ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 69. Num. 2.
Pages 141-148 (February 2016)

Original article
Conduction Abnormalities and Pacemaker Implantations After SAPIEN 3 Vs SAPIEN XT Prosthesis Aortic Valve Implantation

Trastornos de la conducción e implante de marcapasos tras implante de válvula aórtica SAPIEN 3 comparada con la SAPIEN XT

Oliver HusseraThorsten KessleraChristof BurgdorfaChristian TemplinbCostanza PellegriniaSimon SchneidercAlbert Markus KaselaAdnan KastratiadHeribert SchunkertadChristian Hengstenbergad
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2016;69:45510.1016/j.rec.2015.12.010
Ramón Rodríguez-Olivares, Freek Nijhoff, Peter R. Stella

Options

Abstract
Introduction and objectives

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is increasingly used in patients with aortic stenosis. Post-procedural intraventricular conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker implantations remain a serious concern. Recently, the Edwards SAPIEN 3 prosthesis has replaced the SAPIEN XT. We sought to determine the incidences of new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities and permanent pacemaker implantations by comparing the 2 devices.

Methods

We analyzed the last consecutive 103 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with SAPIEN XT before SAPIEN 3 was used in the next 105 patients. To analyze permanent pacemaker implantations and new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities, patients with these conditions at baseline were excluded. Electrocardiograms were recorded at baseline, after the procedure, and before discharge.

Results

SAPIEN 3 was associated with higher device success (100% vs 92%; P=.005) and less paravalvular leakage (0% vs 7%; P<.001). The incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations was 12.6% (23 of 183) with no difference between the 2 groups (SAPIEN 3: 12.5% [12 of 96] vs SAPIEN XT: 12.6% [11 of 87]; P=.99). SAPIEN 3 was associated with a higher rate of new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities (49% vs 27%; P=.007) due to a higher rate of fascicular blocks (17% vs 5%; P=.021). There was no statistically significant difference in transient (29% [20 of 69] vs persistent 19% [12 of 64]; P=.168) left bundle branch blocks (28% [19 of 69] vs 17% [11 of 64]; P=.154) when SAPIEN 3 was compared with SAPIEN XT.

Conclusions

We found a trend toward a higher rate of new-onset intraventricular conduction abnormalities with SAPIEN 3 compared with SAPIEN XT, although this did not result in a higher permanent pacemaker implantation rate.

Keywords

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Pacemaker
Conduction abnormalities
Edwards SAPIEN 3
Edwards SAPIEN XT

Identify yourself

Not yet a subscriber to the journal?

Purchase access to the article

By purchasing the article, the PDF of the same can be downloaded

Price: 19,34 €

Phone for incidents

Monday to Friday from 9am to 6pm (GMT+1) except for the months of July and August, which will be from 9am to 3pm

Calls from Spain 932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain +34 932 415 960
Copyright © 2015. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?