Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 72. Issue 11.
Pages 967 (November 2019)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 72. Issue 11.
Pages 967 (November 2019)
ECG Contest
Full text access
Response to ECG, October 2019
Respuesta al ECG de octubre de 2019
Pasquale Creaa,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author:
, Angela Nicoterab, Teresa Creac
a Cardiology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Italy
b Cardiology Unit, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy
c Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Italy
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2019;72:86610.1016/j.rec.2018.11.006
Pasquale Crea, Angela Nicotera, Teresa Crea
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (1)
Full Text

The correct answer is number 3. As shown in Figure 1, the P-P cycle exactly doubles. This finding strongly suggests a 2:1 sinoatrial (S-A) block. Sympathovagal imbalance and respiratory sinus arrhythmia would have generated a gradually lengthening and shortening of the P-P cycle in a cyclical fashion, usually corresponding to the phases of the respiratory cycle or other autonomic reflexes. Thus, answers 1 and 2 are incorrect. A concealed atrioventricular (A-V) node reentry cannot explain sinus node depression. Moreover, the ECG would have shown a trigger, preceding the pause, such as a Wenckeback phenomenon or a premature atrial impulse.1 For this reason, answer 4 is incorrect.

Figure 1

The sinus impulse is only recorded by the ECG once it has left the sinus node and activated the atrium, thereby resulting in the P wave.2 Delay in conduction at the S-A junction, such as that occurring during a first-degree S-A block is, therefore, not visible electrocardiographically. Second-degree S-A blocks can be revealed by a careful analysis of the ECG. A Wenckebach conduction defect at the S-A level will present as progressive acceleration of the P-P intervals, analogously to the progressive acceleration of the R-R intervals in an A-V Wenckebach disturbance. Pause is less than twice the preceding P-P cycle.3 In contrast, an abrupt doubling of the P-P cycle excludes a second-degree Mobitz type 2 or a 2:1 S-A block. It is worth noting that sinus bradycardia and 2:1 S-A block are indistinguishable on an ECG, unless an abrupt change in heart rate clarifies the underlying mechanism. Advanced S-A block will be revealed by a pause that is a multiple of> 2 of the P-P cycle. ECG of third-degree S-A block is analogous to sinus arrest.

G. Oreto, A. Consolo, I.M. Scimone.
Manifest and concealed AV nodal reentry in Wenckebach type of AV conduction with AV junctional escape rhythm.
J Electrocardiol., 29 (1996), pp. 333-336
M.A. de Almeida Henriques, L. Schamroth.
Sinus rhythm complicated by second-degree sino-atrial block.
Heart Lung., 5 (1976), pp. 137-138
L. Schamroth, E. Dove.
The Wenckebach phenomenon in sino-atrial block.
Br Heart J., 28 (1966), pp. 350-358
Copyright © 2018. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?