Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 60. Issue 5.
Pages 543-547 (May 2007)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 60. Issue 5.
Pages 543-547 (May 2007)
DOI: 10.1016/S1885-5857(07)60196-0
Full text access
Predictive Value of Differential Pulse Pressure in the Diagnosis of Silent Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Type-2 Diabetes
Valor predictivo de la presión diferencial del pulso en el diagnóstico de isquemia miocárdica silente en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2
Visits
8781
Manuel J Gómeza, Ildefonso Roldána, José L Díeza, Katherine Garcíab, Darío Sanmiguela, Antonio Salvadora, Adolfo Rincón de Arellanoa, Antonio Hernández-Mijaresb
a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
b Servicio de Endocrinología, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain
This item has received
8781
Visits
Article information
Statistics
Tables (3)
Figure. Flow chart of the protocol used for the diagnosis of silent myocardial ischemia. ECG indicates electrocardiogram; SMI, silent myocardial ischemia.
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the Study Population*
TABLE 2. Results for Outpatient Blood Pressure Measurement*
Show moreShow less
La isquemia miocárdica silente es más frecuente en diabéticos. La presión arterial diferencial del pulso tiene valor como predictora de riesgo de enfermedad cardiovascular. Estudiamos a 48 varones diabéticos tipo 2 consecutivos sin antecedentes de cardiopatía isquémica. Realizamos medición ambulatoria de la presión arterial y un protocolo de estudio de isquemia miocárdica silente que incluyó: ECG en reposo, ecocardiograma, Holter-ECG-24 h y ergometría convencional y con isótopos radiactivos. Nueve pacientes (19%) presentaron isquemia miocárdica silente. La presión diferencial del pulso mostró buena capacidad discriminadora para determinar la presencia de isquemia silente (área bajo la curva [COR] = 0,83; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 0,71-0,96; p = 0,002). El efecto predictor se mantuvo en el modelo de regresión logística ajustado (odds ratio [OR] = 1,24; IC del 95%, 1,02-1,49). Estimamos una OR de 8,5 (IC del 95%, 1,7-31,2) por cada incremento de 10 mmHg de la presión diferencial del pulso para el riesgo de presentar isquemia silente. La edad y la presión diferencial del pulso fueron los únicos predictores independientes de isquemia miocárdica silente encontrados en este estudio.
Palabras clave:
Diabetes mellitus
Presión diferencial de pulso
Isquemia miocárdica silente
Silent myocardial ischemia occurs more frequently in diabetics. Differential arterial pulse pressure is a valuable predictor of cardiovascular disease. We studied 48 consecutive male patients with type-2 diabetes and no known history of ischemic heart disease. Ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure was carried out and the presence of silent myocardial ischemia was studied using a protocol that involved: resting ECG, echocardiography, 24-hour Holter ECG, conventional exercise stress testing, and exercise testing with nuclear scanning. Nine patients (19%) had silent myocardial ischemia. Differential pulse pressure had good discriminative ability in identifying the presence of silent ischemia: the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-0.96; P=.002). This predictive ability was also observed on adjusted logistic regression modeling (odds ratio [OR], 1.24, 95% CI = 1.02-1.49). We found that the OR for the risk of silent ischemia for every 10-mmHg increase in differential pulse pressure was 8.5 (95% CI 1.7-31.2). Age and differential pulse pressure were the only independent predictors of silent myocardial ischemia found in this study.
Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus
Differential pulse pressure
Silent myocardial ischemia
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Ischemic heart disease is the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The increased cardiovascular risk in this population results from the diabetes, itself, and the higher frequency of conventional risk factors.1 The prevalence of T2DM in individuals over 30 years old in Spain ranges from 6% to 10% and half these patients are unaware of the diagnosis.2

Silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) is 2 to 7 times more frequent in diabetic patients.3 Detection of this condition allows treatment to be optimized by adopting a strategy to assess the extent of coronary disease and the possibility to achieve revascularization.4,5 Nevertheless, there is no current consensus as to the recommended method for screening these patients.6 Along these lines, the importance of blood pressure (BP) status as a determinant of cardiovascular risk and the benefits of treating hypertension have been conclusively established. Among its various components, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and differential pulse pressure (DPP), defined as the difference between SAP and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), have shown the highest value as predictors of cardiovascular risk in relation to increased arterial wall rigidity.7

The main purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of DPP for predicting SMI by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with T2DM and no history of ischemic heart disease.

METHODS

Study Population

The study included 48 consecutive male patients with T2DM8 and no documented history of ischemic heart disease, selected from an endocrinology service to investigate the relationship between several parameters and detection of SMI. The exclusion criteria were physical disability or ECG alteration precluding exercise stress testing, and significant kidney disease (plasma creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL). In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, all patients were informed of the objectives, risks, procedures, and possible benefits of the study and gave consent to participate.

Study Variables

After performing a meticulous anamnesis and physical examination, which included calculation of the waist-hip ratio, body mass index, ankle-brachial index, and study of the fundus of the eye by an ophthalmologist, ABPM was performed with recording of the diurnal, nocturnal, maximum, minimum, and mean SAP and DAP values. In addition, BP fluctuation patterns were examined according to the nocturnal BP dip, categorizing patients as non-dipper (0%-10%), dipper (10%-20%), extreme dipper (>20%) or riser, when there was an increase.

Blood samples were drawn from all patients to determine the following parameters:

­ Lipid profile (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], and triglycerides)

­ Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)

­ Baseline insulin. The HOMA (Homeostasis Model Assessment) index was calculated according to the following formula: insulin (µU/mL)xglucose (mmol/L)/22.5. Insulin resistance was defined as a value ≥3.5

Screening Protocol for Silent Myocardial Ischemia (Figure)

Figure. Flow chart of the protocol used for the diagnosis of silent myocardial ischemia. ECG indicates electrocardiogram; SMI, silent myocardial ischemia.

We began with a baseline electrocardiogram (ECG). If a Q-wave indicating prior myocardial necrosis was seen (defined as duration >0.04 s and depth >1/3 of the QRS complex in at least 2 anatomically consecutive leads), echocardiography was performed. If this test showed regional contractility alterations consistent with the ECG findings, the patient was classified as positive. Otherwise, Holter monitoring of the ECG was continued for 24 hours. Positive status was defined as ≥1 mV of horizontal ST segment depression or 1.5 mV of ST segment elevation for at least 1 min of the recording in the absence of symptoms of angina. If the result was negative, the patient underwent exercise stress testing according to the Bruce protocol; the results were obtained following the recommendations of the Sociedad Española de Cardiología (Spanish Cardiology Society).9 When the results of this test were negative, SMI was ruled out. If the test was inconclusive, exercise stress testing and nuclear scanning were performed, with positive status established by the criteria of the Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear (Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine).10

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative data are expressed as the mean (standard deviation [SD]), and as the median (interquartile range, 25th-75th percentile) when the distribution of the variables was not normal. Qualitative data are expressed as total number and percentage. Student t test was used to compare means and the χ2 test to compare percentages. For variables with a non-normal distribution, the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was used. To assess the capacity of DPP to discriminate between patients with and without SMI, a ROC curve was constructed. The effect of DPP on the risk of presenting SMI was assessed after adjusting for age and other cardiovascular risk factors by a logistic regression model. A P value less than .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Nine (19%) patients presented SMI (8 diagnosed by exercise stress testing and one by Holter-ECG). The clinical characteristics of these patients are shown in Table 1. Patients with SMI were older, and had a higher frequency of diabetic retinopathy, poorer recent diabetic metabolic control, higher DPP (only ABPM variable that reached statistical significance) (Table 2), and a nonsignificant trend (P=.08) toward longer duration of T2DM.

The DPP showed good discriminative capacity for determining the presence of SMI, as is deduced from the area under the curve (AUC) obtained from the ROC curve (AUC=0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.96; P=.002). The predictive effect was maintained in the logistic regression model after adjusting for age, major cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, smoking, and dyslipidemia) and duration of T2DM, and was significant and independent (odds ratio [OR]=1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.49). An OR of 8.5 (95% CI, 1.7-31.2) was estimated for each 10-mm Hg increase in the DPP, for the risk of presenting SMI. The other variable showing an independent relationship in the model was age (OR=1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.91).

DISCUSSION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus causes earlier and more severe diffuse coronary atherosclerosis that progresses at a faster rate.11 Ischemic heart disease in patients with T2DM is often asymptomatic or shows few symptoms, a fact that can lead to a delay in the diagnosis. Scientific evidence indicates that the diabetic population has the same risk of presenting a first cardiovascular event as nondiabetic patients with established coronary disease.12 A diagnostic strategy that allows detection of coronary disease in the early phases can decrease later complications. Diabetic patients with no history of ischemic heart disease have shown a high incidence of SMI. Our results, in which 19% of patients presented SMI, are in line with those obtained in other studies using a similar diagnostic protocol (12%-22%).3

High blood pressure is a fully established cardiovascular risk factor. Recent debate has focused on the precise component of blood pressure assessment that best predicts the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The latest data from the Framingham Heart Study,12 which are supported by other studies, have indicated that DPP, an indirect measure of arterial rigidity, is a better predictive factor of coronary risk than SAP or DAP alone, at least in persons over 50 years of age; the value of this parameter decreases in younger individuals.13,14

Increased arterial rigidity can be a component of the association between cardiovascular risk factors and the development of atherosclerosis. In our study, DPP was associated with the presence of SMI, independently of the remaining cardiovascular risk factors analyzed or the baseline clinical characteristics of the patients. Although this association does not necessarily predict atheroma plaque vulnerability, plaque rupture, and subsequent coronary syndrome, follow-up studies in patients with T2DM have demonstrated that the DPP is a good predictor of cardiovascular events.7

Although mean SAP was higher in the SMI group, neither this parameter nor DAP, in themselves, were predictive of myocardial ischemia. The related literature contains discordant data on the prognostic value of BP fluctuation patterns determined by ABPM with respect to cardiovascular risk. In a study performed in a hospitalized population, Sander et al15 showed that high BP variation was associated with an increase in cardiovascular events. On the other hand, in a population with hypertension, a wide BP range, and a baseline risk profile, Verdecchia et al16 reported no association between BP fluctuation and an adverse prognosis after adjusting for confounding factors. Our study also found no significant differences between the various ABPM patterns and the incidence of SMI, possibly because of the limited size of the sample.

Taking into account the high risk diabetic patients have of presenting coronary disease, the results of the present study are applicable to this population and to male patients followed up in endocrinology and family medicine services, who have not developed any clinical signs or symptoms of this condition.

In conclusion, the frequency of SMI in patients with T2DM and no history of cardiac disease was 19% in this study. Differential pulse pressure and age were independent predictive factors of SMI. Moreover, SAP or DAP alone were not predictive of myocardial ischemia, and ABPM patterns did not prove to be useful for this purpose.

Dr Antonio Hernández Mijares declares that this study has been carried out with partial support from the FISS project, 04/2175.


Correspondence: Dr. M.J. Gómez Martínez.
Servicio de Cardiología. Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset.
Avda. Gaspar Aguilar, 90. 46017 Valencia. España.
E-mail: magomar@comv.es

Received June 14, 2006
Accepted for publication January 31, 2007

Bibliography
[1]
Sánchez-Recalde A, Kaski JC..
Diabetes mellitus, inflamación y arteriosclerosis coronaria..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 54 (2001), pp. 751-63
[2]
Masiá R, Sala J, Rohlfs I, Piulats R, Manresa JM, Marrugat J, et al..
Prevalencia de diabetes mellitus en la provincia de Girona, España: el estudio REGICOR..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 57 (2004), pp. 261-4
[3]
Wackers FJ, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, Chyun DA, Davey JA, Barrett EJ, et al..
Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic subjects. The DIAD study..
Diabetes Care, 27 (2004), pp. 1934-61
[4]
Faglia E, Favales F, Calia P, Paleari F, Segalini G, Gamba PL, et al..
Cardiac events in 735 type 2 diabetic patients who underwent screening for unknown asymptomatic coronary heart disease. 5-year follow-up report from the Milan Study on Atherosclerosis and Diabetes (MiSAD)..
Diabetes Care, 25 (2002), pp. 2032-6
[5]
Davies RF, Goldberg AD, Forman S, Pepine CJ, Knatterud GL, Geller N, et al..
Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) Study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization..
Circulation, 95 (1997), pp. 2037-43
[6]
Screening for coronary heart disease..
Recommendation statement..
Ann Intern Med, 140 (2004), pp. 569
[7]
Cockcroft JR, Wilkinson IB, Evans M, McEwan P, Peters JR, Davies S, et al..
Pulse pressure predicts cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus..
Am J Hypertens, 18 (2005), pp. 1463-7
[8]
Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (position statement). Diabetes Care. 2004;27 Suppl 1:5-10.
[9]
Arós F, Boraita A, Alegría E, Alonso AM, Bardají A, Lamiel R, et al..
Guías de práctica clínica en pruebas de esfuerzo..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1063-94
[10]
Ortega A, Moreno R, Alonso-Farto JC, Almoguera I, Domínguez P, Bittini A, et al..
Implicaciones de la positividad clínica y eléctrica en la gammagrafía de perfusión miocárdica durante la administración de dipiridamol..
Rev Esp Med Nucl, 20 (2001), pp. 4-10
[11]
Bosch X, Alfonso F, Bermejo J..
Diabetes y enfermedad cardiovascular. Una mirada hacia la nueva epidemia del siglo xxi..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 55 (2002), pp. 525-7
[12]
Haffner SM, Lehto S, Ronnemaa T, Pyorala K, Laakso M..
Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction..
N Engl J Med, 339 (1998), pp. 229-43
[13]
Franklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D..
Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart disease? The Framingham Heart Study..
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 354-60
[14]
Franklin SS, Larson MG, Khan SA, Wong ND, Leip EP, Kannel WB, et al..
Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study..
Circulation, 103 (2001), pp. 1245-9
[15]
Sander D, Kukla C, Klingelhofer J, Winbeck K, Conrad B..
Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis. A 3-year follow-up study..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 1536-41
[16]
Verdecchia P, Borgioni C, Ciucci A, Gattobigio R, Schillaci G, Sacchi N, et al..
Prognostic significance of blood pressure variability in essential hypertension..
Blood Press Monit, 1 (1996), pp. 3-11
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.