Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 70. Issue 4.
Pages 296 (April 2017)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 70. Issue 4.
Pages 296 (April 2017)
ECG Contest
Full text access
Response to ECG, March 2017
Respuesta al ECG de marzo de 2017
Alfonso Macías
Corresponding author

Corresponding author:
, Sara Castaño, Inés Madrazo
Servicio de Cardiologia, Hospital General Nuestra Señora del Prado, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2017;70:19710.1016/j.rec.2016.11.021
Alfonso Macías, Sara Castaño, Inés Madrazo
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (1)
Full Text

The correct answer is number 3: monomorphic ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation. On analysis of the device, it was found that the atrial arrhythmia presented first at a high frequency (160 bpm) and this was followed by ventricular tachycardia (150 bpm), probably induced by the ventricular tachycardia response. External synchronized electric cardioversion was performed, and sinus rhythm was achieved with a biphasic 150J shock.

Ventricular tachycardia beats (*), beats with differing degrees of fusion (**), and narrow complex atrial fibrillation (***) can be observed in the rhythm strip (Figure).


Answer 2 is incorrect because atrial fibrillation with aberrant conduction would not have regular periods and there would be no fusion beats. Answer 4 is incorrect because pre-excited atrial fibrillation with a left lateral accessory pathway would sometimes be irregular and the QRS complex between V2 and V4 should be largely positive. Likewise, answer 1 is incorrect because polymorphic ventricular tachycardia would show a clear shift in the electrical axis at higher frequency.

Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?