Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 63. Issue 1.
Pages 97-102 (January 2010)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 63. Issue 1.
Pages 97-102 (January 2010)
DOI: 10.1016/S1885-5857(10)70014-1
Full text access
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Subjects With no Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Grosor íntima-media carotídeo en sujetos sin factores de riesgo cardiovascular
Estíbaliz Jarautaa, Rocío Mateo-Gallegoa, Ana Beaa, Elena Burillob, Pilar Calmarzac, Fernando Civeiraa
a Unidad de Lípidos, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (I+CS), Zaragoza, Spain. Laboratorio de Investigación Molecular, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (I+CS), Zaragoza, Spain
b Laboratorio de Investigación Molecular, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (I+CS), Zaragoza, Spain
c Servicio de Bioquímica, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (I+CS), Zaragoza, Spain
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (2)
Tables (3)
TABLE 1. Clinical Characteristics, Biochemical Profile, and Values of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness of the Study Population, According to Sex
TABLE 2. Mean Values and Upper Limit (75 Percentile) of Normal Distribution of Average Intima-Media Thickness, by Segment and Age Group in Men and Women
TABLE 3. Mean Values and Upper Limit (75 Percentile) of Normal Distribution of Maximum Intima-Media Thickness, by Segment and Age Group in Men and Women
Show moreShow less
Measurement of the carotid intima-media thickness enables arterial wall thickening to be quantified during preclinical disease stages. However, little is known about how the thickness varies in individuals with no cardiovascular risk factors. The objective of this study was to report on the range of carotid intima-media thicknesses observed in a population of healthy subjects with no cardiovascular risk factors and to identify parameters that influence it. The carotid intima-media thickness was assessed in 138 subjects (64 men and 74 women) aged 20-79 years whose age and sex were homogeneously distributed. The upper limit of normal for the mean carotid intima-media thickness ranged from 0.59-0.95 mm in men and from 0.52-0.93 mm in women. The upper limit for the maximum thickness varied from 0.81-1.11 mm in men and from 0.66-1.13 mm in women. The main parameters determining the intima-media thickness were age, male sex, systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level.
Carotid arteries
Risk factors
Low-density lipoproteins
Blood pressure
El grosor íntima-media de la arteria carótida permite la cuantificación del engrosamiento arterial en fases preclínicas de la enfermedad, pero no se conoce sus valores en población sin factores de riesgo cardiovascular. El objetivo es describir la distribución y los factores determinantes del grosor íntima-media carotídeo en población sana y sin factores de riesgo cardiovascular. Estudiamos el grosor íntima-media carotídeo de 138 sujetos (64 varones y 74 mujeres) de 20-79 años de edad distribuidos homogéneamente según edad y sexo. El límite superior de la normalidad de la media del grosor íntima-media osciló entre 0,59 y 0,95 mm en varones y entre 0,52 y 0,93 mm en mujeres. Los valores máximos oscilaron entre 0,81 y 1,11 mm en varones y entre 0,66 y 1,13 mm en mujeres. Los principales factores determinantes del grosor íntima-media fueron edad, sexo masculino, presión arterial sistólica y colesterol de las lipoproteínas de baja densidad.
Palabras clave:
Arterias carótidas
Factores de riesgo
Lipoproteínas de baja densidad
Presión arterial
Full Text


Measurement of the carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) with ultrasound can detect thickening of the artery wall during the initial phases of atherosclerosis before the lumens become compromised.1 It has been shown that CIMT bears a relation to the incidence and prevalence of atherosclerosis in all its clinical forms2-4 and cardiovascular risk factors are predictors of CIMT.5 Likewise, it has been seen that CIMT regresses after pharmacological treatment for different cardiovascular risk factors.6 Therefore, CIMT is considered a surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease, an independent risk factor, and a tool for early detection of atherosclerosis.1

The main objective of the study was to determine the average and maximum CIMT in the 3 best studied segments of the carotid arteries in atherosclerosis— common carotid artery (CCA), carotid sinus (CS), and internal carotid artery (ICA)—in a population with no known cardiovascular risk factors, to serve as a reference for normal CIMT and also to identify patients with greater atherosclerosis in our population. The secondary objective was to study factors determining CIMT in individuals without any traditional cardiovascular risk factors.


Between January 2006 and June 2008, 218 subjects were recruited from among staff of the Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain, and staff and students of the University of Zaragoza, Spain, with the Faculty of Medicine particularly strongly represented, and the "University of Experience" training program aimed at individuals aged over 60 years. The objective was to obtain a sample that included at least 10 men and 10 women in each of 6 preestablished age groups between 18 and 80 years. The inclusion criteria were no personal history of cardiovascular disease, no premature cardiovascular disease in first-degree relatives, cigarette consumption less than 15 pack- years (number of cigarettes smoked per day in packs, multiplied by the number of years of smoking), no diagnosis of dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, or diabetes mellitus, and no serious illness requiring admission to hospital in the past year. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant according to the protocol approved by the ethics committee of our hospital.

The clinical and laboratory data collected are presented in Table 1. The procedure for obtaining these data has been described previously.7

Measurement of CIMT was performed in the posterior wall of both carotid arteries by mode B ultrasound with an Acuson Sequoia ultrasonography device equipped with a linear 8 cm probe operating at 8 MHz. Images of 6 territories were taken: final centimeter of the CCA, the CS, and the first centimeter of the ICA on both sides.1 A single investigator (AMB), accredited by the vascular imaging laboratory of the Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, took the readings using eTRACK1 dedicated software.

Subjects with a BMI >30, blood pressure >160/90 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) >160 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) <30 mg/dL, triglycerides >200 mg/dL, blood glucose >125 mg/dL, creatinine >2 mg/dL, or thyrotropin >6 µU/mL were excluded.

Continuous variables with a normal distribution were expressed as means (SD) whereas those without a normal distribution were expressed as median [interquartile range]. The difference in mean values between men and women was tested using the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Analysis of variance was used to test the differences in means between CCA, CS, and ICA. To determine which variables were predictive of CIMT, a multivariate linear regression model was used. A general linear model was used to fit the values to the variables independently associated with CIMT.


In total, 221 subjects were selected and 138 were included in the final analysis (64 men and 74 women). Eighty-three subjects (46 men and 37 women) were excluded for the following reasons: 41 for LDL-C >160 mg/dL, 25 for cigarette consumption >15 pack-years, 10 for BMI >30, 10 for arterial blood pressure >160/90 mmHg, and 2 for other reasons.

The clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound variables are presented in Table 1. Men had higher average and maximum CIMT compared to women. The differences between sexes tended to diminish in patients aged over 50 years (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Comparison of the mean maximum carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) among age groups according to sex.

In men, the upper limit of normal (75 percentile of the distribution) of the average CIMT in the 6 territories ranged from 0.59 mm in those under 25 years to 0.95 mm in those aged over 65 years (Table 2). In subjects aged 25-45 years, this value was 0.66 mm. From 45 years onwards, a noteworthy increase in CIMT was observed. In women, the upper limit of normal for average CIMT ranged from 0.52 mm in those under 25 years to 0.93 mm in those aged over 65 years (Table 2). The upper limits (75 percentile of the distribution) of CIMT of the mean maximum values of the 6 territories by age group ranged from 0.81 mm to 1.11 mm in men and from 0.66 mm to 1.13 mm in women (Table 3). With regard to the study by segments, in all age groups and in both sexes, the highest average and maximum CIMT were recorded in the sinus (Tables 2 and 3).

Age was the main determining factor for carotid thickening of all segments. The average CIMT of the 6 segments was the strongest predictor in the model (adjusted r2 = 0.669). In addition to age (b=.662; P<.001), other predictive variables were male sex (b=.120; P=.027), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (b=.135; P=.029), and LDL-C (b=.131; P=.029). However, HDL-C level was not an independent predictor. For each year of life, an increase in the mean average CIMT of 0.005 mm in the 6 segments was found. For mean maximum CIMT, the increase was 0.008 mm for the 6 segments.

On adjusting the CIMT values for age and sex, a positive association was observed between carotid thickening and SBP levels and LDL-C levels (Figure 2). The increase in CIMT occurred for any increase in SBP, but was more marked above 120 mmHg. A similar situation was observed for LDL-C levels >125 mg/dL.

Figure 2. Estimated marginal means of maximum carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) adjusted for age, sex, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) by quintiles of systolic blood pressure (A) and estimated marginal means of maximum CIMT adjusted for age, sex, and systolic blood pressure by quintiles of LDL-C (B).


The values obtained allow the distribution of CIMT to be determined in subjects without traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The CIMT in this population is strongly dependent on age and, to a lesser degree, sex, and so we present the values by age group and sex. The study population corresponds, by and large, to a high sociocultural stratum. However, we believe that this bias does not affect the validity of the results. We have chosen as the limit of normal the mean and maximum CIMT values of 6 carotid segments for each age group because this provides a more consistent and complementary information than the data that only use the CCA.2-5 However, we chose the 75 percentile as the upper limit of normal with reference to other population studies.2,4 Our values for normal are within the first 2 quintiles of the CIMT distribution of the Cardiovascular Health Study.3 In the groups in that study, the risk of infarction and stroke was very low (1.1%/year) as subjects were aged over 65 years, with a mean age of 72.5 years. On the other hand, our values are lower than those for subjects who did not develop cardiovascular disease in the ARIC study, which had a similar age distribution to our sample.2 Junyent et al8 studied a group of subjects with a normal lipid profile but, unlike our study, these authors did not exclude subjects with other risk factors and only measured the CCA. The values for CCA in our study were largely in line with their values.8

Age is the main variable related to carotid thickening in all segments, both in men and women, in our study and most studies of the general population.2-5 The changes observed did not follow a linear model. CIMT thickening is more marked from the age of 40 years onwards in men and 50 years onwards in women, in agreement with that observed in other populations.2 SBP and LDL-C are associated much more weakly with CIMT progression, though the association is stronger for SBP above 120 mmHg and LDL-C levels above 125 mg/dL. This reinforces the role of these 2 risk factors, even in the range currently not considered as pathological.


The authors thank Johan Gort and Eric de Groot (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

FIS: PI06/0365 and RTIC C06/01 (RECAVA), SAF2005-07042 and Professionals With Specialist Healthcare Training (Spanish state bulletin [BOE] July 8, 2005).

Correspondence: Dr. F. Civeira.
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet.
Avda. Isabel la Católica, 1-3. 50009 Zaragoza. España.

Received December 18, 2008.
Accepted for publication March 23, 2009.

de Groot E, Hovingh GK, Wiegman A, Duriez P, Smit AJ, Fruchart JC, et al..
Measurement of arterial wall thickness as a surrogate marker for atherosclerosis..
Circulation, 109 (2004), pp. III33-8
Chambless LE, Heiss G, Folsom AR, Rosamond W, Szklo M, Sharrett AR, et al..
Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993..
Am J Epidemiol, 146 (1997), pp. 483-94
O''Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr..
Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group..
N Engl J Med, 340 (1999), pp. 14-22
Lorenz MW, von Kegler S, Steinmetz H, Markus HS, Sitzer M..
Carotid intima-media thickening indicates a higher vascular risk across a wide age range: prospective data from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS)..
Stroke, 37 (2006), pp. 878-92
Dobs AS, Nieto FJ, Szklo M, Barnes R, Sharrett AR, Ko WJ..
Risk factors for popliteal and carotid wall thicknesses in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study..
Am J Epidemiol, 150 (1999), pp. 1055-67
Smilde TJ, Van Wissen S, Wollersheim H, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF..
Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolaemia (ASAP): a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial..
Lancet, 357 (2001), pp. 577-81
Jarauta E, Junyent M, Gilabert R, Plana N, Mateo-Gallego R, De Groot E, et al..
Sonographic evaluation of Achilles tendons and carotid atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia..
Atherosclerosis, (2009 [en prensa]),
Junyent M, Gilabert R, Nunez I, Corbella E, Vela M, Zambon D, et al..
Ecografía carotídea en la evaluación de aterosclerosis preclínica. Distribución de valores del grosor íntima-media y frecuencia de placas de ateroma en una cohorte comunitaria española..
Med Clin (Barc), 125 (2005), pp. 770-4
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?