Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 62. Issue 9.
Pages 966-971 (September 2009)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 62. Issue 9.
Pages 966-971 (September 2009)
DOI: 10.1016/S1885-5857(09)73261-X
Full text access
The Diagnostic Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Chest Pain, Elevated Cardiac Enzymes and Non-Obstructed Coronary Arteries
Utilidad diagnóstica de la resonancia magnética cardiovascular en pacientes con dolor torácico, enzimas cardiacas elevadas y ausencia de obstrucción arterial coronaria
Visits
...
Raymond J. Kima, Afshin Farzaneh-Farb
a Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
b Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center, Division of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
This item has received
...
Visits
(Daily data update)
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
TABLE. Prevalence of Non-Obstructive Coronary Acute Disease in Patients With Acute Myocardial infarction Undergoing Angiography
Figures (1)
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

According to the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus document on the universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI), the cornerstone tests required for diagnosis are biomarkers such as troponins and the 12-lead ECG.1 Widespread use of troponin assays over recent years has significantly improved the diagnosis of MI and enabled the identification of patients with small infarcts, many of whom would not have been identified previously. Despite this, the diagnosis of MI can still pose problems in clinical practice. In this issue of Revista Española de Cardiología, Laraudogoitia et al2 explore the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients presenting with features of acute MI by the consensus definition but without significant coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography.

The Problem

A significant number of patients who have all the classical features of MI—eg chest pain, new ST-segment changes, and rise in troponins—and fulfill the universal definition, ultimately prove not to have had an MI. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated that a surprising proportion of patients with clinically suspected MI have normal coronary arteries or insignificant disease at angiography, including up to 10% of patients initially diagnosed with ST segment elevation MI (STEMI) (Table 1).3-11 Although recanalization after an occlusive coronary event is well documented,12,13 many of these patients are unlikely to have had an MI, leaving clinicians with unanswered questions regarding diagnosis and management.

It is well known that ST-segment changes and elevated troponins can occur in the setting of many disorders including myocarditis, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, tachyarrhythmias, trauma, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, acute decompensated heart failure, drug toxicity, and acute neurological disease.1 However, the relative prevalence of these disorders is unclear as well as the best means of identification and differentiation of these conditions from MI. Thus Laraudogoitia et al2 are to be commended for shedding light on this important problem.

The Role of imaging

In these circumstances, cardiac imaging has the potential to provide important diagnostic information. This has been acknowledged in the ACC/ESC universal definition which indicates that new regional wall motion abnormalities or a loss of viable myocardium could be considered evidence of MI.1 However, it is important to realize that wall motion abnormalities may not occur unless the infarcted region exceeds 20%-50% of the myocardial wall.14,15 Similarly, scintigraphic defects in nuclear imaging may not be apparent until >10 g of myocardial tissue is infarcted.14

Thus, because a sizable threshold of damage is required, echocardiography or radionuclide imaging may miss MI, particularly when small or subendocardial. Conversely, when abnormalities in regional function or perfusion are present, they do not always indicate MI. Both may be abnormal in the setting of ischemia without infarction. Nonischemic conditions such as cardiomyopathy, inflammatory, or infiltrative diseases can also lead to regional wall motion abnormalities or loss of viable myocardium. Hence, the positive predictive value of these imaging findings are not high unless these conditions can be excluded.1

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance imaging

The most accurate and best validated cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) technique for the diagnosis of irreversible myocardial damage is delayed enhancement-CMR (DE-CMR). This simple method involves inversion-recovery imaging approximately 10 minutes after intravenous administration of gadolinium contrast.16,17 When properly performed, normal myocardium appears black or "nulled" whereas nonviable regions appear bright or "hyperenhanced." The mechanism of hyperenhancement has not been fully elucidated, but appears to be based on the absence of viable myocytes rather than any inherent properties that are specific for acute necrosis, collagenous scar, or other forms of nonviable myocardium.17

In animal models of MI, extensive comparisons have demonstrated a nearly exact relationship between the size and shape of infarcted myocardium by DE-CMR to that of histopathology.18-22 Additionally, these studies show DE-CMR can distinguish between reversible and irreversible myocardial injury independent of wall motion, infarct age, and reperfusion status. DE-CMR has been shown to be superior to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in detecting subendocardial infarcts and infarcts in non-anterior locations.21 Furthermore, the high spatial resolution of DE-CMR enables visualization of even microinfarctions, involving as little as 1g of tissue, which may occur during otherwise successful percutaneous coronary intervention.23

Analogous to troponins, the detection of injury by DE-CMR is specific for irreversible myocardial damage but is not specific for MI. However, an advantage of DE-CMR is that the pattern of hyperenhancement, rather than simply the presence or extent, gives important information regarding the etiology of myocardial damage.24-26 For this purpose, the concept that ischemic myonecrosis proceeds as a "wavefront"27 from the subendocardium to the epicardium with increasing coronary occlusion time is crucial. Accordingly, hyperenhancement patterns that spare the subendocardium and are limited to the middle or epicardial portion of the left ventricular (LV) wall are clearly nonischemic in origin since damage in the setting of coronary artery disease almost always involves the subendocardium.24-26 Certain nonischemic disorders such as myocarditis, have characteristic hyperenhancement patterns, which may suggest a specific diagnosis, and a systematic approach to interpreting DE-CMR images in patients with cardiomyopathy has been proposed.25,28

Laraudogoitia et al2 performed DE-CMR on 80 patients that were admitted with chest pain and positive cardiac biomarkers (presumably troponins) who underwent cardiac catheterization showing "no significant lesions" within 48 hours of admission. All CMR studies were performed 4 (3) days from the time of cardiac catheterization. A diagnosis was made based on the detection of hyperenhancement in 63 patients (79%). Based on the pattern of hyperenhancement the final diagnosis was myocarditis in 51 patients (63%), and MI in 12 patients (15%). Takotsubo cardiomyopathy was diagnosed in 9 patients (11%) based on absence of hyperenhancement and initial mid-to-apical wall motion abnormalities which subsequently resolved. In 4 patients (5%) a subsequent diagnosis of pericarditis was made, presumably on clinical grounds, leaving 4 patients (5%) with no specific diagnosis. It is important to point out that the authors' use of the term "no significant lesions in the coronary arteries" is unclear. This is of interest since it may refer to stenosis <70% or to completely normal vessels without luminal irregularities.

These findings are consistent with the recent work of Assomull et al who evaluated the role of CMR in 60 patients presenting with chest pain, elevated troponins, and unobstructed coronary arteries (<50% stenosis).29 DE-CMR provided a new diagnosis in 65% of patients. The commonest underlying cause was myocarditis (50%), followed by MI (12%). However, in contrast to the present study only 1 patient (1.7%) had the diagnosis of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy made.

Similarly, in a recent registry of 1335 STEMI patients undergoing coronary angiography, Larson et al reported that 14% had no culprit artery and 9.5% did not have significant CAD (<50% stenosis).3 The majority of patients with no clear culprit artery and positive cardiac biomarkers underwent CMR, which established that the most common diagnoses in this subgroup were myocarditis (31%), Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (31%), and STEMI without an angiographic lesion (29%).

Takosubo Cardiomyopathy

The diagnosis of Takosubo cardiomyopathy is dependent on the presence of typical apical wall motion abnormalities in the absence of significant obstructive CAD which resolves over a period of several weeks or months. The study of Laraudogoitia et al2 suggests the potential role of CMR in helping to distinguish these patients from those with myocarditis or MI by demonstrating the absence of hyperenhancement. Eitel et al recently examined the role of CMR in 59 patients presenting with typical clinical features of Takosubo cardiomyopathy (acute coronary syndrome patients without significant obstructive CAD and typical apical wall motion abnormalities).30 Interestingly, DE-CMR demonstrated an alternative diagnosis in 21 patients (35.6%). The DE-CMR pattern showed MI in 13 patients (22%) and myocarditis in 8 patients (13.6%). Therefore only 38 patients (68%) were given the diagnosis of Takosubo cardiomyopathy on the basis of CMR. Follow-up CMR was performed in 32 of these patients (84%) and showed completely normalized systolic function.

Acute Myocardial infarction

The present study is consistent with prior observations regarding the presence of acute MI in a significant number of patients, despite unobstructed arteries. The diagnosis is based on subendocardial or transmural hyperenhancement patterns in coronary distributions with the presence of microvascular obstruction in some cases. Laraudogoitia et al2 did not explore the possible causes of acute MI in these patients which may include coronary embolism, spasm, or recanalization. In this regard, DE-CMR is highly sensitive for the detection of intra-cardiac thrombus when performed correctly,31 and in our own practice we have found previously unknown intra-cardiac thrombi in a number of these patients. In the presence of unobstructed coronary arteries, the finding of intra-cardiac thrombus would strongly suggest coronary embolism as the underlying cause. We have also observed cases where the presence of acute MI by DE-CMR prompted re-reviewing of the original coronary angiogram revealing a (usually small) occluded artery which had been originally overlooked.

In many patients with acute MI or acute coronary syndrome the culprit artery cannot be identified (Table),3-11 because of the absence of CAD, absence of typical angiographic characteristics, or because multivessel CAD is present and more than one artery/culprit could be responsible. In these circumstances, by visualizing the MI location, DE-CMR may be helpful in identifying the infarct related artery. The primary utility of this would be in patients with multivessel disease (Figure) since the practical implications of identifying the infarct related artery in the absence of significant stenosis are currently unclear.

Figure. Identification of the infarct related artery using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). A 69 year old man presented with a several week history of exertional chest discomfort while running. On the morning of admission he experienced chest pain whilst sitting in church. His ECG showed no significant signs of ischemia but he had a positive troponin T. (A) Cardiac catheterization showed a 90% mid left anterior descending (LAD) lesion and a sequential 70% mid-distal LAD lesion (arrows) with a proximally occluded circumflex artery. There was only non-obstructive disease in the right coronary artery. Two drug eluting stents were placed in the LAD with the assumption that the circumflex was chronically occluded and the LAD was the acute infarct related artery. (B) Subsequent CMR demonstrated trans-mural hyperenhancement with an area of microvascular obstruction in the infero-lateral wall (arrow) consistent with an acute infarct in the territory of the circumflex artery.

T2-Weighted imaging

T2-weighted imaging has shown promise in assessing acute, edematous, inflammatory processes, such as acute MI or myocarditis and may prove useful in distinguishing chronic myocardial lesions from those of recent onset.32 However, it is interesting to note that T2-weighted imaging did not appear to significantly improve diagnostic performance over and above that provided by DECMR and cine imaging in the present study. Only 37 of 51 patients with evidence of myocarditis and 3 of 13 patients with evidence of MI on DE-CMR showed increased T2 signal intensity. Similarly, just 3 of 9 patients with Takosubo cardiomyopathy and apical wall motion abnormalities showed increased T2 signal intensity. Laraudogoitia et al2, speculate that the late imaging of some of the patients may have been responsible for the low yield of T2-weighted imaging in their study. However, all CMR studies were performed within 4 (3) days from the time of cardiac catheterization which is well within the acute period of tissue edema. This relatively low sensitivity of T2-weighted imaging is also consistent with the findings of both Assomull and Eitel, and likely relates to the limitations of current black-blood T2-weighted imaging sequences.29,30,33

CONCLUSIONS

The study of Laraudogoitia et al2 adds to the growing body of work demonstrating the utility of CMR in patients presenting with signs and symptoms consistent with acute MI but absence of obstructive CAD on coronary angiography. This clinical conundrum occurs not infrequently and adds to the increasing number of indications for CMR in daily clinical practice. Future work should focus on the prognostic significance of the CMR findings in this patient group. In addition, rapidly evolving technical advances in several areas including newer T2-weighted and delayed enhancement sequences as well as more rapid acquisition times may improve the diagnostic yield and usefulness of CMR in these settings.

See original on pageS 976-83

Conflicts of interests disclosures: Dr. Raymond J. Kim is an inventor of a US patent on delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance that is owned by Northwestern University. Dr. Raymond J. Kim is a co-founder of HeartIT, LLC.


Correspondence: R. J. Kim, MD,
Duke Cardiovascular MRI Center,
DUMC 3934, Durham, NC 27710, USA E-mail: raymond.kim@duke.edu

Bibliography
[1]
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD..
Universal definition of myocardial infarction..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 50 (2007), pp. 2173-95
[2]
Laraudogoitia Zaldumbide E, Pérez-David E, Larena JA, Velasco del Castillo S, Rumoroso Cuevas JR, Onaindía JJ, et al..
Utilidad de la resonancia magnética cardiaca en el diagnóstico de los pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo y coronarias normales..
Rv Esp Cardiol, 62 (2009), pp. 976-83
[3]
Larson DM, Menssen KM, Sharkey SW, Duval S, Schwartz RS, Harris J, et al..
"False-positive" cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction..
JAMA, 298 (2007), pp. 2754-60
[4]
Hofsten DE, Wachtell K, Lund B, Molgaard H, Egstrup K..
Prevalence and prognostic implications of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after revascularization with either fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty..
Eur Heart J, 28 (2007), pp. 407-14
[5]
Bonnefoy E, Lapostolle F, Leizorovicz A, Steg G, McFadden EP, Dubien PY, et al..
Primary angioplasty versus prehospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a randomised study..
[6]
Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, Weaver WD, White HD, van de Werf F, et al..
Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators..
N Engl J Med, 341 (1999), pp. 226-32
[7]
Windhausen F, Hirsch A, Sanders GT, Cornel JH, Fischer J, van Straalen JP, et al..
N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide for additional risk stratification in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome and an elevated troponin T: an Invasive versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable coronary Syndromes (ICTUS) substudy..
Am Heart J, 153 (2007), pp. 485-92
[8]
Patel MR, Chen AY, Peterson ED, Newby LK, Pollack CV, Brindis RG, et al..
Prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and insignificant coronary artery disease: results from the Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines (CRUSADE) initiative..
Am Heart J, 152 (2006), pp. 641-7
[9]
Dokainish H, Pillai M, Murphy SA, DiBattiste PM, Schweiger MJ, Lotfi A, et al..
Prognostic implications of elevated troponin in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome but no critical epicardial coronary disease: a TACTICS-TIMI-18 substudy..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 45 (2005), pp. 19-24
[10]
Lindahl B, Diderholm E, Lagerqvist B, Venge P, Wallentin L..
Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 38 (2001), pp. 979-86
[11]
Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, Boden WE, Pepine CJ..
Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 39 (2002), pp. 1456-63
[12]
Topol EJ, Yadav JS..
Recognition of the importance of embolization in atherosclerotic vascular disease..
Circulation, 101 (2000), pp. 570-80
[13]
Arroyo LH, Lee RT..
Mechanisms of plaque rupture: mechanical and biologic interactions..
Cardiovasc Res, 41 (1999), pp. 369-75
[14]
Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP..
Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 36 (2000), pp. 959-69
[15]
Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Parker M, Regenfus M, Fieno DS, Bonow RO, et al..
Relationship of contractile function to transmural extent of infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 42 (2003), pp. 505-12
[16]
Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Hillenbrand HB, Wu E, Bundy JM, et al..
An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction..
[17]
Kim RJ, Shah DJ, Judd RM..
How we perform delayed enhancement imaging..
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 5 (2003), pp. 505-14
[18]
Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, et al..
Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function..
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 1992-2002
[19]
Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM..
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 36 (2000), pp. 1985-991
[20]
Rehwald WG, Fieno DS, Chen EL, Kim RJ, Judd RM..
Myocardial magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent concentrations after reversible and irreversible ischemic injury..
Circulation, 105 (2002), pp. 224-9
[21]
Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, Elliott MD, Regenfus M, Parker M, et al..
Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study..
[22]
Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Thomson L, Hager S, Meinhardt G, Rehwald W, et al..
Effects of time, dose, and inversion time for acute myocardial infarct size measurements based on magnetic resonance imaging-delayed contrast enhancement..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 47 (2006), pp. 2027-33
[23]
Ricciardi MJ, Wu E, Davidson CJ, Choi KM, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, et al..
Visualization of discrete microinfarction after percutaneous coronary intervention associated with mild creatine kinase-MB elevation..
Circulation, 103 (2001), pp. 2780-3
[24]
McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, McKenna WJ, Lorenz CH, Coats AJ, et al..
Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance..
[25]
Mahrholdt H, Wagner A, Judd RM, Sechtem U, Kim RJ..
Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies..
Eur Heart J, 26 (2005), pp. 1461-74
[26]
Hunold P, Schlosser T, Vogt FM, Eggebrecht H, Schmermund A, Bruder O, et al..
Myocardial late enhancement in contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI: distinction between infarction scar and non-infarction-related disease..
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 184 (2005), pp. 1420-6
[27]
Reimer KA, Jennings RB..
The "wavefront phenomenon" of myocardial ischemic cell death. II. Transmural progression of necrosis within the framework of ischemic bed size (myocardium at risk) and collateral flow..
Lab Invest, 40 (1979), pp. 633-44
[28]
Senthilkumar A, Majmudar MD, Shenoy C, Kim HW, Kim RJ..
Identifying the Etiology: A Systematic Approach Using Delayed Enhancement Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance..
Heart Fail Clin, (2009 [in press]),
[29]
Assomull RG, Lyne JC, Keenan N, Gulati A, Bunce NH, Davies SW, et al..
The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients presenting with chest pain, raised troponin, and unobstructed coronary arteries..
Eur Heart J, 28 (2007), pp. 1242-9
[30]
Eitel I, Behrendt F, Schindler K, Kivelitz D, Gutberlet M, Schuler G, et al..
Differential diagnosis of suspected apical ballooning syndrome using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging..
Eur Heart J, 29 (2008), pp. 2651-9
[31]
Weinsaft JW, Kim HW, Shah DJ, Klem I, Crowley AL, Brosnan R, et al..
Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 52 (2008), pp. 148-57
[32]
Abdel-Aty H, Zagrosek A, Schulz-Menger J, Taylor AJ, Messroghli D, Kumar A, et al..
Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction..
[33]
Kellman P, Aletras AH, Mancini C, McVeigh ER, Arai AE..
T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo..
Magn Reson Med, 57 (2007), pp. 891-7
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.