero | |
| Málaga | Hospital Vithas Málaga | Alberto Barrera Cordero | |
| Benalmádena | Hospital Vithas Xanit Internacional Benalmádena | Alberto Barrera Cordero | |
| Sevilla | Hospital Vithas Sevilla | Ernesto Díaz Infante | |
| Córdoba | Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía | Francisco Mazuelos Bellido | |
| Sevilla | QuirónSalud Sagrado Corazón | Juan Manuel Fernández Gómez | |
| Sevilla | Hospital QuirónSalud Infanta Luisa | Rafael Romero Garrido | |
| Huelva | Hospital Juan Ramón Jimenez | Pablo Moriña Vázquez | |
| Sevilla | Hospital Virgen Macarena | Pablo Bastos Amador | |
| Sevilla | Hospital Universitario Virgen de Valme | Ricardo Pavón Jiménez | |
| Granada | Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves | Juan Jiménez Jáimez | |
| Sevilla | Clínica HLA Santa Isabel | Alvaro Arce León | |
| Granada | Hospital Clínico Universitario San Cecilio | José Miguel Lozano Herrera | |
| Huelva | Hospital QuirónSalud Huelva | Pablo Moriña Vázquez | |
| Sevilla | Hospital Virgen del Rocío | Alonso Pedrote Martínez | |
| Granada | Hospital La Inmaculada - Granada | Miguel Álvarez López | |
| Huelva | Hospital QuirónSalud Huelva - Neolaser | María Teresa Moraleda Salas | |
| Jaén | Hospital Universitario de Jaén | Emilio Constán de la Revilla | |
| Córdoba | QuirónSalud Salud Córdoba | Nick Paredes Hurtado | |
| Aragon | Zaragoza | Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa | Mercedes Cabrera Ramos |
| Zaragoza | Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet | Antonio Asso Abadía | |
| Zaragoza | QuirónSalud Salud Zaragoza | Antonio Asso Abadía | |
| Principality of Asturias | Oviedo | Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias | José Manuel Rubín López |
| Gijón | Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes | Diego Pérez Díez | |
| Balearic Islands | Palma | Hospital Universitario Son Espases | Carlos Eugenio Grande Morales |
| Ibiza | Policlínica Nuestra Señora del Rosario | Bieito Campos García | |
| Palma de Mallorca | Hospital QuirónSalud Palmaplanas | Nelson Alvarenga | |
| Canary Islands | Santa Cruz de Tenerife | Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria | Luis Alvarez Acosta |
| Las Palmas | Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín | Haridian Mendoza Lemes | |
| San Cristóbal de la Laguna | Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias | Julio Jesús Ferrer Hita | |
| Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Hospital Perpetuo Socorro | Pablo M. Ruiz Hernández | |
| Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria | Federico Segura Villalobos | |
| Santa Cruz de Tenerife | Hospital Parque Tenerife | Juan Diego Valdivia Miranda | |
| Cantabria | Santander | Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla | Felipe Rodríguez Entem |
| Castile and León | Burgos | Hospital Universitario de Burgos | Francisco Javier García Fernández |
| León | Hospital de León | María Luisa Fidalgo Andrés | |
| Salamanca | Hospital Universitario de Salamanca | Javier Jiménez Candil | |
| Valladolid | Hospital Universitario Río Hortega | Benito Herreros Guilarte | |
| Valladolid | Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid | María de Gracia Sandín Fuentes | |
| Castile-La Mancha | Albacete | Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete | Víctor M. Hidalgo Olivares |
| Toledo | Hospital Universitario de Toledo | Miguel Ángel Arias | |
| Ciudad Real | Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real | Francisco Javier Jiménez Díaz | |
| Catalonia | Barcelona | Hospital Universitario Dexeus | Ángel Moya |
| Esplugues | Hospital Sant Joan de Déu | Georgia Sarquella-Brugada | |
| Barcelona | Clínica Sagrada Familia | Andreu Porta Sánchez | |
| Barcelona | Hospital del Mar | Jesús Jiménez López | |
| Tarragona | Unidad Funcional Territorial de Electrofisiología Camp de Tarragona | Gabriel Martín Sánchez | |
| Badalona | Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol | Axel Sarrias | |
| Barcelona | Hospital Clínic | Eduard Guasch Casany | |
| Barcelona | Clínica Corachan | Jose María Guerra Ramos | |
| L’Hospitalet de Llobregat | Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge | Ignasi Anguera | |
| Lérida | Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova | Diego Menéndez Ramírez | |
| Barcelona | Hospital Santa Cruz y San Pablo | Enrique Rodríguez Font | |
| Barcelona | Clínica Teknon | Julio Martí Almor | |
| Gerona | Hospital Josep Trueta Girona | Eva María Benito Martín | |
| Sabadell | Parc Taulí de Sabadell | Soledad Ascoeta | |
| Barcelona | Hospital Universitario Vall d́Hebron | Alba Santos | |
| Valencian Community | Castellón | Hospital Universitario General de Castellón | Víctor Pérez Roselló |
| Alicante | Balmis de Alicante | Jose Luis Ibáñez Criado | |
| Alicante | HLA Vistahermosa | Alicia Ibáñez Criado | |
| Valencia | Hospital General Universitario de Valencia | Javier Jiménez Bello | |
| Valencia | Hospital Universitario La Fe | Joaquín Osca Asensi | |
| Alzira | Hospital Universitario de la Ribera | Bruno Bochard Villanueva | |
| Manises | Hospital de Manises | Pau Alonso Fernández | |
| Valencia | Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia | Eloy Domínguez Mafí | |
| San Juan de Alicante | Hospital San Juan de Alicante | José Moreno Arribas | |
| Valencia | Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset | Antonio Peláez González | |
| Valencia | Hospital Arnau de Vilanova Valencia | Assumpció Saurí Ortiz | |
| Benidorm | Hospital Clínica Benidorm | Vicente Bertomeu González | |
| Alcoy | Hospital Virgen de los Lirios de Alcoy | Rafael Raso Raso | |
| Extremadura | Badajoz | Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz | José Manuel Durán Guerrero |
| Cáceres | Hospital de Cáceres | Javier Portales Fernández | |
| Galicia | Santiago de Compostela | Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela | Francisco Javier García Seara |
| Vigo | Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro | Pilar Cabanas Grandío | |
| A Coruña | Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña | Enrique Ricoy Martínez | |
| Lugo | Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti | Juliana Elices Teja | |
| Pontevedra | Hospital Vithas Fátima Vigo | Elvis Teijeira Fernández | |
| A Coruña | Hospital HM Modelo La Coruña | Ignacio Mosquera Pérez | |
| Community of Madrid | Majadahonda | Hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda | Víctor Castro Urda |
| Madrid | Hospital Ramón y Cajal | Vanesa Cristina Lozano Granero | |
| Madrid | Hospital Clínico San Carlos | Nicasio Pérez Castellano | |
| Leganés | Hospital Severo Ochoa | Ricardo Salgado Aranda | |
| Alcorcón | Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón | Jose Amador Rubio Caballero | |
| Madrid | Fundación Jiménez Díaz | José Manuel Rubio Campal | |
| Madrid | Hospital Universitario General de Villalba | José Manuel Rubio Campal | |
| Madrid | Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre | Daniel Rodríguez Muñoz | |
| Madrid | Hospital La Luz | Juan Benezet Mazuecos | |
| Móstoles | Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos | Federico Gómez Pulido | |
| Pozuelo de Alarcón | Hospital Universitario QuirónSalud Madrid y Complejo Hospitalario Ruber Juan Bravo | Tomás Datino Romaniega | |
| Getafe | Hospital Universitario de Getafe | Agustín Pastor Fuentes | |
| Fuenlabrada | Hospital Universitario Fuenlabrada | Silvia del Castillo | |
| Madrid | Hospital Universitario (General e Infantil) La Paz (U.E.R.) | José Luis Merino Llorens | |
| Boadilla del Monte | Hospital Universitario HM Montepríncipe | Jesús Almendral Garrote | |
| Torrejón de Ardoz | Hospital Universitario de Torrejón | Óscar Salvador Montañés | |
| Alcalá de Henares | Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias | Juan José González Ferrer | |
| Valdemoro | Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena | Federico Gómez Pulido | |
| Madrid | Hospital Universitario La Paz (Sección de Arritmias y Electrofisiología) | Carlos Álvarez Ortega | |
| Madrid | Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón | Ángel Arenal | |
| Madrid | Hospital Central de la Defensa Gómez Ulla | Sara Moreno | |
| Madrid | Hospital Universitario Sanitas La Zarzuela | Álvaro Marco del Castillo | |
| Cartagena | Hospital Universitario Santa Lucía | Ignacio Gil Ortega | |
| Murcia | Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer | Francisco Jose García Almagro | |
| Region of Murcia | Murcia | Hospital General Universitario Reina Sofía de Murcia | Pablo Ramos Ruiz |
| Murcia | Hospital IMED Virgen de la Fuensanta Murcia | Pablo Ramos Ruiz | |
| El Palmar | Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca | Pablo Peñafiel Verdé | |
| Murcia | HLA La Vega | Ignacio Gil Ortega | |
| Chartered Community of Navarre | Pamplona | Clínica Universidad de Navarra | Pablo Ramos Ardanaz |
| Pamplona | Hospital Universitario de Navarra | Óscar Alcalde Rodríguez | |
| Basque Country | Bilbao | Hospital de Basurto | María Fe Arcocha Torres |
| Vitoria | Hospital Universitario de Álava | Enrique García Cuenca | |
| Barakaldo | Hospital de Cruces | Íñigo Sainz Godoy | |
| Donostia | Hospital Universitario Donostia | Antonio Óscar Luque Lezcano | |
| La Rioja | Logroño | Hospital Universitario San Pedro | Pepa Sánchez Borque |
