Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 75. Issue 6.
Pages 539 (June 2022)
Visits
Not available
Vol. 75. Issue 6.
Pages 539 (June 2022)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Environmental factors like air pollution: not to be forgotten in the 2021 ESC guidelines on heart failure. Response
Factores ambientales como la contaminación del aire: no debe olvidarse en la guía sobre insuficiencia cardiaca de la ESC 2021. Respuesta
Visits
550
Domingo A. Pascual-Figala,b,
Corresponding author
dpascual@um.es

Corresponding author:
, José Ramón González-Juanateyc
a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Universidad de Murcia, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
b Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Related content
Alberto Domínguez-Rodríguez, Pedro Abreu-González, Daniel Hernández-Vaquero
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
To the Editor,

We share the reflection and concern regarding the effect of environmental pollution, particularly that of air pollution on heart failure (HF) and its decompensation and the lack of reflection in the recent guidelines.1 In fact, it is not only a question of HF; the air pollution we breathe is associated with increased all-cause mortality, making it a major risk factor recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) and associated with premature mortality.2

The key question is how to approach this problem in clinical practice guidelines whose main purpose is to translate the scientific evidence to specific recommendations for professionals in their routine practice. It is true that the guidelines cannot recommend masks or moving house to individual patients with HF, nor is there evidence on the benefit of these interventions, but they can provide recommendations for the population setting and health and social care policy. This is the most important point in relation to the letter. In fact, in our comments we highlighted the lack of organizational recommendations with a global health impact on the disease. More specifically, the inclusion of recommendations aimed at society as a whole and its political leaders may represent a step forward in the current concept of guidelines. There have been several calls to action and a recent specific guideline published by the WHO and medical societies calling for a reduction in air pollution,3 but their inclusion in professional guidelines would increase the impact and awareness of them. Not only regarding pollution, but also the other environmental factors.

In summary, the letter highlights the need for the guidelines to coordinate specific recommendations for professionals and patients, with population-level recommendations aimed at those responsible for health and social care policies.

FUNDING

None.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

Both authors participated in the writing and review of the response.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

References
[1]
D. Pascual Figal, J.R. González-Juanatey.
Comentarios a la guía ESC 2021 sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la insuficiencia cardiaca aguda y crónica.
[2]
S. Khomenko, M. Cirach, E. Pereira-Barboza, et al.
Premature mortality due to air pollution in European cities: a health impact assessment.
Lancet Planet Heal., 5 (2021), pp. e121-e134
[3]
B. Hoffmann, H. Boogaard, A. de Nazelle, et al.
WHO Air Quality Guidelines 2021—Aiming for healthier air for all: a joint statement by medical, public health, scientific societies and patient representative organisations.
Int J Public Health., (2021), pp. 66
Copyright © 2022. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?