ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 72. Num. 9.
Pages 777 (September 2019)

Ecg contest
ECG, September 2019

ECG de septiembre de 2019

Albert Massó-van RoesselAntoni Perelló-BordoyJulián Palacios-Rubio
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2019;72:86710.1016/j.rec.2018.10.014
Albert Massó-van Roessel, Toni Perelló-Bordoy, Julián Palacios-Rubio

Options

A 57-year-old man with permanent atrial fibrillation and severe systolic dysfunction due to ischemic heart disease and heart failure was implanted with a Medtronic Amplia cardiac resynchronization therapy device (Medtronic; Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States) with no incidents. On the night of the procedure, the duty cardiologist was alerted because of pauses in the telemetry recording (Figure 1).

Figure 1
(0.31MB).

Based on the telemetry, what was the correct diagnosis and what might have happened?

  • 1.

    Capture failure has occurred, possibly because of incorrect placement or electrode dislocation.

  • 2.

    Loss of capture has occurred in the right ventricle, but the device is functioning normally.

  • 3.

    Loss of capture has occurred in the left ventricle, but the device is functioning normally.

  • 4.

    This is an inappropriate telemetry warning due to poor differentiation between spikes and QRS.

Submit your answer to http://www.revespcardiol.org/en/electroreto/72/9. The answer will be published in the next issue (October 2019). #RetoECG.

Copyright © 2018. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?