ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2024 4.9
Vol. 79. Num. 4.
Pages 290-294 (April 2026)

Editorial
Insights into the 2025 ESC clinical consensus on mental health and cardiovascular disease

Reflexiones sobre el consenso ESC 2025 sobre la enfermedad mental y la enfermedad cardiovascular

SEC Working Group for the 2025 ESC clinical consensus on mental health and cardiovascular disease and SEC Guidelines Committee
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.11.007
Supplementary data
Imagen extra
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2026;79:290-4
WHAT IS NEW?Introduction

This clinical consensus statement emphasizes the bidirectional relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mental health, as demonstrated in certain clinical scenarios, while acknowledging the lack of evidence to guide clinical practice. The working group adopted a Delphi process in which experts in CVD and mental health provided their opinions on areas with limited evidence. An ordinal Likert scale was used, and only recommendations for which at least 75% of experts marked “agree” or “strongly agree” were included.

This document presents 34 recommendations. It offers clinicians a more holistic, patient-centered perspective that considers the patient's overall health, integrating both CVD and mental health in order to address problems more appropriately. This approach represents a paradigm shift.

The relationship between mental and cardiovascular health and disease

Mental health is an integral component of overall health. It exists on a continuum (figure 1), ranging from mental well-being—defined by the World Health Organization as a state that enables people to cope with daily stress, use their abilities, learn and work effectively, and contribute to their community—to various forms of mental health impairment. The optimal end of this continuum is characterized by predominant features of optimism, resilience, and well-being.Mental health conditions (MHC) include psychosocial difficulties and other mental states associated with distress, cognitive impairment, altered emotional or behavioral responses, and risk of self-harm. Mental health disorders (MHD) involve more pronounced alterations in cognition, emotional regulation, or behavior, are usually associated with functional impairment, and encompass “severe mental illness” (SMI), which involves substantial psychosocial functional impairment.

Figure 1.

Central illustration. Relationship between mental illness and cardiovascular disease. CVD, cardiovascular disease; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder. Figure elaborated with data from Bueno et al.1.

(0.59MB).

The objectives of this document are: a) to review the evidence regarding the association between CVD and MHD to increase awareness of this relationship; b) to promote improved mental health screening and management in people with CVD, MHC, and MHD, providing a systematic guide for initial clinical management; and c) to identify gaps in the evidence and research needs to support better health care.

This document reinforces the concepts underlying the interrelationship between CVD and MH, which should be that positive mental health characteristics are associated with better cardiovascular health, whereas acute and chronic CVD events can negatively affect mental health, either worsening pre-existing mental conditions or triggering new ones. The coexistence of CVD, MHC and MHD can interact to worsen the prognosis of both CVD and mental health conditions. People with MHC may experience social and economic deprivation, as well as stigma, stereotypes, and prejudices. Individuals with SMI, in particular, have fewer opportunities to receive adequate diagnostic and therapeutic interventions and consequently experience poorer cardiovascular prevention, care, and outcomes.

Despite this knowledge, multiple problems in clinical practice hinder proper management, such as insufficient awareness among professionals of the prevalence of MHC and MHD in the population and their impact on the risk of developing CVD, as well as a lack of understanding of how these MHC and MHD affect quality of life, therapeutic adherence, and prognosis of CVD. All of this is compounded by inappropriate and nonsystematic screening, assessment, communication, and management of mental health and MHD, which should be integrated into routine clinical practice. Additionally, there is limited knowledge on how to improve and prevent CVD in patients with MHC or MHD, and conversely, how to enhance mental health and resilience in individuals with CVD.

Cardiovascular care is optimal when it is person-centered and aims to improve overall health, not just cardiovascular health. This document emphasizes the need for close collaboration between professionals who treat CVD and mental health issues. In this regard, it advocates for the creation of a psycho-cardio team composed of psychiatrists, psychologists, specialists in the cardiovascular field, nurses, social workers, primary care teams, and other allied professionals. This multidisciplinary psycho-cardio team should adhere to the ACTIVE principles, which consist of:

  • -

    Acknowledging the relationship between CVD and mental illness.

  • -

    Checking for mental health symptoms or conditions in CVD patients and cardiovascular symptoms during mental health follow-up.

  • -

    Tools: using validated tools to screen and diagnose mental health symptoms and conditions.

  • -

    Implementing person-centered management through shared decision-making and stepped care approaches.

  • -

    Venture to change cardiovascular care by implementing the structural and functional changes needed to integrate mental health care within cardiovascular practice.

  • -

    Evaluating the need for educational support and adjustments in management and to improve cardiovascular and mental health outcomes.

Impact of mental health on the risk of developing CVDMental health conditions as a determinant of cardiovascular risk

The guidelines stress that positive mental health—optimism, life satisfaction, and psychological resilience—is associated with healthier cardiovascular profiles and a reduced incidence of major adverse events. Conversely, psychosocial stressors such as work strain, unemployment, financial insecurity, discrimination, and adverse childhood experiences significantly increase the risk for hypertension, coronary artery disease, and premature mortality. Loneliness and social isolation are highlighted as being particularly important, especially in older adults.

MHC such as depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are consistently associated with an elevated incidence of CVD, independent of conventional risk factors. The underlying mechanisms involve autonomic dysregulation, systemic inflammation, and metabolic alterations, combined with maladaptive behaviors such as smoking, inactivity, and an unhealthy diet. The guidelines recommend the systematic assessment of psychosocial risks as part of preventive cardiology, with early interventions including counseling, stress management, and social support.

Mental health and mental health conditions in people with cardiovascular disease

The document stresses that CVD per se frequently triggers MHD. Acute cardiac events can evoke intense fear and grief, while chronic conditions such as heart failure undermine self-image and independence. Depression affects nearly 1 in 5 individuals with CVD, with a higher prevalence in women and younger patients. Depression independently predicts mortality, recurrent events, and impaired quality of life. The most common type of depression observed following acute coronary syndromes is “adjustment disorder with depressed mood”. Anxiety disorders, also common after acute coronary syndromes, similarly impair prognosis and adherence.

PTSD following myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, or device shocks is increasingly recognized, affecting up to a third of patients. Loneliness and chronic stress further worsen outcomes and complicate adherence to medication, lifestyle changes, and participation in rehabilitation programs. Importantly, the guidelines note that caregivers of patients with CVD are themselves at high risk of psychological distress.

Identification and screening of mental health problems

The ESC guidelines emphasize the importance of diagnosing MHD in patients with CVD. Emotional risk factors are now widely recognized as determinants that influence not only the onset and prognosis of CVD but also postevent care and treatment adherence.

Consequently, systematic screening in patients with cardiovascular conditions is essential for identifying symptoms related to the most prevalent emotional disorders, anxiety and depression.

Regarding screening, the document highlights the usefulness of brief instruments that can detect these disorders and, when screening results are positive, facilitate referral to mental health professionals. The guidelines specifically mentions 3 questionnaires: the Whooley questions, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2, followed by PHQ-7 if it is positive, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-2, followed by GAD-7 if it is positive. The Whooley questions include: “during the past month, have you often been bothered by: feeling down, depressed or hopeless, or by having little interest or pleasure in doing things?” Both the GAD (2- and 7-item versions) for anxiety and the PHQ (2- and 9-item versions) for depression demonstrate good sensitivity and specificity in individuals with CVD. The generic Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire is also noted as a reliable and valid tool in this patient population.

The guidelines suggest that assessment should be conducted at several time points following a new cardiovascular event (at diagnosis and during hospitalization, at follow-up—annually—or or anytime based on clinical judgment).

Overall, the guidelines advocate for early, systematic, and repeated screening to ensure that MHD are not overlooked and can be appropriately managed.

Management of mental health conditions in people with CVD

The guideline outlines a comprehensive stepped-care model for managing MHC in patients with CVD. This approach prioritizes the importance of person-centered care that integrates effective communication, psychological interventions, lifestyle modifications, and, when necessary, medical treatments.

Effective communication is encouraged to demonstrate empathy and active listening to understand the patient's emotional and psychological responses to CVD. Psychoeducation is recommended as a preventive measure, helping to alleviate patient anxieties by providing clear information about their condition.

The consensus also highlights the role of various psychological interventions. Cognitive-behavioral therapy is noted for its effectiveness in improving symptoms of depression and anxiety, although its impact on major adverse cardiac events is recognized as having limited evidence. Furthermore, social prescribing can enhance mental and social well-being.

The recommendations also strongly advise lifestyle interventions, including physical activity, diet, and stress management techniques such as mindfulness and meditation.

There are a range of tools and resources that can support patient care, such as digital tools and motivational interviewing for lifestyle changes. Cardiac rehabilitation programs are identified as an ideal setting for integrating mental health support into a patient's overall care plan.

Pharmacological treatment is an option, but the consensus strongly advises careful assessment of risks and benefits, particularly regarding potential drug-drug interactions.

Severe mental illness and cardiovascular disease

Cardiovascular risk is increased in patients with SMI (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe recurrent major depression). Furthermore, mortality is 2.5 times higher; cardiovascular events, especially in young people, are 2 to 3 times more frequent, and sudden death is 2 to 4 times more common compared with the general population. The etiology is multifactorial, including genetic factors, a sedentary lifestyle, and the effects of the disease itself on the acquisition of risk factors (smoking is 5 times more prevalent in patients with schizophrenia, and hypertension is more common in patients with bipolar disorder). There is also poorer metabolic control and possible adverse effects from the use of some therapies for mental illness.

However, antipsychotics can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events and improve adherence, as well as enhance control of associated cardiovascular risk factors. Occasionally, some therapies lead to weight gain and can worsen metabolic control. When using therapies with a risk of cardiovascular complications, the increased incidence of tachycardia should be considered. Atrial fibrillation is also more common due to the use of some therapies, but it does not appear to be directly related to the disease. For all these reasons, monitoring of risk factors is recommended at 3 months after starting psychiatric treatment. Electrocardiograms are also recommended at baseline, at 1 week, at 6 to 12 weeks, and annually thereafter if treatments that can prolong the QT interval or cause other rhythm disturbances or arrhythmias are used. Medication should be discontinued if the QT is> 500ms or if it increases above baseline QT by 60-70ms.

It is very important not to adopt paternalistic attitudes with these patients, but rather to respect their will and preferences to promote their self-determination and dignity.2 Therefore, their opinions should be consulted regarding treatments or techniques, as with any other patient, except in exceptional cases involving the legal guardian for those who have been deemed incapable of consent due to their illness.

These guidelines, while based on expert recommendations rather than research evidence, provide much-needed guidance for the management of patients with CVD and SMI. Thus, they urge clinicians to act similarly to how they would with any other patient, emphasizing the importance of both pharmacological and behavioral therapy.

It is essential for patients with CVD and SMI to implement standard preventive strategies within the context of a multidisciplinary psycho-cardio team.

Mental health in specific populations

Due to the bilateral relationship between mental health and CVD, factors such as socioeconomic context, gender, comorbidities, frailty, and comedication can directly impact both conditions (figure 1).

Socioeconomic factors such as financial insecurity, pollution, lack of green spaces, lack of healthy food, and low educational levels have been shown to have a negative impact. Thus, it has been observed that people with MHD are more vulnerable, in addition to facing various stereotypes and prejudices, which negatively impact cardiovascular health.

Migrant and refugee populations are particularly vulnerable groups. This is due to language barriers, greater difficulty in accessing the health care system, and higher levels of discrimination contribute to the increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and MHD (especially higher rates of depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and CVD). Adapting interventions culturally is a key strategy to reduce these inequities.

In older populations, CVD, MHC and MHD significantly worsen clinical outcomes and quality of life. Frailty has a direct impact on both mental health and CVD. Comedication and drug interactions can also affect CVD and mental health.

It is also important to highlight sex differences in both CVD and MHD (figure 1). In populations with CVD, depression is twice as common in women as in men, increasing the risk of acute coronary syndromes and mortality. Biological factors, such as menopause and social factors, such as social roles, work stress, and intimate partner violence, further increase sex differences. Conversely, although men have lower rates of depression, they can experience erectile dysfunction, an early marker of CVD. In addition, women with arrhythmias show higher levels of anxiety and depression, especially at older ages or in situations of loneliness. Tako-tsubo syndrome, or “broken heart syndrome,” is 8 times more frequent in women and is strongly associated with psychosocial stress. In heart failure, women have more psychological symptoms and higher rates of hospital readmission.

Furthermore, in sex-specific heart diseases such as peripartum cardiomyopathy, there is an association with postpartum depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder.

Transgender people have a 40% higher risk of CVD and MHD due to discrimination and marginalization.

For all these reasons, it is recommended to carry out a comprehensive patient evaluation and adapt treatment to patients’ sociocultural contexts.

In addition, psychological stressors associated with socioeconomic deprivation can exacerbate the risk of CVD and the risk of stress, depression, and anxiety.3 Socioeconomic deprivation hampers access to mental health and cardiovascular care systems.

It is recommended to adapt clinical advice and behavioral change strategies to patients’ circumstances. In the field of cardio-oncology, cancer diagnosis and treatment-related toxicity generate high levels of stress and anxiety, which may trigger acute cardiovascular events. Likewise, cancer survivors are at increased risk of depression and fear of recurrence, both of which negatively affect cardiovascular health and quality of life. Again, a multidisciplinary approach is essential.

CONSEQUENCES OF THE APPLICATION OF THE GUIDELINES IN OUR ENVIRONMENT

The 2025 ESC guidelines call for routine screening for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder in cardiovascular care, using validated tools embedded in standard follow-up. They recommend creating integrated psycho-cardio pathways in which cardiologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, and other professionals collaborate to deliver person-centered interventions.

For successful implementation, health systems must normalize mental and psychosocial assessment as part of cardiovascular care, train professionals to address mental health proactively, and reduce stigma in both patients and providers. Integrating these recommendations into routine clinical practice is essential to improve adherence, outcomes, and overall quality of life in people living with or at risk of CVD.

In summary, the authors emphasize the core message of a stepped-care approach. This approach reiterates that psychological interventions can significantly improve mental health symptoms and quality of life in CVD patients. The consensus also stresses the need to balance the risks and benefits of pharmacological treatments. It highlights the importance of supporting caregivers and emphasizes the need to address the specific requirements of diverse patient populations, including those with SMI, older adults, and individuals facing socioeconomic deprivation.

However, the consensus concludes by noting that implementing these changes may require significant organizational and country-specific measures. Currently, the only clinical setting where this dual approach is being applied with a psycho-cardio team is cardiac rehabilitation. This opens up a new opportunity to expand this holistic approach to the largest possible number of patients.

Moreover, implementing the cognitive-behavioral approaches and motivational interviewing advocated in this document will require additional time, personnel, and a restructuring of our current organizational model of care.

On the other hand, these guidelines emphasize financial and social constraints. However, our health system, unlike others, does offer coverage for mental health and SMI.

GAPS IN EVIDENCE

It should be noted that this document does not address organic mental disorders or dementia-related cognitive decline. Moreover, one of the more common disorders significantly impacting CVD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, is not included. In this regard, the review of the results of the Horizon 2020 project TIMESPAN4–6 is recommended.

Regarding the therapeutic approach, unresolved evidence gaps remain, including the most effective strategies for posttraumatic stress disorder in cardiac populations, the impact of early preventive psychosocial interventions, and structured caregiver support.

In summary, these guidelines emphasize the relationship between mental and cardiovascular disease, promoting careful assessment by professionals in both fields, with early structured screening and a collaborative approach in a psycho-cardio team to improve the prognosis of our patients.

FUNDING

None.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

No artificial intelligence was used to generate the content of this article.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The conflict-of-interest declaration documents for all authors are available in the supplementary data.

Appendix A
AUTHORS

SEC Guidelines Committee: Pablo Avanzas (president), Pilar Mazon (secretary), Rut Andrea Riba, Marisol Bravo Amaro, Alberto Cordero Fort, Marisa Crespo, Javier Jiménez-Candil, María Antonia Martínez Momblan, Sonia Mirabet, Juan Sanchis Forés, Marta Sitges Carreño, José M. de la Torre, Javier Torres Llergo, and David Vivas.

SEC Working Group for the 2025 ESC clinical consensus on mental health and cardiovascular disease: Marisol Bravo Amaro (coordinator), Marina Díaz Marsá (coordinator), Vicente Arrarte Esteban, Clara Bonanad Lozano, Guillermo Moreno Muñoz, Cristina Prieto Fernández, José Antonio Ramos Quiroga, Virginia Soria Tomás.

APPENDIX B
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2025.11.007

References
[1]
H. Bueno, C. Deaton, M. Farrero, et al.
2025 ESC Clinical Consensus Statement on mental health and cardiovascular disease: developed under the auspices of the ESC Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee.
Eur Heart J., (2025), 46 pp. 4156-4225
[2]
G. Szmukler.
Capacity”, “best interests” “will and preferences” and the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities.
World Psychiatry., (2019), 18 pp. 34-41
[3]
J. Hua, R. Shen, X. Guo, et al.
The mediating role of depression in the association between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: A nationwide cross-sectional study from NHANES 2005-2018.
J Affect Disord., (2024), 366 pp. 466-473
[4]
Management of chronic cardiometabolic disease and treatment discontinuity in adults with ADHD; TIMESPAN. Available at: https://timespan.eu. Consulted: 10 Oct 2025.
[5]
H. Yao, I. Brikell, H. Larsson, et al.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and cardiometabolic risk profile in patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the SWEDEHEART registry.
Eur J Prev Cardiol., (2025),
[6]
H. Larsson.
How can we improve the management of individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorders and co-occurring cardiometabolic disease?.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther., (2023), 21 pp. 725-728

SEE RELATED CONTENT: https://secardiologia.es/cientifico/guias-clinicas/miscelanea/15963-2025-esc-clinical-consensus-statement-on-mental-health-and-cardiovascular-disease

All the authors of this article are listed in alphabetical order in appendix A.

Corresponding autor.

E-mail addresses: maria.sol.bravo.amaro@sergas.es (M. Bravo Amaro); marinadiazmarsa20@gmail.com (M. Díaz Marsá).

Copyright © 2025. Sociedad Española de Cardiología