Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 55. Issue 12.
Pages 1223-1344 (December 2002)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 55. Issue 12.
Pages 1223-1344 (December 2002)
Full text access
Long-Term Prognosis of Women with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes
Pronóstico a largo plazo de las mujeres con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST
Visits
7015
Xavier Boscha, Nuria Casanovasa, Faustino Miranda-Guardiolaa, Salvador Díez-Ajaa, Marta Sitgesa, Ignasi Angueraa, Ginés Sanza, Amadeo Betriua
a Institut de Malalties Cardiovasculars. Hospital Clínic. Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS). Departament de Medicina. Universitat de Barcelona. España.
This item has received
7015
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (5)
TABLE 1. Clinical characteristics
TABLE 2. Presentation of angina and clinical data obtained at admission
TABLE 3. Treatment and diagnostic tests performed at admission
TABLE 4. Hospital course
Fig. 1. Adjusted incidence of mortality, myocardial infarction, or new episode of acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation at 30 months for women in the study and for men of the same age and with the same prevalence of diabetes and arterial hypertension.
Show moreShow less
Background and objectives. Women with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction have a worse prognosis than men. However, information about the prognosis of women with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) is scarce. The aim of this study was to determine if the long-term prognosis of men and women with NSTEACS differs. Patients and method. In a consecutive series of 300 patients admitted for a NSTEACS and ischemic ECG changes, we compared the clinical characteristics, in-hospital and long-term follow-up of 95 women and 95 men matched for age, presence of diabetes, and past history of hypertension. Results. The median age of patients was 69 years, 36% had diabetes, and 65% had a history of hypertension. There were no gender differences in the history of angina or hypercholesterolemia, clinical presentation, number of patients with ST-segment depression, and CK-MB elevation. However, smoking, coronary artery disease, and peripheral vascular disease were less frequent in women. Treatment at admission and at discharge was similar in men and women, as was the use of in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic procedures (echocardiography: 80 vs 88%; coronary angiography: 57 vs 59%; percutaneous coronary intervention: 17 vs 14%; coronary surgery 13 vs. 11%). Women had a better mean ejection fraction (55 ± 13 vs 49 ± 14%; p < 0.01) and fewer stenosed coronary vessels (1.4 ± 1.1 vs 2.2 ± 0.9; p < 0.01). There were no differences in the frequency of recurrent angina (28 vs 25%), and of death or infarction (both 3.2%) during hospitalization. However, during a 30-month follow-up the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or a new episode of NSTEACS was significantly lower in women with a relative risk (RR) of 0.53 (95% CI: 0.33-0.86; p < 0.01). This apparently better prognosis persisted after adjusting for clinical data and ejection fraction (RR: 0.57 (0.33-0.98); p < 0.05), but disappeared after adjusting for the number of diseased coronary vessels (RR: 0.71 (0.35-1.47); p = 0.36). Conclusions. Women with NSTEACS had a better long-term prognosis than men. This better prognosis was independent of the patients' clinical characteristics and treatment, and could be explained by a less severe and less extensive coronary artery disease.
Keywords:
Unstable angina
Myocardial infarction
Acute coronary syndrome
Women
Prognosis
Antecedentes y objetivos. Las mujeres con infarto y elevación del segmento ST tienen un peor pronóstico que los varones. Sin embargo, existe poca información sobre el pronóstico de las mujeres con síndrome coronario agudo sin elevación del segmento ST (SCASEST). El objetivo del estudio fue conocer si el pronóstico a largo plazo de las mujeres con SCASEST es diferente al de los varones. Pacientes y método. De un total de 300 pacientes consecutivos ingresados por SCASEST con cambios isquémicos en el ECG, se compararon las características clínicas y la evolución de las 95 mujeres con las de 95 varones seleccionados por tener la misma edad, prevalencia de diabetes mellitus e hipertensión arterial. Resultados. La edad media de los pacientes fue de 69 años, el 36% eran diabéticos y el 65% tenía antecedentes de hipertensión arterial. No existieron diferencias entre géneros en los antecedentes de angina o hipercolesterolemia, forma de presentación clínica, frecuencia de descenso del segmento ST en el ingreso o elevación de la CK-MB. Sin embargo, las mujeres presentaron menos antecedentes de tabaquismo, enfermedad coronaria y vasculopatía periférica. El tratamiento al ingreso y al alta fue similar en ambos grupos, así como la frecuencia de procedimientos realizados (ecocardiografía: 80 frente a 88%; coronariografía: 57 frente a 59%; angioplastia: 17 frente a 14%, y cirugía: 13 frente a 11%). Las mujeres tuvieron mejor fracción de eyección (55 ± 13 frente a 49 ± 14%; p < 0,01) y un menor número de vasos estenosados (1,4 ± 1,1 frente a 2,2 ± 0,9; p < 0,01). Durante la hospitalización no se observaron diferencias en la incidencia de angina recurrente (28 frente a 25%) ni en la de mortalidad o infarto (3,2% en ambos casos). Sin embargo, en el seguimiento a 30 meses la incidencia acumulada de mortalidad, infarto o nuevo episodio de SCASEST fue significativamente menor en las mujeres con un RR (IC del 95%) de 0,53 (0,33-0,86; p < 0,01). Este mejor pronóstico se mantuvo al corregir los resultados por los demás datos clínicos y la fracción de eyección (RR = 0,57; IC del 95%, 0,33-0,98; p < 0,05), pero desapareció al corregir por el número de vasos estenosados (RR = 0,71; IC del 95%, 0,35-1,47; p = 0,36). Conclusiones. Las mujeres con SCASEST y cambios electrocardiográficos en el ingreso presentan una evolución mejor que los varones a largo plazo. Este mejor pronóstico es independiente de las características clínicas y del tratamiento realizado y parece explicarse por una menor extensión y gravedad de la enfermedad coronaria.
Palabras clave:
Angina inestable
Infarto de miocardio
Síndrome coronario agudo
Mujeres
Pronóstico
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiological characteristics and clinical presentation of ischemic heart disease differ between women and men; while the incidence of heart disease is much higher in men, the most frequent clinical manifestation in men is myocardial infarction and in women is chest pain.1 In addition, the overall mortality rate for ischemic heart disease is 3 times higher in men, a difference that tends to dissipate after the age of 55 years.1 In spite of these differences, the majority of the large cardiologic studies have generally involved men and the results extrapolated to women.

Only in the last 10 years, by means of comparative studies, has been paid greater attention to the different characteristics of ischemic heart disease presenting in women. The initial studies performed described the presence of a worse prognosis for women with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.2-5 These differences were attributed, in part, to a later-in-life presentation of ischemic heart disease in women, a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (especially arterial hypertension and diabetes), delayed diagnosis, and a lesser use of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.6-12 In addition, various studies on patients treated with angioplasty or coronary surgery have shown a worse prognosis in women than in men.13-17

There are few studies that have analyzed the difference in prognosis between types of patients with unstable angina or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and the results of such studies are contradictory.18-20 Our study was designed to determine if the short-term and long-term prognosis for women with a non-ST segment elevation acute coronary síndrome (NSTEACS) is different from that of men.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We designed a prospective observational study that included all the patients with the diagnosis of unstable angina or a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction who presented in the emergency department of our hospital from March 1996 to February 1997. Unstable angina was defined as the presence of ischemic pain associated with the presence of ischemic abnormalities recorded on ECG upon admission: ST segment depression >=1 mm or the presence of negative T-waves of >=3 mm in at least 2 contiguous leads. An infarct without ST segment elevation was diagnosed in presence of prolonged angina without ST segment elevation and with elevation of the MB fraction (activity) of the creatinphosphokinase enzyme (CK-MB) over the normal values as defined by the laboratory in our center. We collected data on the clinical presentation, prior history, tests performed and treatment administered, as well as the patient's hospital course and long-term outcome.

Patients

During the study, an initially conservative strategy of treatment was followed during the first 48 hours, in which indications for revascularization were established in relation to the recurrence of symptoms and signs of ischemia or the results of a stress test performed prior to discharge.19,21 except for patients who upon admission presented with signs of persistent ischemia on ECG, that were submitted to early coronary angiography. Pharmacological treatment, tests to be performed, and interventions were established in advance in a protocol that was distributed to the various units of the cardiology service.

We evaluated a total of 300 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of NSTEACS. Of these patients, we selected the 95 women who presented with ischemic changes on ECG upon admission and compared them with 95 men, adjusting for age (±2 years), history of arterial hypertension and diabetes.

Diagnostic techniques

An echocardiogram was performed within the first 72 hours after admission in order to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and to rule out the presence of valvulopathies or cardiomyopathies. A Hewlett-Packard model SONOS 5500 echocardiograph was used. Tests performed were systematically reviewed by experienced medical personnel.

A conventional stress test or a cardiac perfusion scintigraphy stress test was performed the third day after admission on all patients who were clinically stable following of a modified Bruce protocol. For those patients in whom we could not perform a conventional stress test due to physical or cardiological causes, a pharmacological stress test with dipyridamole in conjunction with cardiac perfusion scintigraphy was performed.

Indications for coronary angiography and revascularization

The presence of refractory angina and hemodynamic instability were considered to be indications for immediate catheterization. Indications for elective coronary angiography were: the presence of signs of acute persistent ischemia on ECG; the recurrence of anginal pain with ECG changes that did not fit the profile of refractory angina during the hospital stay; the presence of signs of severe ischemia during the stress test; the presence of ventricular dysfunction (EF<40%); and the inability to perform a stress test as a result of cardiac causes (recurrent angina or hesrt failure).

A stress test was considered positive, affecting the decision to perform cardiac catheterization, in presence of severe signs of ischemia defined by the occurrence of angina or >=1 mm ST segment depression at a workload of 5 METS or less, ST segment depression of more than 2 mm or in more than 4 leads or persistent (more than 5 minutes in the post-exercise period), or a decrease in systolic arterial pressure of more than 10 mm Hg during exercise. In the patients in whom myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was performed, coronary angiography was considered to be indicated in presence of a perfusion defect, whether it was reversible or not, in 2 or more vascular areas, or in only 1 area if extensive and reversible.

Coronary revascularization was considered for those patients in whom coronary angiography was performed and who presented with appropriate coronary features.

Ischemic events

To achieve the final objectives of this study we counted only spontaneous ischemic events. Coronary revascularization was considered as an additional therapeutic procedure. A myocardial infarction or reinfarction in the cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without ST segment elevation was diagnosed in the presence of an elevation of CK-MB values greater than the maximum normal limit. In the setting of revascularization surgery, we required a CK-MB elevation of more than 5 times the maximum limit of normal to diagnose a perioperative AMI.

Follow-up

After discharge, all patients were followed clinically by means of telephone interview. As a final study goal, we established the incidence of death, AMI or readmission for a new episode of NSTEACS during both the hospital stay and during the 30-month follow-up period.

Statistical analysis

Qualitative variables are expressed as numbers and percentages, and quantitative variables as mean±standard deviation (SD). The comparison of variables was performed using the χ² test and the exact Fisher test for qualitative values and the Student t test for the quantitative values. We established a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and we considered a P value of P<.05 to be significant. The cumulated incidence of events was calculated during the 30-month follow-up period by constructing Kaplan-Meier survival curves that were compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model.22 Adjustment for possible confounding variables between men and women was made in 3 stages. In the first stage, we included only the clinical variables that, on binary analysis, had P values <.15 both in the comparison of baseline variables by gender and when analyzing the prognosis at 30 months. In the second stage, we added the EF. Finally, in the third stage, we added the information obtained from coronary angiography with respect to the number of stenosed vessels. The analysis was also repeated on the entire group of 300 patients studied. We calculated the adjusted relative risk (RR) with its corresponding 95% CI for both the bivariate analysis and the multivariate analysis. The data was analyzed with the SPSS statistical package version 10.0.

RESULTS

Clinical characteristics

Mean patient age was 69 years, the prevalence of arterial hypertension was 65% and of diabetes mellitus was 36%. Unstable angina was the final diagnosis in 80% of patients and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 20%. Baseline clinical characteristics of the patients included are shown in Table 1. There were no gender differences in the prevalence of hipercolesterolemia or the history of angina or of coronary revascularization. Nevertheless, men were more often smokers (30% of men vs 6% of women; P<.01) and had a higher frequency of peripheral vascular disease (36% of men vs 16% of women; P<.05).

The pain that led to hospital admission was more prolonged in women than in men (115 ±151 min for women vs 75 ±84 min in men; P<.05) and was considered as being typical of a coronary event in 93% of women and 96% of men (NS) (Table 2). Most of the episodes occurred at rest, were prolonged, and had been present within prior 48 hours. No differences were observed in the type of ECG changes at the time of admission or in the elevation level of the serological markers of necrosis.

Treatment and tests performed

There were no significant differences with regard to medical treatment administered at admission (Table 3). Aspirin was administered to 100% of patients, heparin to 90% of patients, and beta-blockers to 73% of patients. A stress test was performed on more than half of the patients. No significant differences were observed between men and women with regard to the presence of angina or ischemic changes during the stress test, although man had a higher frequency of positive perfusion stress tests. No differences were observed either in the number of coronary angiographies or in the number of revascularization procedures that were performed (Table 3).

The EF measured by echocardiography was 55%±13% for women and 49%±14% for men (P<.01). Only 13% of women presented with an EF lower than 40%, vs 29% in men (P<.05). Among the patients who were catheterized, the number of diseased coronary vessels was significantly lower among women (1.4 ±1.1 vessels vs 2.2 ±0.9 vessels for men; P<.01) as a result of, above all, a greater number of women without significant coronary lesions (28% of women vs 4% of men; P<.05).

Hospital course

During the hospital stay, coronary angioplasty was performed in 17% of women and on 14% of men (NS), and surgery was performed in 14% of women and in 12% of men (NS). Ten percent of the procedures were performed in an emergency setting (Table 3). During this time, 4 patients died, 3 had a myocardial infarction, and 51 had recurrent angina, 31 of whom had transient ischemic changes on ECG. There was no gender differences between the sexes regarding the incidence of adverse clinical events during the hospital course (Table 4).

Long-term course

Treatment recommendations at the time of hospital discharge were similar for both groups (Table 3). Clinical follow-up was performed for a median of 26 months. During this time, revascularization procedures were performed in 56 patients (31%), 40 (22.5%) during the initial hospitalization and 16 (8%) after discharge (6 angioplasty procedures and 12 by-pass surgeries). During the entire follow-up period, 30 patients died (16%), 8 had a myocardial infarction (4%), and 42 (22%) presented with another episode of NSTEACS that required another hospitalization. In total, 72 patients (40%) died, had a myocardial infarction or a new episode of NSTEACS.

At 30 months follow-up, the cumulative incidence of adverse events was significantly lower in women than in men, with a RR (95% CI) of 0.53 (0.33 to 0.86; P<.01), a difference that was observed after the first 6 months (Figure 1). After performing the multivariate analysis, the RR of adverse cardiac events for women compared to men was 0.60 (0.36 to 0.99; P<.05) after adjustment for baseline clinical features, and 0.57 (0.33 to 0.98; P<.01) after adjustment for clinical data and EF. Nevertheless, when the number of stenosed vessels was included, the differences no longer remained statistically significant, with a RR of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.35 to 1.47; P=.36).

Fig. 1. Adjusted incidence of mortality, myocardial infarction, or new episode of acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation at 30 months for women in the study and for men of the same age and with the same prevalence of diabetes and arterial hypertension.

After repeating the analysis on the entire group of 300 patients studied, the results remained unchanged, and women presented an RR of ischemic events of 0.59 (0.37 to 0.95) after adjustment for clinical data, 0.64 (0.38 to 0.99) after the addition of EF, and 0.70 (0.48 to 1.26) after including the number of stenosed vessels in the analysis.

DISCUSSION

Our data show that women with NSTEACS have a better long-term prognosis than men. These results were obtained despite the fact that we selected for the study only patients with ischemic changes on ECG on admission and after adjusting for the other clinical variables with an established prognostic value. Nevertheless, when taking into account differences in coronary anatomical features, the differences were no longer statistically significant. These results concur with previous studies performed on patients with unstable angina and non- ST segment elevation myocardial infarction,23-25 and provide important information to better understand and clinically manage this syndrome in women.

Gender differences in the prognosis of acute coronary syndromes

The Framingham study1 was the first study to report gender differences in mortality rate after a myocardial infarction; these results were supported by later studies.2-5,11 While some studies have attributed these differences to the older age of women and their higher prevalence of arterial hypertension and diabetes,6,7 other studies have found that the difference in mortality rate is independent of these factors,5 especially in patients younger than 75 years of age.4 Some studies have suggested, nevertheless, that the higher mortality rate for women with myocardial infarction is a consequence of a proven higher prehospitalization mortality rate for men.1,26

With regard to NSTEACS, the existing evidence is scarce and contradictory. Thus, while in the TIMI IIIb study19 no differences were observed in the prognosis at 42 days, in the GUSTO IIb study18 a tendency to excessive risk was noted at 30 days for women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, a neutral effect in women with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, and a significant (35%) decrease in women with unstable angina. Finally, in the FRISC II study,20 which compared the efficacy of an initial invasive treatment strategy for NSTEACS vs a conservative treatment strategy, the prognosis for women was better than for men in the conservative treatment group, with similar results in the invasive treatment group.

In our study, as in others,19 we did not observe differences in prognosis during the hospital stay. However, we did observe differences in the survival curves beginning in the first 6 months of follow-up and continuing through the follow-up period. In the only study performed on the long-term prognosis according to gender,23 the multivariate analysis showed a significant (23%) risk reduction in women as compared with men. Nevertheless, in contrast to our study, the prognosis of patients was not adjusted for the number of stenosed coronary vessels and the EF.

The results of our study are notable because, in contrast to other studies,6-10 both men and women received the same treatment and underwent the same number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Multiple studies have reported that the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes seems to be different in man and women, with a lower number of revascularization procedures being performed on women. In spite of the fact that in a recent study no significant differences were observed,17 data from clinical registries show the opposite.7,12 These differences have been attributed to the older age of the studied women,27 to a larger number of concomitant illnesses, and to a management bias. The latter could result in a worse prognosis in women if lower frequency of the procedures with known diagnostic and therapeutic value are performed. The recent observation that the mortality rate of women with myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty was lower than that of men after adjustment for the remaining variables17 reinforces the importance of this treatment bias that was not found in our study.

Extension and severity of the coronary artery disease

In our study, we analyzed a group of women with NSTEACS that were compared to an identical number of men matched for age and history of diabetes and arterial hypertension, which are the principal confounding variables in studies on coronary heart disease according to gender.1-20,23-27 It is well established that women have a higher incidence of atypical angina than men. For this reason, the current clinical practice guidelines28 distinguish between the suspicion and the clear presence of unstable angina according to the absence or presence of ischemic signs on the ECG recorded on admission or the elevation of ser ological markers of myocardial necrosis. To avoid this bias, in our study we selected only patients with typical angina and ECG changes. In spite of this, women had better EF and a lesser number of stenosed coronary vessels. The high prevalence (28%) of coronary arteries without significant lesions observed in the women in our study is similar to that found in other clinical trials that used the same inclusion criteria, such as the TIMI IIIb study19 (25%) and the GUARANTEE registry7 (25%). In the GUSTO IIb study,18 the percentage was 9% in women with a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and 31% in women with unstable angina. In accordance with our results, it should be pointed out that in the FRISC II study,20 the difference in prognosis between women and men in the conservative arm disappeared when women with normal coronary arteries were withdrawn from the analysis.

Clinical implications

In the FRISC II study29 a significant interaction was observed between sex and management strategy, indicating that, as opposed to men, women with NSTEACS did not benefit from an initial invasive treatment strategy. Therefore, while in the non-invasive treatment group the incidence of infarct and the combination of death or infarct were significantly lower in women than in men, in the invasive treatment strategy group there was a non-significant trend toward a worse prognosis in women. It should be pointed out that in this group, a lower number of revascularization procedures were performed in women (67% vs 82%; P<.001) according to their lower prevalence of significant coronary disease. Several studies and clinical registries have reported a greater frequency of complications and a worse prognosis among women who underwnt percutaneous coronary interventions13,14 or coronary surgery,15 especially among women less than 60 years of age.16

On the other hand, the importance of coronary thrombosis in the pathophysiology of NSTEACS seems to be different in man and women. In the PRISM-PLUS study,30 the prevalence of coronary thrombus on coronary angiography performed 48 to 72 hours after admission was 50% lower in women than in men. In adition, in a recent meta-analysis of the efficacy of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in patients with NSTEACS, the administration of these drugs was associated with a 15% increase in the incidence of death or myocardial infarction in women in contrast to a 19% risk reduction in men.31 These differences in the effect of this type of medication according to sex were consistent even after adjustment for baseline clinical differences, but disappeared in the subgroup of patients who had positive troponin values, an indirect marker for coronary thrombosis.

Taken together, these results suggest that the pathophysiology of NSTEACS may be different for men and women, with a less extensive and severe coronary artery disease in women, and a possible lower prevalence of ulcerated plaques and thrombotic load in women, as suggested by the results of our study. These results also suggest that treatment of NSTEACS might be different in some aspects for men and women, especially with regards to whether the initial treatment strategy is invasive or conservative, and also, that the initial risk stratification is particularly important in women.

Study characteristics and limitations

The method of data analysis that was performed by pairing each woman with a man of the same age and prevalence rate for arterial hypertension and diabetes, ensures that no bias occurred as a result of baseline differences in patients' characteristics. In addition, the multivariate analysis allowed for final adjustment of the clinical and angiographic variables and the EF.

Although the number of patients studied was relatively small, it included all the women admitted over 1 year with NSTEACS who had ischemic changes on the ECG recorded on admission. We did not perform coronary angiography on all patients; therefore, the disappearance of statistical significance when adjusting for the number of stenosed vessels could be due to a lack of statistical power. However, the relative risk of ischemic events for women as compared with men did not remain the same after adjusting for angiographic data, but decreased in paralel to the differences observed in coronary anatomy. Finally, the extension of the follow-up to 30 months increased the power of the statistical analysis by registering a high incidence of ischemic events and ensuring the validity of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with NSTEACS and electrocardiographic changes upon admission have a better long-term outcome than men. This improved prognosis is independent of clinical characteristics and treatment performed, and appears to be attributable to a lesser extent and severity of coronary artery disease in women.


Correspondence: Dr. X. Bosch.
Institut de Malalties Cardiovasculars. Hospital Clínic.
Villarroel, 170. 08036 Barcelona. España.
E-mail: xbosch@medicina.ub.es

Bibliography
[1]
Lerner DJ, Kannel WB..
Patterns of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality in the sexes: a 26-year follow-up of the Framingham population..
Am Heart J, 111 (1986), pp. 383-90
[2]
Dittrich H, Gilpin E, Nicod P, Gali G, Henning H, Ross J..
Acute myocardial infarction in women: influence of gender on mortality and prognostic variables..
Am J Cardiol, 62 (1988), pp. 1-7
[3]
Greenland P, Reicher-Reiss H, Goldbourt U, Behar S, and the Israeli SPRINT investigators..
In-hospital and 1-year mortality in 1,524 women after myocardial infarction: comparison with 4,315 men..
Circulation, 83 (1991), pp. 484-91
[4]
Vaccarino V, Parsons L, Every N, Barron H, Krumholz H..
Sex-based differences in early mortality afer myocardial infarction..
N Engl J Med, 341 (1999), pp. 217-25
[5]
Marrugat J, Sala J, Masià R, Pavesi M, Sanz G, Valle V, et al..
Mortality differences between men and women following first myocardial infarction..
JAMA, 280 (1998), pp. 1405-9
[6]
Kostis JB, Wilson AC, O'Dowd K, Gregory P, Chelton S, Cosgrove NM, et al..
Sex differences in the management and long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a statewide study..
Circulation, 90 (1994), pp. 1715-30
[7]
Scirica B, Moliterno D, Every N, Anderson H, Aguirre F, Granger CB, et al..
Differences between men and women in the management of unstable angina pectoris (The GUARANTEE registry)..
Am J Cardiol, 84 (1999), pp. 1145-50
[8]
Chandra NC, Ziegelstein RC, Rogers WJ, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Gore JM, French WJ, et al..
Observations of the treatment of women in the United States with myocardial infarction: a report from the National Registry of Myocardial Infartion..
Arch Intern Med, 158 (1998), pp. 981-8
[9]
Clarke KW, Gray D, Keating NA, Hampton JR..
Do women with acute myocardial infarction receive the same treatment as men?.
BMJ, 308 (1994), pp. 883-6
[10]
Swahn E..
The care of patients with ischaemic heart disease from a gender perspective..
Eur Heart J, 19 (1998), pp. 1758-65
[11]
Echánove I, Cabadés A, Velasco JA, Pomar F, Valls F, Francés M, et al..
Características diferenciales y supervivencia del infarto agudo de miocardio en la mujer. Registro de infartos agudos de miocardio de la ciudad de Valencia (RICVAL)..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 50 (1997), pp. 851-9
[12]
De Velasco JA, Llargués E, Fitó R, Sala J, del Río A, de los Arcos E..
Prevalencia de los factores de riesgo y tratamiento farmacológico al alta hospitalaria en el paciente coronario. Resultados de un registro multicéntrico nacional (Programa 3C)..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 54 (2001), pp. 159-68
[13]
Kelsey SF, James M, Holubkov AL, Holubkov R, Cowley MJ, Dtre KM..
Results of percutaneous trasluminal coronary angioplasty in women: 1985-1986 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Coronary Angioplasty Registry..
Circulation, 87 (1993), pp. 720-7
[14]
Malenka DJ, O'Connor GT, Quinton H, Wennberg D, Robb JF, Shubrooks S, et al, the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group..
Differences in outcomes between women and men associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a regional prospective study of 13,061 procedures..
Circulation, 94 (1996), pp. II99-104
[15]
O'Connor GT, Morton JR, Diehl MJ, Olmstead EM, Coffin LH, Levy DG, et al, the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group..
Differences between men and women in hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery..
Circulation, 88 (1993), pp. 2104-10
[16]
Vaccarino V, Abramson JL, Veledar E, Weintroub WS..
Sex differences in hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery. Evidence for a higher mortality in younger women..
Circulation, 105 (2002), pp. 1176-81
[17]
Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Pache J, Seyfarth M, Blasini R, et al..
Sex-based analysis of outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated predominantly with percutaneous coronary intervention..
JAMA, 287 (2002), pp. 210-5
[18]
Hochman J, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, Weaver WD, White HD, Van de Werf F, et al..
Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes..
N Engl J Med, 341 (1999), pp. 226-32
[19]
Hochman JS, McCabe CH, Stone PH, Becker RC, Cannon CP, DeFeo-Fraulini T, et al..
Outcome and profile of women and men presenting with acute coronary syndromes: a report from TIMI IIIb..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 30 (1997), pp. 141-8
[20]
Lagerqvist B, Säfström K, Stahle E, Wallentin L, Swahn E, and the FRISC II Study Group Investigators..
Is early invasive treatment of unstable coronary artery disease equally effective for both women and men?.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 38 (2001), pp. 41-8
[21]
Sionis Green A, Bosch X, Miranda-Guardiola F, Anguera I, Sitges M, Díez-Aja S, et al..
Evolución hospitalaria y pronóstico actual de la angina inestable..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1573-82
[22]
Cox DR..
Regression models and life tables..
JR Stat Soc, 34 (1974), pp. 187-220
[23]
Roger V, Forkouh M, Weston S, Reeder G, Jacobsen S, Zinsmeister A, et al..
Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina..
JAMA, 283 (2000), pp. 646-52
[24]
Golderg R, Goff D, Cooper L, Luepker R, Zapka J, Bittner V, et al..
Age and sex differences in presentation of symptoms among patientes with acute coronary disease: the REACT trial..
Coron Artery Dis, 11 (2000), pp. 399-407
[25]
Chua TP, Saia F, Bhardwaj V, Wright C, Clarke D, Hennessy M, et al..
Are there gender differences in patients presenting with unstable angina?.
Int J Cardiol, 72 (2000), pp. 281-6
[26]
Chambless L, Keil U, Dobson A, Mähönen M, Kuulasmaa K, Rajakangas A, et al..
Population versus clinical view of case fatality from acute coronary heart disease: results from the WHO MONICA project 1985-1990..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 3849-59
[27]
Bermejo García J, López de Sá E, López-Sendón JL, Pabón Osuna P, García-Morán E, Bethencourt A, et al..
Angina inestable en el anciano: perfil clínico, manejo y mortalidad a los tres meses. Datos del registro PEPA..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1564-72
[28]
Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox K, Wallentin L, Hamm C, Fadden E, et al..
Management of acute coronary syndromes: acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST segment elevation. Task force of the ESC..
Eur Heart J, 21 (2000), pp. 1406-32
[29]
Wallentin L, Lagerquist B, Husted S, Kontny F, Stahle E, Swahn E, the FRISC II Investigators..
Outcome at one year after an invasive compared with a noninvasive strategy in unstable coronary artery disease: the fast revascularisation during instability in coronary artery disease (FRISC II) invasive randomised trial..
Lancet, 356 (2000), pp. 9-16
[30]
Zhao XQ, Theroux P, Snapinn SM, Sax FL, and the PRISM-PLUS investigators..
Intracoronary thrombus and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade with tirofiban in unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Angiographic results from the PRISM-PLUS trial (Platelet receptor inhibition for ischemic syndrome management in patients limited by unstable signs and symptoms)..
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 1609-15
[31]
Boersma E, Harrington RA, Moliterno DJ, White H, Théroux P, Van de Werf F, et al..
Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials..
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.