Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 74. Issue 8.
Pages 655-663 (August 2021)
Download PDF
More article options
Not available
Vol. 74. Issue 8.
Pages 655-663 (August 2021)
Original article
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.09.008
Full text access
Predictors of cardiovascular outcomes after surgery in severe tricuspid regurgitation: clinical, imaging and hemodynamic prospective study
Predictores de eventos cardiovasculares tras cirugía por insuficiencia tricuspídea grave: estudio prospectivo con datos clínicos, de imagen y hemodinámicos
José F. Rodríguez-Palomaresa,b,,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author: Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Paseo Vall d’Hebron 119-129, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.
, Jordi Lozano-Torresa,b,, Ilaria Dentamaroa, Filipa X. Valentea,b, Augusto Sao Avilésa,c, Laura Gutiérrez García-Morenoa,b, Pau Rello Sabatéa,b, Imanol Otaeguia,b, Beatriz Mínguez Rosiqued, Hug Cuéllar Calabriae, Artur Evangelista Masipa,b, Pilar Tornos Masf, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzáleza,g, María Teresa González-Alujasa,b
a Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
b Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Spain
c Unidad de Estadística y Bioinformática (UEB), Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain
d Unidad de Hepatología, Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Vall d’Hebron Institut of Research, CIBERehd, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
e Servicio de Radiología, Institut de Diagnòstic per la imatge (IDI), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
f Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain
g CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2021;74:646-710.1016/j.rec.2020.12.002
Daniel Perez-Camargo, Ana Paula Tagliari, Maurizio Taramasso
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (2)
Tables (4)
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the entire study group and of patients with or without the primary endpoint (hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death)
Table 2. Predictors of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure)
Table 3. Predictors of cardiovascular death
Table 4. Multivariate analysis for significant tricuspid regurgitation recurrence
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Introduction and objectives

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a prevalent valve disease with a high mortality rate. Current guidelines do not define specific thresholds at which patients should be considered for surgery or percutaneous procedures. Thus, patients are usually referred for intervention at a late stage of the disease. This study aimed to assess predictors of cardiovascular outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with severe TR referred for surgery.


This was an observational, prospective, nonrandomized study. All patients underwent surgery for severe TR based on current clinical guidelines. Complete anamnesis, blood test, echocardiogram, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and right and left catheterization were performed. Patients were followed up in the outpatient department and a combined endpoint (hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality) was registered.


Forty-three consecutive patients were included (age: 66.9 ± 9.6 years, 67.4% female). Tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in all patients. After a median follow-up of 38 months, 12 patients (27.9%) showed the combined endpoint and 7 (16.3%) died. Above all clinical, blood and imaging data, the indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume constituted the best predictor of the combined endpoint (HR, 1.1; P = .02) and cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.1; P = .05). Furthermore, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume was associated with TR recurrence after surgery, with no impact on clinical outcomes.


In patients with severe TR referred for surgery, right ventricular remodeling assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance constituted the best independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes at follow-up.

Tricuspid regurgitation
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Right ventricular function
Valve repair
Valve replacement
Cardiovascular mortality
Heart failure
Introducción y objetivos

La insuficiencia tricuspídea (IT) grave es una valvulopatía prevalente con una alta tasa de mortalidad. La guía vigente no define umbrales específicos para considerar a los pacientes para cirugía o procedimientos percutáneos. Por lo tanto, se suele derivarlos para intervención en una etapa tardía de la enfermedad. Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar los predictores de los eventos cardiovasculares en una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes con IT grave remitidos para cirugía.


Se trata de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y no aleatorizado. Todos los pacientes se sometieron a cirugía por IT grave según las guías clínicas vigentes. Se realizó anamnesis completa, análisis de sangre, ecocardiograma, resonancia magnética cardiovascular y cateterismo derecho e izquierdo. Se siguió a los pacientes en la consulta externa y se registró un criterio de valoración combinado (hospitalización por insuficiencia cardiaca o muerte de causa cardiovascular).


Se incluyó a 43 pacientes consecutivos (edad, 66,9 ± 9,6 años; el 67,4% mujeres). En todos los casos se realizó anuloplastia tricuspídea. Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 38 meses, 12 pacientes (27,9%) presentaron el criterio combinado y 7 (16,3%) fallecieron. Por encima de todos los datos clínicos, sanguíneos y de imagen, el volumen telediastólico del ventrículo derecho indexado constituyó el mejor predictor del objetivo combinado (HR = 1,1; p = 0,02) y de muerte de causa cardiovascular (HR = 1,1; p = 0,05). Además, el volumen telediastólico del ventrículo derecho indexado se asoció con la recurrencia de la IT después de la cirugía, sin impacto en los resultados clínicos.


En pacientes con IT grave remitidos para cirugía, el remodelado del ventrículo derecho evaluado por resonancia magnética cardiovascular fue el mejor predictor independiente de desenlace cardiovascular en el seguimiento.

Palabras clave:
Insuficiencia tricuspídea
Resonancia magnética cardiovascular
Función del ventrículo derecho
Reparación valvular
Reemplazo valvular
Mortalidad cardiovascular
Insuficiencia cardiaca
Full Text

Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common heart valve disease, affecting ≈1.6 million people in the United States and, if not treated, it results in progressive right ventricular (RV) dilation and failure, with an associated increase in morbidity and mortality.1 The prevalence of significant TR increases with age, nearing 1.5% and 5.6% in men and women > 70 years of age, respectively.2

Despite the increase in mortality associated with significant TR, management has classically been conservative.3 However, recent studies have shown chronic RV overload to be associated with irreversible RV dysfunction and poor prognosis. Thus, tricuspid valve repair at the time of left-sided valve surgery has recently gained acceptance.4,5 However, the optimal timing for surgery in isolated TR remains controversial and surgery is commonly undertaken at a late stage.3,4

Mortality in severe TR surgical series is high, ranging from 15% to 20% during hospitalization to 17% to 24% during the first year of follow-up.6 This high mortality rate has been attributed to delay in surgery since patients may develop anemia, RV dysfunction, cirrhosis, and/or renal failure.7 In a recent longitudinal echocardiographic study by Axtell et al.7 in a cohort of 3276 patients with severe TR, surgery was not associated with improved long-term survival compared with medical management alone after accounting for immortal time bias. Those authors hypothesized that a delay of up to 8 years from diagnosis to surgery could account for the absence of differences and recommended that the optimal timing for surgery be defined. If not, forthcoming randomized controlled trials with novel percutaneous techniques8,9 to address severe TR may fail to yield differences in mortality.

Data available to define the appropriate timing for surgery to improve survival in patients with severe TR are lacking. Thus, the present study aimed to define the main predictors of outcomes in a prospective cohort of patients with severe functional TR referred for surgery. The findings could be useful to plan the intervention (percutaneous or surgical) in this population to reduce outcomes at follow-up.


This was an observational, single-center, prospective, nonrandomized study. The study was conducted in a public tertiary referral hospital with 1146 beds and more than 750 open-heart procedures per year. From April 2014 to December 2017, we included all consecutive patients with severe functional TR with an indication for surgery on the tricuspid valve (left-sided valve disease surgery could be associated if required). The indication for TR surgery was based on the current ESC guidelines for valvular heart disease management.10,11 Follow-up of patients with severe TR was based on annual 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography. Patients were referred to surgery when they had signs and symptoms of right heart failure refractory to optimal medical treatment as long as they did not present a RV ejection fraction < 30% or < 45% but associated with the presence of pulmonary arterial pressure ≥ 60mmHg (according to our study protocol).3 We excluded patients with a pacemaker, contraindication for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), congenital tricuspid valve disease, significant left-sided valvular heart disease (with an indication of surgical treatment per se), or severe pulmonary stenosis or regurgitation.

Patients included in the study were evaluated by anamnesis, complete physical examination, blood test, 2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography, CMR, left cardiac catheterization to assess coronary artery disease and right cardiac catheterization to evaluate pulmonary pressure. Patients were followed up at the outpatient department and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality were recorded. No functional tests were performed. The primary endpoint was the combination of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality at follow-up. The second endpoint was cardiovascular mortality alone. Cardiovascular operative mortality was included when it occurred within 30 days after surgery in or out of the hospital, and after 30 days during the same hospitalization subsequent to the intervention.12 Follow-up was started at the time of surgery.

Before discharge, a follow-up echocardiogram was performed in all patients who survived the first 24hours after surgery to determine the presence and the main predictors of residual TR.

Blood test

Blood samples were collected in all patients and the following parameters were determined: hemoglobin, hematocrit, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, glutamyl transpeptidase, bilirubin, protein, albumin, renin, pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and aldosterone.

2-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography

All patients were evaluated by echocardiography using Vivid 9 ultrasound (GE Healthcare, General Electric, USA) and all images were postprocessed with specific software: Echopach (GE Healthcare, General Electric, USA). The following parameters were evaluated: left and RV function, atrial and ventricular volumes and areas, tricuspid annulus diameter, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and Doppler tissue imaging of the tricuspid ring (S’DTI). Valvular heart disease severity was assessed with the central jet area, vena contracta width, hepatic vein systolic flow, and density and shape of the continuous wave Doppler velocity profile as recommended by the current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology.13 TR was classified according to the new proposed classification as mild, moderate, severe, massive, and torrential.14 In the case of a patient with associated mitral valve disease or mitral prosthesis, the study was completed by transesophageal echocardiography.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

All CMR studies were performed with a 1.5 T clinical scanner (Sonata or Avanto scanner Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Left ventricular ejection fraction (%), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (mL/m2), LVESV index (mL/m2), left ventricular mass index (g/m2), RV ejection fraction (%), RV end-diastolic volume index (mL/m2), RV end-systolic volume index (mL/m2), global longitudinal, circumferential and radial strain of the free wall of the RV were calculated by CMR tissue tracking. In addition, right atrial area, diameters, and volumes were performed. Late gadolinium enhancement sequences were performed 10 to 15minutes after contrast administration. Further details on the technical aspects of CMR acquisition, sequences and quantification can be found in the supplementary data.

CMR studies were analyzed off-line by an experienced observer blinded to all patient data using customized software (Cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc., Calgary, Alberta, Canada).

Left and right cardiac catheterization

All left and right cardiac catheterizations were performed using a Philips Integris Angio Diagnost 5 prior to surgery and according to current recommendations.15 The following parameters were evaluated: presence of significant coronary stenosis, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure, diastolic pulmonary artery pressure and indexed pulmonary vascular resistance. Results were analyzed by an experienced observer blinded to all patient data.

The study protocol was approved by the hospital Ethics Committee on human research and complied with the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki guidelines. All patients included in the study signed the consent form before inclusion.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as the number of cases and proportions. Normal distribution was evaluated in continuous variables using the Shapiro-Wilk test and was compared among groups using the Student t test or Wilcoxon test. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test or the Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Potential predictors of outcome were evaluated using proportional hazards Cox regression models. Variables were entered into the multivariate model if P-value < .10 on univariate analyses. To avoid multicollinearity, variables were excluded from the multivariable Cox regression if the tolerance test was < 0.1 or the variation inflation factor > 5. Schoenfeld residual analysis was also included to confirm that the proportional assumption was met for the exposure of interest. Martingale residuals distribution was performed to test the linearity assumption for the Cox models for the prediction of the composite endpoint and for the prediction of cardiovascular mortality based on the echocardiographic results before discharge. This analysis was an attempt to determine the main factors associated with a poor surgical outcome and not the time of its appearance. Receiver operator characteristics curves were used to define the discriminative ability of the logistical model to predict TR recurrence.

A P-value < .05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS 19.0 software version (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for the analysis.


Over a 32-month period, 47 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. However, 4 patients were excluded: 2 for severe claustrophobia and 2 for having a non-CMR conditional pacemaker. Thus, a final population of 43 patients was included in the analysis. Before surgery, all patients were under optimal medical treatment: beta-blockers in 11 patients (25.6%), digoxin in 26 (60.4%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers in 34 (79%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist in 34 (79%) and diuretics in 43 (100%). Demographic characteristics are shown in table 1. Twenty-nine patients (67.4%) were women, mean age: 66.9 ± 9.6 years, 37 (86.1%) were in atrial fibrillation, and 97.6% were symptomatic (NYHA ≥ II). Nineteen patients (44.2%) had had prior surgery (57.9% mitral valve, 10.5% aortic valve, 10.5% mitral+aortic valves, 5.3% tricuspid valve, 5.3% mitral + tricuspid valve, 5.3% coronary artery bypass grafting, 5.3% others). TR was severe in 6 patients (13.9%) and massive in 37 (86%). None of the patients had torrential TR. Although the main indication for surgery was TR, 26 patients (60.5%) also required mitral valve repair (moderate secondary to endoleak), 4 (9.3%) aortic bioprosthesis for moderate aortic stenosis and 1 (2.3%) required tricuspid valve repair, mitral valve repair and aortic valve replacement (severe TR with moderate mitral regurgitation and moderate aortic stenosis). Tricuspid annuloplasty with a semirigid ring was performed in all patients. None of them received a valve prosthesis (bioprosthesis or a mechanical valve) since the study included only patients treated for secondary TR. Late gadolinium enhancement was not present in any of the patients.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the entire study group and of patients with or without the primary endpoint (hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular death)

  All patients (n = 43)  Primary endpoint (n = 12)  No primary endpoint (n = 31)  P 
Age, y  66.9 ± 9.6  66.8 ± 9.3  66.9 ± 9.8  .830 
Female sex  29 (67.4)  7 (58.3)  22 (71.0)  .490 
Weight, kg  70.6 ± 10.7  66.6 ± 12.1  72.12 ± 9.9  .090 
Height, cm  161.3 ± 9.2  160.9 ± 9.7  161.4 ± 9.1  .600 
BMI  27.3 ± 4.7  25.7 ± 3.7  27.9 ± 4.9  .180 
Medical history
Hypertension  23 (53.5)  10 (83.3)  13 (41.9)  .020 
Dyslipidemia  16 (37.2)  6 (50.0)  10 (32.3)  .190 
Diabetes  7 (16.3)  5 (41.7)  2 (6.5)  .005 
CAD  4 (9.3)  2 (16.7)  2 (6.5)  .260 
Atrial fibrillation  37 (86.1)  10 (83.3)  27 (87.1)  .840 
Previous cardiac surgery  19 (44.2)  8 (66.7)  11 (35.5)  .202 
Asthma/COPD  5 (11.6)  1 (8.3)  4 (12.9)  .500 
NYHA classification        .517 
1 (2.4)  0 (0)  1 (3.3)   
II  13 (31.0)  3 (25.0)  10 (33.3)   
III  27 (64.3)  9 (75.0)  18 (60.0)   
IV  1 (2.4)  0 (0)  1 (3.3)   
Euroscore II  4.8 ± 3.5  6.77 ± 3.36  4.11 ± 3.33  .060 
Aortic cross-clamping duration, min  90.6 ± 30.6  97.4 ± 40.5  88.6 ± 27.7  .410 
Isolated tricuspid surgery  12 (27.9)  4 (33.3)  8 (25.8)  .610 
Tricuspid annuloplasty  43 (100)       
Blood test
Hemoglobin, g/dL  12.6 ± 1.7  11.6 ± 1.3  13.1 ± 1.6  .020 
Hematocrit, %  39.0 ± 5.1  35.8 ± 4.2  40.3 ± 4.9  .020 
Urea, mg/dL  59.9 ± 46.2  72.0 ± 68.7  55.2 ± 34.4  .250 
Creatinine, mg/dL  1.0 ± 0.6  1.2 ± 0.9  1.0 ± 0.4  .270 
eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2  73.6 ± 26.2  72.1 ± 30.7  74.2 ± 24.8  .650 
AST, UI/L  31.2 ± 15.3  36.8 ± 26.2  29.0 ± 7.6  .100 
ALT, UI/L  24.3 ± 14.1  21.4 ± 21.4  25.4 ± 10.6  .260 
ALP, UI/L  111.1 ± 41.7  131.6 ± 51.8  100.0 ± 32.1  .090 
GGT, UI/L  145.6 ± 159.5  224.0 ± 240.5  103.3 ± 76.4  .177 
Bilirubin, mg/dL  1.08 ± 0.5  1.2 ± 0.6  1.0 ± 0.4  .290 
Protein, g/dL  7.3 ± 0.7  7.3 ± 0.8  7.3 ± 0.7  .900 
Albumin, g/dL  3.9 ± 0.4  3.9 ± 0.4  3.9 ± 0.4  .810 
Renin, ng/mL/h  8.5 ± 10.9  18.6 ± 14.4  3.4 ± 3.9  .080 
Aldosterone, ng/dL  24.5 ± 17.2  34.5 ± 20.3  18.9 ± 13.6  .120 
BNP, pg/mL  321.1 ± 250.3  369.0 ± 371.6  289.3 ± 164.0  .450 
Right catheterization
sPAP, mmHg  41.5 ± 14.8  51.6 ± 21.9  37.6 ± 9.0  .010 
mPAP, mmHg  28.0 ± 8.6  32.3 ± 12.4  26.3 ± 6.3  .060 
dPAP, mmHg  19.4 ± 6.3  20.6 ± 8.4  19.0 ± 5.6  .440 
iPVR, dyn*m2/cm5  371.3 ± 172.3  497.8 ± 235.6  322.6 ± 119.7  .070 
RA pressure, mmHg  14 ± 6.67  19.33 ± 5.79  12.12 ± 6.03  .022 
LVEF, %  57.2 ± 7.3  57.2 ± 9.5  57.3 ± 6.4  .710 
TAPSE, mm  17 ± 3.7  16.7 ± 3.1  17.1 ± 3.9  .840 
S’ Tricuspid annulus, cm/s  9.3 ± 2.5  10.4 ± 3.7  8.9 ± 1.9  .060 
sPAP, mmHg  53.5 ± 12.1  64.1 ± 11.0  49.7 ± 10.2  .004 
Right atrium area, cm2  35.7 (9.6)  33.7 (10.6)  36.3 (9.5)  .450 
Tricuspid annulus diameter, mm  42.8 ± 7.5  42.7 ± 6.4  42.9 ± 8.0  .970 
Inferior cava vein diameter, mm  23.2 ± 5.3  25.2 ± 3.7  22.4 ± 5.6  .130 
Massive tricuspid regurgitation  37 (86.1)  11 (91.7)  26 (83.9)  .490 
Magnetic resonance
iRVEDV, mL  102.3 ± 36.2  132.9 ± 27.8  90.5 ± 32.1  .001 
iRVESV, mL  50.7 ± 18.8  67.6 ± 17.3  44.2 ± 15.1  .002 
RVEF, %  49.3 ± 8.2  48.3 ± 10.7  49.7 ± 7.2  .820 
iLVEDV, mL  79.1 ± 28.6  91.6 ± 35.7  74.4 ± 24.5  .140 
iLVESV, mL  38.4 ± 20.6  46.7 ± 28.4  35.3 ± 16.2  .160 
LVEF, %  52.9 ± 8.6  50.8 ± 10.7  53.7 ± 7.8  .400 
Right atrium area, cm2  35.7 ± 9.6  35.7 ± 11.0  36.0 ± 10.3  .940 
Tricuspid annulus diameter, mm  43.6 ± 7.3  42.9 ± 5.6  43.9 ± 7.9  .540 
Longitudinal strain, %  −17.2 ± 6.1  −19.1 ± 4.4  −16.4 ± 6.6  .270 
Circumferential strain, %  −14.9 ± 3.6  −16.1 ± 2.9  −14.4 ± 3.8  .230 
Radial strain, %  24.7 ± 7.5  27.0 ± 6.4  23.7 ± 7.9  .280 
Right atrium volume, mL  215.9 ± 112.8  218.3 ± 111.0  215.0 ± 116.4  .980 
Right atrium diameter AP, mm  87.6 ± 87.9  74.4 ± 12.5  92.7 ± 103.2  .690 
Right atrium diameter LM, mm  59.7 ± 14.7  63.2 ± 12.1  58.3 ± 15.6  .450 
Treatment at discharge
Beta-blocker  9 (23.7)  2 (25)  7 (23.3)  .674 
ACEi/ARB  19 (50)  4 (50)  15 (50)  .847 
MRA  16 (42.1)  6 (75)  10 (33.3)  .111 
Furosemide  35 (92.1)  8 (100)  27 (90)  NC 
Furosemide dosage  65.1 ± 44.3  80 ± 70.9  60.7 ± 33.50  .270 

ACEi, angiotensin-conversing-enzyme inhibitors; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AP, anteroposterior; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CAD, coronary artery disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; dPAP, diastolic pulmonary artery pressure; eGFR, glomerular filtration rate; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; iLVEDV, indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume; iLVESV, indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume; iPVR, indexed pulmonary vascular resistance; iRVEDV, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume; iRVESV, indexed right ventricular end-systolic volume; LM, lateral-medial; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; mPAP, mean pulmonary artery pressure; MRA, mineralcorticoid receptor antagonist; NC, not calculated; RA, right atrium; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Values are expressed as No. (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

All patients were followed up for a median of 38 months [interquartile range, 14-63 months].

Predictors of the primary endpoint

Twelve patients (27.9%) required hospitalization for heart failure or had a cardiovascular death. Median time from surgery to the event was 2.5 [0.3-15.3] months.

Compared with event-free patients, those with the primary outcome had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .02), diabetes (P = .005), anemia (lower hemoglobin and hematocrit concentrations, P = .02 in both cases), higher indexed RV end-diastolic volume ([iRVEDV] 132.9mL/my vs 90.5mL/my, P = .001), higher indexed right ventricle end-systolic volume ([iRVESV] 67.6mL/my vs 44.2mL/my, P = .002), and higher systolic pulmonary arterial pressure estimated by echocardiography (64.1mmHg vs 49.7mmHg, P = .004) and right cardiac catheterization (P = .01) (table 1). The incidence of the primary event did not differ between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid surgery and those who associated a combined surgical approach (P = .61).

After adjustment for hypertension, diabetes, body mass index, hemoglobin, aspartate aminotransferase, iRVEDV, iRVESV, and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure variables, on multivariate Cox regression analysis, only iRVEDV was the main predictor of the primary outcome with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.1 (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 1.01-1.13); P = .024 (table 2). The proportional hazards assumption was confirmed by Schoenfeld residual analysis (P = .90). The ability of iRVEDV to predict the primary endpoint was also confirmed by the C-statistic = 0.91 (95%CI, 0.74-0.95). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the primary endpoint by iRVEDV tertiles are represented in figure 1A. In particular, the incidence of the primary outcome in patients with an iRVEDV > 104mL/m2 was 66% higher than in those with a lower threshold (10 patients vs 2, respectively; log-rank 16.375, P < .001).

Table 2.

Predictors of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure)

Risk factors  Adjusted HR  95%CI  P 
Hypertension  2.10  0.27-16.18  .481 
Diabetes  0.71  0.07-7.35  .773 
Body mass index  0.75  0.55-1.01  .057 
Hemoglobin  0.66  0.33-1.32  .242 
AST  1.00  0.95-1.05  .990 
iRVEDV  1.10  1.01-1.13  .024 
iRVESV  1.03  0.92-1.03  .364 
sPAP (echocardiography)  1.03  0.96-1.11  .395 

95%CI, 95% confidence interval; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HR, hazard ratio; iRVEDV, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume; iRVESV, indexed right ventricular end-systolic volume; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Figure 1.

Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the primary endpoint (A) and secondary endpoint (B) by iRVEDV (indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume tertiles during follow-up. iRVEDV, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume.

Predictors of cardiovascular mortality

Cardiovascular operative mortality was 9.3% and overall mortality was 16.3% (all patients due to cardiovascular mortality). Median time from surgery to death was 2 [0.1-16] months. Four of the patients died before discharge (2 due to cardiogenic shock and 2 to acute RV dysfunction), and 3 died during follow-up (all due to RV heart failure).

On univariate analysis, a rise in alkaline phosphatase (P = .014), a drop in albumin concentration (P = .031) and an increase in iRVEDV (P = .049) were associated with overall cardiovascular mortality (table 1 of the supplementary data). However, on multivariate Cox regression analysis, iRVEDV was the main predictor of overall cardiovascular mortality with an HR of 1.1 (95%CI, 1.05-1.15); P = .045 (table 3). The proportion assumption was also confirmed by Schoenfeld residual analysis (P = .83). C-statistics also confirmed the high ability of iRVEDV to predict the secondary endpoint: 0.82 (95%CI, 0.65-0.92). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for cardiovascular mortality by iRVEDV tertiles are represented in figure 1B. Thus, patients with an iRVEDV > 104mL/my showed higher cardiovascular mortality than those with a lower iRVEDV (5 vs 2, respectively, log-rank 5.368; P = .045).

Table 3.

Predictors of cardiovascular death

Risk factors  Adjusted HR  95%CI  P 
Diabetes  0.35  0.03-4.24  .412 
iRVEDV  1.10  1.05-1.15  .045 
iRVESV  0.98  0.89-1.07  .598 
sPAP (echocardiography)  1.02  0.95-1.10  .572 

95%CI, 95% confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; iRVEDV, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume; iRVESV, indexed right ventricular end-systolic volume; sPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Variables associated with postsurgical tricuspid regurgitation recurrence

All patients (except 3 with early death) underwent a follow-up echocardiogram predischarge and TR recurrence was present in 32 patients: 19 (47.5%) mild, 8 (20.0%) moderate and 5 (12.5%) severe. Predictors of significant TR (degrees of regurgitation II or III/IV assessed by quantitative Doppler measures) recurrence are shown in table 2 of the supplementary data. There was a rise in renin levels (P = .033), increased iRVEDV (P = .025) and an increase in RV function: RV ejection fraction (P = .009), RV free wall global longitudinal strain (P = .002), RV circumferential strain (P = .009) and RV radial strain (P = .025) were the main variables associated with significant TR recurrence, thereby suggesting that the better the RV function, the higher the velocity through the tricuspid valve, resulting in a higher Doppler signal of recurrent TR. However, on multivariate logistic regression analysis, only iRVEDV was associated with TR recurrence (OR, 1.06; 95%CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .044) (table 4). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of the logistic model to predict TR recurrence was 0.939 (P < .01) (figure 2). Paradoxically, tricuspid annulus diameter presurgery was not associated with TR recurrence.

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis for significant tricuspid regurgitation recurrence

Risk factors  OR  95%CI  P 
Diabetes  0.93  0.03-33.49  .970 
Global longitudinal strain  0.89  0.59-1.35  .589 
iRVEDV  1.06  1.01-1.13  .044 
RVEF  1.12  0.88-1.42  .367 
Isolated tricuspid regurgitation  0.01  0.00-1.69  .077 

95%CI, 95% confidence interval; iRVEDV, indexed right ventricular end-diastolic volume; OR, odds ratio; RVEF, right ventricular ejection fraction.

Figure 2.

Area under the ROC curve for the recurrence of tricuspid regurgitation after surgery. ROC, receiver operator characteristics.


Interestingly, the presence of recurrent significant TR (moderate or severe) was not associated with either the primary endpoint (HR, 2.26; 95%CI, 0.65-7.83; P = .197) or cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.87; 95%CI, 0.48-17.21; P = .249).


TR has long been considered a forgotten entity owing to the belief that left-sided valve treatment prevented the development of significant TR.3 However, follow-up studies found this conservative approach to be associated with a high incidence of significant residual TR in 25% of patients.16,17 Thus, current ESC/EACTS11 and AHA/ACC18 guidelines for the management of valvular heart diseases recommend surgery in patients with mild or moderate secondary TR with a dilated annulus (≥ 40mm or > 21mm/m2 by 2-dimensional echocardiography) undergoing left-sided valve surgery (IIa and IIb class indication, respectively).

Significant TR is associated with increased morbidity and mortality.2,16 High functional class, RV dilation and dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension, renal failure, and severe liver dysfunction have been considered the main risk factors. The problem in patients with TR is that they can remain asymptomatic for a long time and, when symptoms appear, could be at an irreversible stage in which RV dysfunction persists despite treatment.6,7 A recent study by Axtell et al.7 in 3276 patients with isolated TR showed that surgical treatment performed up to 8 years after diagnosis was not associated with improved long-term survival compared with medical management alone and after adjustment for immortal time bias. Therefore, it is important to establish the precise moment when the surgical indication should be established to avoid progression to an irreversible stage. In addition, the new percutaneous approach for significant TR before irreversible RV dysfunction is established would reduce the mortality rate associated with surgical treatment. The need to recognize the ‘optimal timing’ for percutaneous treatment of the TR is vital to avoid unnecessary procedures.19,20 Our study is the first prospective work in patients with severe TR to evaluate the prognostic role of clinical, blood, echocardiographic, CMR and hemodynamic variables as predictors of major cardiac events (such as cardiovascular mortality and/or admission for heart failure). The main finding of our study was that RVEDVi assessed by CMR constituted the best predictor of cardiovascular outcomes during follow-up. Thus, RVEDVi > 104mL/m2 was associated with a 23.3% primary endpoint rate and an 11.6% cardiovascular mortality rate, with this value being independent of the degree of pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction severity. Kim et al.21 found that a RV end-systolic area < 20cm2 predicted event-free survival. Similarly, our results showed that a surgical intervention before significant RV dilation is present ( > 104mL/m2) could have reduced the primary endpoint incidence from 23.3% to 4.6% and overall mortality from 11.6% to 4.6%. In addition, our study is in line with a recent retrospective echocardiographic study by Dietz et al.22 who observed that the presence of RV dilation (defined as a tricuspid annulus ≥ 40mm) associated with ventricular dysfunction (defined as a TAPSE < 17mm) constituted the main predictors of global mortality in patients with severe TR. However, in that study, only 21% of the patients had a severe TR and only 8% underwent surgery. Similarly to our study, Kim et al.23 reported that, in 31 patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery (especially tricuspid valve replacement in 81% of cases), an indexed end-diastolic volume of the RV < 164mL/m2 was the best predictor of recovery of RV function during follow-up. However, although patients in that study had a similar degree of RV dysfunction compared with that in our study (49.7 ± 8.3% vs 49.3 ± 8.2%), the threshold of iRVEDV obtained was clearly different (164mL/m2 vs 104mL/m2, respectively). Several reasons could explain these differences: the study by Kim et al. aimed to determine only RV function recovery without prognostic implications, the population was younger (56.6 ± 9.1 vs 66.9 ± 9.6 years, respectively), the proportion of male sex was lower (13% vs 33%, respectively), most patients underwent tricuspid valve replacement (81% vs 0%, respectively), systolic pulmonary arterial pressure value was not included and, finally, 6 patients who died at follow-up were excluded.23

Surgery is the treatment of choice for severe TR when medical treatment fails. However, it carries a high mortality rate (17%-24%)24 secondary to a late indication when patients have multiple comorbidities and is associated with irreversible RV remodeling. However, RV remodeling is not only influenced by TR severity, other factors such as pressure overload, cell death or myocardial fibrosis are also involved in the pathophysiology of the RV.22 Furthermore, similarto what occurs in the presence of severe mitral regurgitation, RV ejection fraction is not the best method for calculating the ventricular function in severe TR.25 Thus, in line with our results, the combination of RV dilatation/dysfunction associated with significant TR seems to be needed for right heart failure to occur,26,27 which is associated with tachyarrhythmias, ascites, liver dysfunction, lower cardiac output, and worse cardiovascular outcomes.26 The European11 and American18 guidelines for the management of heart valve diseases recommend surgery with indications IIa and IIb (respectively) in patients with severe TR when they are symptomatic or when they show progressive RV dilation/dysfunction, in the absence of severe left ventricular/RV dysfunction or significant pulmonary hypertension. However, the specific cutoff point at which surgery should be indicated has not been established, and the indication is thus made arbitrarily according to different centers. The overall cardiovascular mortality rate in our study was 16.3%. Moreover, the cardiovascular operative mortality rate was 9.3% similar to that reported by Verdonk et al.28 (5-13%) and lower than that reported by Rodríguez-Capitán et al.29 (18.5%). Unexpectedly, the combination of left valve surgery (required in 60.5% of patients with no severe left valve disease) was not associated with an increase in mortality. This could be explained by the fact that the indication for surgery in our population was based on the presence of TR severity and not on severe left valve disease. Furthermore, since all patients received optimal medical treatment at discharge (table 1) according to current clinical practice guidelines, inadequate treatment could not explain long-term mortality.

Similar to previous studies, in our series, most patients (97.6%) were symptomatic with a functional class (NYHA) ≥ II; however, compared with patients with no clinical outcomes, NYHA functional class was not statistically significant (P = .51) to predict outcomes, as published elsewhere.30,31 Moreover, various risk factors have been evaluated to stratify the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with significant TR. The presence of liver enzyme alterations, cirrhosis, or high bilirubin levels has been associated with increased mortality in tricuspid valve surgery.6,32 In addition, the presence of anemia has been associated with poor clinical outcomes.21 Several mechanisms have been associated with anemia in patients with significant TR such as low renal perfusion, malabsorption, nutritional deficiencies, hemodilution, and hypersplenism (secondary to systemic venous congestion).21 In our study, neither hemoglobin nor liver enzymes had prognostic implications. This could be explained by the fact that we evaluated a surgical population and therefore patients were not in the end-stage of the disease. The role of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients undergoing TV surgery is controversial since some studies have shown that patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension do not recover RV function, while other studies have reported opposite findings.3,18 Our study demonstrated that pulmonary arterial hypertension is associated with a higher rate of cardiovascular events during follow-up with an HR of 1.05 (P = .004); however, its role in the prediction of outcomes is subject to the degree of RV dilation (P = .395, in the adjusted model).


The main limitations of our study are that it was a single-center study and with a small population; however, it does reflect the reality of this disease with few patients being referred for surgery (around 8% in big series)22 and mostly at an advanced stage of disease. Nevertheless, our study also has several strengths such as its prospective nature and the fact that all patients were studied within a homogeneous and exhaustive protocol that included all clinical data and imaging techniques recommended by scientific societies. A further limitation of our study is that patients were referred for surgery at different stages of their disease and no functional test rather than NYHA functional class was performed; however, current guidelines do not recommend specific thresholds for the performance of these tests. In this regard, our study provides an approximation of the indexed RV end-diastolic volume from which the risk of major cardiovascular complications after surgery is significantly increased during follow-up. Multivariate analysis can bias the results of the study when using a small sample size and, also, when the number of events is low. However, being an observational and prospective study, it minimizes the possibility of selection bias. This fact associated with the small differences between the groups with/without events allowed us to use smaller samples to obtain a good level of accuracy. Finally, recurrent TR regurgitation was analyzed based on quantitative Doppler analysis (since 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography was not performed in all patients sistematically).


In patients with isolated severe TR referred for surgical tricuspid valve repair, an end-diastolic RV volume > 104mL/m2 was associated with the need for hospitalization for RV heart failure and a high cardiovascular mortality rate during follow-up. These findings suggest that surgical valvular repair or percutaneous procedures should be performed before this threshold is reached in order to optimize results and improve patients’ quality of life.


This work was partially funded by a Clinical Research Project Grant in Cardiology from the Spanish Society of Cardiology and Spanish Heart Foundation. There are no relationships with industry.


I. Ferreira-González is Editor-in-Chief of Rev Esp Cardiol. The journal's editorial procedure to ensure impartial handling of the manuscript has been followed. The remaining authors confirm they have no disclosures regarding this manuscript.


  • -

    Mortality in severe tricuspid regurgitation surgery is high (15%-20%) and is usually attributed to a delay in surgery. Despite this high mortality, there are no available data to define the best cardiovascular predictor at which patients should be referred for surgery to improve survival.


  • -

    This study shows that RV remodelling assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance is the best independent predictor of cardiovascular outcomes at follow-up in this population. In addition, survival could be reduced if patients are referred for surgery before an end-diastolic RV volume of 104 mL/m2 is reached.


We would like to thank Christine O’Hara for English revision.


Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version available at

A. Mangieri, C. Montalto, M. Pagnesi, et al.
Mechanism and Implications of the Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, (2017),
J.P. Singh, J.C. Evans, D. Levy, et al.
Prevalence and clinical determinants of mitral, tricuspid, and aortic regurgitation (the Framingham Heart Study).
Am J Cardiol., 83 (1999), pp. 897-902
P. Tornos Mas, J.F. Rodríguez-Palomares, M.J. Antunes.
Secondary tricuspid valve regurgitation: a forgotten entity.
Heart., 101 (2015), pp. 1840-1848
M. Taramasso, H. Vanermen, F. Maisano, A. Guidotti, G. La Canna, O. Alfieri.
The Growing Clinical Importance of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 59 (2012), pp. 703-710
M.J. Antunes, J. Rodríguez-Palomares, B. Prendergast, et al.
Management of tricuspid valve regurgitation.
Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg., 52 (2017), pp. 1022-1030
H. Kundi, J.J. Popma, D.J. Cohen, et al.
Prevalence and Outcomes of Isolated Tricuspid Valve Surgery Among Medicare Beneficiaries.
Am J Cardiol., 123 (2019), pp. 132-138
A.L. Axtell, V. Bhambhani, P. Moonsamy, et al.
Surgery Does Not Improve Survival in Patients With Isolated Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 74 (2019), pp. 715-725
J. Rodés-Cabau, R.T. Hahn, A. Latib, et al.
Transcatheter Therapies for Treating Tricuspid Regurgitation.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 67 (2016), pp. 1829-1845
A. Latib, J. Curio, A. Mangieri.
Expanding the Armamentarium to Tackle a Still Unmet Need: New Transcatheter Options for the Treatment of Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 72 (2019), pp. 991-993
A. Vahanian, O. Alfieri, F. Andreotti, et al.
Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012).
Eur Heart J., 33 (2012), pp. 2451-2496
H. Baumgartner, V. Falk, J.J. Bax, et al.
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.
Eur Heart J., 38 (2017), pp. 2739-2791
J.P. Jacobs, C. Mavroudis, M.L. Jacobs, et al.
What is Operative Mortality? Defining Death in a Surgical Registry Database: A Report of the STS Congenital Database Taskforce and the Joint EACTS-STS Congenital Database Committee.
Ann Thorac Surg., 81 (2006), pp. 1937-1941
P. Lancellotti, C. Tribouilloy, A. Hagendorff, et al.
Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag., 14 (2013), pp. 611-644
R.T. Hahn, J.L. Zamorano.
The need for a new tricuspid regurgitation grading scheme.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag., 18 (2017), pp. 1342-1343
S. Bangalore, D.L. Bhatt.
Right Heart Catheterization Coronary Angiography, and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Circulation., 124 (2011), pp. e428-e433
G. Wang, Z. Sun, J. Xia, et al.
Predictors of secondary tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided valve replacement.
Surg Today., 38 (2008), pp. 778-783
V. Katsi, L. Raftopoulos, C. Aggeli, et al.
Tricuspid regurgitation after successful mitral valve surgery.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg., 15 (2012), pp. 102-108
R.A. Nishimura, C.M. Otto, R.O. Bonow, et al.
2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 70 (2017), pp. 252-289
C.C. Chang, K.M. Veen, R.T. Hahn, et al.
Uncertainties challenges in surgical transcatheter tricuspid valve therapy: a state-of-the-art expert review.
Eur Heart J., 41 (2019), pp. 1932-1940
F. Giannini, A. Colombo.
Percutaneous treatment of tricuspid valve in refractory right heart failure.
Eur Heart J Suppl., 21 (2019), pp. B43-B47
Y.-J. Kim, D.-A. Kwon, H.-K. Kim, et al.
Determinants of Surgical Outcome in Patients With Isolated Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Circulation., 120 (2009), pp. 1672-1678
M.F. Dietz, E.A. Prihadi, P. van der Bijl, et al.
Prognostic Implications of Right Ventricular Remodeling and Function in Patients With Significant Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Circulation., 140 (2019), pp. 836-845
H.-K. Kim, Y.-J. Kim, E.-A. Park, et al.
Assessment of haemodynamic effects of surgical correction for severe functional tricuspid regurgitation: cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.
Eur Heart J., 31 (2010), pp. 1520-1528
C.M. Vassileva, J. Shabosky, T. Boley, S. Markwell, S. Hazelrigg.
Tricuspid valve surgery: The past 10 years from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg., 143 (2012), pp. 1043-1049
B.S. Rana, S. Robinson, R. Francis, et al.
Tricuspid regurgitation and the right ventricle in risk stratification and timing of intervention.
Echo Res Pract., 6 (2019), pp. R25-R39
N. Wang, J. Fulcher, N. Abeysuriya, et al.
Tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality independent of pulmonary pressures and right heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur Heart J., 40 (2019), pp. 476-484
E. Agricola, C. Marini, S. Stella, et al.
Effects of functional tricuspid regurgitation on renal function and long-term prognosis in patients with heart failure.
J Cardiovasc Med., 18 (2017), pp. 60-68
C. Verdonk, A. Darmon, C. Cimadevilla, et al.
Is tricuspid annuloplasty increasing surgical mortality and morbidity during mitral valve replacement?. A single-centre experience.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis., 111 (2018), pp. 480-486
J. Rodríguez-Capitán, J.J. Gómez-Doblas, L. Fernández-López, et al.
Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Surgery for Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 66 (2013), pp. 629-635
R. Jeganathan, S. Armstrong, B. Al-Alao, T. David.
The Risk and Outcomes of Reoperative Tricuspid Valve Surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg., 95 (2013), pp. 119-124
F. Filsoufi, A.C. Anyanwu, S.P. Salzberg, T. Frankel, L.H. Cohn, D.H. Adams.
Long-Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Replacement in the Current Era.
Ann Thorac Surg., 80 (2005), pp. 845-850
G. Ailawadi, D.J. LaPar, B.R. Swenson, et al.
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Predicts Mortality for Tricuspid Valve Surgery.
Ann Thorac Surg., 87 (2009), pp. 1460-1468

Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Copyright © 2020. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Supplemental materials
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?