ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 60. Num. 9.
Pages 952-958 (September 2007)

Cardiovascular Responses to Hypertonic NaCl Injection Into the Anteroventral Third Ventricle Region in Rats With Fructose-Induced Hypertension and Insulin Resistance

Respuestas cardiovasculares al NaCl hipertónico inyectado en la región anteroventral del tercer ventrículo de ratas con hipertensión e insulinorresistencia inducidas por fructosa

Francisco J RosaaEduardo Romero-VecchioneaJosé VásquezaRafael AntequeraaMiriam Straussb

Options

INTRODUCTION

In attempts to induce changes in experimental animals similar to those seen in metabolic syndrome in humans, rats have been fed long-term diets rich in fructose,1 saccharose,2 or lipids.3 Those fed a fructose-rich diet for 14 to 4 weeks5 have been reported to manifest symptoms observed in humans suffering from this syndrome, such as obesity, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and high blood pressure.6 Such patients are at increased risk of suffering a cardiovascular event7,8; they also suffer dyslipidemia, abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, hyperuricemia, and are more sensitive to dietary salt because of reduced sodium excretion at the kidney.9,10 In addition, they show increased vascular reactivity to noradrenalin11 and insulin resistance associated with increased sympathetic activity. All these factors contribute to the development of high blood pressure.12 Insulin resistance is nearly always accompanied by high plasma insulin concentrations; the ensuing mitogenic activity in the smooth muscle fibers of the arteries contributes to the increase in peripheral resistance and the development of athersclerosis.13-15 Metabolic syndrome has also been associated with a reduction in baroreceptor gain, which helps maintain blood pressure high.16 Further, patients with this syndrome suffer hypertriglyceridemia, a reduction in their high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, and an increase in the level of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C).17-19 All these factors are associated with endothelial dysfunction, which impairs arterial vasodilatory function, further increasing the risk of athersclerosis.20,21

Stimulation of the rat anteroventral third ventricular (AV3V) region of the brain with hypertonic NaCl increases the blood pressure and heart rate via efferent sympathetic nerve activity.22 However, these responses have not been explored in rodents fed a fructose-rich diet. The aim of the present work was to determine their magnitude in rats with experimental metabolic syndrome induced by feeding them a fructose-rich diet over 6 months, a longer period than that used by other authors.

METHODS

The experimental animals used were male Sprague-Dawley rats with a baseline weight of 200-250 g. These were housed and maintained according to international animal research guidelines. A 12L/12D photoperiod was established. All rats were weighed weekly using a balance designed for small animals.

DIET

Twelve rats were fed 60% fructose with their normal compressed food (Ratarina®) for 6 months. All animals had free access to filtered tap water. Twelve control rats were fed Ratarina® without fructose under the same conditions.

Biochemical Assays

Blood samples were taken at the end of the sixth month dietary period. Plasma was separated and the concentrations of glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and uric acid determined using a standard, automated laboratory technique (Spin React Lab®, Model 180). Plasma insulin was determined by ultrasenstitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using the 1,3 Ultrasensitive kit (ALPCO®, USA). Insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostatic model assessment equation (HOMA)23-25 for humans after a 12 h fast.

Determination of Blood Pressure and Heart Rate

Blood pressure and heart rate were measured non-invasively every month using a digital tail plethysmograph (Letica, Modelo 5001®, Spain). After 6 months of high fructose diet, the rats showed high blood pressure, hyperinsulinemia, and dyslipidemia, and were used to assess the hemodynamic effects of microinjecting hypertonic NaCl into the AV3V region of the brain.

Microinjection of Hypertonic NaCl Into the AV3V

Rats fed on both diets were anesthetized with 35 mg/kg pentobarbital, and the right femoral artery and vein cannulated with PE-50 polyethylene catheters. The arterial catheter allowed the continuous recording of the systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP respectively) using a strain gauge transducer. The venous catheter was used for the administration of solutions or dugs. Heart rate was recorded using a tachograph (Letica, Modelo CAR 300, Spain) activated by pulse waves.

The animals' heads were held in a stereotaxic apparatus (David Kopf Instruments®, USA). The coordinates used for locating the AV3V (taking the bregma as a reference) were: anteroposterior 1.0 mm, lateral 0.5 mm, depth 7.5 mm.25

Two µL microinjections of 1.5 M NaCl were given over 2 min using a 0.2 mm diameter stainless steel Hamilton® syringe. The dead space was taken into account to correct the injected volume.

Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded continuously before microinjection of the hypertonic NaCl and afterwards until baseline values were restored.

Control rats were microinjected with 2 µL of isotonic artificial cerebrospinal fluid22; this causes no hemodynamic changes (results not shown).

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as means (standard error [SE]). Differences between means were analyzed using the Student t test for non-paired data. The Student t test for paired data was used to compare the differences between groups before and after microinjection of the NaCl. ANOVA was used to detect possible significant differences between the data for different groups. All calculations were performed using SPSS v. 11 software.

RESULTS

After 6 months on the fructose-rich diet, the body weight of the rats thus treated increased significantly to 505 (37) g compared to 375 (26) g (P<.05) for the rats fed the control diet. After a 12 h fast, the former rats showed the following plasma variable values: blood sugar 110.2 (5.1) mg/dL compared to 63.0 (2.2) mg/dL in the control animals, plasma insulin 429 (8.3) µU/mL compared to 18.3 (7.4) µU/mL, triglycerides 175.5 (4.68) mg/dL compared to 65.5 (7.8) mg/dL, total cholesterol 106.2 (16.4) mg/dL compared to 40.3 (3.8) mg/dL, and uric acid 2.8 (0.3) mg/dL compared to 1.4 (0.4) mg/dL; all these differences were significantly different (P<.01). The HOMA index, calculated as

was significantly greater (P<.01) in the animals fed the fructose-rich diet (11.63 compared to 2.78 for the control diet rats).

Blood Pressure and Paseline Heart Rate

After 6 months on the fructose-rich diet, the SBP of the rats was 152.0 (2.0) mm Hg compared to 120.4 (3.5) mm Hg for the control rats (P<.01), and their DBP was 116.4 (2.13) mm Hg compared to 74.58 (2.49) mm Hg (P<.01). The baseline heart rate of the rats of the 2 dietary groups did not differ significantly (345.5 [7.67] beats/min for the fructose-rich diet rats, and 344 [6.70] beats/min for the control animals; P>.05).

Hemodynamic Changes Caused by Microinjection of the Hypertonic 1.5 M NaCl Into the AV3V Region

After 6 months administration of the control or fructose-rich diet, 2 µL of 1.5 M NaCl were microinjected into the AV3V. The fructose diet rats showed an increase in SBP over baseline values greater than that seen in the control diet rats (44.64 [3.6] mm Hg compared to 28.33 [3.1] mm Hg; P<.01) (Figure 1). In the control diet rats, the DBP increased by 13.0 (1.9) mm Hg over baseline compared to 19.9 (2.4) mm Hg (P<.01) in the rats fed the fructose-rich diet (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Effect of microinjecting 2 µL of 1.5 M NaCl into the anteroventral third ventricular region on systolic blood pressure in the control rats (n=12) and in those fed the fructose-rich diet (n=12). The bars show the mean; the vertical lines represent the standard error of the mean. *P<.01 compared to baseline prior to the microinjection of hypertonic NaCl.

Figure 2. Effect of microinjecting 2 µL of 1.5 M NaCl into the anteroventral third ventricular region on diastolic blood pressure in the control rats (n=12) and in those fed the rich-rich diet (n=12). The bars show the mean; the vertical lines represent the standard error of the mean. *P<.01 compared to baseline prior to the microinjection of hypertonic NaCl.

The heart rate increased by 23.0 (5.0) beast/min over baseline in the control diet rats, and by 66.2 (8.4) beats/min in the fructose-rich diet rats (P<.01) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Effect of microinjecting 2 µL of 1.5 M NaCl into the anteroventral third ventricular region on heart rate in the control rats (n=12) and in those fed the rich-rich diet (n=12). The bars show the mean; the vertical lines represent the standard error of the mean. *P<.01 compared to baseline prior to the microinjection of hypertonic NaCl.

These responses lasted longer in the fructose-rich diet rats than in the control diet rats (70 [7] min compared to 45.5 [5.5] min; P<.01).

DISCUSSION

The 6-month fructose-rich diet led to plasma metabolic changes greater than those reported by other authors in studies in which this diet was followed for between 2 weeks and 1 month. The reason for extending the dietary period in rats lies in the fact that human diets can remain unchanged over long periods; for rats, 6 months represents about 1/5 of their lives. The fructose-rich diet increased plasma glucose concentrations of the corresponding rats by 74.6% over that of the control diet rats. This increase is much greater than that achieved when diets are fed for shorter periods (9.5% after 2 weeks4 and 11.5%-12% after 1 month5,26). Clearly, this longer administration period provides a greater, more prolonged stimulus to the beta cells of the pancreas.1,26,27 This likely explains the greater plasma insulin levels seen in the present work (2.3 times greater than in the control group compared to just 0.41% - 2.16% seen when fructose-rich diets were provided for 71-304 days).

The increase in plasma insulin concentrations was insufficient to normalize blood sugar levels due to the simultaneous development of insulin resistance, similar to that seen in diabetes type 2.28,29

Insulin resistance was shown in the present work via the increase in the HOMA index, despite its limitations as a measure for estimating insulin sensitivity.24,30 Other authors have reported insulin resistance in rats fed diets with high fructose contents for shorter periods.1,5

The increase in plasma triglycerides in the fructose-diet rats is the result of their greater carbohydrate intake and insulin resistance; this is also observed in other models and in human metabolic syndrome. The underlying mechanism is a reduction in the synthesis and storage of triglycerides in the adipose tissue provoked by a reduction in the activity of lipoprotein lipase in this tissue, and a reduction in glycogen production at the liver.31

The increase in plasma cholesterol seen in the present fructose diet rats is similar to that seen in others fed a diet enriched in carbohydrates.32

The fructose-rich diet led to an increase in body weight due to the accumulation of fat in the adipose tissue; at the end of the experiments, autopsy revealed (macroscopically) the extensive accumulation of visceral adipose tissue around the abdominal organs compared to the control rats. In agreement with this finding, obese patients with predominantly visceral fat deposits are reported to show greater sympathetic activity.33 This mechanism contributes to the development of high blood pressure in humans, and probably explains the hypertension recorded in the present fructose diet rats.

The fructose-rich diet induced insulin resistance through the repetitive stimulation of the pancreatic beta cells, a consequence of which is an increase in the plasma insulin concentration. The increased interaction between insulin and its receptors at the target tissues (such as the muscles and adipose tissue) provokes the autophosphorylation of tyrosine residues in the receptor's internal domains34 as well as reductions in the expression and distribution of cellular glucose transporters.35,36

Other mechanisms that might explain the hypertension seen in the rats fed the fructose-rich diet include: an increased reabsorption of sodium at the kidney induced by hyperinsulinemia,37,38 increased arterial reactivity to endothelin,20,27,39 a reduction in endothelial vasoconstrictory action,18-21 and sympathetic hyperactivity induced by sodium reaching the neurons of the AV3V region, as shown in this work. The increase in sympathetic discharge induced by NaCl is probably 1 of the factors that maintains blood pressure high in the fructose-rich diets rats. However, the mechanism by which the AV3V neurons become hyperactive towards NaCl is unclear. One possibility is a sensitizing effect provoked by high plasma insulin levels passing through the AV3V region, where there is no blood-brain barrier. The AV3V region includes the subfornical organ and the organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis, which show increased permeability to high molecular weight substances due to the absence of the above barrier.40,41 In agreement with this argument, microinjections of insulin into the subfornical organ and the surroundings of the AV3V region have been reported to increase the blood pressure.42

CONCLUSIONS

1. Long-term fructose rich-diet led to a metabolic state involving insulin resistance and high blood pressure.

2. This diet induces an exaggerated hypertensive response when the AV3V region is stimulated with hypertonic NaCl (1.5 M).

ABBREVIATIONS
AV3V: region: anteroventral third ventricular region
DBP: diastolic blood pressure
HOMA: homeostatic model assessment
SBP: systolic blood pressure

This work received financial support from the Consejo de Desarrollo Científico y Humanístico of the Universidad Central de Venezuela via research project number N° PG 0900-5761-2004, and via the Proyecto de Investigación del Consejo de Investigación de la Universidad de Oriente.


Correspondence: Dr. F.J. Rosa
Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Los Chaguaramos, 1050 Caracas. Venezuela.
E-mail: frankrosa29@yahoo.com; garciel@ucv.ve

Received October 4, 2006.
Accepted for publication May 21, 2007.

Bibliography
[1]
Hwang I, Ho H, Hoffman B, Reaven G..
Fructose-induced insulin resistance and hypertension in rats..
Hypertension, (1987), 10 pp. 512-5
[2]
del Zotto H, Massa L, Gómez C, Gagliardino J..
Changes induced by sucrose administration upon the morphology and function of pancreatic islets in the normal hamster..
Diabetes Metab Res Rev, (1999), 15 pp. 106-12
[3]
Setty S, Sun W, Tune J..
Coronary blood flow regulation in the prediabetic metabolic syndrome..
Basic Res Cardiol, (2003), 98 pp. 416-23
[4]
Tobey TA, Mondon CE, Zavaroni I, Reaven G..
Mechanism of insulin resistance in fructose-fed rats..
Metabolism, (1982), 31 pp. 608-12
[5]
Reaven GM, Tranquilina R, Risser Y-D, Chan I, Reaven EP..
Characterization of a model of diabetes-induced hypertriglyceridemia in young nonobese rats..
J Lipid Res, (1979), 20 pp. 371-7
[6]
Reaven G..
Insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, hypertrglyceridemia, and hypertension. Parallels between human disease and rodent models..
Diabetes Care, (1991), 14 pp. 195-202
[7]
Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH..
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey..
JAMA, (2002), 287 pp. 359-9
[8]
Eckel R, Grundy S, Zimmet P..
The metabolic syndrome..
[9]
Moller D, Kaufman K..
Metabolic syndrome: a clinical and molecular perspective..
[10]
Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Baldari G, Campese VM..
Clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in salt sensitive patients with essential hypertension: role of insulin..
Am J Hypertens, (1996), 9 pp. 24-32
[11]
Baron A D, Brechtel G, Johnson A..
Interactions between insulin and norepinephrine on blood pressure and insulin sensitivity..
J Clin Invest, (1994), 93 pp. 2453-62
[12]
Hernández del Rey R..
Síndrome metabólico y sistema nervioso simpático..
Hipertensión, (2005), 22 pp. 23-31
[13]
Hsueh W, Lyon Ch, Quiñones M..
Insulin resistance and the endothelium..
Am J Med, (2004), 117 pp. 109-17
[14]
Sjöholm A, Nÿstrom T..
Endothelial inflammation in insulin resistance..
[15]
Caballero E..
Endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and insulin resistance: a focus on subjects at risks for type 2 diabetes..
Current Diabetes Report, (2004), 4 pp. 237-46
[16]
Beske S, Alvarez G, Ballard T, Davy K..
Reduced cardiovagal baroreflex gain in visceral obesity. Implications for the metabolic syndrome..
Am J Physiol, (2001), 282 pp. H630-5
[17]
Reaven G, Chen YD, Jeppesen J, Matheux P, Krauss R..
Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in individuals with small, dense, low density lipoprotein particles..
J Clin Invest, (1993), 92 pp. 141-6
[18]
Goff D, d'Agostino R, Haffner S, Otvos J..
Insulin resistance and adiposity influence lipoprotein size and subclass concentrations. Results from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study..
Metabolism, (2005), 54 pp. 264-70
[19]
Saltiel A..
The molecular and physiological basis of insulin resistance: emerging implications for metabolic and cardiovascular disease. J..
Clin Invest, (2000), 106 pp. 163-4
[20]
Miller A, Hoenig M, Ujhelyi M..
Mechanisms of impaired endothelial dependent relaxations associated with insulin resistance..
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther, (1998), 3 pp. 125-34
[21]
Katakam PV, Ujhelyi MR, Miller A..
EDHF mediated relaxation is impaired in fructose-fed rats..
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, (1999), 34 pp. 461-7
[22]
Rosa F, Vásquez J, Lup.i, Lezama E, Romero-Vecchione E..
Pharmacological modulation of the cardiovascular response to hypertonic NaCl injection in the anteroventral area of the rat brain third ventricle..
Pharmacology, (1997), 54 pp. 98-107
[23]
Mathews DR, Hosker JP, Rudensky AS..
Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and beta cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man..
Diabetologia, (1985), 28 pp. 412-9
[24]
Clinician's Manual of Insulin Resistance. 1st ed. London: Science Press Ltd; 2002. p. 70.
[25]
A stereotaxic atlas of the rat brain. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1979.
[26]
Zavaroni I, Sander S, Scott S, Reaven G..
Effect of fructose on insulin secretion and insulin action in the rat..
Metabolism, (1980), 29 pp. 970-3
[27]
Shafrir E, Ziv E, Mosthaf L..
Nutritionally induced insulin resistance and receptor defect leading to b-cell failure in animal models..
Ann N Y Acad Sci, (1999), 892 pp. 223-46
[28]
Reaven G..
Pathophysiology of insulin resistance in human disease..
Physiol Rev, (1995), 75 pp. 473-86
[29]
Le Roith D..
ß-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: role of metabolic and genetic abnormalities..
Am J Med, (2002), 113 pp. S3-11
[30]
Alberti K, Zimmet P..
Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part I: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Provisional report of a WHO consultation..
[31]
Klannemark M, Orho M, Langin D..
The putative role of the hormone sensitive lipase gene in the pathogenesis of the metabolic syndrome..
Diabetologia, (1998), 41 pp. 1515-22
[32]
Feingold K, Moser A..
Effect of glucose or fructose feeding on cholesterol synthesis in diabetic animals..
Am J Physiol, (1985), 249 pp. G634-41
[33]
Alvarez GE, Beske SD, Ballard TP, Davy KP..
Sympathetic neural activation in visceral obesity..
Circulation, (2002), 106 pp. 2533-6
[34]
Shullman G..
Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance..
J Clin Invest, (2000), 106 pp. 171-6
[35]
Kotani K, Peroni O, Minokoshi Y, Boss O, Kahn B..
glucose transporter deficiency increases hepatic lipid production and peripheral utilization. J Clin Inves, (2004), 114 pp. 1666-75
[36]
Maianu L, Keller S, Garvey T..
Adipocytes exhibit abnormal subcellular distribution and translocation of vesicles containing glucose transporter 4 and insulin-regulated aminopeptidase in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Implications regarding defects in vesicle trafficking..
J Clin Endocrinol Metabol, (2001), 86 pp. 5450-6
[37]
Catena C, Giacchetti G, Novello M, Colussi G, Cavarape A, Secchi L..
Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance in rats with fructose-induced hypertension..
Am J Hypertens, (2003), 16 pp. 973-8
[38]
Catena C, Cavarape A, Novello M, Giacchetti G, Sechi L..
Insulin receptors and renal sodium handling in hypertensive fructose-fed rats..
Kidney Int, (2003), 64 pp. 2163-71
[39]
Miller A, Tulbert C, Puskar M, Busija D..
Enhanced endothelin activity prevents vasodilation to insulin in insulin resistance..
Hypertension, (2002), 40 pp. 78-82
[40]
Muntzel MS, Thunhorst RL, Johnson AK..
Effect of subfornical organ lesions on sympathetic nerve responses to insulin..
Hypertension, (1996), 29 pp. 1020-4
[41]
van Houten M, Posner BI, Kopriwa BM, Brawer JR..
Insulin binding sites in the rat brain: in vivo localization to the circumventricular organs by quantitative radioautography..
Endocrinology, (1979), 105 pp. 666-73
[42]
Muntzel M, Beltz T, Mark A, Johnson AK..
Anteroventral neural responses to hyperinsulinemia..
Hypertension, (1994), 23 pp. 1059-62
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?