Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 71. Issue 3.
Pages 146-154 (March 2018)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Visits
4201
Vol. 71. Issue 3.
Pages 146-154 (March 2018)
Original article
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2017.06.002
Full text access
Factors Influencing the Phenotypic Expression of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Genetic Carriers
Factores que influyen en la expresión fenotípica de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica en portadores genéticos
Visits
4201
Inmaculada Pérez-Sáncheza, Antonio José Romero-Pucheb, Esperanza García-Molina Sáezc,d, María Sabater-Molinaa,d,
Corresponding author
mariasm79es@hotmail.com

Corresponding author: Unidad de Cardiopatías Hereditarias, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Ctra. Murcia-Cartagena S/N, 30120 El Palmar, Murcia, Spain.
, José María López-Ayalae, Carmen Muñoz-Esparzae, David López-Cuencae, Gonzalo de la Morenae, Francisco José Castro-Garcíaf, Juan Ramón Gimeno-Blanesa,d,e
a Unidad de Cardiopatías Hereditarias, Instituto Médico de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
b Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
c Biobanco, Instituto Médico de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
d Departamento de Medicina Interna, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia, Spain
e Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
f Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2018;71:132-810.1016/j.rec.2017.07.003
Ares Pasipoularides
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2018;71:77010.1016/j.rec.2018.03.021
Javier Limeres Freire
This item has received
4201
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (4)
Show moreShow less
Tables (2)
Table 1. Mutation Frequency in our MYH7-MYBPC3 Carriers
Table 2. Main Clinical Features of the 192 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Evaluated
Show moreShow less
Additional material (1)
Abstract
Introduction and objectives

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a disorder with variable expression. It is mainly caused by mutations in sarcomeric genes but the phenotype could be modulated by other factors. The aim of this study was to determine whether factors such as sex, systemic hypertension, or physical activity are modifiers of disease severity and to establish their role in age-related penetrance of HCM.

Methods

We evaluated 272 individuals (mean age 49 ± 17 years, 57% males) from 72 families with causative mutations. The relationship between sex, hypertension, physical activity, and left ventricular hypertrophy was studied.

Results

The proportion of affected individuals increased with age. Men developed the disease 12.5 years earlier than women (adjusted median, 95%CI, –17.52 to –6.48; P < .001). Hypertensive patients were diagnosed with HCM later (10.8 years of delay) than normotensive patients (adjusted median, 95%CI, 6.28-17.09; P < .001). Individuals who performed physical activity were diagnosed with HCM significantly earlier (7.3 years, adjusted median, 95%CI, –14.49 to –1.51; P = .016). Sex, hypertension, and the degree of physical activity were not significantly associated with the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy. Adjusted survival both free from sudden death and from the combined event were not influenced by any of the exploratory variables.

Conclusions

Men and athletes who are carriers of sarcomeric mutations are diagnosed earlier than women and sedentary individuals. Hypertensive carriers of sarcomeric mutations have a delayed diagnosis. Sex, hypertension, and physical activity are not associated with disease severity in carriers of HCM causative mutations.

Keywords:
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Genotype
Phenotype
Physical activity
Hypertension
Sex
Abbreviations:
AF
HCM
HT
LVH
Resumen
Introducción y objetivos

La miocardiopatía hipertrófica (MCH) es una enfermedad con expresión variable, causada principalmente por mutaciones en genes sarcoméricos, aunque otros factores podrían estar modulando el fenotipo. El objetivo es determinar si el sexo, la hipertensión arterial o la actividad física son moduladores de la gravedad de la enfermedad y establecer su papel en la penetrancia en relación con la edad al diagnóstico de la MCH.

Métodos

Se evaluó a 272 individuos (media de edad, 49 ± 17 años; el 57% varones) procedentes de 72 familias con mutación causal y se estudió la relación del sexo, la hipertensión y la actividad física con la hipertrofia ventricular izquierda.

Resultados

La proporción de afectados aumentó con la edad. Se diagnosticó a los varones una mediana ajustada de 12,5 años (IC95%, –17,52 a –6,48; p < 0,001) antes que a las mujeres. A los pacientes hipertensos, se les diagnosticó MCH una mediana ajustada de 10,8 años (IC95%, 6,28-17,09; p < 0,001) más tarde que a los normotensos. A los individuos que hacían ejercicio, se los diagnosticó significativamente antes (mediana ajustada, 7,3 años; IC95%, –14,49 a –1,51; p = 0,016). El sexo, la hipertensión y el ejercicio no resultaron significativamente asociados con la gravedad de la hipertrofia del ventrículo izquierdo. Los factores explorados no influyeron en la supervivencia ajustada libre de muerte súbita y el evento combinado.

Conclusiones

Se diagnostica a los varones y los deportistas portadores de mutaciones sarcoméricas antes que a las mujeres y los individuos sedentarios. Los portadores de mutaciones sarcoméricas hipertensos tienen un retraso en el diagnóstico. El sexo, la hipertensión y el ejercicio no se asocian con la gravedad de la enfermedad en portadores de mutaciones causales de MCH.

Palabras clave:
Miocardiopatía hipertrófica
Genotipo
Fenotipo
Actividad física
Hipertensión arterial
Sexo
Full Text
INTRODUCTION

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic cardiac disease characterized by morphological, functional, clinical, and prognostic heterogeneity.1–7 This variable phenotypic expression and its incomplete penetrance8 have constituted an obstacle to a full understanding of the clinical spectrum and the consequences of the disease. HCM is mainly caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomeric contractile proteins.9,10

Pathogenic mutations have been identified in more than 12 genes.11MYH7 and MYBPC3 gene mutations account for about 80% of genotyped cases.12,13

Although intense and competitive exercise is not recommended in the clinical guidelines for HCM,14 the association between physical activity and outcomes in HCM is weak. Nevertheless, physical activity has been accepted as a trigger for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death (SD) in patients with HCM.15 Clinicians are confronted with HCM patients, or even unaffected carriers, seeking advice on physical activity. Discerning whether lifestyle choices can modify penetrance is crucial.16

Sex has proven to be an important variable in the natural history of the characterization and management of a variety of acquired cardiovascular conditions.17–22

Similar to intense physical activity, hypertension (HT) is thought to enhance the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) via the induction of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.23

Observations of within-family variations are not explained by mutational heterogeneity and therefore environmental factors must be involved.21

The primary aim of this study was to compare penetrance, understood as age at diagnosis of HCM, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in a large cohort of genotyped HCM families with mutations in MYBPC3 and MHY7, in terms of sex, the presence or absence of HT, and the intensity of physical activity.

METHODSStudy Sample

All participants were recruited from an initial pool of 72 families (464 individuals) with HCM; From these 72 families, we excluded 192 (41.4%) normal relatives who did not carry the family mutation. In the sample of 272 carriers from 72 different families, 20 affected individuals with clinical variables but no available sample were included as obligate carriers (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flowchart of individuals included in the study.

(0.25MB).

Our cohort comprised a total of 272 individuals (mean age 49.0 ± 17.5 years, 57% males). Two hundred and twenty-one (81.3%) were carriers of a causative mutation in the MYBPC3 gene and 51 (18.8%) in the MYH7 gene (Table 1).

Table 1.

Mutation Frequency in our MYH7-MYBPC3 Carriers

Mutations  Published  Segregation evidence  Pathogenicity score (based on in silico and segregation evidence)  No. of families  No. of carriers  No. of affected carriers  No. of unaffected carriers 
IVS23+1G>A
(c.2308+1G>A) 
Yes  Yes    21 (29.6)  85 (31.3)  61 (71.8)  24 (28.2) 
p. R891Afs*160
(c.2670-267ins G) 
Yes  Yes    19 (26.8)  65 (23.9)  46 (70.8)  19 (29.2) 
p.P108Afs*9
(c.321-322insGCTGGCCCCTGCC) 
No  Yes    13 (18.3)  49 (18.0)  41 (83.7)  8 (16.3) 
p.E258K
(c.772 G>A) 
Yes  Yes  Putative (definitive causing)  5 (7.0)  22 (8.1)  13 (59.1)  9 (40.9) 
p.T1377M
(c.4130 C>T) 
No  Yes  Putative (definitive causing)  5 (7.0)  22 (8.1)  16 (72.7)  6 (27.3) 
p.R1382Q
(c.4145 G>A) 
Yes  Yes  Putative (definitive causing)  1 (1.4)  2 (0.7)  2 (100.0)  0 (0.0) 
p.D928N
(c.2782 G>A) 
Yes  Yes  Putative (definitive causing)  3 (4.2)  13 (4.8)  7 (53.8)  6 (46.2) 
p.E1348Q
(c.4042 G>C) 
Yes  Not possible  VUS2 (unclear)  1 (1.4)  4 (1.5)  2 (50.0)  2 (50.0) 
p.E1356Q
(c.4066 G>C) 
Yes  Not possible  VUS2 (unclear)  1 (1.4)  4 (1.5)  2 (50.0)  2 (50.0) 
p.E1387Q
(c.4159 G>C) 
Yes  Not possible  VUS2 (unclear)  1 (1.4)  4 (1.5)  1 (25.0)  3 (75.0) 
p.R1079Q
(c.3236 G>A) 
Yes  Not possible  VUS2 (unclear)  1 (1.4)  2 (0.7)  1 (50.0)  1 (50.0) 

VUS, variant of unknown clinical significance (VUS2, uncertain).

Values are expressed as No. (%).

A founder effect of c.2308+1G>A, p.P108Afs*9 and p.R891Afs*160 (c.2670-267insG) in MYBPC3 was demonstrated with haplotype analysis. Seventy-four percent of the carriers shared 1 of these 3 founder mutations from the region, which are thought to cause a truncated protein. Cosegregation and/or in silico studies in all variants were demonstrated and were consistent with a disease-causing mutation (Table 1). Eight individuals (2.9%) had an additional mutation in another gene.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was defined in probands as unexplained LVH (≥ 15mm) in the absence of another cardiac or systemic disease able to cause LVH.1 Relatives were considered to be affected if they fulfilled the diagnostic criteria within the context of familial HCM.24,25

Patients were prospectively included and cardiac imaging and examinations were performed prospectively; symptoms and arrhythmic events prior to the first evaluation were also recorded. The mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 3.3 years.

After cardiac examination, 192 (70.6%, mean age 52.5 ± 16.6 years, 127 [66.1%] males) met the HCM diagnostic criteria and were considered clinically affected (patients), while 80 (29.4%) were considered normal (all carriers).

Of the 260 individuals evaluated, 63 (23.2%) had HT. Information on blood pressure was lacking in 12 (4.4%). There were 58 (31.7%) hypertensive and 125 (68.3%) normotensive individuals among the 183 HCM-affected patients with available information. Among the 77 normal carriers with available values, there were 5 (3.3%) hypertensive and 72 (90%) normotensive individuals.

Physical Activity

Individuals were asked about their physical activity and were classified according to a “typical week” concept. Only the hours of physical activity estimated to be associated with an increase of > 70% or maximal heart rate were considered. Physical activity during the last 2 years prior to the time of the diagnosis in affected carriers or to the time of first evaluation in unaffected carriers was considered. Interviews were performed prospectively at the time of the first evaluation for patients seen from 2007 to 2015 and those patients evaluated from 2003 to 2006 were contacted by telephone. Patients who were sedentary at the time of evaluation but had a history of participating in competitive sports in the past were reclassified as physically active.

  • Group 1 (n = 156 [84.9%]). Sedentary or low physical activity (generally without sweating) (eg, walking, gardening): included sedentary lifestyle participants (n = 137 [74.5%]) or individuals who exercised for ≤ 2hours of significant physical activity/wk (n = 19 [10.3%]).

  • Group 2 (n = 17 [9.3%]). Intermediate or moderate physical activity: included individuals who performed significant physical activity for > 2 and < 5h/wk (n = 13 [7.1%]). Those who had worked in a physically demanding job (n = 4 [2.2%]) were also included in this group.

  • Group 3 (n = 11 [6%]). Intense or high physical activity: included amateur athletes, professional (n = 6 [3.3%]) and ex-professional athletes (n = 5 [2.7%]) who performed intense regular physical activity for > 5h/wk.

Sixty (84.5%) out of the 71 unaffected carriers were sedentary or performed low physical activity, 8 (11.3%) performed intermediate or moderate physical activity, and 3 (4.2%) performed intense or high physical activity. In 9 (11.2%), no information on physical activity was available.

Table 1 of the supplementary material shows details of the number of patients for each of the subgroups regarding exposure variables (HT, sex, and physical activity), according to the classification of “affected carrier”/“unaffected carrier”. An expanded Methods section is available in the Methods section of the supplementary material.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 15.0) statistical software and STATA (version 13) for Laplace survival analysis.

Age at diagnosis, maximal ventricular hypertrophy, and SD were defined as dependent variables in the analysis. Sex, HT, and physical activity were defined as exploratory variables on multivariate analysis. Sudden death equivalent was defined as SD, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or the presence of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV includes advanced heart failure symptoms, heart transplant, and heart failure-related death.

Multivariate survival analysis included all 3 exploratory variables and those selected as covariates. For penetrance (age at HCM diagnosis), the “type of gene” (MYBPC3 vs MYH7) was included in the model as an additional covariate. For stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF), “heart failure (NYHA III-IV)”, “SD equivalent” and “combined event” survival analysis, a list of covariates included indexed maximal wall thickness (mm/m2), left atrial diameter (mm), the presence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (> 30mmHg), and type of gene. Laplace derived analysis26 was used for survival analysis and Figure 2 and Figure 3. The median was given as a summary of the comparisons. Linear logistic regression was used for the evaluation of the impact of the exploratory variables on LVH (maximal wall thickness in mm). P-values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

Figure 2.

Penetrance of the disease (HCM) in carriers of MYBPC3 and MYH7 mutations. A: penetrance by sex; B: presence or absence of HT; C: intensity of physical activity. Adjusted Laplace median and 95%CI are given. All 3 exploratory variables (sex, HT, and physical activity) and “type of gene” were included in the analysis of each of the graphs. All genetic carriers, affected and unaffected, were included in the analysis. 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; HT, hypertension.

(0.21MB).
Figure 3.

Adjusted Laplace estimates of survival. A: free from AF; B: stroke; C: NYHA III-IV; D: SD; E: the combined event by sex; F: free from AF; G: stroke; H: NYHA III-IV; I: SD; J: the combined event for the presence or absence of HT; K: free from AF; L: stroke; M: NYHA III-IV; N: SD; O: the combined event by physical activity. Laplace median adjusted value and 95CI are given. All 3 exploratory variables (sex, HT, and physical activity) and covariates (indexed maximal wall thickness [mm/m2], left atrial diameter [mm], presence of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction [> 30mmHg] and type of gene) were included for analysis of each of the graphs and analyses. Only affected carriers were included in the analysis. 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; AF, atrial fibrillation; HT, hypertension; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD, sudden death.

(0.92MB).
RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of the 192 patients at the first evaluation in terms of the 3 grouping variables (sex, HT, and physical activity) are summarized in Table 2.27

Table 2.

Main Clinical Features of the 192 Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Evaluated

  All-cohort  Female (33.9%)  Male
(66.1%) 
P  Normotensive (68.3%)  Hypertensive (31.7%)  P  Sedentary (85.4%)  Moderate-intense (14.6%)  P 
Male sex        87 (69.6)  34 (58.6)  .144  101 (61.6)  26 (92.9)  .001 
Age at diagnosis, y  41.0 ± 16.0  46.8 ± 18.6  37.3 ± 16.0  .001  35.9 ± 15.5  52.1 ± 15.1  < .001  42.8 ± 17.0  32.2 ± 12.5  .001 
Age at evaluation, y  53.2 ± 16.3  59.3 ± 15.6  50.1 ± 15.8  < .001  46.9 ± 14.7  66.9 ± 10.8  < .001  55.0 ± 15.9  43.1 ± 15.2  < .001 
Reason for diagnosis
Incidental  29 (15.4)  5 (7.2)  24 (18.6)  .034  22 (16.9)  7 (12.1)  .331  27 (16.9)  2 (7.1)  .188 
Family screening  84 (44.7)  30 (44.1)  62 (41.8)  .504  67 (51.9)  18 (31)  .011  67 (41.9)  17 (60.7)  .064 
Symptoms  75 (39.9)  33 (47.8)  43 (33.3)  .040  40 (30.8)  33 (56.9)  .001  66 (41.3)  9 (32.1)  .364 
LV mass  295.4 ± 107.7  259.6 ± 93.6  306.5 ± 116.2  .006  283.4 ± 122.2  306.7 ± 85.9  .164  290.4 ± 110.9  292.8 ± 114.3  .920 
Maximal LVH, mm  20.3 ± 6.0  18.1 ± 5.8  20.2 ± 6.5  .040  19.3 ± 6.8  20.3 ± 5.3  .179  19.6 ± 6.5  19.1 ± 5.2  .499 
iLVWT  10.9 ± 4.5  10.8 ± 3.2  11.0 ± 5.0  .756  11.0 ± 5.1  11.0 ± 2.6  .908  11.2 ± 4.7  9.9 ± 2.9  .07 
Obstruction  54 (28.4)  20 (31.3)  34 (27)  .538  38 (30.4)  15 (25.9)  .529  49 (30.2)  5 (17.9)  .180 
Severe LVH  14 (7.5)  3 (4.8)  11 (8.9)  .313  11 (8.9)  3 (5.3)  .399  13 (8.2)  1 (3.6)  .393 
Left atrium  43.9 ± 7.9  43.3 ± 9.5  44.2 ± 7.9  .488  42.6 ± 8.0  47.3 ± 8.6  .001  44.2 ± 8.8  42.1 ± 6.2  .222 
LVEF %  58.4 ± 13.2  57.9 ± 13.9  58.1 ± 13.6  .938  57.2 ± 14.7  59.6 ± 11.8  .350  57.5 ± 13.4  60.6 ± 14.8  .327 
LVEDd  43.9 ± 7.1  43.6 ± 7.1  43.8 ± 9.3  .434  42.8 ± 9.7  45.1 ± 5.8  .100  44.0 ± 7.4  45.8 ± 6.2  .058 
Pattern of LVH
No hypertrophy  6 (3.8)  2 (3.8)  4 (3.7)  .991  6 (5.8)  0 (0.0)  .012  6 (4.5)  0 (0.0)  .271 
ASH  97 (60.6)  31 (58.5)  66 (61.7)  .697  65 (63.1)  32 (64.0)  .914  78 (58.2)  19 (73.1)  .156 
Concentric  27 (16.9)  8 (15.1)  19 (17.8)  .672  18 (17.5)  8 (16.0)  .820  22 (16.4)  5 (19.2)  .726 
Apical  4 (2.6)  1 (2.0)  3 (2.9)  .733  1 (1.0)  3 (6.3)  .071  4 (3.2)  0 (0.0)  .357 
Systolic impairment  38 (21.1)  12 (19.4)  26 (22.0)  .676  20 (20.0)  12 (23.5)  .512  34 (22.4)  4 (14.3)  .336 
Diastolic function
Normal  14 (10.4)  6 (13.0)  8 (9.1)  .478  14 (16.5)  0 (0.0)  .005  9 (8.2)  5 (20.8)  .066 
Impaired relaxation  25 (18.7)  11 (23.9)  14 (15.9)  .259  12 (14.1)  13 (30.2)  .030  21 (19.1)  4 (16.7)  .782 
Pseudonormal  35 (26.1)  6 (13.0)  29 (33.0)  .013  21 (24.7)  14 (32.6)  .347  29 (26.4)  6 (25.0)  .890 
Restrictive  3 (3.0)  3 (6.5)  1 (1.1)  .082  2 (2.4)  2 (4.7)  .480  3 (2.7)  1 (4.2)  .707 
Atrial fibrillation  53 (27.6)  19 (29.2)  34 (26.8)  .718  20 (18.5)  24 (47.1)  < .001  48 (29.3)  5 (17.9)  .212 
NYHA
116 (60.4)  28 (43.1)  88 (69.3)  < .001  83 (66.4)  28 (48.3)  .020  95 (57.9)  21 (75.0)  .088 
II  48 (25.0)  20 (30.8)  28 (22.0)  .187  30 (24.0)  17 (29.3)  .444  43 (26.2)  5 (17.9)  .345 
III-IV  24 (12.5)  15 (23.1)  9 (7.1)  .002  10 (8.0)  12 (20.7)  .014  22 (13.4)  2 (7.1)  .354 
Syncope  28 (14.9)  10 (15.9)  18 (14.4)  .789  12 (9.8)  13 (22.8)  .019  21 (13.1)  7 (25.0)  .103 
NSVT  49 (34.8)  18 (40.0)  31 (32.3)  .370  22 (24.2)  25 (56.8)  < .001  42 (35.9)  7 (29.2)  .528 
ABPR  30 (27.5)  9 (29.0)  21 (26.9)  .824  28 (37.3)  2 (6.5)  .001  26 (29.5)  4 (19.0)  .333 
FHSCD  72 (37.5)  27 (41.5)  45 (35.4)  .408  42 (33.6)  25 (43.1)  .214  62 (37.8)  10 (35.7)  .833 
Events
Sudden deatha  12 (6.3)  1 (1.5)  11 (8.7)  .054  8 (6.4)  3 (5.2)  .191  9 (5.4)  3 (10.7)  .792 
Resuscitated cardiac arrestb  9 (4.7)  1 (1.5)  9 (4.7)  .265  6 (4.8)  3 (5.2)  .310  6 (4.6)  3 (10.7)  .536 
5-year SD-HCM score  3.59 ± 3.1  3.1 ± 2.4  3.8 ± 3.4  .116  4.26 ± 3.3  3.39 ± 3.1  .091  3.4 ± 3.0  4.5 ± 3.6  .116 
4 ≤ score < 6  55 (30.4)  18 (29.5)  37 (30.8)  .855  30 (25.0)  25 (45.5)  .007  45 (29.4)  10 (35.7)  .505 
Score ≥ 6  23 (12.7)  17 (14.2)  6 (9.8)  .408  13 (10.8)  10 (18.2)  .182  16 (10.5)  7 (25.0)  .034 

ABPR, abnormal blood pressure response; ASH, asymmetrical septal hypertrophy; FHSCD, family history of sudden cardiac death; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; iLVWT, indexed left ventricular wall thickness; LV, left ventricular; LVEDd, left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction, LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; NSVT, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SD-HCM, sudden death-hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

LV mass, by Deveraux formula (g); Obstruction, if left ventricular outflow tract gradient (> 30mmHg); Pattern of LVH, morphological subtype of hypertrophy according to Binder et al.27; Severe LVH, if Max LVH ≥ 30mm.

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or No. (%).

a

Including 3 nonresuscitated sudden death cases, 3 cardiac arrests and 6 appropriate ICD discharges.

b

Including 3 resuscitated cardiac arrests and 6 appropriate ICD discharges.

Sex

Women had higher NYHA functional class at baseline and during follow-up. Fifteen (23.1%) women vs 9 (7.1%) men were in NYHA functional class III-IV (P = .002). IMLVWT, the percentage of obstruction, systolic and diastolic function variables, and the proportion of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring were all similar in women and men (Table 2).

The proportion of affected individuals increased with age. Men were diagnosed with the disease 12.50 years earlier than women (Laplace median 95%CI, –17.52 to –6.48; P < .001), adjusted for HT, physical activity, and “type of gene” (Figure 2A).

There were no differences in survival free from AF, stroke, NYHA functional class III-IV, SD, and the combined event (AF, stroke, NYHA III-IV, SD) in terms of sex (Figures 3A-3E).

Hypertension

Of the 183 participants with available HT information and who met the HCM criteria, 58 (31.7%) had HT (Table 2). The presence of symptoms was the main reason for HCM diagnosis in hypertensive vs normotensive patients (33 patients [56.9%] vs 40 [30.8%]; P = .001). HT-HCM patients had worse NYHA class (12 hypertensive patients [20.7%] vs 10 normotensive patients [8.0%] had NYHA III-IV; P = .01) and reported more syncopes (13 [22.8%] vs 12 [9.8%]; P = .014). There was no difference in LVH (LV mass, MLVWT or IMLVWT) or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. HT-HCM patients had apical LVH slightly more frequently. Left atrium and left ventricular end diastolic diameters were significantly enlarged in patients with HT-HCM compared with normotensive patients (P = .001 and P = .082, respectively). Patients with HT had more atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Twenty-four (47.1%) HT-HCM patients had AF vs 20 (18.5%) in the normotensive group (P < .001). Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring was also more frequent among HT-HCM patients (25 patients [56.8%] vs 22 [24.2%]; P < .001). However, abnormal blood pressure response was more prevalent among normotensive patients (28 patients [37.3%] vs 2 [6.5%]; P =.001).

Diagnosis of HCM was delayed in hypertensive patients. Hypertensive patients had a later diagnosis of HCM, by 10.83 years, compared with normotensive patients (Laplace median 95%CI, 6.28-17.09; P < .001), adjusted by sex, physical activity, and “type of gene” (Figure 2B).

There was no difference between HT-HCM and normotensive patients in terms of survival free from AF or stroke (Figure 3F and Figure3G). Paradoxically, survival free from NYHA III-IV was lower in normotensive vs HT-HCM patients (P = .02) (Figure 3H), with no significant differences in SD or the combined event (AF, stroke, NYHA III-IV, SD) (Figure 3I and Figure3J).

Physical Activity

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients who performed intense physical activity were significantly younger at evaluation than more sedentary groups (43.1 ± 15.2 vs 55.0 ± 15.9 years; P = .001). There was no association between exercise intensity and LVH or left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Of note, LA dimension and left ventricular end diastolic diameter were similar in both groups. There was a trend toward better diastolic function in the group of HCM patients who performed more intense physical activity (normal mitral flow 5 [20.8%] vs 9 [8.2%]; P = .066).

There was no significant difference in symptoms regarding the intensity of physical activity. The proportion of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter monitoring and AF was similar in both groups.

Although the proportion of affected individuals was similar regardless of the intensity of physical activity (72.2% vs 71.8%), patients who performed more intense physical activity were diagnosed with HCM 7.34 years earlier than those in the sedentary group (Laplace median 95%CI, –14.49 to –1.51; P = .016), adjusted for sex, HT, and “type of gene” (Figure 2C).

There was no difference between these 2 groups in terms of survival free from AF, stroke, NYHA III-IV, SD, or the combined event (AF, stroke, NYHA III-IV, SD) (Figure 3K and Figure3O).

Table 2 of the supplementary material shows the clinical characteristics of 14 individuals who performed intense or competitive exercise (11 affected individuals + 3 unaffected carriers).

Multivariate Analysis

In summary, sex, HT or physical activity were not predictors of LVH in the univariate or multivariate analysis. All 3 variables were independently associated with age at HCM diagnosis in Cox regression and in Laplace survival analysis (Figure 4). While male sex and intense physical activity were predictors of an earlier diagnosis, HT was associated with a delayed diagnosis.

Figure 4.

Hazard ratios from Cox regression multivariate analysis (and 95%CI) including sex, HT, and physical activity. 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; HT, hypertension.

(0.05MB).

None of the 3 exploratory variables (sex, HT, physical activity) were associated with the events evaluated (stroke, AF, NYHA III-IV, SD, or combined event) in Cox regression analysis when the “type of gene”, left atrial diameter, indexed LVH and obstruction were included as covariables (Table 3 of the supplementary material). Left atrial diameter (mm) was the only covariate consistently associated with the events evaluated. Left ventricular hypertrophy together with left atrial diameter were independent predictors of SD in the Cox regression analysis (HR, 1.10; 95%CI, 1.00-1.20; P = .039; HR, 1.06; 95%CI, 1.03-1.10; P < .001), for indexed LVH and left atrial diameter, respectively).

When Laplace multivariate analysis was performed, left atrial diameter remained the main covariate associated with survival free from stroke, AF, NYHA III-IV, and the combined event but not with SD (Table 2 of the supplementary material and Figure 3). Laplace analysis also showed a value for the 3 exploratory variables on survival free from NYHA III-IV. None of the exploratory variables or covariates was associated with survival free from the combined event with this test.

DISCUSSION

Epigenetic mechanisms and environmental factors are fundamental in cardiac adaptations and disease.28

This study presents data on disease expression, penetrance–understood as the age at which HCM is diagnosed–and outcome in a large cohort of carriers of HCM-associated mutations. This is the first and largest study addressing the issue of HT and sex in terms of penetrance and severity of the phenotype and is the only study to address the impact of intense physical activity at the time of diagnosis, disease severity, and outcomes in a genotyped HCM series. Our study included 272 genotyped patients with 3 founder mutations with a very similar impact on the protein (MYBPC3 IVS23+1G>A, p.R891Afs*160, p.P108Afs*9), accounting for 74% of the population (n = 199, 85 + 65 + 49).

Sex

In keeping with previous studies,17–21,29–32 we found that male sex was associated with an earlier diagnosis of HCM. In our series, men were diagnosed more than a decade earlier than women. Possible explanations for this consistent finding might be found in the role of estrogens in the development of hypertrophy.33

Once the phenotype developed, women behaved similarly to men, achieving similar degrees of LVH (indexed) and obstruction, and were even more limited symptomatically. We failed to identify consistent differences in heart failure, AF, and stroke survivals between the sexes. Consistent with previous literature, no significant differences were evidenced in SD and the combined event between the sexes in our series.

Hypertension

There is a general belief, based on indirect data or from small series, that HT should be associated with an increase in LVH in HCM patients34–36 and that intense physical activity is associated with an increase in LVH and is also a trigger for malignant arrhythmias and hence, a cause of SD in HCM.37,38

A recently published article on the role of HT and sex in penetrance and phenotype demonstrated a bivariate association between HT and HCM expression.35 The study failed to demonstrate differences between men and women and physical activity. Multivariate analysis was not possible due to the small sample size and there was a significant proportion of missing data (44%). In another recent article,36 no statistical analysis was performed. Physical activity was not recorded in this second series either.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to clearly demonstrate the effect of additional risk factors on phenotypic outcome in a homogeneous HCM genotyped population. Hypertensive individuals in our series had a delayed diagnosis of HCM. This finding was not entirely unexpected, as hypertrophy could be considered a consequence of HT in some hypertensive patients with mild phenotypes. Moreover, medication given to HT patients could prevent or delay the occurrence of the HCM phenotype. The design of the study precludes further conclusions. While age at diagnosis was available for the analysis, age at the development of LVH was not.

Although HCM patients with HT were more symptomatic and had a higher prevalence of arrhythmias, that did not seem to have an impact on prognosis in the survival analysis compared with normotensive patients after adjustment with covariates.

Physical Activity

Diagnosis of HCM is included in the current guidelines as a cause of disqualification in competitive sports.39–41 This recommendation, which extends to silent carriers, is based on the hypothesis that regular exercise training and competitive sports can play a role in triggering cellular mechanisms leading to the HCM phenotype and arrhythmic outcomes in the presence of a predisposing gene abnormality. The authors of these guidelines conclude that there is no firm data to support this recommendation and that it is based on what seems to be most reasonable to expert panels.42

In our series, we found that carriers of sarcomeric mutations from the more intense exercise groups were diagnosed with HCM 7 years earlier than sedentary carriers.

Once the disease develops, HCM patients who perform physical activity in the higher intensity groups develop a similar degree of hypertrophy. Of interest, in the multivariate analysis, sex, HT and physical activity intensity were not predictors of LVH in our series. Interestingly, we failed to identify differences in the left ventricle and left atrium dimension between the exercise and sedentary HCM groups. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy might prevent heart remodeling in the hearts of athletes. Physical activity seems to have more of an impact on right ventricle size in normal individuals and in desmosomal mutation carriers than it does on the left chamber in HCM patients.42 In contrast, all 3 variables were significantly associated with age at HCM diagnosis.

There is little information in the literature on the assumed poor prognosis of HCM patients who engage in intense physical activity and this comes from clinical reports and retrospective series.43

In our study, HCM patients who performed more intense physical activity had a similar rate of events (AF, stroke, NYHA III-IV, SD, and the combined event).

In conclusion, on the basis of our data, physical activity does play a role in age at diagnosis but is not significant in disease expression and, in particular, does not seem to have a major impact on prognosis. An explanation for this finding should be sought in future larger prospective studies.

Limitations

The effect of double mutations could not be assessed, because most genetic studies were performed in the preultrasequencing era. Analysis of 2 to 5 genes (all including MYH7 and MYBPC3) was performed in 80% of the patients, while in 20% of the index cases, the genetic study was considered complete when 1 of the founder mutations was identified. Age at disease development could not be assessed because the study period was limited. Age at diagnosis was used as a surrogate of disease penetrance. Definitions for the intensity of physical activity were arbitrary. The classification aimed to evaluate the impact of physical habits at the time of diagnosis and disease severity on outcomes. Analysis of the dosage-effect of sport or physical activity was beyond the scope of this article. The number of individuals in the intense physical activity group was small.

CONCLUSIONS

Men and carriers of HCM mutations who perform intense physical activity are diagnosed significantly earlier than women and sedentary relatives. In contrast, hypertensive carriers of HCM mutations have a delayed diagnosis. Sex, HT and the degree of physical activity are not significantly associated with the severity of LVH in carriers of HCM causative mutations.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?

  • Male carriers of HCM mutations develop the disease earlier in life than female carriers. There is a general belief that HT and intense exercise are associated with an increase in LVH in HCM patients. Indirect data support the idea that intense physical activity might trigger ventricular arrhythmias leading to SD in HCM patients.

WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?

  • This study demonstrates that, in addition to sex, HT and physical activity also have an impact on age at diagnosis of HCM in genetic carriers. The role of HT and physical activity in the severity of phenotype and outcome is not clinically significant.

FUNDING

This study was funded by a grant from the Fundación Española del Corazon-Coca-Cola LTD (2007) and supported by a grant from the Fundación para la Formación e Investigación Sanitaria de la Región de Murcia. The investigators are part of a cardiovascular research network of the Carlos III Health Institute (RIC; RD12/0042/0049) and IMIB (Instituto Médico de Investigación Biosanitaria). M. Sabater was supported by a grant from ISCIII (RIC). The investigators are part of the clinical group of CIBERER and the University of Murcia.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None declared.

.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Iván Gómez, M. José Oliva, María López, M. Carmen Olmo, M. José Antolinos and Miguel Pagan for their help in both the clinical and molecular work of this project. We particularly acknowledge the patients and the BioBank (PT13/0010/0018) from the Spanish National Biobanks Network (B.000859).

References
[1]
B.J. Maron, W.J. McKenna, G.K. Danielson, et al.
American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 42 (2003), pp. 1687-1713
[2]
B.J. Maron.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.
JAMA., 287 (2002), pp. 1308-1320
[3]
T. Hirota, T. Kubo, H. Kitaoka, et al.
A novel cardiac myosin-binding protein C S297X mutation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
J Cardiol., 56 (2010), pp. 59-65
[4]
P. Spirito, C.E. Seidman, W.J. McKenna, B.J. Maron.
The management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
N Engl J Med., 336 (1997), pp. 775-785
[5]
P. Elliott, W.J. McKenna.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Lancet., 363 (2004), pp. 1881-1891
[6]
H. Kitaoka, T. Kubo, M. Okawa, et al.
Utility of tissue Doppler imaging to predict exercise capacity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: comparison with B-type natriuretic peptide.
J Cardiol., 53 (2009), pp. 361-367
[7]
K. Hayato, M. Okawa, Y. Matsumura, et al.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with mild left ventricular remodeling: echocardiographic assessment using left ventricular wall motion score.
J Cardiol., 51 (2008), pp. 95-105
[8]
P. Charron, L. Carrier, O. Dubourg, et al.
Penetrance of familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Genet Couns., 8 (1997), pp. 107-114
[9]
J.G. Seidman, C. Seidman.
The genetic basis for cardiomyopathy: from mutation identification to mechanistic paradigms.
Cell., 104 (2001), pp. 557-567
[10]
J. Gómez, J.R. Reguero, E. Coto.
Luces y sombras en el diagnóstico genético de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 69 (2016), pp. 61-68
[11]
B.J. Maron, M.S. Maron, C. Semsarian.
Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: clinical perspectives.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 60 (2012), pp. 705-715
[12]
P. Charron, M. Komajda.
Molecular genetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: towards individualized management of the disease.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn., 6 (2006), pp. 65-78
[13]
M. Sabater-Molina, D. Saura, E. García-Molina Sáez, et al.
Nueva mutación fundadora en MYBPC3: comparación fenotípica con la mutación de MYBPC3 más frecuente en España.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 70 (2016), pp. 105-114
[14]
P.M. Elliott, A. Anastasakis, M.A. Borger, et al.
2014 ESC Guidelines on diagnosis and management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur Heart J., 35 (2014), pp. 2733-2779
[15]
B.J. Maron.
Distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart: a clinical problem of increasing magnitude and significance.
Heart., 91 (2005), pp. 1380-1382
[16]
B.J. Maron.
Distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from athlete's heart physiological remodelling: clinical significance, diagnostic strategies and implications for preparticipation screening.
Br J Sports Med., 43 (2009), pp. 649-656
[17]
J.K. Ghali, H.J. Krause-Steinrauf, K.F. Adams, et al.
Gender differences in advanced heart failure: insights from the BEST study.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 42 (2003), pp. 2128-2134
[18]
P.P. Dimitrow, D. Czarnecka, J.A. Strojny, K. Kawecka-Jaszcz, J.S. Dubiel.
Impact of gender on the left ventricular cavity size and contractility in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Int J Cardiol., 77 (2001), pp. 43-48
[19]
B.J. Maron, S.A. Casey, D.G. Hurrell, D.M. Aeppli.
Relation of left ventricular thickness to age and gender in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Am J Cardiol., 91 (2003), pp. 1195-1198
[20]
I. Olivotto, M.S. Maron, A.S. Adabag, et al.
Gender-related differences in the clinical presentation and outcome of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 46 (2005), pp. 480-487
[21]
S.P. Page, S. Kounas, P. Syrris, et al.
Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C Mutations in Families with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Disease Expression in Relation to Age, Gender, and Long Term Outcome.
Circ Cardiovasc Genet., 5 (2012), pp. 156-166
[22]
V. Regitz-Zagrosek, S. Oertelt-Prigione, U. Seeland, R. Hetzer.
Sex and gender differences in myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure.
Circ J., 74 (2010), pp. 1265-1273
[23]
F. Aslam, A. Haque, J. Foody, J. Shirani.
The Frequency and Functional Impact of Overlapping Hypertension on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Single-Center Experience.
J Clin Hypertens., 12 (2010), pp. 240-245
[24]
P. Charron, O. Dubourg, M. Desnos, et al.
Diagnostic Value of Electrocardiography and Echocardiography for Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in a Genotyped Adult Population.
Circulation., 96 (1997), pp. 214-219
[25]
W.J. McKenna, P. Spirito, M. Desnos, O. Dubourg, M. Komajda.
Experience from clinical genetics in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: proposal for new diagnostic criteria in adult members of affected families.
Heart., 77 (1997), pp. 130-132
[26]
A. Bellavia, M. Bottai, N. Orsini.
Evaluating Additive Interaction Using Survival Percentiles.
Epidemiology., 27 (2016), pp. 360-364
[27]
J. Binder, S.R. Ommen, B.J. Gersh, et al.
Echocardiography-guided genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: septal morphological features predict the presence of myofilament mutations.
Mayo Clin Proc., 81 (2006), pp. 459-467
[28]
A. Pasipoularides.
Linking Genes to Cardiovascular Diseases: Gene Action and Gene-Environment Interactions.
J Cardiovasc Transl Res., 9 (2015), pp. 506-527
[29]
L.L. Nijenkamp, A. Güçlü, Y. Appelman, J. van der Velden, D.W. Kuster.
Sex-dependent pathophysiological mechanisms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Implications for rhythm disorders.
Heart Rhythm., 12 (2015), pp. 433-439
[30]
C.L. Lin, C.W. Chiang, C.K. Shaw, P.H. Chu, C.J. Changh, Y.L. Ko.
Gender differences in the presentation of adult obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with resting gradient: a study of 122 patients.
Jpn Circ J., 63 (1999), pp. 859-864
[31]
V. Regitz-Zagrosek.
Therapeutic implications of the gender specific aspects of cardiovascular disease.
Nat Rev Drug Discov., 5 (2006), pp. 425-438
[32]
P.P. Dimitrow, D. Czarnecka, K.K. Jaszcz, J.S. Dubiel.
Sex differences in age at onset of symptoms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
J Cardiovasc Risk., 4 (1997), pp. 33-35
[33]
T. Kubo, H. Kitaoka, M. Okawa, et al.
Gender-specific differences in the clinical features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a community-based Japanese population: Results from Kochi RYOMA study.
J Cardiol., 56 (2010), pp. 314-319
[34]
D.W. Brown, W.H. Giles, B. Janet, J.B. Croft.
Left ventricular hypertrophy as a predictor of coronary heart disease mortality and the effect of hypertension.
Am Heart J., 140 (2000), pp. 848-856
[35]
G.R. Claes, F.H. van Tienen, P. Lindsey, et al.
Hypertrophic remodelling in cardiac regulatory myosin light chain (MYL2) founder mutation carriers.
Eur Heart J., 37 (2016), pp. 1815-1822
[36]
C. Calore, M. De Bortoli, C. Romualdi, et al.
A founder MYBPC3 mutation results in HCM with a high risk of sudden death after the fourth decade of life.
J Med Genet., 52 (2015), pp. 338-347
[37]
D. Corrado, C. Basso, A. Pavei, P. Michieli, M. Schiavon, G. Thiene.
Trends in Sudden Cardiovascular Death in Young Competitive Athletes After Implementation of a Preparticipation Screening Program.
JAMA., 296 (2006), pp. 1593-1601
[38]
D. Corrado, C. Schmied, C. Basso, et al.
Risk of sports: do we need a pre-participation screening for competitive and leisure athletes?.
Eur Heart J., 32 (2011), pp. 934-944
[39]
A. Pelliccia, R. Fagard, H.H. Bjørnstad, et al.
Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease.
Eur Heart J., 26 (2005), pp. 1422-1445
[40]
A. Pelliccia, D.P. Zipes, B.J. Maron.
Bethesda Conference #36 and the European Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations Revisited. A Comparison of U.S. and European Criteria for Eligibility and Disqualification of Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 52 (2008), pp. 1990-1996
[41]
B.J. Maron, D.P. Zipes.
Introduction: Eligibility recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities—general considerations.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 45 (2005), pp. 1318-1321
[42]
A. La Gerche, A.T. Burns, D.J. Mooney, et al.
Exercise induced right ventricular dysfunction and structural remodelling in endurance athletes.
Eur Heart J., 33 (2012), pp. 998-1006
[43]
D. Corrado, C. Basso, G. Rizzoli, M. Schiavon, G. Thiene.
Does Sports Activity Enhance the Risk of Sudden Death in Adolescents and Young Adults?.
J Am Coll Cardiol., 42 (2003), pp. 1959-1963
Copyright © 2017. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
Supplemental materials
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.