Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 63. Issue 1.
Pages 107-110 (January 2010)
Vol. 63. Issue 1.
Pages 107-110 (January 2010)
Full text access
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Heavily Calcified Lesions Using Rotational Atherectomy and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: Outcomes at One Year
Intervencionismo coronario en lesiones severamente calcificadas mediante aterectomía rotacional y stent liberador de paclitaxel: resultados tras un año de seguimiento
Visits
11221
Juan García deLaraa, Eduardo Pinara, Juan Ramón Gimenoa, José Antonio Hurtadoa, Javier Lacunzaa, Raúl Valdesusoa, Mariano Valdés Chávarria
a Unidad de Hemodinámica, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (2)
TABLE 1. Baseline Characteristics (n=50)
TABLE 2. Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics
Show moreShow less
Figures (2)
Heavily calcified lesions present a challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention. With rotational atherectomy, it is possible to treat these lesions and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) reduce the risk of restenosis over the long term. This retrospective study investigated clinical outcomes with rotational atherectomy and PESs in 50 consecutive patients with heavily calcified lesions. Mortality and target lesion revascularization at 1 year (median, 14 months; interquartile range, 8.75-25.5 months) were recorded. Some 52% of patients were aged over 70 years, 68% were male, 52% had acute coronary syndrome, 80% had multivessel disease and 44% were receiving abciximab. Two patients died in hospital, three died during follow-up (one cardiac death) and 3 (6%) underwent target lesion revascularization. At 1 year, the survival rate free of cardiac death was 94% and the survival rate free of target lesion revascularization was 94%. These findings demonstrate that the combination of rotational atherectomy and PESs gives excellent results in heavily calcified lesions.
Keywords:
Rotational atherectomy
Paclitaxel-eluting stent
Rotablator
Drug-eluting stent
Las lesiones severamente calcificadas dificultan el intervencionismo coronario. La aterectomía rotacional permite tratar estas lesiones y los stents liberadores de paclitaxel (SLP) reducen la reestenosis a largo plazo. Se evaluó retrospectivamente el resultado de la aterectomía rotacional y los SLP en lesiones severamente calcificadas en 50 pacientes consecutivos. Se estudió la mortalidad y la revascularización de la lesión tratada tras 1 año (mediana, 14 meses; intervalo intercuartílico, 8,75-25,5). El 52% eran mayores de 70 años; el 68%, varones; el 52% tenía síndrome coronario agudo; el 80%, enfermedad multivaso y un 44% recibió abciximab. Hubo 2 muertes intrahospitalarias, 3 en el seguimiento (una cardiaca) y 3 (6%) casos de revascularización de la lesión tratada. A 1 año, la supervivencia libre de muerte cardiaca fue del 94% y la supervivencia libre de revascularización de la lesión tratada, del 94%; esto muestra que la estrategia de SLP y aterectomía rotacional en lesiones severamente calcificadas proporciona excelentes resultados.
Palabras clave:
Aterectomía rotacional
Stent liberador de paclitaxel
Rotablator
Stent farmacoactivo
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

Heavily calcified lesions (HCL) present a challenge for percutaneous coronary intervention.1,2 If managed aggressively, they cause dissection or incomplete apposition of the stent, which prior preparation of the plaque would avoid.3

Paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) have been shown to help reduce restenosis and revascularization in vessels with HCL.4 Rotational atherectomy (RA) facilitates differential ablation of calcified plaque which, in turn, facilitates angioplasty and implantation.5,6 However, the major studies of PESs have considered this an exclusion criterion.

Small-sample observational studies report good results for sirolimus-eluting stents used in HCL treatment following RA.7

The present study analyzes immediate and 1-year results following treatment of HCL with RA and PES implantation.

METHODS

We analyzed a retrospective series of 50 consecutive patients from the same center who underwent RA and received at least 1 PES implant between April 2005 and April 2007. All presented HCL according to qualitative angiographic criteria determined by the physician responsible for the procedure.

A physician not directly related with the procedure recorded incidence of death (from cardiac or any other cause) and of clinically indicated revascularization of the lesion treated (RLT). Quantitative angiographic evaluation was with QCA-CMS® (Medis Medical Imaging Systems) before and after the procedure.

Procedure

All patients received acetylsalicylic acid (150-300 mg/day) and clopidogrel (300 mg of load, 75 mg/day), from at least 24 h preprocedure. After angiographic confirmation of HCL, treatment began immediately, or not, at the discretion of the operator.

A 0.09 inch guidewire was introduced directly or following exchange using a microcatheter or coaxial balloon. Rotational atherectomy was with a Rotablator® (Boston Scientific-Scimed Corp.) at 140 000-180 000 rpm and a 0.7 burr-to-minor artery ratio. Advancement was slow (maximum 10 s) and saline solution was administered with heparin, nitroglycerin and verapamil during atherectomy. Patients received at least 1 PES following dilatation in all cases. Subsequently, stent dilatation was applied if residual stenosis was >50%. Nonfractioned heparin (70-100 U/kg) and abciximab were administered as coadjuvant medication at the operator's discretion.

Postprocedure, double antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel (75 mg/day) and aspirin (100-300 mg/ day) was administered for at least 12 months. Creatinkinase (CK) and CK-MB fraction enzymes were recorded at 8, 12, and 24 h postprocedure. In the follow-up, all deaths were considered cardiac unless diagnosed otherwise. Residual stenosis of <20% was considered an angiographic success.

Statistical analysis was with SPSS 15.0. Continuous variables are expressed as mean±SD and categorical variables as number and percentage. Pre-event time lapse was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics are in Table 1. We enrolled 50 patients with mean age 70 (1.2) years; 68% men; 52% with acute coronary syndrome. In 14 (28%) patients, ejection fraction (EF) was <55%.

Forty patients (80%) presented multivessel disease and 15 (30%) a diseased left main coronary artery (LMCA). Rotational atherectomy was of 1 vessel in 44 (88%) patients, 2 vessels in 4 (8%), and 3 vessels in 2 (4%); RA was of the LMCA in 12 (24%) patients, 3 of whom presented protected LMCA. Angiographic characteristics are in Table 2. Mean reference diameter was 2.83 (0.8) mm; mean lesion length, 29 (2.6) mm; 28 (56%) patients presented >20 mm lesions and 11 (22%) had >45° angulation.

Abciximab was administered to 22 (44%) patients at the operator's discretion. The most frequently used burr size was 1.5 mm (30 [60%] patients). After RA, all lesions were predilatated and at least 1 PES was deployed with 92% angiographic success.

Dissection requiring repair occurred in 1 (2%) patient. Perforation by the intracoronary guidewire occurred in another (2%) although this did not affect the vessel treated with RA. In 1 patient (2%), acute vessel closure occurred and was resolved by stenting.

Prophylactic pacemakers were not implanted although 1 patient subsequently did require one for complete atrioventricular (AT) block. The device was extracted in the laboratory after nodal conduction recovery.

Significant (>1.5 mm) branch loss occurred in 2 (4%) patients. We recorded CK-MB elevation (<20 mg/dL) in 14 (28%) patients although data did not follow a normal distribution (median, 4.7; interquartile range, 3.45-8.70). This was relevant (>20 mg/dL) in 7 (14%) patients.

No deaths occurred during the procedure. Two deaths occurred during hospitalization: one patient died at 24 h due to cardiac tamponade related with the intracoronary guidewire that perforated a vessel other than the one treated by RA. Another patient (81 years, diseased LMCA, and 3 vessels) died of cardiac arrest at 5 days.

The remaining patients (96%) were followed up for median 14 months after discharge. One patient (65 years, severely depressed EF, 3 diseased vessels) died at 4 months postprocedure. We recorded another 2 postprocedure deaths due to noncoronary causes: 1 patient died of leukemia at 9 months; another died of a stroke at 4 months.

Kaplan-Meier curves showed 94% (4%) survival free of cardiac death at 1 year (Figure 1) and 89% (5%) overall survival (free of any cause death).

Figure 1. One-year survival free of cardiac cause death.

At 1-year follow-up, 94% (4%) of surviving patients were RLT-free and 3 required revascularization (Figure 2). When contacted at 1 year, 81% of survivors were free of angina.

Figure 2. One-year survival free of revascularization of the lesion treated.

DISCUSSION

In an unselected series of patients with complex lesions, RA and PES implantation produced 92% angiographic success. These results coincide with other published series of patients treated with RA.8-10

Two (4%) patients died in-hospital, which is comparable with previously reported studies.9,11,12 Kini et al8 found 0.2% in-hospital mortality in a younger population (65 [11] years) with a more favorable angiographic profile (17 [8] mm mean lesion length; 58% calcified; 7% bifurcated). We recorded minimal intraprocedural complications by comparison with prior studies.7,11 Incidence of type B or greater dissection (2%) and acute vessel closure (2%) was minimal. The only major complication (perforation by intracoronary guidewire) occurred in a vessel not treated with RA.

We recorded substantial CK-MB elevation (>20 ng/mL) in 14% of patients, exceeding that reported elsewhere, although with no repercussions on clinical results.9,12 Both procedural and follow-up results for this series were good despite the high-risk population with complex lesions.

The results show excellent 1-year survival from cardiac-cause death. Overall mortality at 1 year was 2 deaths from proven noncardiac causes and 2 deaths in-hospital.

Clavijo et al7 describe a series of patients with HCL treated by RA and sirolimus-eluting stent (SLS) implantation and report 6.8% 6-month mortality among discharged patients.

The RLT was 6% per year, indicating a substantial reduction versus the 16%-25% described for conventional stents after RA.6,9,13 Clavijo et al report 4.2% 6-month RLT using SLS.7

At >1 year, >80% of patients remain free of angina versus 75% at 9 months and 58% at 1 year reported in conventional stent studies.9,13

The principle limitations of the study are its retrospective design, small sample size and lack of a control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The present paper describes results of using PES after RA in heavily calcified lesions. This strategy produces a high angiographic success rate with low incidence of short-term major clinical events. At 1-year follow-up, we found a high rate of survival from cardiac death with low RLT.

Similar findings have been published on the use of SLS after RA in patients with HCL. More extensive studies are needed to confirm these findings.


Correspondence: Dr. J. García de Lara.
Servicio de Cardiología. Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca. Carretera de Cartagena, s/n. 30120 El Palmar. Murcia. España.
E-mail: garciadelara@secardiologia.es

Received November 18, 2008.
Accepted for publication May 20, 2009.

Bibliography
[1]
Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ, et al..
Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group..
Circulation, 82 (1990), pp. 1193-202
[2]
Zaacks SM, Allen JE, Calvin JE, Schaer GL, Palvas BW, Parrillo JE, et al..
Value of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association stenosis morphology classification for coronary interventions in the late 1990s..
Am J Cardiol, 82 (1998), pp. 43-9
[3]
Sharma SK, Israel DH, Kamean JL, Bodian CA, Ambrose JA..
Clinical, angiographic, and procedural determinants of major and minor coronary dissection during angioplasty..
Am Heart J, 126 (1993), pp. 39-47
[4]
Moussa I, Ellis SG, Jones M, Kereiakes DJ, McMartin D, Rutherford B, et al..
Impact of coronary culprit lesion calcium in patients undergoing paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (a TAXUS-IV sub study)..
Am J Cardiol, 96 (2005), pp. 1242-7
[5]
Dill T, Dietz U, Hamm CW, Kuchler R, Rupprecht HJ, Haude M, et al..
A randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy in complex coronary lesions (COBRA study)..
Eur Heart J, 21 (2000), pp. 1759-66
[6]
Safian RD, Feldman T, Muller DW, Mason D, Schreiber T, Haik B, et al..
Coronary angioplasty and Rotablator atherectomy trial (CARAT): immediate and late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial..
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 53 (2001), pp. 213-20
[7]
Clavijo LC, Steinberg DH, Torguson R, Kuchulakanti PK, Chu WW, Fournadjiev J, et al..
Sirolimus-eluting stents and calcified coronary lesions: clinical outcomes of patients treated with and without rotational atherectomy..
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 68 (2006), pp. 873-8
[8]
Kini A, Marmur JD, Duvvuri S, Dangas G, Choudhary S, Sharma SK..
Rotational atherectomy: improved procedural outcome with evolution of technique and equipment. Single-center results of first 1,000 patients..
[9]
Bersin RM, Cedarholm JC, Kowalchuk GJ, Fitzgerald PJ..
Long-term clinical follow-up of patients treated with the coronary rotablator: a single-center experience..
[10]
Reifart N, Vandormael M, Krajcar M, Gohring S, Preusler W, Schwarz F, et al..
Randomized comparison of angioplasty of complex coronary lesions at a single center. Excimer Laser, Rotational Atherectomy, and Balloon Angioplasty Comparison (ERBAC) Study..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 91-8
[11]
Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J, Reimers B, Di Francesco L, Martini G, et al..
Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 128-36
[12]
Reisman M, Harms V, Whitlow P, Feldman T, Fortuna R, Buchbinder M..
Comparison of early and recent results with rotational atherectomy..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 29 (1997), pp. 353-7
[13]
Rubartelli P, Niccoli L, Alberti A, Giachero C, Ettori F, Missiroli B, et al..
Coronary rotational atherectomy in current practice: acute and mid-term results in high- and low-volume centers..
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 61 (2004), pp. 463-71
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?