Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Visits
Not available
Vol. 71. Issue 5.
Pages 335-343 (May 2018)
Original article
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.08.001
Full text access
IVUS Findings in Late and Very Late Stent Thrombosis. A Comparison Between Bare-metal and Drug-eluting Stents
Hallazgos por IVUS en trombosis de stent tardía y muy tardía. Comparación entre stents metálicos y farmacoactivos
Visits
...
Lara Fuentesa,,
Corresponding author
castillo@gmail.com

Corresponding author: Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08097 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
, Josep Gómez-Laraa,, Neus Salvatellab, Nieves Gonzaloc, Felipe Hernández-Hernándezd, Eduard Fernández-Nofreriase, Ángel Sánchez-Recaldef, Fernando Alfonsog, Rafael Romagueraa, José Luis Ferreiroa, Gerard Rouraa, Luis Teruela, Montserrat Gracidaa, Ana Lucrecia Marcanoa, Joan-Antoni Gómez-Hospitala, Ángel Cequiera
a Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d’ Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
b Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
c Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
d Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
e Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
f Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
g Departamento de Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
...
Visits
(Daily data update)
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Clinical, Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics
Table 2. Qualitative Intravascular Ultrasound Findings
Table 3. Quantitative Intravascular Ultrasound Findings
Show moreShow less
Abstract
Introduction and objectives

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a life-threatening complication after stent implantation. Intravascular ultrasound is able to discern most causes of ST. The aim of this study was to compare intravascular ultrasound findings between bare-metal stents (BMS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with late (31 days to 1 year) or very late ST (> 1 year).

Methods

Of 250 consecutive patients with late or very late ST in 7 Spanish institutions, 114 patients (45.5% BMS and 54.5% DES) were imaged with intravascular ultrasound. Off-line intravascular ultrasound analysis was performed to assess malapposition, underexpansion, and neoatherosclerosis.

Results

The median time from stent implantation to ST was 4.0 years with BMS and 3.4 years with DES (P = .04). Isolated malapposition was similarly observed in both groups (36.5% vs 46.8%; P = .18) but was numerically lower with BMS (26.6% vs 48.0%; P = .07) in patients with very late ST. Isolated underexpansion was similarly observed in both groups (13.5% vs 11.3%; P = .47). Isolated neoatherosclerosis occurred only in patients with very late ST and was more prevalent with BMS (22.9%) than with DES (6.0%); P = .02. At 2.9 years’ follow-up, there were 0% and 6.9% cardiac deaths, respectively (P = .06) and recurrent ST occurred in 4.0% and 5.2% of patients, respectively (P = .60).

Conclusions

Malapposition was the most common finding in patients with late and very late ST and is more prevalent with DES in very late ST. In contrast, neoatherosclerosis was exclusively observed in patients with very late ST and mainly with BMS.

Keywords:
Bare-metal stents
Drug-eluting stents
Intravascular ultrasound
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Stent thrombosis
Abbreviations:
BMS
DES
IVUS
PCI
ST
Resumen
Introducción y objetivos

La trombosis de stent (TS) es una complicación grave tras la angioplastia coronaria, y la ecografía intravascular es una herramienta capaz de discernir las causas. El objetivo es comparar los hallazgos por ecografía intravascular entre stents metálicos (SM) y stents farmacoactivos (SFA) en pacientes con TS tardía (de 31 días a 1 año) o muy tardía (>1año).

Métodos

Se incluyó a 114 pacientes (el 45,5% con SM y el 54,5% con SFA) de un total de 250 consecutivos con TS tardía o muy tardía en 7 hospitales españoles. Se realizó una ecografía intravascular, que se analizó posteriormente para detectar la presencia de malaposición, infraexpansión y neoateroesclerosis.

Resultados

El tiempo hasta la TS fue de 4,0 años en los SM y 3,4 años en los SFA (p = 0,04). La malaposición fue similar en ambos grupos (el 36,5 frente al 46,8%; p = 0,18), aunque numéricamente menor en los SM con trombosis muy tardía (el 26,6 frente al 48,0%; p = 0,07). La infraexpansión se observó de manera similar en ambos grupos (el 13,5 frente al 11,3%; p = 0,47). La neoateroesclerosis solo se observó en TS muy tardías y fue más prevalente en los SM (22,9%) que en los SFA (6,0%; p = 0,02). A los 2,9 años de seguimiento, las muertes cardiacas eran 0 frente a 6,9% respectivamente (p = 0,06) y las recurrencias de TS se produjeron en el 4,0 frente al 5,2% (p = 0,60).

Conclusiones

La malaposición es el hallazgo más frecuente en los pacientes con TS tardía y muy tardía, más prevalente en los SFA con TS muy tardías. Sin embargo, la neoateroesclerosis se observó únicamente en pacientes con TS muy tardías, y principalmente en SM.

Palabras clave:
Stents metálicos
Stents farmacoactivos
Ecografía intravascular
Intervención coronaria percutánea
Trombosis de stent
Full Text
INTRODUCTION

Stent thrombosis (ST) is a rare but life-threatening complication that usually results in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The mortality rate is around 20% to 40%.1,2 Definite late and very late ST are defined as the presence of angiographic or pathologic intrastent thrombus occurring later than 1 month after the index percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).3 The incidence of ST has been reduced in the last few years by the emergence of new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) and contemporary antithrombotic therapies.4–6

The etiology of ST is usually multifactorial.7 Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an intracoronary imaging tool able to characterize vessel wall remodeling and to discern most causes of ST, such as persistent or late incomplete stent/strut apposition (malapposition), underexpansion, and neoatherosclerosis. Intravascular ultrasound can also predict cardiovascular events at follow-up in patients treated with IVUS-guided PCI.8 Current myocardial revascularization guidelines recommend the use of intravascular imaging techniques to detect stent-related mechanical problems (class IIa, level of evidence C).9 Assessment of causes of ST may help to select the best treatment strategy for each case. Treatment with balloon angioplasty without additional stent implantation has been associated with greater resolution of malapposition and stent underexpansion than treatment with additional stent implantation in the assessment of the posttreatment results with IVUS. In contrast, patients with neoatherosclerosis could benefit from additional stent implantation.10

Little is known about differences in the prevalence, timing, and causes of late and very late ST between bare-metal stent (BMS) and DES. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, angiographic, and IVUS findings between BMS or DES in patients with definite late and very late ST.

METHODSPopulation and Procedure Characteristics

All patients with angiographic late or very late ST (≥ 1 month) were prospectively included in 7 Spanish Institutions from January 2008 to December 2012. Late ST are those occurring between 31 days to 1 year after stent implantation, whereas very late ST are those occurring > 1 year after stent implantation.3 All Institutions participating in the study were high-volume centers (> 500 PCI/y) with high use of IVUS for complex PCI.11 A total of 250 consecutive eligible patients presented with definite late or very late ST as defined by the Academic Research Consortium (0.69% of all PCIs performed by all institutions participating in the study). Of these, 117 lesions in 116 patients were imaged with IVUS. Three of these patients were excluded from the analysis due to lack of information on the stent type. The patient flowchart is shown in Figure 1. Most of the excluded patients were those seeking medical attention during off-office hours or were hemodynamically unstable. This study was approved by the local ethics committee of all participating institutions and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Figure 1.

Patient flowchart. CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ST, stent thrombosis.

(0.1MB).

Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed according to the standard practices in each participating center and the treatment of the ST was left to the operator's discretion after “on-line” evaluation of IVUS images.

Intravascular Ultrasound Acquisition and Analysis

IVUS imaging was performed after the restoration of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≥ 2 with thrombus aspiration or percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty. IVUS acquisition was performed with the Atlantis 40MHz catheter (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, United States).

Image acquisition was done using an automated pullback system transducer with a pullback speed of 0.5mm/s except for 1 institution that performed IVUS recording at 1mm/s. The image data were digitally recorded for “off-line” analysis.

“Off-line” IVUS analysis was performed by 2 experienced analysts blinded to the type of stent implanted using quantitative IVUS analysis software (QIvus 3.0, Medis, Leiden, The Netherlands). All analyses were performed by a local core laboratory (BARCICORE-lab, Barcelona, Spain). The stent segment was defined by the stent edges. The proximal and distal reference segments were defined as the 5mm proximal and distal to the stent edges whenever possible.

Before the quantitative analysis, the 2 operators were requested to qualitatively evaluate the IVUS pullback and to identify 5 IVUS findings: malapposition, aneurysms, stent fracture, stent underexpansion, and neoatherosclerosis. Malapposition was defined as a separation of at least 1 metallic strut from the vessel wall in the absence of a side branch. Aneurysms were defined as lesions that included all layers of the vessel wall with an external elastic membrane and lumen area > 50% larger than the proximal reference segment.12,13 Stent fracture was defined as a 0.5-mm gap within the stent segment. Stent underexpansion was defined when the minimal stent area was ≤ 80% of the reference lumen area. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as the presence of clear intrastent plaque with lipid or calcium echogenic characteristics.14,15 Examples of each IVUS finding are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Qualitative intravascular ultrasound findings. A: malapposition. B: malapposition + aneurysm. C: underexpansion. D: calcified neoatherosclerosis plaque.

(0.23MB).

Quantitative measurements of lumen, stent, vessel (external elastic membrane), malapposition, and neointimal areas were performed according to standard procedures.12,16 The reference lumen area was obtained by the mean of the largest lumen area measured within the 5mm proximal and distal segments.12

Clinical Follow-up

Major adverse cardiac events at follow-up were defined as death, recurrent ST, or target lesion revascularization. Clinical events and follow-up information were obtained from telephone interviews with the patients or their relatives and from hospital records.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS Statistics package, version 20.0 (IBM Corp Armonk, New York, United States). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to evaluate the normality assumptions of all continuous variables. Continuous variables are reported as the mean ± 1 standard deviation or interquartile range when nonnormally distributed. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages. If the data were normally distributed, the Student t test was used to assess differences in continuous variables between the DES- and BMS-treated groups. The Wilcoxon test was used in nonnormally distributed variables. Comparisons between categorical variables were performed with the chi-square test. Event-free survival curves were generated with Kaplan-Meier analysis, and survival curves among groups were compared using the log-rank test. A 2-sided P value < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTSBaseline Clinical and Angiographic Characteristics at the Time of Stent Implantation

A total of 114 lesions in 113 patients with late or very late ST were included in the present study: 52 (45.5%) were BMS and 62 (54.5%) were DES. Baseline clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics are shown in Table 1. Bare-metal stents were more often implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (73.1% vs 36.1%; P < .01) and in the right coronary artery (46.2% vs 21.0%; P = .04) at the index procedure. The minimum stent diameter was higher in the BMS group than in the DES group (3.2 ± 0.5mm vs 2.8 ± 0.4mm; P < .01). First-generation DES were used in 67% of the patients in the DES group.

Table 1.

Clinical, Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics

n = 114 lesions  All patients  BMS (n = 52)  DES (n = 62)  P 
Clinical and angiographic characteristics at the time of stent implantation
Clinical indication        < .001 
Silent or stable angina  20 (17.7)  7 (13.5)  13 (21.3)   
NSTEMI ACS  33 (29.2)  7 (13.5)  26 (42.6)   
STEMI ACS  60 (53.1)  38 (73.0)  22 (36.1)   
Culprit artery        .040 
LAD  65 (57.0)  23 (44.2)  42 (67.7)   
LCx  10 (8.8)  5 (9.6)  5 (8.1)   
RCA  37 (32.5)  24 (46.2)  13 (21.0)   
Left main  1 (0.9)  0 (0.0)  1 (1.6)   
Vein graft  1 (0.9)  0 (0.0)  1 (1.6)   
DES type
PES  NA  NA  28 (46.0)  NA 
SES  NA  NA  13 (21.0)  NA 
EES  NA  NA  13 (21.0)  NA 
ZES  NA  NA  4 (6.0)  NA 
Others  NA  NA  4 (6.0)  NA 
Number of stents  1.3 ± 0.5  1.2 ± 0.5  1.4 ± 0.6  .122 
Total stent length, mm  26 ± 11.9  23.2 ± 7.6  27.8 ± 16.0  .085 
Minimal stent diameter, mm  3.0 ± 0.50  3.2 ± 0.50  2.8 ± 0.34  < .001 
Clinical characteristics at the time of stent thrombosis
Age, y  61.7 [52.0-70.3]  61.7 [50.7-71.1]  61.3 [52.5-69.4]  .432 
Men  105 (92.1)  50 (96.2)  55 (88.7)  .142 
Hypertension  74 (64.9)  36 (69.2)  38 (61.3)  .376 
Hypercholesterolemia  84 (73.7)  36 (69.2)  48 (77.4)  .323 
Diabetes mellitus  40 (35.1)  12 (23.1)  28 (45.2)  .014 
Smoking status        .021 
Never  24 (21.1)  10 (19.2)  14 (22.6)   
Previous smoker  44 (38.6)  27 (51.9)  17 (27.4)   
Current smoker  46 (40.3)  15 (28.9)  31 (50.0)   
Previous myocardial infarction  91 (80.5)  46 (88.5)  45 (73.9)  .049 
Previous coronary artery bypass graft  4 (3.5)  1 (1.9)  3 (4.8)  .399 
Body mass index  27 [24.5-29.9]  27.5 [25.1-29.4]  27.8 [24.5-31.2]  .293 
Ejection fraction, %  55 [46.5-60.0]  50 [45.0-56.5]  56 [45.0-60.0]  .136 
Creatinine clearance, mL/min  82.7 [59.2-96.7]  83.1 [57.5-98.5]  80.1 [58.5-97.2]  .867 
Current antiplatelet therapy        .048 
None  12 (10.5)  2 (3.9)  10 (16.1)   
Monotherapy  85 (74.6)  44 (84.6)  41 (66.1)   
Dual antiplatelet therapy  17 (14.9)  6 (11.5)  11 (17.8)   
Time to thrombosis, y  3.6 [0.9-5.7]  4.0 [0.6-7.7]  3.4 [1.4-5.2]  .035 
Late stent thrombosis  29 (25.4)  17 (32.7)  12 (19.4)  .132 
Very late stent thrombosis  85 (74.6)  35 (67.3)  50 (80.6)   
Clinical presentation        .471 
NSTEMI ACS  19 (16.7)  7 (13.5)  10 (16.1)   
STEMI  95 (83.3)  43 (82.7)  52 (83.9)   
Killip class        .093 
I-II  103 (90.3)  50 (96.2)  53 (85.5)   
III-IV  11 (9.7)  2 (3.8)  9 (14.5)   
Angiographic and procedural characteristics at the time of the stent thrombosis
TIMI flow before treatment        .047 
82 (71.9)  42 (80.8)  40 (64.5)   
6 (5.3)  1 (1.9)  5 (8.1)   
8 (7.0)  5 (9.6)  3 (4.8)   
18 (15.8)  4 (7.7)  14 (22.6)   
Thromboaspiration  89 (78.1)  42 (80.8)  47 (75.8)  .524 
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors  73 (64.0)  32 (61.5)  41 (66.1)  .611 
Additional stent  53 (46.5)  28 (53.8)  25 (40.3)  .149 
Number of additional stents  1.3 ± 0.7  1.4 ± 0.7  1.2 ± 0.6  .318 
Additional stent type         
BMS  26 (22.8)  14 (26.9)  12 (19.3)  .392 
DES  27 (23.7)  14 (26.9)  13 (21.0)   
TIMI flow after treatment        .107 
≤ 2  4 (3.5)  3 (5.8)  1 (1.6)   
110 (96.5)  49 (94.2)  61 (98.4)   

ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BMS, bare-metal stents; DES, drug-eluting stents; EES, everolimus-eluting stent; LAD, left anterior descending artery; LCx, left circumflex; NA, non applicable; NSTEMI, non—ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PES, paclitaxel-eluting stent; RCA, right coronary artery; SES, sirolimus-eluting stent; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; ZES, zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Data are expressed as No. (%), mean ± standard deviation, or median [interquartile range].

Clinical and Angiographic Characteristics at the Time of Stent Thrombosis

Overall, ST occurred at a median of 3.6 years (range, 0.9-5.7 years) after the index PCI. However, ST occurred later in the BMS group (4.0 years; range, 0.6-7.7 years) than in the DES group (3.4 years; range, 1.4-5.2 years); P = .04. The clinical presentation at the time of ST was acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 83.3% of patients and non—ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 16.7% of patients, with no differences between treatment groups.

Clinical characteristics at the time of the ST were similar between the 2 stent types except for diabetes mellitus (23.1% in the BMS group vs 45.2% in the DES group, P = .01), smoking status (28.9% of current smokers in the BMS group vs 50.0% in the DES group; P = .02), and history of previous myocardial infarction (88.5% vs 73.9%: P = .05), respectively. Most of the patients were on single antiplatelet therapy at admission (74.6%). A total of 10.5% were not receiving any antiplatelet drug; among these, there was a larger proportion of patients in the BMS group (16.1%) than in the DES group (3.9%); P = .05.

At the time of the ST, BMS patients more often had total occlusion of the target vessel with TIMI flow 0 before treatment (80.8% vs 64.5%; P = .05, respectively). A total of 53 lesions (46.5%) were treated with an additional stent implantation, with a numeric difference between groups (53.8% vs 40.3%; P = .15, respectively).

Intravascular Ultrasound Findings

Qualitative IVUS findings including all possible combinations of the selected IVUS parameters are summarized in Table 2. All patients had IVUS acquisition before treatment. In 10 of the patients (8.6%), none of the predefined qualitative IVUS findings were observed: 1.9% in the BMS group vs 14.5% in the DES group, P = .02.

Table 2.

Qualitative Intravascular Ultrasound Findings

  OverallLate ST (1-12 months)
n = 29
Very late ST (≥ 1 year)
n = 85
  All lesions
(n = 114) 
BMS
(n = 52) 
DES
(n = 62) 
P  BMS
(n = 17) 
DES
(n = 12) 
P  BMS
(n = 35) 
DES
(n = 50) 
P 
None  10 (8.8)  1 (1.9)  9 (14.5)  .018  0 (0.0)  0 (0.0)  NA  1 (2.9)  9 (18.0)  .033 
Isolated malapposition  48 (42.1)  19 (36.5)  29 (46.8)  .270  9 (52.9)  5 (41.7)  .550  10 (28.6)  24 (48.0)  .072 
Isolated underexpansion  14 (12.3)  7 (13.5)  7 (11.3)  .725  1 (5.9)  2 (16.7)  .553  6 (17.1)  5 (10.0)  .334 
Isolated neoatherosclerosis  11 (9.6)  8 (15.4)  3 (4.8)  .050  0 (0.0)  0 (0.0)  NA  8 (22.9)  3 (6.0)  .023 
Malapposition + aneurysm  11 (9.6)  7 (13.5)  4 (6.5)  .207  3 (17.6)  0 (0.0)  .246  4 (11.4)  4 (8.0)  .712 
Malapposition + underexpansion  11 (9.6)  4 (7.7)  7 (11.3)  .517  3 (17.6)  4 (33.3)  .403  1 (2.9)  3 (6.0)  .640 
Underexpansion + neoatherosclerosis  3 (2.6)  1 (1.9)  2 (3.2)  0 (0.0)  0 (0.0)  NA  1 (2.9)  2 (4.0) 
Malapposition + neoatherosclerosis  2 (1.8)  2 (3.8)  0 (0.0)  .206  0 (0.0)  0 (0.0)  NA  2 (5.7)  0 (0.0)  .167 
Other combinations  4 (3.5)  3 (5.8)  1 (1.6)  .330  1 (5.9)  1 (8.3)  2 (5.7)  0 (0.0)  .167 

BMS, bare-metal stents; DES, drug-eluting stents; NA, non applicable; ST, stent thrombosis.

Data are expressed as No. (%).

Isolated malapposition was found in 48 (42.1%) patients, isolated underexpansion in 14 (12.3%) and isolated neoatherosclerosis in 11 (9.6%). There was only 1 stent fracture (0.9%), in a patient in the DES group. Isolated malapposition was numerically lower in the BMS group than in the DES group (36.5% vs 46.8%; P = .18). When only patients with very late ST were analyzed, isolated malapposition was 20% lower in BMS-treated patients (28.6% vs 48.0%; P = .07, respectively). The combination of malapposition and aneurysm tended to be higher in the BMS group (13.5% vs 6.5%; P = .17). Isolated neoatherosclerosis was exclusively observed in patients with very late ST and was more frequent in the BMS group (15.4% vs 4.8%: P = .05).

Quantitative IVUS data are summarized in Table 3. Differences were observed regarding the mean lumen area (10.1 ± 4.7mm2 vs 8.5 ± 3.5mm2; P = .04), mean stent area (9.5 ± 3.2mm2 vs 7.2 ± 1.6mm2, P < .01), and mean vessel area (20.9 ± 5.2mm2 vs 18.4 ± 4.5mm2; P = .01), with areas being significantly larger in the BMS than in the DES group, respectively. The malapposition length was similar between BMS (10.3 ± 9.5) and DES (10.7 ± 13.2); P = .83. However, the maximal malapposition area was numerically larger in the BMS group (6.6mm2; range 0-10.4mm2) than in the DES group (3.8mm2; range 0-7.4); P = .14.

Table 3.

Quantitative Intravascular Ultrasound Findings

n = 114 lesions  BMS (n = 52)  DES (n = 62)  P 
Lengths, mm
Stent length  23.5 ± 8.7  26.8 ± 12.8  .124 
Malapposition length  10.3 ± 9.5  10.7 ± 13.2  .833 
Areas, mm2
Reference lumen area  18.1 ± 5.6  15.9 ± 4.7  .036 
Lumen area
Maximal  16.4 ± 8.0  13.6 ± 6.9  .059 
Mean  10.1 ± 4.7  8.5 ± 3.5  .042 
Minimal  6.0 ± 3.2  5.4 ± 2.4  .224 
Stent area
Maximal  11.5 ± 3.9  9.9 ± 2.2  < .001 
Mean  9.5 ± 3.2  7.2 ± 1.6  < .001 
Minimal  7.5 ± 2.8  5.6 ± 1.5  < .001 
Vessel area
Maximal  27.5 ± 7.8  25.0 ± 7.7  .102 
Mean  20.9 ± 5.2  18.4 ± 4.5  .009 
Minimal  15.5 ± 4.7  13.4 ± 4.1  .015 
Malapposition area
Maximal  6.6 [0.0-10.4]  3.8 [0.0-7.4]  .137 
Mean  2.8 [0.0-4.7]  1.2 [0.0-3.3]  .115 
Maximal neointimal area  2.2 [1.3-4.7]  1.3 [0.6-2.3]  .002 
Volumes, mm3
Lumen volume  256.7 ± 185.0  229.1 ± 156.0  .408 
Stent volume  228.9 ± 125.5  190.2 ± 95.7  .082 
Vessel volume  508.1 ± 224.8  491.2 ± 261.3  .733 
Malapposition volume  26.8 [0.0-68.4]  10.1 [0.0-51.6]  .241 
Percentage of malapposition volume, %  16.2 ± 16.2  14.2 ± 17.5  .542 
Neointimal volume  10.5 [0.0-25.8]  10.5 [0.0-22.8]  .067 
Neointimal volumen obstruction, %  11.8 ± 16.4  5.5 ± 8.3  .017 

BMS, bare-metal stents; DES, drug-eluting stents.

Unless otherwise indicated, data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range].

The maximal neointimal area was also larger in the BMS group (2.2mm2; range, 1.3-4.7mm2) than in the DES group (1.3mm2, range 0.6-2.3mm2); P < .01. Neointimal volume obstruction, defined as the neointimal volume divided by the stent volume, was also significantly larger in the BMS group (11.8% ± 16.4% vs 5.5% ± 8.3%; P = .02).

Outcomes

Clinical data were available in 107 patients (94.7%) with a median follow-up of 2.9 years (range, 1.9-4.9). During follow-up, there were 11 deaths (10.3%): 2 (4.0%) in the BMS group vs 9 (15.5%) in the DES group (P = .06). Only 4 deaths (3.7%) were from cardiac or unknown causes, 0 in the BMS group vs 4 (6.9%) in the DES group (P = .06). Target lesion revascularization was observed in a total of 6 patients (5.1%): 2 (4.0%) in the BMS group vs 4 (6.9%) in the DES group (P = .42). Recurrent definite or probable ST occurred in 5 patients (4.7%): 2 (4.0%) in the BMS group and 3 (5.2%) in the DES group (P = .60). All patients presenting with recurrent ST had malapposition at the time of the first ST. Treatment of the first ST had been balloon angioplasty without additional stent implantation in 1 patient and additional stent implantation in 4 patients. Immediately after PCI of the first ST, IVUS showed persistent malapposition in 4 of the patients (80.0%). Clinical presentation of the recurrent ST was ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 2 patients, non—ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 2 patients, and sudden cardiac death in 1 patient. Figure 3 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, and recurrent definite or probable ST, showing similar clinical outcomes between treatment groups regarding the prespecified major adverse cardiac events at follow-up.

Figure 3.

Event-free survival curves. BMS, bare-metal stents; DES, drug-eluting stents.

(0.11MB).
DISCUSSION

The main findings of the present study were: a) IVUS imaging in patients with late and very late ST identified a large number of those with mechanical causes of ST; b) malapposition was the most common finding in patients with late or very late ST, being observed in > 60% of patients and more frequently in the DES group; c) neoatherosclerosis occurred exclusively in patients with very late ST and was more frequent in the BMS group; and d) patients with late or very late ST treated with IVUS-guided strategies had favorable outcomes for both types of stent at mid-term follow-up.

To our knowledge, this is the largest study analyzing IVUS differences between BMS and DES in patients with late and very late ST. It is well known that the causes of ST are multifactorial and include patient-related factors, procedural factors, antiplatelet therapy, and device-specific factors. It has been reported that mechanical causes of early ST (< 1 month) usually consist of stent underexpansion, the presence of residual dissection, and impaired TIMI flow at the end of the procedure.17 In contrast, delayed vessel healing, positive vessel remodeling with late acquired malapposition, excessive neointimal response, and neoatherosclerosis have been associated with late and very late ST.18–21 IVUS-guided PCI is associated with better clinical outcomes at follow-up. A recent meta-analysis that included more than 25 000 patients demonstrated that IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and ST after DES implantation.22

Malapposition is the most common finding observed in patients with ST.23–25 However, its importance is still controversial, especially regarding the extension that becomes clinically relevant and that can contribute to recurrent ST.25 It is known that the incidence of malapposition is higher in DES than in BMS in event-free patients as assessed by IVUS at 6 to 9 months.26 In that study, patients with malapposition had a higher risk of developing late or very late ST at follow-up.26 Kosonen et al.,27 found malapposition in 50% of the patients with very late ST as assessed by IVUS, being significantly more prevalent in patients treated with DES. In the same study, malapposition was more extensive in the DES group with larger maximal malapposition areas and longer malapposition length.27 In the present study, malapposition was also the most common finding in patients with ST in both the DES and BMS groups. The proportion of patients with malapposition was numerically larger in the DES group, especially in patients with very late ST. Nevertheless, there were no differences between groups regarding malapposition length, area, or volume.

Incomplete stent apposition can be persistent, related to inadequate stent implantation, or acquired due to positive vessel remodeling or thrombus dissolution after PCI. Guo et al.28 reported malapposition in 30% to 40% of patients immediately after primary PCI treated with DES or BMS. Of these, 40% of cases of malapposition resolved at 13 months. The incidence of late malapposition was higher in DES than in BMS, but no deaths or ST related to malapposition were reported in that study.

The presence of coronary aneurysms has also been associated with ST.29 In our study, the combination of malapposition and aneurysms was numerically higher in the BMS group (13.5% vs 6.5%) but this difference was not statistically significant. This finding can be explained by the preference of operators to implant BMS in large vessels not suitable for optimal stent apposition. An example of a patient with very late ST of a BMS implanted in a large right coronary artery is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Very late BMS thrombosis caused by probable positive vessel remodeling. A 69-year-old man with non—ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The baseline angiography (A,B,C) showed a thrombotic lesion in the proximal right coronary artery (A). B: quantitative coronary angiography showed a reference vessel diameter of 4.84mm. P and D are the proximal and distal reference vessel diameters, respectively. C: the patient was treated with a 4.5 × 38mm BMS. D: at 18 months, the patient presented with very late ST. Angiography showed thrombotic occlusion of the artery. E: flow was restored after thrombus aspiration. IVUS imaging (E1, E2, E3, G) showed proximal and distal reference lumen diameters of 4.9mm (E1, E3); the stented segment showed probable positive vessel remodeling (lumen diameter 6.9mm) with large malapposition (E2, G: axial and longitudinal view respectively). The patient was treated with a 6.0 × 15mm noncompliant balloon. BMS, bare-metal stent; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; ST, stent thrombosis.

(1.05MB).

The present study shows that neointimal proliferation and neoatherosclerosis were significantly more common in ST cases in the BMS group. Lee et al.30 described neointimal rupture within the stents in 100% of BMS-related very late ST and 43.5% of DES-related very late ST; Pesarini et al.31 observed plaque rupture in 78% vs 8% of patients with late or very late ST, respectively. Kang et al.32 observed neoatherosclerotic plaques in 70% of 33 very late ST in DES and BMS imaged with optical coherence tomography. This discrepancy between IVUS and optical coherence tomography findings can be explained by the low axial resolution of IVUS compared with optical coherence tomography, hampering characterization of the neointimal tissue in the stent and identification of the amount of plaque.32 Optical coherence tomography is the best imaging technique to assess strut coverage, malapposition, stent underexpansion, and neoatherosclerosis.33 However, in patients with ST, the presence of persistent thrombus may hamper the assessment of these findings and, in most cases, optical coherence tomography is unable to assess the external elastic membrane and the vessel wall reaction.

Limitations

First, this study is observational. All comparisons are only hypothesis-generating observations. Second, there may be an inclusion bias since IVUS was only performed in 50% of patients with ST presenting at in our institutions. Most of the excluded patients were admitted during off-office hours or were not imaged with IVUS due to hemodynamic instability. The exclusion of this high-risk group of patients could have influenced the study results. Moreover, first-generation DES were used in 67% of patients in the DES group. Therefore, further research is needed to extend these results to new-generation DES. Finally, IVUS was not performed at the index procedure; therefore, we were unable to distinguish between persistent or acquired malapposition.

CONCLUSIONS

IVUS imaging in patients with late and very late ST was able to identify a large number of cases with mechanical causes of ST. Differences were found in the mechanical causes of ST between BMS and DES according to IVUS. Malapposition was the most common finding in patients with ST and was more often observed in patients with very late ST in DES. In contrast, neoatherosclerosis was exclusively observed in patients with very late ST and more frequently in patients with BMS. Patients with late and very late ST treated with IVUS-guided procedures had favorable clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Therefore, knowledge of the causes could lead to better treatment of the ST.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?

  • It is well known that the causes of ST are multifactorial. Intravascular ultrasound is an intracoronary imaging tool able to discern most of the causes of ST, such as malapposition, underexpansion, and neoatherosclerosis.

  • Nevertheless, few studies have assessed differences in IVUS findings between BMS and DES in late or very late ST. Moreover, the incidence of the main IVUS findings assessed differ slightly between them.

  • A previous study suggested that IVUS-guided treatment of ST was associated with better outcomes. Therefore, IVUS assessment of mechanical causes of ST may improve diagnosis and aid in selection of the best treatment strategy for each patient.

WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?

  • This is the largest study to date analyzing IVUS differences between BMS and DES in patients with late and very late ST.

  • This study shows that malapposition was the most common finding in all ST, contributing mostly to ST in DES, whereas neoatherosclerosis was mainly found in ST in BMS. These findings suggest that different mechanisms underlie ST development, depending on the stent type.

  • Patients with late and very late ST treated with IVUS-guided strategies have favorable outcomes.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

A. Sánchez-Recalde is Associate Editor of Revista Española de Cardiología.

References
[1]
E.J. Armstrong, D.N. Feldman, T.Y. Wang, et al.
Clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of angiographically documented early, late, and very late stent thrombosis.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 5 (2012), pp. 131-140
[2]
S. Schulz, T. Schuster, J. Mehilli, et al.
Stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence, timing, and relation to discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy over a 4-year period.
Eur Heart J., 30 (2009), pp. 2714-2721
[3]
D.E. Cutlip, S. Windecker, R. Mehran, et al.
Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions.
Circulation., 115 (2007), pp. 2344-2351
[4]
T. Tada, R.A. Byrne, I. Simunovic, et al.
Risk of stent thrombosis among bare-metal stents, first-generation drug-eluting stents, and second-generation drug-eluting stents: results from a registry of 18,334 patients.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 6 (2013), pp. 1267-1274
[5]
J.M. De la Torre-Hernandez, F. Alfonso, F. Hernandez, et al.
Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA (Estudio ESpanol sobre TROmbosis de stents FArmacoactivos).
J Am Coll Cardiol., 51 (2008), pp. 986-990
[6]
J.M. De la Torre Hernandez, F. Alfonso, F. Gimeno, et al.
Thrombosis of second-generation drug-eluting stents in real practice results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA-2 (Estudio Espanol Sobre Trombosis de Stents Farmacoactivos de Segunda Generacion-2).
JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 3 (2010), pp. 911-919
[7]
R.A. Byrne, M. Joner, A. Kastrati.
Stent thrombosis and restenosis: what have we learned and where are we going?The Andreas Gruntzig Lecture ESC 2014.
Eur Heart J., 36 (2015), pp. 3320-3331
[8]
S.Y. Lee, D.H. Shin, J.S. Kim, et al.
Intravascular Ultrasound Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Implantation of Everolimus-eluting Stents for Long Coronary Lesions.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 70 (2017), pp. 88-95
[9]
S. Windecker, P. Kolh, F. Alfonso, et al.
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI).
Eur Heart J., 35 (2014), pp. 2541-2619
[10]
J. Gomez-Lara, N. Salvatella, N. Gonzalo, et al.
IVUS-guided treatment strategies for definite late and very late stent thrombosis.
EuroIntervention., 12 (2016), pp. e1355-e1365
[11]
P. Jiménez-Quevedo, A. Serrador, A. Pérez de Prado, 25th Official Report of the Spanish Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiac Catheterization and Interventional Cardiology (1990-2015), et al.
Spanish Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Intervention Registry.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 69 (2016), pp. 1180-1189
[12]
G.S. Mintz, S.E. Nissen, W.D. Anderson, et al.
American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition. Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 37 (2001), pp. 1478-1492
[13]
S. Cook, E. Ladich, G. Nakazawa, et al.
Correlation of intravascular ultrasound findings with histopathological analysis of thrombus aspirates in patients with very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis.
Circulation., 120 (2009), pp. 391-399
[14]
M. Fineschi, A. Carrera, T. Gori.
Atheromatous degeneration of the neointima in a bare metal stent: intravascular ultrasound evidence.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)., 10 (2009), pp. 572-573
[15]
C.E. Appleby, S. Bui, V. Dzavik.
A calcified neointima--“stent” within a stent.
J Invasive Cardiol., 21 (2009), pp. 141-143
[16]
J. Gomez-Lara, L. Teruel, S. Homs, et al.
Lumen enlargement of the coronary segments located distal to chronic total occlusions successfully treated with drug-eluting stents at follow-up.
EuroIntervention., 9 (2014), pp. 1181-1188
[17]
J.W. Van Werkum, A.A. Heestermans, A.C. Zomer, et al.
Predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: the Dutch Stent Thrombosis Registry.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 53 (2009), pp. 1399-1409
[18]
A.V. Finn, G. Nakazawa, M. Joner, et al.
Vascular responses to drug eluting stents: importance of delayed healing.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol., 27 (2007), pp. 1500-1510
[19]
R.A. Byrne, R. Iijima, J. Mehilli, et al.
Durability of antirestenotic efficacy in drug-eluting stents with and without permanent polymer.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv., 2 (2009), pp. 291-299
[20]
F. Otsuka, R.A. Byrne, K. Yahagi, et al.
Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment.
Eur Heart J., 36 (2015), pp. 2147-2159
[21]
J. Gomez-Lara, S. Brugaletta, F. Jacobi, et al.
Five-Year Optical Coherence Tomography in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Bare-Metal Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv., 9 (2016), pp. e003670
[22]
J.M. Ahn, S.J. Kang, S.H. Yoon, et al.
Meta-analysis of outcomes after intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in 26,503 patients enrolled in three randomized trials and 14 observational studies.
Am J Cardiol., 113 (2014), pp. 1338-1347
[23]
J.M. De la Torre Hernandez.
Late acquired incomplete stent apposition: incidence, mechanisms and clinical implications.
EuroIntervention., (2009), pp. D112-D120
[24]
G.F. Attizzani, D. Capodanno, Y. Ohno, C. Tamburino.
Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and clinical aspects of incomplete stent apposition.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 63 (2014), pp. 1355-1367
[25]
N. Foin, J.L. Gutierrez-Chico, S. Nakatani, et al.
Incomplete stent apposition causes high shear flow disturbances and delay in neointimal coverage as a function of strut to wall detachment distance: implications for the management of incomplete stent apposition.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv., 7 (2014), pp. 180-189
[26]
A.K. Hassan, S.C. Bergheanu, T. Stijnen, et al.
Late stent malapposition risk is higher after drug-eluting stent compared with bare-metal stent implantation and associates with late stent thrombosis.
Eur Heart J., 31 (2010), pp. 1172-1180
[27]
P. Kosonen, S. Vikman, L.O. Jensen, et al.
Intravascular ultrasound assessed incomplete stent apposition and stent fracture in stent thrombosis after bare metal versus drug-eluting stent treatment the Nordic Intravascular Ultrasound Study (NIVUS).
Int J Cardiol., 168 (2012), pp. 1010-1016
[28]
N. Guo, A. Maehara, G.S. Mintz, et al.
Incidence, mechanisms, predictors, and clinical impact of acute and late stent malapposition after primary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound substudy of the Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction (HORIZONS-AMI) trial.
Circulation., 122 (2010), pp. 1077-1084
[29]
F. Alfonso, M.J. Perez-Vizcayno, M. Ruiz, et al.
Coronary aneurysms after drug-eluting stent implantation: clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound findings.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 53 (2009), pp. 2053-2060
[30]
C.W. Lee, S.J. Kang, D.W. Park, et al.
Intravascular ultrasound findings in patients with very late stent thrombosis after either drug-eluting or bare-metal stent implantation.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 55 (2010), pp. 1936-1942
[31]
G. Pesarini, R. Dandale, A. Rigamonti, et al.
Late and very late coronary stent thrombosis: Intravascular ultrasound findings and associations with antiplatelet therapy.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv., 82 (2013), pp. 1056-1065
[32]
S.J. Kang, C.W. Lee, H. Song, et al.
OCT analysis in patients with very late stent thrombosis.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging., 6 (2013), pp. 695-703
[33]
A. Murata, D. Wallace-Bradley, A. Tellez, et al.
Accuracy of optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of neointimal coverage after stent implantation.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging., 3 (2010), pp. 76-84

Both authors have contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2017. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.