Response to ECG, November 2015

doi:10.1016/j.rec.2015.05.018

Ampliar

Vol. 68. Num. 12.

Pages 1178 (December 2015)

Ecg contest
Response to ECG, November 2015

Respuesta al ECG de noviembre de 2015

Sonia Mirabet

ECG, November 2015

Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68:102510.1016/j.rec.2015.05.017

Sonia Mirabet

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2015.05.018

View PDF

Lea este artículo en español

Options

Other articles of interest

Statistics

1985 Total PDF

3978 Total HTML

Year/month	Html	Pdf	Total
2025 May	59	11	70
2025 April	52	9	61
2025 March	47	11	58
2025 February	40	20	60
2025 January	37	31	68
2024 December	34	16	50
2024 November	34	25	59
2024 October	39	33	72
2024 September	66	19	85
2024 August	31	34	65
2024 July	21	9	30
2024 June	23	17	40
2024 May	21	16	37
2024 April	32	29	61
2024 March	27	25	52
2024 February	25	20	45
2024 January	27	30	57
2023 December	18	56	74
2023 November	19	11	30
2023 October	26	29	55
2023 September	25	15	40
2023 August	10	13	23
2023 July	29	34	63
2023 June	29	11	40
2023 May	30	15	45
2023 April	21	14	35
2023 March	8	7	15
2023 February	29	17	46
2023 January	12	12	24
2022 December	26	17	43
2022 November	27	15	42
2022 October	30	19	49
2022 September	38	28	66
2022 August	30	35	65
2022 July	19	21	40
2022 June	17	27	44
2022 May	18	30	48
2022 April	40	20	60
2022 March	22	31	53
2022 February	22	20	42
2022 January	12	15	27
2021 December	15	36	51
2021 November	25	28	53
2021 October	20	29	49
2021 September	15	35	50
2021 August	19	18	37
2021 July	29	18	47
2021 June	22	18	40
2021 May	24	11	35
2021 April	53	45	98
2021 March	81	30	111
2021 February	51	9	60
2021 January	40	4	44
2020 December	32	12	44
2020 November	25	7	32
2020 October	50	12	62
2020 September	15	7	22
2020 August	28	11	39
2020 July	44	17	61
2020 June	14	11	25
2020 May	19	12	31
2020 April	15	11	26
2020 March	12	15	27
2020 February	23	13	36
2020 January	30	30	60
2019 December	39	25	64
2019 November	25	21	46
2019 October	27	17	44
2019 September	16	21	37
2019 August	5	9	14
2019 July	78	37	115
2019 June	35	18	53
2019 May	23	12	35
2019 April	27	20	47
2019 March	39	15	54
2019 February	52	19	71
2019 January	49	13	62
2018 December	74	23	97
2018 November	49	12	61
2018 October	59	12	71
2018 September	25	9	34
2018 August	32	8	40
2018 July	70	17	87
2018 June	81	11	92
2018 May	48	9	57
2018 April	37	9	46
2018 March	56	6	62
2018 February	64	7	71
2018 January	47	2	49
2017 December	22	7	29
2017 November	20	5	25
2017 October	15	9	24
2017 September	15	10	25
2017 August	26	14	40
2017 July	10	3	13
2017 June	27	10	37
2017 May	30	7	37
2017 April	22	15	37
2017 March	30	21	51
2017 February	30	6	36
2017 January	31	1	32
2016 December	34	11	45
2016 November	33	5	38
2016 October	55	4	59
2016 September	77	9	86
2016 August	43	5	48
2016 July	69	13	82
2016 June	52	14	66
2016 May	26	21	47
2016 April	40	20	60
2016 March	53	13	66
2016 February	87	27	114
2016 January	93	22	115
2015 December	108	55	163

The echocardiogram (Figure A) shows a nondilated mildly hypertrophic left ventricle with preserved contractility, significant biatrial dilatation, a type I diastolic dysfunction mitral flow pattern, and significant dilatation of the suprahepatic veins, all of which is compatible with a diagnosis of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Right heart catheterization confirmed the restrictive physiology.

Figure

(0.11MB).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2015.05.018

View PDF

Lea este artículo en español

Options

Other articles of interest

Statistics

1985 Total PDF

3978 Total HTML

Year/month	Html	Pdf	Total
2025 May	59	11	70
2025 April	52	9	61
2025 March	47	11	58
2025 February	40	20	60
2025 January	37	31	68
2024 December	34	16	50
2024 November	34	25	59
2024 October	39	33	72
2024 September	66	19	85
2024 August	31	34	65
2024 July	21	9	30
2024 June	23	17	40
2024 May	21	16	37
2024 April	32	29	61
2024 March	27	25	52
2024 February	25	20	45
2024 January	27	30	57
2023 December	18	56	74
2023 November	19	11	30
2023 October	26	29	55
2023 September	25	15	40
2023 August	10	13	23
2023 July	29	34	63
2023 June	29	11	40
2023 May	30	15	45
2023 April	21	14	35
2023 March	8	7	15
2023 February	29	17	46
2023 January	12	12	24
2022 December	26	17	43
2022 November	27	15	42
2022 October	30	19	49
2022 September	38	28	66
2022 August	30	35	65
2022 July	19	21	40
2022 June	17	27	44
2022 May	18	30	48
2022 April	40	20	60
2022 March	22	31	53
2022 February	22	20	42
2022 January	12	15	27
2021 December	15	36	51
2021 November	25	28	53
2021 October	20	29	49
2021 September	15	35	50
2021 August	19	18	37
2021 July	29	18	47
2021 June	22	18	40
2021 May	24	11	35
2021 April	53	45	98
2021 March	81	30	111
2021 February	51	9	60
2021 January	40	4	44
2020 December	32	12	44
2020 November	25	7	32
2020 October	50	12	62
2020 September	15	7	22
2020 August	28	11	39
2020 July	44	17	61
2020 June	14	11	25
2020 May	19	12	31
2020 April	15	11	26
2020 March	12	15	27
2020 February	23	13	36
2020 January	30	30	60
2019 December	39	25	64
2019 November	25	21	46
2019 October	27	17	44
2019 September	16	21	37
2019 August	5	9	14
2019 July	78	37	115
2019 June	35	18	53
2019 May	23	12	35
2019 April	27	20	47
2019 March	39	15	54
2019 February	52	19	71
2019 January	49	13	62
2018 December	74	23	97
2018 November	49	12	61
2018 October	59	12	71
2018 September	25	9	34
2018 August	32	8	40
2018 July	70	17	87
2018 June	81	11	92
2018 May	48	9	57
2018 April	37	9	46
2018 March	56	6	62
2018 February	64	7	71
2018 January	47	2	49
2017 December	22	7	29
2017 November	20	5	25
2017 October	15	9	24
2017 September	15	10	25
2017 August	26	14	40
2017 July	10	3	13
2017 June	27	10	37
2017 May	30	7	37
2017 April	22	15	37
2017 March	30	21	51
2017 February	30	6	36
2017 January	31	1	32
2016 December	34	11	45
2016 November	33	5	38
2016 October	55	4	59
2016 September	77	9	86
2016 August	43	5	48
2016 July	69	13	82
2016 June	52	14	66
2016 May	26	21	47
2016 April	40	20	60
2016 March	53	13	66
2016 February	87	27	114
2016 January	93	22	115
2015 December	108	55	163

Ecg contest Response to ECG, November 2015

Respuesta al ECG de noviembre de 2015

Options

Ecg contest
Response to ECG, November 2015