Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 73. Issue 8.
Pages 690 (August 2020)
Vol. 73. Issue 8.
Pages 690 (August 2020)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Designs and methods for impact evaluation of interventions. Response
Diseños y metodologías para evaluar el impacto de las intervenciones. Respuesta
Visits
...
Guillermo Aldamaa,
Corresponding author
, Javier Muñizb,c,d
a Servicio de Cardiología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
b Instituto Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
c Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), A Coruña, Spain
d Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020;73:68910.1016/j.rec.2020.01.013
Antonio Sarria-Santamera
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
To the Editor,

We would like to thank Antonio Sarria-Santamera for the interest shown in our article.1 In his letter, he raises 2 different issues.

First, he mentions limitations in interpreting the hazard ratio. However, these limitations are inherent in the estimator and do not depend on whether the study is experimental or not and, consequently, would not be mitigated by a different study design.2

Second, he mentions the causal relationship between implementation of the PROGALIAM program and the decrease in mortality. The ideal context for this kind of inference is a clinical trial, but conducting a trial would not have been ethical in view of the nature of the study. As he points out, the alternative is to find a comparable group around the same timeframe. In the case of the IPHENAMIC program, this was not possible because the PROGALIAM network was established simultaneously throughout the geographical area, which precluded application of some of the methods proposed. Other alternatives, such as propensity score matching, are not desirable because they start with the effect that the intervention could influence the profile of patients arriving at the hospital alive, and this effect should not be cancelled out. The plausibility of causal effects between PROGALIAM implementation and reduced mortality is supported by the survival analysis and by observations such as the fact that 30-day gross mortality before PROGALIAM was almost unchanged and began to decline after implementation, as shown in figure 2 of our article.1 Likewise, figure 1 of the additional material shows that 30-day mortality in the total population and in each of the areas dropped significantly, particularly in areas where access improved to a greater extent. Although not impossible, it is highly unlikely that there are any variables not included in our study that coincided with PROGALIAM implementation and had sufficient impact on mortality to explain these findings.

Despite the limitations of observational studies, we believe that they are essential in certain settings and, as expressed by the European Union and by the author himself in his references, are very useful for collecting real-world information, identifying outcomes, and ensuring responsible use of public funds.3,4

.

References
[1]
G. Aldama, M. López, M. Santás, et al.
Impacto en la mortalidad tras la implantación de una red de atención al infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST Estudio IPHENAMIC.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 73 (2020), pp. 632-642
[2]
M.J. Stensrud, J.M. Aalen, O.O. Aalen, M. Valberg.
Limitations of hazard ratios in clinical trials.
Eur Heart J., 40 (2019), pp. 1378-1383
[3]
L. Bowman, A. Baras, R. Bombien, et al.
Understanding the use of observational and randomized data in cardiovascular medicine.
[4]
C. Mate Redondo, M.C. Rodríguez-Perez, S. Domínguez Coello, et al.
Hospital mortality in 415 798 AMI patients: 4 years earlier in the Canary Islands than in the rest of Spain.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 72 (2019), pp. 466-472
Copyright © 2020. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?