Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 55. Issue 3.
Pages 271-291 (March 2002)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 55. Issue 3.
Pages 271-291 (March 2002)
Full text access
Physiologic evaluation of coronary circulation. Role of invasive and noninvasive techniques
Valoración fisiológica de la circulación coronaria. Papel de las técnicas invasivas y no invasivas
Visits
10872
Jaume Candell-Rieraa, Josep Martín-Comínb, Javier Escanedc, Jesús Peteirod
a Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Barcelona.??
b Hospital de Bellvitge. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat.
c Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Madrid.
d Hospital Juan Canalejo. Coru??a.
This item has received
10872
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (13)
Show moreShow less
Tables (1)
For many years, the evaluation of the extent and severity of coronary artery disease has been mainly anatomical, carried out by coronary angiography. However, this technique has methodological limitations and interobserver variability is considerable. Quantification of coronary reserve with pressure guidewires and intracoronary Doppler now provides more precise physiologic evaluation of coronary circulation. Myocardial perfusion single proton emission computed tomography and echocardiography, combined with stress and/or pharmacological challenge testing, though they are only semiquantitative techniques, also offer appropriate complements to coronary angiography in the functional evaluation of coronary patients. The aim of this paper is to discuss the clinical value of these techniques.
Keywords:
Coronary circulation
Catheterization
Scintigraphy
Echocardiography
Durante muchos años, la valoración de la extensión y severidad de la enfermedad coronaria ha sido fundamentalmente anatómica y se ha venido realizando mediante la coronariografía. Sin embargo, esta técnica está sujeta a limitaciones metodológicas y a una considerable variabilidad interobservador. La cuantificación de la reserva coronaria mediante guías de presión y Doppler intravascular permite, en la actualidad, una valoración funcional más precisa del estado de la circulación coronaria. El SPECT miocárdico de perfusión y el ecocardiograma junto a la práctica de pruebas de esfuerzo y/o de provocación farmacológica, aun con la limitación de ser técnicas semicuantitativas, también aportan un adecuado complemento a la coronariografía para la valoración funcional del paciente coronario. En este artículo se pretende realizar una valoración de estas exploraciones desde el punto de vista clínico.
Palabras clave:
Circulación coronaria
Cateterismo
Gammagrafía
Ecocardiografía
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

The anatomic classification of the extension of coronary artery disease to one, two, and three vessels has been used routinely in the prognostic assessment of patients with ischemic heart disease and in the selection of patients for revascularization.1-3 However, this criterion is too simple and not free of limitations. In 1986, Plotnick4 noticed that patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease did not constitute a homogeneous population. He remarked that clinical decisions based only on the number of vessels exemplify a unidimensional approach to a multidimensional problem, and demanded «less anatomy and more physiology» in the assessment of ischemic heart disease. In an attempt to overcome these limitations, different systems for scoring coronariography have been devised,5-10 but subjective assessment of the coronary stenoses continues to be subject to considerable interobserver variability.11-13 This variability can be considerable although quantitative programs are used.14 Topol and Nissen15 warned in 1995 of the excessive concern of cardiologists for «coronary luminology,» in spite of the dissociation often existing between coronariography and clinical manifestations. The use of intracoronary ultrasound is also just a morphometric approach to the study of the coronary arteries.

At present, more credence is conceded to knowledge of the functional repercussion of a specific coronary stenosis that can be studied in the course of catheterization by assessing coronary reserve using pressure guide wires, intracoronary Doppler, myocardial perfusion SPECT, echocardiography, and the conventional electrocardiographic exercise stress test. However, the anatomofunctional correlation of coronary lesions is not always optimal, since different factors, such as the methods used, interpretation criteria, provocation maneuvers, and the patient´s treatment can influence the results of these studies. This motivated Ellestad16 to affirm recently that the time has come to seek a new gold standard for re-evaluating the effectiveness of noninvasive tests.

It is interesting that the invasive techniques used for the assessment of coronary physiology have used as a gold standard noninvasive functional studies such as tomographic radionuclide scans of myocardial perfusion and stress echography, which are not exactly characterized as techniques that allow absolute quantification of coronary flow. The only noninvasive technique that allows quantitative assessment is positron-emission tomography, but it is highly complex and expensive, so its use is strictly limited even in centers that are equipped with the technique. It can be affirmed that the cardiologist currently has more possibilities for measuring anatomic parameters invasively (quantitative coronariography, intravascular ultrasound) than for quantifying absolutely functional parameters by invasive (intravascular pressure guide wire and Doppler) and noninvasive means (tomographic perfusion radionuclide scan, stress echocardiography, contrast echocardiography). As will be seen later, the values obtained from the studies of functional parameters are only semiquantitative, the result of comparing the most affected coronary regions with less affected or normal areas.

However, in clinical practice the cardiologist often has the problem of assessing the true importance of a single stenosis that is considered moderate in the coronariography, or as a preliminary step to considering partial or total revascularization in a coronary patient with multivessel disease. The practice of percutaneous coronary intervention (angioplasty or stent) has increased enormously in the last decade. Initially, percutaneous revascularization techniques were not performed during diagnostic catheterization, but at the present, in order to reduce the aggressiveness of the procedure for the patient, avoid vascular complications, and reduce costs, revascularization is increasingly performed during the same procedure. Therefore, it is not uncommon that the cardiologist ordering a diagnostic coronariography indicates on the order that revascularization may be performed, depending on the result of coronariography. Incomplete percutaneous revascularization has been recognized as a reasonable strategy in many patients with multivessel disease, and it is known that total revascularization is performed in only 10% of these patients using percutaneous coronary interventionist techniques (angioplasty, stent). It is in such cases that previous knowledge of the location of the most functionally stenotic coronary artery, the so-called culprit lesion or the lesion responsible for the clinical manifestations of the patient or the most severe ischemia, is extremely important .

In this article, after a brief description of the physiology of the coronary circulation, the current status of invasive and noninvasive studies that can help cardiologists to make functional assessments will be described.

PHYSIOLOGY OF CORONARY CIRCULATION

Before approaching in detail the different techniques for functionally assessing the coronary circulation, it is advisable to briefly review some physiological facts that are fundamental for correctly interpreting the results of these studies. The coronary circulation it common described in terms of analogies with simple electrical or hydraulic circuits. In fact, these models are far from capable of integrating the complexity of the phenomena that occur during the cardiac cycle.

Heart function is highly dependent on the maintenance and modulation of coronary blood flow. The myocardium, particularly the subendocardium, is the tissue with the highest baseline aerobic demands in the body (8-10 ml O2/min/100 g vs 0.15 ml O2/min/100 g in the skeletal muscle). The three main determinants of this demand are wall stress, inotropic state, and heart rate.17,18

Coronary blood flow is influenced by extravascular compression. Throughout the cardiac cycle, variations in intramyocardial and intracavitary pressure modify coronary vascular resistance drastically.19 Coronary blood flow is modulated by variations in the resistance of the vascular bed. Whereas blood flow is predominantly diastolic in the left coronary artery, in the right coronary artery there is also systolic blood flow due to the low extravascular compression exerted by the right ventricle and atria.19,20

During cardiac systole, retrograde flow takes place in the coronary arteries and anterograde flow in the coronary veins. As a result of the extravascular compression resulting from systole, the microcirculatory and intramural vascular bed empties in two directions, retrogradely in the arterial direction and anterogradely in the venous direction, which causes a 180° phase difference in the flow in the coronary arteries and venous sinus.17,21-23

During diastole, part of the anterograde flow fills the intramyocardial microcirculatory bed. Although coronary blood flow is fundamentally diastolic, during protodiastole epicardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion dissociate because the blood flow dissipates in a capacitance phenomenon, as filling the intramural branches and microcirculation milked during systole are filled.21,24

In baseline circumstances, the relation between blood pressure and flow in the coronary arteries is not linear. If the only situation considered from now on is analogous to the mid end-diastole, that is to say, a situation in which extravascular compression is minimal and constant and there are no variations in coronary conductance, coronary blood flow remains stable over a broad range of pressures. This phenomenon receives the name of coronary self-regulation and is the result of intrinsic myogenic tone, a response by the smooth muscle cells of the coronary arterioles to pressure variations.17,21,25-27 Coronary self-regulation is only effective within the range of pressures indicated: when the perfusion pressure falls below this pressure, coronary blood flow decreases.

During maximum coronary hyperemia, the relation between coronary blood pressure and flow is linear. In contrast to the situation just described, complete vasodilation of resistance vessels induced by a maximum physiological or pharmacological hyperemic stimulus (increased myocardial metabolism) establishes a fixed relation between coronary perfusion pressure and blood flow. The slope of this relation is influenced by the resistance of the system: the lower this slope (conductance) is, the greater the resistance of the system will be.21,28 The pressure-flow relation during maximum hyperemia constitutes a ceiling of expected coronary flow values for different perfusion pressures.29

The increase in blood flow from the self-regulation to the maximum hyperemia situation constitutes an indicator of the functional state of the coronary system. This concept constitutes the coronary flow reserve, a functional indicator of the state of coronary circulation that is widely used in diagnostic techniques.17,21,25-27,29 In figures 1 through 3 this principle is illustrated schematically. It is important to remember that in normal conditions the coronary reserve is transmurally heterogeneous: in the subendocardium, the coronary reserve is smaller because there is a greater baseline degree of arteriolar vasodilation as a result of greater subendocardial metabolic requirements.18

Fig. 1. Application of the relation between intracoronary pressure and flow to the diagnostic study of coronary circulation. The basic concept of coronary reserve is shown in this figure. In baseline conditions, the relation between pressure and flow are not linear, but are characterized by a broad plateau of pressures for which coronary flow remains constant, a phenomenon modulated by arteriolar resistance. Nevertheless, during maximum hyperemia induced by myocardial oxygen demand or the administration of vasodilator drugs, this relation is linear (solid lines). The slope of this relation expresses coronary resistance (R). A situation is considered physiological when resistance is normal (small R). The induction of hyperemia means that, for a given pressure, coronary flow increases 3 times over baseline values (arrow). Nevertheless, an increase in resistance (large R) resulting from epicardial stenosis or microcirculatory dysfunction, and manifested as a less pronounced slope in the pressure-flow relation, is associated with a smaller increase in flow in relation to baseline values for the same pressure (1.5 times the baseline flow value). The intracoronary velocity tracings obtained with a Doppler guide wire make it possible to obtain, in accordance with this principle, coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR).

Fig. 2. The existing linear relation between pressure and flow during hyperemia makes it possible to infer, in accordance with pressure measurements, the degree of limitation to flow caused by epicardial stenosis. The graph shows the flows corresponding to pressures BP1 and BP2, which have a fixed relation dictated by the slope of the relation between pressure and flow during hyperemia. When the difference between these pressures results from the hemodynamic effect of an epicardial stenosis (transtenotic gradient in hyperemia), it is inferred that the percentage drop in flow faithfully reflects the percentage drop in pressure through the same stenosis (0.4 in both). Intracoronary pressure recordings obtained by a pressure guide wire thus make it possible to obtain the myocardial fractional flow reserve, which in this case indicates that the coronary blood flow received by the myocardium dependent on the vessel is only 40% of the flow that would be received in the absence of stenosis.

Fig. 3. The slope of the pressure/flow relation in hyperemia, an index of coronary resistance, can be directly estimated. To do so, it is necessary to have instantaneous information on intracoronary pressure and flow. Using only data collected in mid end-diastole, regression analysis can be used to establish the slope (b) of this relation. This index receives the name of instantaneous hyperemic diastolic pressure-flow slope (i-HDPFS).

The presence of epicardial stenosis causes a loss of energy associated with blood flow that is expressed as a fall in effective perfusion pressure. Stenoses cause two types of resistance, one related with friction (f) and the other related with turbulence and the dispersion of blood flow after passing the stenosis (s). The transtenotic pressure gradient, ΔP, has a nonlinear relation with the f and s components and flow, Q, in accordance with the expression ΔP=fQ+sQ2. The resistive components of friction and turbulence are influenced by characteristics of the blood (viscosity and density) and the geometry of the stenosis (reduction of luminal area, length, and the inflow and outflow angles).26,29,30 The complex interrelation between these factors contrasts with the simplicity of the indices of angiographic severity commonly used in clinical practice (e.g., the percentage of luminal diameter), and illustrates the limitations of angiography for evaluating the functional repercussions of stenosis.31

Coronary self-regulation compensates for the fall in blood pressure caused by stenosis in order to maintain constant coronary blood flow. The mechanism of self-regulation, which in physiological conditions adjusts microcirculatory resistance to myocardial energy requirements, has a chronic compensatory function in response to the fall in intracoronary pressure secondary to stenosis. As the stenosis increases in severity, sustained arteriolar vasodilation increasingly compromises the self-regulatory function to maintain an adequate myocardial blood flow. In other words, the compensatory function of coronary self-regulation in a stenotic vessel is at the expense of reducing coronary reserve. The compromised coronary reserve is first evident in the subendocardium, where baseline arteriolar vasodilation is greater due to higher energy demands.

The hemodynamic effect of a stenosis is manifested in the smaller slope of the pressure-flow relation. The diagnostic utility of the coronary reserve concept derives from this finding. The potential increase in coronary blood flow from a given pressure at baseline to maximum hyperemia (that is, the coronary reserve) decreases in the presence of stenosis. This effect is quantifiable in absolute terms if measurements obtained at baseline and in hyperemia are available. In addition, because adjacent vascular beds have a conserved coronary reserve, the induction of maximum hyperemia tends to increase the heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion, a phenomenon that constitutes the basis for different diagnostic techniques. In this sense, pure arterial vasodilators (adenosine, papaverine, dipyridamole) administered systemically, enhance the heterogeneity of regional and transmural myocardial perfusion (inducing the theft phenomenon when the vessel of the epicardial layers dilate). Dobutamine exhausts the coronary reserve in the stenotic vessel as a result of metabolically increasing myocardial demand (it increases contractility and myocardial oxygen consumption more than physical exercise) and specifically inducing vasodilation of the microcirculation (doses of 30-40 µg/kg/min produce overall coronary vasodilation similar to that of adenosine administered systemically).32 Finally, physical exercise is the most physiological stimulus, since it combines metabolic stimuli with neural modulation of the coronary circulation.

Microcirculatory dysfunction is also manifested the smaller slope of the pressure-flow relation. This is important for the correct interpretation of diagnostic techniques based on coronary reserve, and explains the development of techniques for the specific assessment of epicardial and microcirculatory resistance.33-36 Many clinical entities that cause remodeling of the coronary microcirculation also participate in the development of epicardial stenoses, such as diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, smoking, and hypercholesterolemia, as well as heart transplant vasculopathy.26,36 Likewise, microcirculatory resistance can increase in relation to alpha-adrenergic stimulation (e.g., in relation to physical exercise or mental stress),37 during acute myocardial ischemia,38 or as a result of microembolization (platelet or thrombotic aggregates, particles resulting from rotational atherectomy).39

Another important observation for diagnostic techniques is that microcirculatory dysfunction reduces the gradient of transtenotic pressure in an epicardial stenosis that, as discussed above, is dependent on coronary blood flow. This phenomenon can lead to an incorrect interpretation of diagnostic tests that are based on the Bernouilli formula or measurement of the translesional gradient.35,40 This again explains the importance of tests that allow independent assessment of the severity of an epicardial stenosis and the state of microcirculation.

INVASIVE METHODS FOR THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY CIRCULATION

The techniques of intracoronary physiological assessment described below arise from the possibilities, made available by technological advances, to make the same observations used to clarify the pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease experimentally for clinical purposes, and to develop noninvasive techniques for detecting ischemia. By virtue of its invasive character, intracoronary physiological assessments are always made with previous knowledge of the coronary anatomy and in a highly selective way. Studies are made of individual vessels or the stenosis itself, which allows the assessment of patients with single or multivessel disease. Since these interventions are percutaneous, their results contribute to decision-making and the assessment of the final results during such interventions.

General aspects of physiological assessment in the hemodynamics laboratory

Although various invasive techniques have been used for the physiological assessment of coronary circulation in hemodynamics laboratories,41 the instruments most used at present are very small caliber solid guide wires equipped with speed or pressure sensors.35 Guide wires with velocity sensors provide reliable information about the mean speed of coronary blood flow, based on spectral analysis of the radiofrequency signal obtained. Guide wires equipped with pressure sensors provide measurements of intracoronary pressure with a high frequency response. In both cases, in contrast with previously used techniques, the low profile of guide wires (0.16 mm²) produces negligible interference with the measurements obtained. Doppler guide wires allow good quality recordings to be obtained at baseline and during hyperemia in most cases. Occasionally, the increase in blood flow with the induction of hyperemia can change the position of the guide wire, causing signal loss and making it necessary to reposition the guide wire. In contrast, pressure guide wires do not have to be positioned and provide stable pressure signals that do not change during the induction of hyperemia. Measurements of intracoronary pressure are combined with those of aortic pressure obtained with the catheter guide wire.

Many of the techniques that will be describe require pharmacological induction of maximum coronary hyperemia. The agents most often used are adenosine (or adenosine triphosphate) and papaverine. Adenosine can be administered by the intracoronary (20-40 µg boli) or intravenous route (140-160 µg/kg/ min), although the intravenous route is preferable for the purpose of guaranteeing complete, sustained hyperemia during measurements. It must be used with caution in patients with bronchial hyperreactivity, cardiac conduction disorders, and severe kidney failure. Its effect can be antagonized by concomitant xanthine treatment. Papaverine administered in an intracoronary bolus (12 mg in the left coronary and 8 mg in the right) provides a stable maximum hyperemia lasting approximately 1 min. Finally, although it is not generally used in calculations of coronary reserve, the administration of maximum doses of dobutamine (30-40 µg/kg/min) is also associated with maximum coronary hyperemia.32

Coronary reserve indices

Coronary flow velocity reserve

Doppler guide wires make it possible to calculate an index equivalent to classic, or volumetric, coronary reserve, the coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR), which is the ratio between intracoronary mean velocity in baseline conditions and after pharmacological induction of maximum hyperemia. CFVR does not discriminate between the effect on coronary reserve of epicardial stenoses or microcirculatory disorders. Its usefulness in the hemodynamic assessment of epicardial stenoses has been studied widely. The most relevant papers in this field are listed in Table 1, with the type of test used to detect ischemia used as a reference.42-49 The cutoff point for determining the hemodynamic relevance of these studies varies, with CFVR <2 generally being accepted as indicative of abnormal coronary reserve. The main limitation of the concept of CFVR is its dependency on values obtained with respect to the baseline flow velocity, which can be modified by many factors,34,35,50 including sex, blood pressure, and heart rate. For this reason, a model has been proposed to adjust CFVR measurements to the baseline speed and age of the patient, a concept designated corrected coronary flow velocity reserve.51

Relative coronary flow velocity reserve

As mentioned, coronary reserve and, therefore, CFVR provide combined information on the epicardial (stenosis) and microcirculatory components of the vessel studied. The potential coexistence of both anomalies can lead to problems in clinical decision-making.34,35 The concept of relative coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR-r) provides a solution for this problem.52 CFVR-r is the ratio between the CFVR obtained in a stenotic vessel and CFVR in a non-stenotic reference vessel (Figure 4). CFVR-r can have a maximum value of 1, corresponding to the complete absence of hemodynamic relevance in the problem stenosis. Below 0.60-0.65 (Table 1), the problem stenosis would be considered hemodynamically significant regardless of the presence of microvascular dysfunction.47,49 This technique offers the advantage of providing simultaneous information on the state of the microcirculation (CFVR<2 in the reference vessel indicates that the subject has microcirculatory dysfunction). The limitations of the method are the assumption that microcirculation presents a similar degree of impairment in the two territories in which CFVR measurements are made and the need for a non-stenotic reference vessel, which impedes its application in patients with multivessel disease.

Fig. 4. Usefulness of the fractional flow reserve in a diabetic patient with angiographically mild restenosis (arrow) in a stent previously implanted in the anterior descending branch and persistent angina. Noninvasive tests to detect ischemia detection were inconclusive. The coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in the problem vessel is abnormal (1.9), which can lead to the conclusion that the restenosis is hemodynamically significant. Nevertheless, CFVR in the circumflex branch, without angiographically evident stenosis, demonstrates a borderline value with normality that suggests the presence of microvascular dysfunction. The ratio between the two CFVR vales (relative CFVR) permits normalization of the results of the stenotic vessel for the documented microcirculatory substrate in the reference vessel, and demonstrates a normal value (>0.65). In the context of the patient´s microvascular impairment, revascularization of the restenosis indicated would contribute, in the best of cases, only 5% more flow in the anterior descending branch and for that reason should not be performed.

Myocardial fractional flow reserve

Information can be obtained relative to the coronary flow reserve in accordance with intracossure measurements. The principle on which this technique is based derives from the pressure-flow relation in the coronary tree. This relation is linear during hyperemia, so it is evident that the proportion between two intracoronary pressures is identical to the proportion between the two coronary flows corresponding to these pressures. If this concept is applied to pressures proximal (Pa) and distal (Pd) to a stenosis, we will be able to calculate the percentage fall in coronary flow caused by the stenosis: For example, Pd/Pa ratio=0.5 will be interpreted as a 50% reduction in coronary blood flow caused by the stenosis in relation to a non-stenotic situation (in which case there would be no difference between Pa and Pd, and Pd/Pa=1). The Pd/Pa ratio obtained during maximum hyperemia constitutes the myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFR) (Figure 5).53-58 Pijls et al54 found that an FFR value of 0.75 has an elevated sensitivity and specificity for the identification of coronary stenoses associated with inducible ischemia. This cutoff point is based on other studies48,49 summarized in Table 1. A modification of FFR is the diastolic FFR, which is characterized by using the ratio of pressures obtained only during diastole.48 This technique, aside from demonstrating the highest sensitivity for the detection of inducible ischemia, can potentially avoid the interference of systolic phenomena that affect calculations based on mean pressures.59,60

Fig. 5. Application of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) to the assessment of two stenoses of the left common trunk. After the administration of adenosine, an evident increase occurs in the pressure gradient through the stenosis in the common trunk as a result of increased flow. In spite of having a similar degree of angiographic severity, FFR was different in both cases, and coronary revascularization was considered necessary in the case shown in the lower panel, which presented a value <0.75. Observe the persistence of a residual pressure gradient in this case, which disappears when the guide is pulled back through the stenosis, thus confirming the persistence of guide calibration.
Pa indicates aortic pressure; Pd, pressure distal to the stenosis.

FFR has characteristics that deserve detailed analysis. In the first place, it is a specific technique for the hemodynamic assessment of stenoses, so it cannot be applied to coronary arteries without epicardial stenosis. The information that FFR provides is relative to a theoretical hemodynamic situation in which the stenosis to be studied does not exist, a characteristic that makes it especially useful for assessing the need for percutaneous revascularization. FFR evaluation provides combined information on anterograde flow through the stenosis and on collateral circulation in the myocardial territory dependent on the artery to be studied: in vessels with important collateral support, the relative effect of stenosis on the perfusion of the territory is smaller and FFR values are higher. Unlike CFVR, FFR provides very similar values under different hemodynamic conditions.61 Finally, although it does not contribute information on the state of coronary microcirculation, FFR measurements are dependent on the state of the microcirculation. Since the transtenotic pressure gradient is a function of coronary flow, attenuation of the hyperemic response by microcirculatory impairment will be associated with higher FFR values than those obtained in cases of normal microcirculation. From a practical viewpoint, this may not constitute a limitation of the technique: the finding of a normal FFR value in a stenosis with important underlying microcirculatory involvement would make it possible to anticipate a small percentage increment in myocardial blood flow if this vessel is revascularized.35

Methods not based on the concept of coronary reserve: slope of the diastolic pressure-flow relation in hyperemia (coronary conductance) and coronary resistance

In the introduction to the elementary principles of coronary physiology, the relation between coronary blood pressure and flow is emphasized as one of the best ways to approach coronary function. This principle was developed by Mancini et al28 to be used as a diagnostic application designated as the instantaneous hyperemic diastolic pressure-flow slope (i-HDPFS) using only measurements obtained in mid end-diastole. As commented above (Figure 3), during protodiastole there is no relation between pressure and flow due to the capacitance of intramyocardial vessels and microcirculation. Experimental studies have shown a good correlation between the severity of epicardial stenoses and the degree of subendocardial conductance measured with radiospheres. The method has been adapted for clinical use with guide wires fitted with pressure microsensors and flow velocity by Mario et al.62 The principle of i-HDPFS is similar to that of the hemipressure time used in the assessment of mitral stenosis with Doppler echocardiography. It has the advantage of not needing baseline reference measurements because data are collected only during maximum hyperemia. The main limitation of i-HDPFS is the technical difficulty of obtaining the measurement. There are no commercial systems for the measurement of this variable, and in clinical studies, the poor quality of the Doppler signal has made it impossible to perform this calculation in 20% of cases. Controversy exists regarding its dependence on changes in preload, heart rate, and cardiac contractility.61,63

A second approach is to calculate coronary resistance from mean values of coronary pressure and flow velocity, expressed in absolute terms38 or as a ratio between resistance in baseline conditions and hyperemia.64 In spite of their limited diffusion, these techniques have demonstrated their potential for identifying histological changes in microcirculation64,65 and for observations about their role in different coronary syndromes.38,66

A growing amount of info rmation is available on the safety not only of intracoronary maneuvers with pressure and flow guide wires,67 but also on decision-making about revascularization based on intracoronary physiological data obtained with these techniques.68-79

NONINVASIVE METHODS FOR THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF CORONARY CIRCULATION

As discussed in the previous section, the techniques of intracoronary physiological assessment described have been validated by noninvasive functional studies of the coronary circulation: myocardial tomographic radionuclide perfusion scanning (SPECT: single-photon emission computed tomography) and echocardiography. In the hospital setting, half of the indications for noninvasive studies are requested for the functional assessment of a specific coronary stenosis or for the detection of the culprit lesion, after practicing diagnostic coronariography, which indicates that in many cases this last study alone is not sufficient to make an integral assessment of coronary patients.

Radionuclide study of myocardial perfusion

The most recent innovation in nuclear cardiology is positron-emission tomography (PET). This technique uses isotopes with a very short mean life (min/s) and high energy (511 KeV), which is why tissue attenuation is minimal. PET allows the quantitative and noninvasive determination of coronary blood flow80-84 in an exact way. The isotopes most used for the absolute quantification of coronary blood flow are 13N-ammonium and 82Rb. A good correlation has been observed between coronary blood flow determined by radionuclide scan and by microspheres. On the other hand, PET can be used to assess the viability of the myocardium by the combined use of metabolic radiomarkers like 18F-FDG, whose uptake depends on cellular integrity, and perfusion radiomarkers like 13N-ammonium or 82Rb. Clinical experience with PET in cardiology is limited because it is an expensive technique, of limited availability, whose diagnostic performance remains to be determined.

For these reasons, the assessment of myocardial perfusion in clinical practice is usually made by myocardial perfusion scan using single-photon emission computed tomography, or SPECT, which is a technique with which broad experience is available (Figure 6). Myocardial perfusion studies were initiated in the 1970s using thallium chloride (201TlCl) as the radiomarker. Thallium-201 is a monovalent cation of behavior similar to the potassium that penetrates the cell by active uptake (Na pump) and passive diffusion. Myocardial uptake is proportional to coronary flow and peaks at approximately 20 min. Once the peak value is reached, so-called redistribution takes place, a process by which intra and extracellular concentrations balance out and 201Tl circulates from high-uptake to low-uptake zones. This means that the post-stress study must be acquired quickly (within 10 min of radiomarker administration) and before redistribution begins.

Fig. 6. Tomographic short-axis, vertical long-axis, and horizontal long-axis sections, with effort (E) and rest (R), corresponding to myocardial perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-tetrofosmin in a healthy subject. Note the homogeneous distribution of the radionuclide marker in all the segments of the left ventricle.

In addition to 201Tl, there are currently two other perfusion radionuclide markers available for clinical use: 99mTc-sestamibi (MIBI: methoxy-isobutyl-isonitryl) and 99mTc-tetrofosmin. These agents have different advantages over 201Tl. Unlike 201Tl, they penetrate the cell by passive diffusion and do not present appreciable redistribution. This means that they must be administered in two doses, one for the stress study and the other for the study at rest. Although the efficiency of extraction is greater for 201Tl than for technetium-labeled markers,85 the use of Tl-labeled markers is usually preferred because they can be administered at higher doses and require a shorter examination time. Consequently, they yield images with a greater count density and allow synchronized studies to be obtained without increasing the irradiation of the patient. After intravenous administration, they are distributed by the organism in proportion to regional blood flow and cardiac activity is proportional to coronary flow and to myocardiocyte integrity. For that reason, they have also been used in the diagnosis of myocardial viability.86,87 The utility of these radionuclide markers to evaluate myocardial perfusion has been widely demonstrated and it can be affirmed that there is a good correlation between the decrease in coronary blood flow during stress and the severity of defects in the radionuclide scan.88 Other markers are under study, but not available commercially. They have characteristics similar to those mentioned, for instance, 99mTc-teboroxime,89 Q1290 and, more recently, 99mTc-NOET91 and agonists of the adenosine-A2A receptors.92 There are various protocols for the acquisition of SPECT (stress-rest in one day, two days, etc.) and single detector and multidetector (with two or three detector heads) gammacameras.93,94 The response of the heart to stress can be evaluated with the effort stress test using a treadmill or bicycle, or pharmacological stress: dipyridamole, adenosine and dobutamine, basically. The acquisition of SPECT synchronized with the ECG has been introduced recently (gated-SPECT). This technique consists of synchronizing the onset of acquisition with the R-wave signal in the ECG and dividing the cardiac cycle into 8 or 16 segments. Gated-SPECT enables the simultaneous assessment of coronary perfusion and cardiac function (Figure 7), a good correlation having been demonstrated between the ejection fraction determined by gated-SPECT and that determined by echocardiography95,96 and contrast ventriculography.97 The combined assessment of myocardial thickening and contractility provided by gated-SPECT helps to differentiate defects due to artifacts from those due to ischemia, as well as the myocardial contractile reserve by means of low-dose dobutamine stimulation.98 The latest innovation in this context has been the correction of attenuation, a method for correcting the attenuation of tissues surrounding the heart.99,100

Fig. 7. Normal gated-SPECT corresponding to the study shown in Figure 4. On the left, images in diastole (D) and systole (S) of the short axis, horizontal long axis, and vertical long axis. On the right, left ventricular volume-time curve with the calculation of the ejection fraction and a three-dimensional image of the ventricular contours in end-diastole and end-systole. EDV indicates end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; SV, systolic volume; EF, ejection fraction.

SPECT allows the study of myocardial perfusion by assessing the homogeneity/heterogeneity of the distribution of the radionuclide marker in the myocardium. In the healthy subject, the images obtained post-stress or at rest demonstrate homogeneous activity in the left ventricular myocardium. Any zone of hypoactivity must be considered pathological and must be assessed, especially the changes observed between the image obtained in stress and at rest (Figure 8). When assessing the precision of SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, it has been observed that there are no significant differences in results according to the sex or age of the patients, and that the sensitivity and specificity values are about 90-95%.101-103 It is necessary to take into account that are diverse non-atherosclerotic causes that can give rise to perfusion defects: the X syndrome, coronary spasm, coronary ectasia, coronary fistula, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies.104-106

Fig. 8. Images of myocardial perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-tetrofosmin (short axis) corresponding to a patient with disease of the descending anterior artery alone. A severe defect (arrow) can be seen with effort (R) that is reversible at rest (R).

Diagnosis of multivessel disease

The diagnosis of multivessel disease by means of the radionuclide perfusion scan is based principally on the detection of reversible perfusion defects in more than one coronary region (Figure 9) and other indirect signs, such as transitory ischemic left ventricular dilation and post-effort pulmonary radionuclide uptake. The association of these indicators of severe ischemia in the radionuclide perfusion scan with signs of severity in the electrocardiogram improves the results of both tests considered separately.107-109 After reviewing thousands of patients included in studies in which SPECT and effort or pharmacological echography was performed, it has been concluded that effort SPECT is more sensitive but less specific than stress echography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.110,111

Fig. 9. Images of myocardial perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-tetrofosmin (short axis) in a patient with disease of the anterior descending coronary (AD) and right coronary arteries (RC). The most severe defect (large arrow) corresponds to the lower region. In the anterior region (small arrow) a less severe reversible perfusion defect can be observed. E indicates effort; R, rest.

Assessment of the myocardium at risk

The term «myocardium at risk» is generally used to define the extension of the myocardium threatened by diseased coronary arteries. However, in fact it should refer to the amount of myocardium that could be infarcted if the most stenotic coronary artery was occluded.112 Correlations between different quantitative tomographic radionuclide scanning methods for the assessment of the extension of perfusion defects are very acceptable, as demonstrate by the results of Ceriani et al,113 which compared three quantitative methods for assessing the myocardium at risk by means of SPECT.114-116 The correlations between tomographic radionuclide quantification and different coronariographic qualifications of the entire myocardium at risk are significant although not optimal.117-120 They improve progressively as the coronariographic score becomes more complex (r=0.48 for the Califf method, r=0.59 for the modified Gensini method, and r=0.65 for a coronariographic score in which the presence of collateral circulation is also assessed).117

In coronariography, the role of collateral circulation can be underestimated.120-122 In fact, the best correlations are obtained with the coronariographic score that takes into account the existence of collateral circulation in cases in which an occluded coronary artery exists. Although it is known that not always is the most stenotic artery responsible for future infarction, it would be more logical to use the term myocardium at risk to define the extension of the myocardium that can be infarcted if the coronary artery with the most severe lesion were to be occluded.121-124 The best correlation (r=0.85) between the myocardium at risk obtained by SPECT and that determined by coronariography (considering circulation collateral) is obtained when assessing the culprit lesion.117 It is logical that this is the case, considering that tomographic radionuclide perfusion does not allow absolute quantification of the coronary flow, offering information only about the most hypoperfused region with respect to the least hypoperfused region.

Detection of the culprit lesion

Myocardial radionuclide perfusion scan is very useful in indicating partial revascularization procedures in patients with chronic coronary arterial disease,125-127 since in these cases what we aim to detect is the coronary stenosis that induces ischemia, the so-called «culprit lesion». This term is used as a synonym for the coronary lesion that causes symptoms in patients with ischemic heart disease.128,129 Some authors have relied on coronariography129 and others on radionuclide perfusion scan128 to detect the culprit lesion before performing a partial revascularization. The first possibility occurs generally in patients with unstable angina, and the second in stabilized patients.

The myocardial region with the greatest hypoperfusion in stress is assessed better in short-axis sections, because these images visualize in combined form the four basic regions of the left ventricular myocardium (anterior, septal, inferior, and lateral). In these images, the relative perfusion of these regions can be compared and the most severely affected region determined with respect to the radionuclide scan (Figure 9). The assessment of myocardial ischemia by radionuclide perfusion scan correlates well with CFVR, relative CFVR, FFR, and diastolic FFR (Table 1). Consequently, in cases in which the significance of a certain coronary stenosis is inconclusive,130,131 perfusion tomographic radionuclide scan can be very useful for assessing the severity of ischemia.

The agreement between coronariography and tomographic radionuclide scan for the diagnosis of the culprit lesion is approximately 84%, being higher for the right coronary (91%) and anterior descending coronary (79%) than for the circumflex (62%). Discordant cases usually correspond to cases in which the tomographic radionuclide scan has problems in the assigning ischemia to the territory of the right coronary or circumflex, and to cases of three-vessel disease with stenosis of similar severity of, at least, two of the three affected arteries.117 Among other factors that can help to explain these discrepancies is the method used for to quantify the radionuclide scan132-135 and coronariography,136-139 the presence of collateral circulation,140-142 type of stress used to produce ischemia,143,144 peak oxygen consumption, and myocardial consumption of oxygen reached during the test145 and treatment of the patient.146,147

The extreme culprit lesion case, from a coronariographic vantage point, is the occluded artery. The fact that it is not uncommon to observe occluded arteries in coronariographic studies of patients without a history of myocardial infarction, as well as different degrees of uptake defect severity in territories corresponding to occluded arteries, illustrates the disparity that can exist between a basically anatomic test like coronariography and a functional test like tomographic myocardial radionuclide perfusion scan.148 From the vantage point of clinical care, it has been observed that the contribution of SPECT and coronariography to the therapeutic decision adopted by the clinical cardiologist in 85% of cases coincides with the severity of the disease and, therefore, conditions the attitude (conservative or revascularization) to be adopted.149

Echocardiography for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia

Echocardiography is very sensitive for the diagnosis of acute ischemia, aided by improvement of imaging in the latest generation of equipment, particularly the development of second harmonic imaging,150 which allows a better definition of the endocardial margin. The main advantages of echocardiography with respect to other techniques for investigating ischemia are its low cost, broad availability, absence of radiation, and the possibility of evaluating associated valve dysfunction.151,152 Its main limitation derives from the difficulty of making a quantitative analysis. However, this can now be palliated, in part, with new techniques like Doppler tissue studies,153-155 the measurement of tissue deformation (strain),156 and the omnidirectional M-mode.157 Another limitation is its broad interobserver variability, which has been observed in studies in which the second harmonic was not yet in use.158

Stress echocardiography

The development of stress echocardiography has also been facilitated by second harmonic imaging, in addition to the availability of software that allows the comparison a posteriori of digitized baseline and stress images. Stress echocardiography has two major clinical applications: the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and myocardial viability. Provocation maneuvers have been divided by the mode of triggering ischemia. Thus, exercise, dobutamine, and electrical stimulation increase myocardial oxygen demand, and ergonovine reduces demand. Vasodilator drugs like dipyridamole and adenosine produce ischemia by «coronary theft» mechanisms.159

The performance of stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of ischemia is based on the concept of the «ischemic cascade»:160 In the presence of ischemia, in first place disturbances in myocardial perfusion occur, which can be detected by radionuclide scan and perfusion echocardiography. Then, disturbances in diastolic function appear, which can be visualized by pulsed transmitral Doppler or M-mode color Doppler and, regionally, by tissue Doppler and studies of strain (tissue deformation). Eventually, disturbances in systolic function that can be detected by stress echocardiography occur (Figures 10 and 11). The, finally, ECG disturbances and angina appear.

Fig. 10. Normal response in exercise stress echocardiography. In the apical 4-chamber plane, an overall improvement in the ejection fraction is visible, passing from 64% to 74%, with normal thickening and displacement of all segments. Above: baseline echo; below: peak exercise (150 bpm). Left: end-diastolic images; right: end-systolic images.

Fig. 11. Ischemic response of the region of the anterior descending coronary. In the apical 4-chamber plane, apical akinesia can be observed with exercise (arrow). Above: baseline echo; below: peak exercise (131 bpm). Left: end-diastolic images; right: end-systolic images.

Numerous studies have been published on exercise echocardiography on the treadmill and ergometric bicycle, reporting a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 85-90%. The diagnostic precision is always greater than that of conventional effort tests161-165 and generally close to that of radionuclide studies.161,166 In exercise echocardiography, regional and overall contractile function are analyzed at baseline and at peak effort167,168 or in the immediate postexercise period. Interpretable images are commonly obtained in more than 85% of patients. Limitations to the sensitivity of this technique are the need for special training, particularly when postexercise images are acquired, since there is a narrow «temporal window» for acquiring them, ideally <1.5 min. Other limitations are those of conventional exercise testing: inability to walk and failure to attain an adequate tachycardization.

Comparative studies of exercise, dobutamine, and dipyridamole have demonstrated a greater sensitivity (and similar specificity) of exercise and dobutamine than with dipyridamole,169,170 and scant serious undesirable effects.171 The addition of atropine to dobutamine increases the precision of the test and is especially useful in the presence of beta-blocker treatment.172 Transesophageal stress echocardiography has been carried out with dobutamine with considerable diagnostic safety and precision.173 Echocardiography with ergonovine can play a role in patients with suspected Printzmetal angina and negative results of other tests.174 Recently, excellent results have been communicated with transthoracic echocardiography obtained by oral introduction of a transesophageal electrical stimulation probe.175,176

Assessment of the coronary reserve

Coronary reserve represents the capacity of the coronary arteriolar bed to dilate in response to increased cardiac metabolic needs.177 It is calculated as the ratio between the velocity of coronary flow after the administration of a vasodilator (usually adenosine or dipyridamole) and in baseline circumstances. The advantages of adenosine are rapid action and termination of its effect and almost peak vasodilator capacity. Its disadvantage is more frequent side effects.178 Coronary reserve decreases progressively when a fixed lesion produces a stenosis of 50%, in such a way that it is completely suppressed with lesions of more than 90%. Its usefulness in the functional study of coronary lesions between 30% and 70% is unquestionable because it is in this range of angiographic severity that clinical doubts arise.

Transesophageal echography allows the visualization of the proximal segments of coronary arteries (generally the left main trunk and the first centimeters of the circumflex artery and anterior descending artery), but the latest generation equipment allows transthoracic visualization of flow through the distal portion of the anterior descending artery (Figure 12). This has the advantage of allowing the coronary reserve to be calculated at that level. Visualizing the flow of the anterior descending artery requires experience, as well as the use of modified planes. The possibility of measuring the distal coronary reserve is excellent because the reserve calculated reflects the residual vasodilator capacity of the vascular bed, which is affected specifically by proximal lesions of the proximal and middle anterior descending coronary.179-181 Caiati et al,182 who studied the coronary reserve with the infusion of adenosine using pulsed Doppler in the distal section of the anterior descending artery, reported a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 76% for detecting stenosis >75%. The flow signal was optimal without contrast in half of the patients (55%) and in all of them after contrast was administered. However, it must be considered that the coronary reserve is also reduced in left ventricular hypertrophy,183 small-vessel disease, constrictive pericarditis,184 cardiomyopathies,185 transplanted hearts,186 and left bundle-branch block.187

Fig. 12. Diastolic flow of the distal anterior descending coronary artery obtained by transthoracic pulsed Doppler in baseline circumstances.

Echocardiography of myocardial perfusion

Myocardial perfusion echocardiography is the technique that, in combination with vasodilators, results in the earliest detection of ischemia by revealing a heterogeneous flow, as radionuclide techniques do. The main difference with respect to myocardial radionuclide perfusion scan is that the thallium or technetium compounds are deposited in the cardiac cell, indicating cellular integrity or viability, whereas perfusion echocardiography only indicates the integrity of the microcirculation.

At present, contrast agents are available that can be used intravenously thanks to special characteristics that allow them to pass the pulmonary barrier without being destroyed. Nevertheless, it still has not been established which is the best method for detecting echocontrast in the myocardium. The contrast agents produce a significant amount of bubbles that enter the coronary circulation and expand and compress alternatively when exposed to ultrasound. The detection of these bubbles depends on their capacity to generate two resonance waves of different frequency, in contrast with myocardial tissue. Therefore, if ultrasounds are emitted to the myocardium at a frequency of 1.8 mHz, the myocardium itself will not transmit any frequency at 3.6 mHz, but the bubbles will. Therefore, by changing the system reception frequency to 3.6 mHz, the echoes from the bubbles will be visualized without the echoes from the myocardium. The second point to consider is that ultrasound rapidly destroys the bubbles, especially if the so-called «mechanical index» is high. The intermittent imaging system is the system of transmitting and receiving ultrasounds only once every x cycles. The bubbles can be destroyed by the fleeting emission of ultrasounds, but in the meantime new bubbles that can be detected enter the system.

At present, numerous problems still exist, due mainly to artifacts. To determine if the echoes originating from the myocardium represent true perfusion or artifacts, the image can be multiplied, as well as intermittent. Multiplication consists of the emission and reception of ultrasound by the system at a moment in the cardiac cycle (image 1), and immediately after, in 30-50 ms (image 2). If «perfusion» is visible in image 1 and not in image 2, it is probably true perfusion, because the bubbles in image 1 will have been destroyed and the time is too short for the myocardium to have filled again. If perfusion is appreciated in both images, it usually should be considered an artifact. Another system for differentiating between true perfusion and artifacts is to change the frequency of the multiple images, passing from emitting and receiving, for example, every 4-5 beats in which perfusion is observed, to emitting and receiving every beat, in which it should not be visible due to the destruction of the bubbles.

Studies made with intermittent and multiple images using dipyridamole188 or adenosine,189 and comparing this technique with SPECT and technetium compounds, have obtained similar results. Agreement between methods for the presence or absence of coronary artery disease in each patient was 81-86%. Nevertheless, the agreement between techniques was greater in the territory of the anterior descending artery (81%; K=0.81) and right coronary (76%; K=0.52), and significantly smaller in the territory of the circumflex artery (72%; K=0.40). This is due to the large number of false defects obtained with echocontrast on the lateral face. In effect, due to the angle of incidence of ultrasound on the lateral wall, false defects may be more common in this territory. Spencer et al 190 also demonstrated a greater frequency of perfusion defects with echocontrast in the lateral wall, in the absence of defects in thallium radionuclide scans, with both techniques carried out at rest.

In addition to the system for detecting perfusion by intermittent and multiple images, bubbles can currently be visualized in real-time images. The aim is to work with a very low mechanical index that does not destroy the bubbles. To check if true perfusion is involved, at a given moment an emission with a high mechanical index (flash) will destroy the bubbles present in a true perfusion (Figure 13). The initial results obtained with these techniques seem promising, because they overcome many of the limitations of perfusion echocardiography,191,192 allowing them to be used, for example, during stress tests.193,194

Fig. 13. Four-chamber image of a real-time echocontrast perfusion study (mechanical index 0.1) in a patient with extensive anterior akinesia after anterior infarction. On the left can be observed signals due to echocontrast in the entire myocardium. On the right is seen the destruction of intramyocardial bubbles when the mechanical index is suddenly increased to 1.4. 

Possible, or future, clinical applications of myocardial perfusion echocardiography are not only the detection of ischemia, but also the detection of viability. Studies that have compared vascular integrity by echocontrast with the inotropic reserve by echodobutamine to predict recovery in coronary patients with ventricular dysfunction have documented a good sensitivity with the echocontrast (80-95%), but a notably lower specificity than with dobutamine echocardiography (50-75% vs 85%).195-199 Myocardial perfusion echocardiography can also evaluate the non-reflux phenomenon. It is known that approximately 18-25% of patients have impaired microcirculation after an effective primary angioplasty or fibrinolysis (TIMI-3), and that these patients do not recover their microcirculatory function during follow-up.200,201

CONCLUSIONS

The intracoronary hemodynamic parameters that reflect the physiology of coronary circulation correlate acceptably with the functional assessment of myocardial ischemia evaluated by myocardial perfusion SPECT and stress echocardiography. However, none of these techniques allows absolute quantification of coronary flow and discrepancies can be observed between them in up to 15% of patients.

From the review of more than 7000 patients included in 75 studies in which SPECT and either stress or pharmacological stress echography110 were available, it was concluded that effort SPECT was more sensitive than effort echography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, identification of stenotic arteries, and diagnosis of multivessel disease. In a review of 1380 patients from 22 studies in which there was a direct comparison of SPECT and stress echography (effort, dobutamine, adenosine, or dipyridamole),111 SPECT was found to be more sensitive but less specific than echography, particularly in the identification and localization of nonsevere coronary artery disease and if vasodilators were used as the provocation maneuver. The greater tradition of radionuclide scans has probably contributed to its selection as the reference method for invasive functional studies,42-45,47-49,202 but in practice the indication for each examination depends mainly on the availability and experience with each technique in individual hospitals. The most desirable aim is that each center control its own results insofar as the diagnostic and prognostic effectiveness of the method that it uses. In this sense, different studies have shown that complications in patients with ischemic heart disease correlate more with the amount of ischemic myocardium revealed by effort or pharmacological stress than with the number of angiographically stenotic arteries.203-208 Therefore, in the future decisions about coronary revascularization must also be based on evidence that a certain coronary stenosis also has objective functional significance.


Correspondencia: Dr. J. Candell-Riera.
Servicio de Cardiología. Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron.
P.° de la Vall d'Hebron, 119-129. 08035 Barcelona. Spain
E-mail: jcandell@hg.vhebron.es

Bibliography
[1]
Bruschke AV.G, Proudfit WL, Sones FM..
Progress study of 590 consecutive nonsurgical cases of coronary disease followed 5-9 years. I. Arteriographic correlations..
Circulation, 47 (1973), pp. 1147-53
[2]
Humphries JO, Kuller L, Ross RS, Friesinger GC, Page EE..
Natural history of ischemic heart disease in relation to arteriographic findings. A twelve year study of 224 patients..
Circulation, 49 (1974), pp. 489-97
[3]
Burggraf GW, Parker JO..
Prognosis in coronary artery disease. Angiographic, hemodynamic, and clinical factors..
Circulation, 51 (1975), pp. 146-56
[4]
Plotnick GD..
Coronary artery bypass surgery to prolong life?: Less anatomy/more physiology..
Am J Cardiol, 8 (1986), pp. 749-51
[5]
Folland ED, Vogel RA, Hartigan P, Bates ER, Beauman GJ, Fortin T, et al..
Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease..
Circulation, 89 (1994), pp. 2005-14
[6]
Califf RM, Phillips HR, Hindman MC, Mark DB, Lee KL, Behar VS, et al..
Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 5 (1985), pp. 1055-63
[7]
Marwick T, D'Hondt AM, Baudhuin T, Willemart B, Wijns W, Detry JM, et al..
Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease: Combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both?.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 159-67
[8]
Leaman DM, Brower RW, Meester GT, Serruys P, van den Brand M..
Coronary artery atherosclerosis: severity of the disease, severity of angina pectoris and compromised left ventricular function..
Circulation, 63 (1981), pp. 285-92
[9]
Favaloro RG..
Computerized tabulation of cine coronary angiograms..
Circulation, 81 (1990), pp. 1992-2003
[10]
Ellis SG, Cowley MJ, Disciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ, Bulle TM, et al..
Determinants of 2-year outcome after coronary angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease on the basis of comprehensive preprocedural evaluation. Implications for patient selection..
Circulation, 83 (1991), pp. 1905-14
[11]
Zir LM, Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW..
Interobserver variability in coronary angiography..
Circulation, 53 (1976), pp. 627-32
[12]
DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Owen W..
Variability in the analysis of coronary arteriograms..
Circulation, 55 (1977), pp. 324-28
[13]
Kleiman NS, Rodríguez AR, Raizner AE..
Interobserver variability in grading of coronary arterial narrowings using the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association grading criteria..
Am J Cardiol, 69 (1992), pp. 413-15
[14]
Keane D, Haase J, Slager CJ, van Swijndregt EM, Lehmann KG, Ozaki Y, et al..
Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach..
Circulation, 91 (1995), pp. 2174-83
[15]
Topol EJ, Nissen SE..
Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease..
Circulation, 92 (1995), pp. 2333-42
[16]
Ellestad MH..
The time has come to reexamine the gold standard when evaluating noninvasive testing..
Am J Cardiol, 87 (2001), pp. 100-1
[17]
The Heart: physiology, from cell to circulation. Philadelphia: Lippincot-Raven, 1998; p. 267-94.
[18]
Metabolic regulation of coronary blood flow. En: Marcus ML, editor. The coronary circulation in health and disease. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983; p. 65-92.
[19]
Differences in the regulation of coronary perfusion to the right and left ventricles. En: Marcus ML, editor. The coronary circulation in health and disease. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983; p. 337-47.
[20]
Akasaka T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Takagi T, Okura H..
Comparison of relation of systolic flow of the right coronary artery to pulmonary artery pressure in patients with and without pulmonary hypertension..
Am J Cardiol, 76 (1996), pp. 240-4
[21]
Hoffman J, Spaan JAE..
Pressure-flow relations in coronary circulation..
Physiol Rev, 70 (1990), pp. 331-90
[22]
Klues HG, Schwartz ER, von Dahl J, Reffelmann T, Reul H, Potthast K, et al..
Disturbed intracoronary hemodynamics in myocardial bridging. Early normalization by intracoronary stent placement..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 2905-13
[23]
Iwakura K, Ito H, Takiuchi S, Taniyama Y, Nakatsuchi Y, Negoro S, et al..
Alteration in the coronary blood flow velocity pattern in patients with no reflow and reperfused acute myocardial infarction..
Circulation, 94 (1996), pp. 1269-75
[24]
Kajiya F, Tomonaga G, Tsujioka K, Ogasawara Y, Nishihara H..
Evaluation of local flow velocity in proximal and distal coronary arteries by laser Doppler method..
J Biomech Eng, 107 (1985), pp. 10-5
[25]
Gould KL..
Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation..
Circ Res, 43 (1978), pp. 242-3
[26]
Coronary artery stenosis and reversing atherosclerosis. Londres: Arnold Publishers, 1999; p. 3-29.
[27]
Klocke FJ..
Measurements of coronary blood flow and degree of stenosis; current clinical implications and continuing uncertainties..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1 (1983), pp. 131-41
[28]
Mancini GB.J, McGillem MJ, DeBoe SF, Gallagher KP..
The diastolic hyperemic flow vs pressure relation: a new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve..
Circulation, 80 (1989), pp. 941-50
[29]
Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW..
Physiological basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional redistribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve..
Am J Cardiol, 33 (1974), pp. 87-94
[30]
Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL, Parsel L..
Assessment of coronary stenosis by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 7 (1986), pp. 103-13
[31]
White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, et al..
Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?.
N Engl J Med, 310 (1984), pp. 819-24
[32]
Bartunek J, Wijns W, Heyndrickx GR, de Bruyne B..
Effects of dobutamine on coronary stenosis physiology and morphology. Comparison with intracoronary adenosine..
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 243-49
[33]
Serruys PW, Di Mario C, Meneveau N, de Jaegere P, Strikwerda S, de Feyter PM, et al..
Intracoronary pressure and flow velocity with sensor-tipped guidewires: a new methodologic approach for assessment of coronary hemodynamics before and after coronary interventions..
Am J Cardiol, 71 (1993), pp. 41D-53D
[34]
Application of coronary flow measurements to decision making in angioplasty. En: Serruys PW, Foley DP, de Feyter PJ, editors. Quantitative coronary angiography in clinical practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994; p. 181-230.
[35]
Kern MJ..
Coronary physiology revisited. Practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory..
Circulation, 101 (2000), pp. 1344-51
[36]
L´Abatte A, Sambuceti G, Haunsø S, Schneider-Eicke..
Methods for evaluating coronary microvasculature in humans..
Eur Heart J, 200 (1999), pp. 1300-13
[37]
Baumgart D, Haude M, Görge G, Liu F, Ge J, Brobe-Eggebrecht C, et al..
Augmented alpha-adrenergic constriction of atherosclerotic human coronary arteries..
Circulation, 99 (1999), pp. 2090-97
[38]
Marzilli M, Sambuceti G, Fedele S, L´Abbate A..
Coronary microcirculatory vasoconstriction during ischemia in patients with unstable angina..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 35 (2000), pp. 327-34
[39]
Eeckhout E, Kern MJ..
The coronary non-reflow phenomenon: a review of mechanisms and therapies..
Eur Heart J, 22 (2001), pp. 729-39
[40]
Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA.J, Siebes M, Schotborgh CE, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, et al..
Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions..
Circulation, 103 (2001), pp. 184-7
[41]
Nitenberg A, Anyony I..
Coronary vascular reserve in humans: a critical review of methods of evaluation and of interpretation of the results..
Eur Heart J, 16 (1995), pp. 7-21
[42]
Miller DD, Donouhue TJ, Younis LT, Bach RG, Aguirre FV, Wittry MD, et al..
Correlation of pharmacological 99mTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging with poststenotic coronary flow reserve in patients with angiographically intermediate artery stenoses..
Circulation, 89 (1994), pp. 2150-60
[43]
Joye ID, Schulman DS, Lasorda D, Farah T, Donohue BC, Reichek N..
Intracoronary Doppler guide wire versus stress single photon emission computed tomographic thallium-201 imaging in assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 24 (1994), pp. 940-7
[44]
Deychak YA, Segal J, Reiner JS, Rohrbeck SC, Thompson MA, Lundergan CF, et al..
Doppler guide wire flow-velocity indexes measured distal coronary stenoses associated with reversible thallium perfusion defects..
Am Heart J, 129 (1995), pp. 219-27
[45]
Heller LI, Cates C, Popma J, Deckelbaum LI, Joye JD, Dahlberg ST, et al..
Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 484-90
[46]
Danzi GB, Pirelli S, Mauri L, Testa R, Ciliberto GR, Massa D, et al..
Which variable of stenosis severity best describes the significance of an isolated left anterior descending coronary artery lesion? Correlation between quantitative angiography, intracoronary Doppler measurements and high dose dipyridamole echocardiography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 31 (1998), pp. 526-33
[47]
Verberne HJ, Piek JJ, van Liebergen RA.M, Koch KT, Schoroeder-Tanka JM, van Royen EA..
Functional assessment of coronary artery stenosis by Doppler derived absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in comparison with 99mTc MIBI SPECT..
Heart, 82 (1999), pp. 509-14
[48]
Abe M, Tomiyama H, Yoshida H, Doba N..
Diastolic fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of moderate coronary stenoses. Comparison with fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 2365-70
[49]
Chamuleau SA.J, Meuwissen M, van Eck-Smit BL.F, Koch KT, de Jong A, de Winter RJ, et al..
Fractional flow reserve, absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve in relation to the results of technatium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with two-vessel coronary artery disease..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 37 (2001), pp. 1316-22
[50]
Anderson HV, Stokes MJ, Leon M, Abu-Halawa SA, Syuart Y, Kirkeeide RL..
Coronary artery flow velocity is related to lumen area and regional left ventricular mass..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 48-54
[51]
Wieneke H, Haude M, Ge J, Altmann C, Kaiser S, Baumgart D, et al..
Corrected coronary flow velocity reserve: a new concept for assessing coronary perfusion..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 35 (2000), pp. 1713-20
[52]
Baumgart D, Haude M, Gorge G, Ge J, Vetter S, Dagres N, et al..
Improved assessment of coronary stenosis severity using the relative coronary flow reserve..
Circulation, 98 (1998), pp. 40-6
[53]
Pijls NH.J, van Gelder B, van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FAL.E, Bonnier HJR.M, et al..
Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow..
Circulation, 92 (1995), pp. 3183-93
[54]
Pijls NH.J, de Bruyne B, Peels K, van der Voort P, Bonnier HJR.M, Bartunek J, et al..
Measurement of myocardial fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses..
N Engl J Med, 334 (1996), pp. 1703-08
[55]
De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin J, Pjils NH.J, Sys SU, Bol A, et al..
Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography..
Circulation, 89 (1994), pp. 1013-22
[56]
Bartunek J, van Schuerberbeeck E, De Bruyne B..
Comparison of exercise electrocardiography and dobutamine echocardiography with invasively assessed myocardial fractional flow reserve in evaluation of severity of coronary arterial narrowing..
Am J Cardiol, 79 (1997), pp. 478-81
[57]
De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin J, Pjils NH.J, Sys SU, Bol A, et al..
Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography..
Circulation, 89 (1994), pp. 1013-22
[58]
Bech JW, Droste H, Pijls NH.J, Bruyne B, Bonnier H..
Fractional flow reserve for decision making in equivocal left main coronary artery disease..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 645
[59]
Escaned J, Cortés J, Goicolea J, Alfonso F, Hernández R, Fernández-Ortiz A, et al..
Angiographic and intracoronary physiological assessment of myocardial bridging during dobutamine challenge..
Circulation, 100 (1999), pp. 731
[60]
Escaned J, Flores A, Cortés J, Alfonso F, Fernández R, Fernández-Ortiz A, et al..
Influence of flow characteristics of the right and left coronary arteries on fractional flow reserve measurements..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 639
[61]
De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NH, Heyndrinckx GR, Wijns W..
Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans: feasibility, reproducibility and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve..
Circulation, 94 (1996), pp. 1842-49
[62]
Di Mario C, Krams R, Gil R, Serruys PW..
Slope of the hyperemic diastolic coronary flow velocity-pressure relation. A new index for assessment of the physiological significance of coronary stenosis in humans..
Circulation, 90 (1994), pp. 1215-24
[63]
Cleary RM, Ayon D, Moore NB, DeBoe SF, Mancini GB..
Tachycardia, contractility and volume loading alter conventional indexes of coronary flow reserve, but not the instantaneous hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 20 (1992), pp. 1261-9
[64]
Krams R, Kofflard MJ.M, Duncker DJ, Von Birgelen C, Carlier S, Kliffen M, et al..
Decreased coronary flow reserve in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is related to remodeling of the coronary microcirculation..
Circulation, 97 (1998), pp. 230-3
[65]
Escaned J, Flores A, Segovia J, Aragoncillo P, Salas C, Alfonso F, et al..
Assessment of coronary microcirculation in cardiac allografts. A comparison of intracoronary physiology, intravascular ultrasound and histological morphometry [abstract]..
J Heart Lung Transplant, 20 (2001), pp. 204-5
[66]
Sambuceti G, Marzilli M, Marraccini P, Schneider-Eicke J, Gliozheni E, Parodi O, et al..
Coronary vasoconstriction during myocardial ischemia induced by rises in metabolic demand in patients with coronary artery disease..
Circulation, 95 (1997), pp. 2652-9
[67]
Quian J, Ge J, Baumgart D, Oldenburg O, Aude M, Sack S, et al..
Safety of intracoronary Doppler flow measurement..
Am Heart J, 140 (2000), pp. 502-10
[68]
Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, Bach RG, Caracciolo EA, Wolford T, et al..
Clinical outcome of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal translesional pressure-flow velocity measurements..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 25 (1995), pp. 178-87
[69]
Ferrari M, Schnell B, Werner GS, Figulla HR..
Safety of deferring angioplasty in patients with normal coronary flow velocity reserve..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 33 (1999), pp. 82-7
[70]
Bech GJ.W, de Bruyne B, Bonnier HJR.M, Bartunek J, Wijns W, Peels K, et al..
Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 31 (1998), pp. 841-7
[71]
Bech JW, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ..
Comparison of deferral versus performance of PTCA based upon fractional flow reserve: The DEFER Study..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 33 (1999), pp. 89
[72]
Chamuleau SA.J, Tio RA, Cock CC, Muinck ED, Pijls NH.J, Laarman GJ, et al..
Intermediate Lesions: Intracoronary flow Assessment versus 99mTc-MIBI SPECT (ILIAS Study); a Dutch multicenter study..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. II-477
[73]
Rieber J, Stemplfle HU, Jung P, Leibig M, Erhard I, Segmiller T, et al..
Safety of deferring patients with coronary multivessel disease and normal fractional flow reserve..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. II-478
[74]
Serruys PW, Di Mario C, Piek J, Schroeder E, Vrints C, Probst P, et al..
Prognostic value of intracoronary flow velocity and diameter stenosis in assessing the short- and long-term outcomes of coronary balloon angioplasty: the DEBATE study (Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe)..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 3369-77
[75]
Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Carlier S, Sousa JE, Piek J, Muramatsu T, et al..
Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional baloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 2930-7
[76]
Di Mario C, Moses JW, Anderson TJ, Bonan R, Muramatsu T, Jain AC, et al..
Randomized comparison of elective stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronary Doppler..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 2938-44
[77]
Lafont A, Dubuis-Randé JL, Steg PG, Dupouy P, Carrié D, Coste P, et al..
The French Randomized Optimal Stenting Trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative angiography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 36 (2000), pp. 404-9
[78]
Bech GJ.W, Pijls NH.J, De Bruyne B, Peels KH, Michels HR, Bonnier HJR.M, et al..
Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty..
Circulation, 99 (1999), pp. 883-8
[79]
Hanekamp CE.E, Koolen JJ, Pijls NH.J, Michels HR, Bonnier HJRM..
Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimal stent deployment..
Circulation, 99 (1999), pp. 1015-21
[80]
Choi Y, Huang SC, Hawkins RA, Kim JY, Kim BT, Hoh CK, et al..
Quantification of myocardial blood flow using 13N-ammonia and PET. Comparison of tracer models..
J Nucl Med, 40 (1999), pp. 1045-55
[81]
Camici PG..
Positron emission tomography to asses the hemodynamics of the coronary circulation..
Sem Interv Cardiol, 3 (1998), pp. 31-8
[82]
Schelbert HR, Phelps ME, Huang SC, MacDonald NS, Hansen H, Selin C, et al..
Nitrogen-13-ammonia as an indicator of myocardial blood flow..
Circulation, 63 (1981), pp. 1259-72
[83]
Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M, Rosenpire KC, Krivokapich J, Schelbert H, Kuhl DE, et al..
Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using 13N-ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 15 (1990), pp. 1032-42
[84]
Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Weinheimer CJ, Bergmann SR..
Nonivasive quantitation of regional myocardial blood flow with 82Rb and positron emission tomography: exploration of a mathematical model..
Circulation, 82 (1990), pp. 1377-86
[85]
Glover DK, Ruiz M, Yang JY..
Myocardial 99mTc-tetrofosmin uptake during induced vasodilatation with either a critical or mild stenosis: comparison with 201Tl and regional myocardial blood flow..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 2332-8
[86]
Isotopic diagnosis of viable myocardium. En: Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Aguad??-Bruix S, editors. Myocardium at risk and viable myocardium. Evaluation by SPET. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001; p. 183-212.
[87]
Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, González JM, Rossello-Urgell J..
Eficacia del SPET miocárdico esfuerzo-reposo con 99mTc-MIBI en la predicción de la recuperabilidad de la función contráctil posrevascularización. Resultados del protocolo multicéntrico español..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 903-10
[88]
Glover DK, Ruiz M, Koplan BA, Watson DD, Beller GA..
99mTc-tretrofosmin assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability in canine models of coronary occlusion and reperfusion..
J Nucl Med, 40 (1999), pp. 142-9
[89]
Johnson LL..
Myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m-teboroxime..
J Nucl Med, 35 (1994), pp. 689-92
[90]
Takahashi N, Reinhardt CP, Marcel R, Leppo JA..
Correlations between uptake of 99mTc-Q12 and 201Tl: myocardial perfusion and viability in a model of acute coronary reperfusion..
J Nucl Med, 39 (1998), pp. 159-65
[91]
Vanzetto G, Calnon DA, Ruiz M, Watson DD, Pasqualini R, Beller GA, et al..
Myocardial uptake and redistribution of 99mTc-NOET in dogs with either sustained coronary blood flow or transient coronary oclusion comparison with 201Tl and myocardial blood flow..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 2325-31
[92]
Glover DK, Ruiz M, Yang JY, Koplan BA, Allen TR, Smith WH, et al..
Pharmacological stress thallium scintigraphy with 99mTc-cyclohexylmethylidenehydrazineadenosine (WRC-0470): a novel, short acting A2A receptor agonist..
Circulation, 94 (1996), pp. 1726-32
[93]
Radion??clidos, instrumentaci??n y procedimientos. En: Candell J, Castell J, Aguad?? S, editores. Miocardio en riesgo y miocardio viable. Barcelona: Ediciones Doyma S.A., 1998; p. 3-28.
[94]
Muxí A, Pavía J, Aguadé S, Ricart Y, Nuño JA, Martínez-Sampere JJ, et al..
Estudios tomográficos de normalidad de perfusión miocárdica con 99mTc-tetrofosmina. Estudio multicéntrico español (II). Aspectos clínicos..
Rev Esp Med Nuclear, 20 (2001), pp. 102-12
[95]
Chua T, Kiat H, Germano G, Maurer G, van Train K, Friedman J, et al..
Gated 99mTc-sestamibi for simultaneous assessment of stress myocardial perfusion, postexercise regional ventricular function and myocardial viability. Correlation with echocardiography and 201Tl scintigraphy..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 23 (1994), pp. 1107-14
[96]
Nichols K, Lefkowitz D, Faber T, Folks R, Cooke D, Garcia EV, et al..
Echocardiograhic validation of gated-SPECT ventricular function measurements..
J Nucl Med, 41 (2000), pp. 1308-14
[97]
Ruiz-Salmerón RJ, Ponce De León E, López A, Romeo D, del Campo V, Nandayapa R, et al..
Capacidad del protocolo del gated-SPECT reposo/dobutamina para predecir la recuperación contráctil posrevascularización de áreas miocárdicas disinérgicas..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1052-62
[98]
Nichols K, Tamis J, DePuey EG, Mieres J, Malhotra S, Rozanski A..
Relationship of Gated-Spect ventricular function parameters to angiographic measurements..
J Nucl Cardiol, 5 (1998), pp. 295-303
[99]
Hendel RC, Berman DS, Cullom SJ, Follansbee W, Heller GV, Kiat H, et al..
Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging..
Circulation, 99 (1999), pp. 2742-9
[100]
Lee DS, So Y, Cheon GJ, Kim KM, Lee MM, Chung JK, et al..
Limited incremental diagnostic values of attenuation non-corrected gating and ungated attenuation correction to rest/stress myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with an intermediate likehood of coronary artery disease..
J Nucl Med, 41 (2000), pp. 860-2
[101]
Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Castell-Conesa J, Aguade-Bruix S, Olona M, Palet J, et al..
Simultaneous dipyridamole/ maximal subjective exercise with 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: Improved diagnostic yield in coronary artery disease..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 29 (1997), pp. 531-6
[102]
Santana-Boado C, Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Aguade-Bruix S, Garcia-Burillo A, Canela T, et al..
Diagnostic accuracy of technetium-99m-MIBI myocardial SPECT in women and men..
J Nucl Med, 39 (1998), pp. 751-5
[103]
Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Bermejo B, Armadans L, Castell J, Casans I, et al..
Interhospital observer agreement in interpretation of 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial exercise SPECT studies..
J Nucl Cardiol, 8 (2001), pp. 49-57
[104]
Diagnostic accuracy of SPET. En: Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Aguad??-Bruix S, editors. Myocardium at risk and viable myocardium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001; p. 69-94.
[105]
Romero-Farina G, Candell-Riera J, Pereztol-Valdes O, Galve-Basilio E, Palet-Balart J, García del Castillo H, et al..
Clasificación morfológica de la miocardiopatía hipertrófica mediante tomogammagrafía miocárdica. Comparación con la clasificación ecocardiográfica..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 511-6
[106]
Romero-Farina G, Candell-Riera J, Pereztol-Valdés O, Aguadé-Bruix S, Castell-Conesa J, Armadans L, et al..
Tomogammagrafía miocárdica de esfuerzo en los pacientes con miocardiopatía hipertrófica..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 53 (2000), pp. 1589-95
[107]
Interaction of
[108]
Castell Conesa J, Santana Boado C, Candell Riera J, Aguade Bruix S, Olona M, Canela T, et al..
La tomogammagrafía miocárdica de esfuerzo en el diagnóstico de la enfermedad coronaria multivaso..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 50 (1997), pp. 635-42
[109]
Morise AP..
An incremental evaluation of the diagnostic value of thallium single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging and lung/heart ratio concerning both the presence and extent of coronary artery disease..
J Nucl Cardiol, 2 (1995), pp. 238-45
[110]
O'Keefe JH, Barnhart CS, Bateman TM..
Comparison of stress echocardiography and stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for diagnosing coronary artery disease and assessing its severity..
Am J Cardiol, 75 (1995), pp. 25D-34D
[111]
Geleijnse ML, Elhendy A..
Can stress echocardiography compete with perfusion scintigraphy in the detection of coronary artery disease and cardiac risk assessment?..
Eur J Echocardiography, 1 (2000), pp. 12-21
[112]
Hutter AM..
Is there a left main equivalent?.
Circulation, 62 (1980), pp. 207-11
[113]
Ceriani L, Verna E, Giovanella L, Bianchi L, Roncari G, Tarolo GL..
Assessment of myocardial area at risk by technetium-99m sestamibi during coronary artery occlusion: comparison between three tomographic methods of quantification..
Eur J Nucl Med, 23 (1996), pp. 31-9
[114]
Verani MS, Jeroudi MO, Mahmarian JJ, Boyce TM, Borges-Neto S, Patel B, et al..
Quantification of myocardial infarction during coronary occlusion and myocardial salvage after reperfusion using cardiac in aging with technetium-99m hexaquis-2-methoxyisobutil isonitrile..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 12 (1988), pp. 1573-81
[115]
Tamaki S, Nakajima H, Murakami T, Yui Y, Kambara H, Kadota K, et al..
Estimation of infarct size by myocardial emission computed tomography with thallium-201 and its relation to creatine kinase-MB release after myocardial infarction in man..
Circulation, 66 (1982), pp. 994-1001
[116]
O'Conor MK, Hammel T, Gibbsons RJ..
In vitro validation of a simple tomographic technique for estimation of porcentage myocardium at risk using methoxyisobutil isonitrile technetium 99m (sestamibi)..
Eur J Nucl Med, 16 (1990), pp. 69-76
[117]
Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Castell-Conesa J, Aguadé-Bruix S, Olona-Cabases M, Domingo E, et al..
Culprit lesion and jeopardized myocardium: Correlation between coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography..
Clin Cardiol, 20 (1997), pp. 345-50
[118]
Herrington DM, Siebes M, Sokol DK, Ciu CO, Waldorf GD..
Variability in measures of coronary lumen dimensions using quantitative coronary angiography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 1068-74
[119]
Assessment of revascularization. En: Zaret BL, Beller GA, editors. Nuclear cardiology. State of the art and future directions. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999; p. 398-426.
[120]
Haronian HL, Remetz MS, Sinusas AJ, Baron JM, Miller HI, Cleman MW, et al..
Myocardial risk area defined by technetium-99m sestamibi imaging during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: comparison with coronary angiography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 1033-43
[121]
Little WC, Constantinescu M, Applegate RJ, Kutcher MA, Burrows MT, Kahl FR, et al..
Can coronary angiography predict the site of a subsequent myocardial infarction in patients with mild- to moderate coronary artery disease?..
Circulation, 78 (1988), pp. 1157-66
[122]
Ambrose JA, Tannenbaum MA, Alexopoulos D, Hjemdahl-Monsen CE, Leavy J, Weiss M, et al..
Angiographic progression of coronary artery disease and the development of myocardial infarction..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 12 (1988), pp. 56-62
[123]
Giroud D, Li JM, Urban P, Meier B, Rutishauer W..
Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography..
Am J Cardiol, 69 (1992), pp. 729-32
[124]
Candell-Riera J, Pereztol-Valdes O, Santana-Boado C, Missorici M, Oller-Martinez G, Aguade-Bruix S, et al..
Relationship between the location of the most severe myocardial perfusion defects, the most severe coronary artery stenosis, and the site of subsequent myocardial infarction..
J Nucl Med, 42 (2001), pp. 558-63
[125]
Gibson RS, Watson DD, Taylor GJ, Crosby IK, Wellons HL, Holt ND, et al..
Prospective assessment of regional myocardial perfusion before and after coronary revascularization surgery by quantitative thallium-201 scintigraphy..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 1 (1983), pp. 804-15
[126]
Lim YL, Okada RD, Chesler DA, Block PC, Boucher CA, Pohost GM..
A new approach to quantitation of exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy before and after an intervention: Application to define the impact of coronary angioplasty on regional myocardial perfusion..
Am Heart J, 108 (1984), pp. 917-25
[127]
Ritchie JL, Narahara KA, Trobaugh GB, Williams DL, Hamilton GW..
Thallium-201 myocardial imaging before and after coronary revascularization. Assessment of regional myocardial blood flow and graft patency..
Circulation, 56 (1977), pp. 830-6
[128]
Breisblatt WM, Barnes JV, Weiland F, Spaccavento LJ..
Incomplete revascularization in multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: The role for stress thallium-201 imaging..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 11 (1988), pp. 1183-90
[129]
Percutaneous transluminalcoronary angioplasty of the
[130]
White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, et al..
Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?..
N Engl J Med, 310 (1984), pp. 819-24
[131]
Di Carli M, Czernin J, Hoh CK, Gerbaudo VH, Brunken RC, Huang SC, et al..
Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease..
Circulation, 91 (1995), pp. 1944-51
[132]
Methods for quantifying myocardial perfusion. En: Candell-Riera J, Ortega-Alcalde D, editors. Nuclear Cardiology in everyday practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994; p. 88-108.
[133]
Methods of quantification. En: Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Aguad??-Bruix S, editors. Myocardium at risk and viable myocardium. Evaluation by SPET. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001; p. 45-67.
[134]
Maddahi J, Van Train K, Prigent F, Garcia EV, Friedman J, Ostrzega E, et al..
Quantitative single photon emission computed thallium-201 tomography for detection and localization of coronary artery disease: Optimization and prospective validation of a new technique..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 14 (1989), pp. 1689-99
[135]
Quantitative analysis of SPECT myocardial perfusion. En: De Puey EG, Berman DS, Garcia EV, editors. Cardiac SPECT Imaging 1995;3: p. 49-74.
[136]
Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, Dodge JT Jr, Alexander B Jr, Marble SJ, et al..
TIMI frame count. A quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow..
Circulation, 93 (1996), pp. 879-88
[137]
Bartunek J, Sys SU, Heyndrickx GR, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B..
Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 26 (1995), pp. 328-34
[138]
Arnese M, Salustri A, Fioretti PM, Cornel JH, Boersma E, Reijs AE, et al..
Quantitative angiographic measurements of isolated left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. Correlation with exercise echocardiography and technetium-99m 2-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile single-photon emission tomography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 25 (1995), pp. 1486-91
[139]
Mancini GB, Simon SB, McGillem MJ, LeFree MT, Friedman HZ, Vogel RA..
Automated quantitative coronary arteriography: Morphologic and physiologic validation in vivo of rapid digital angiographic method..
Circulation, 75 (1987), pp. 452-60
[140]
Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H, Phillips RA..
Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 5 (1985), pp. 587-92
[141]
Rentrop KP, Feit F, Sherman W, Thornton JC..
Serial angiographic assessment of coronary artery obstruction and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction. Report from the Second Mount Sinai-New York University Reperfusion Trial..
Circulation, 80 (1989), pp. 1166-75
[142]
Pijls NH, Bech GJ, el Gamal MIBonnier HJ, De Bruyne B, Van Gelder B, et al..
Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 25 (1995), pp. 1522-28
[143]
Stress testing. En: Candell-Riera J, Ortega-Alcalde D, editors. Nuclear Cardiology in everyday practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994; p. 43-66.
[144]
Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, Castell-Conesa J, Aguade-Bruix S, Olona M, Palet J, et al..
Simultaneous dipyridamole/maximal subjective exercise with 99mTc-MIBI SPECT: Improved diagnostic yield in coronary artery disease..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 29 (1997), pp. 531-6
[145]
Santana-Boado C, Candell-Riera J, Castell-Conesa J, Olona M, Palet-Balart J, Aguadé-Bruix S, et al..
Importancia de los parámetros ergométricos en los resultados de la tomogammagrafía de perfusión miocárdica..
Med Clin (Barc), 109 (1997), pp. 406-9
[146]
Hockings B, Saltissi S, Croft DN, Webb-Peploe MM..
Effect of beta adrenergic blockade on thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging..
Br Heart J, 49 (1983), pp. 83-9
[147]
Martin GJ, Henkin RE, Scanlon PJ..
Beta blockers and the sensitivity of the thallium treadmill test..
Chest, 92 (1987), pp. 486-7
[148]
Santana Boado C, Candell Riera J, Aguade Bruix S, Castell Conesa J, Bermejo Fraile B, Canela Coll T, et al..
Cuantificación de la isquemia miocárdica en regiones dependientes de arterias coronarias ocluidas de pacientes sin infarto previo..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 51 (1998), pp. 388-95
[149]
Palet Balart J, Candell Riera J, Castell Conesa J, Aguade Bruix S, Cortadellas Angel J, Salas Lobato A, et al..
La tomogammagrafía de perfusión y la coronariografía como exploraciones complementarias en la decisión terapéutica de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 47 (1994), pp. 796-802
[150]
Finkelhor RS, Pajouh M, Kett A, Stefanski R, Bosich G, Youssefi ME, et al..
Clinical impact of second harmonic imaging and left heart contrast in echocardiographic stress testing..
Am J Cardiol, 85 (2000), pp. 740-3
[151]
Peteiro J, Freire E, Montserrat L, Castro A..
The effect of exercise on ischemic mitral regurgitation..
Chest, 114 (1998), pp. 1075-82
[152]
Peteiro J, Montserrat L, Castro A..
Subaortic obstruction during exercise stress echocardiography..
Am J Cardiol, 84 (1999), pp. 1119-23
[153]
Von Bibra H, Tuchnitz A, Klein A, Schneider-Eicke J, Schomig A, Schwaiger M..
Regional diastolic function by pulsed Doppler myocardial mapping for the detection of left ventricular ischemia during pharmacological stress testing..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 36 (2000), pp. 444-52
[154]
Pasquet A, Armstrong G, Beachler L, Lauer MS, Marwick TH..
Use of segmental tissue Doppler velocity to quantitate exercise echocardiography..
J Am Soc Echocardiography, 12 (1999), pp. 901-12
[155]
Peteiro J, Monserrat L, Fabregas R, Vazquez JM, Calviño R, Castro Beiras..
Comparison of two-dimensional echocardiography and pulsed Doppler tissue imaging during dobutamine-atropine stress testing to detect coronary artery disease..
Echocardiography, 18 (2001), pp. 1-10
[156]
Armstrong G, Pasquet A, Fukamachi K, Cardon L, Olstad B, Marwick T..
Use of peak systolic strain as an index of regional left ventricular function: comparison with tissue Doppler velocity during dobutamine stress and myocardial ischemia..
J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 13 (2000), pp. 731-7
[157]
M-mode echocardiography-an obsolete technique?. En: Chambers J, Monaghan MJ, editors. Echocardiography: an international review. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993; p. 1-9.
[158]
Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, Arnese M, Fioretti P, Pingitore A, et al..
Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 27 (1996), pp. 330-6
[159]
Heindrickx CR, Baic H, Nelkins P, Leulsen K, Fishbein MC, Vatner SF..
Depression of regional blood flow and wall thickening after brief coronary occlusion..
Am J Physiol, 234 (1978), pp. H653-660
[160]
Mecanismos de isquemia debidos a enfermedad coronaria org??nica. En: Picano E, editor. Ecocardiograf??a de esfuerzo. Barcelona: Springer-Verlag Heildelberg, 1994; p. 52-8.
[161]
Hecht HS, DeBord L, Shaw R, Chin H, Dunlap R, Ryan C, et al..
Supine bicycle stress echocardiography versus tomographic thallium-201 exercise imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease..
J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 6 (1993), pp. 177-85
[162]
Marwick TH, Anderson T, Williams MJ, Haluska B, Melin JA, Pashkow F, et al..
Exercise echocardiography is an accurate and cost-efficient technique for detection of coronary artery disease in women..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 26 (1995), pp. 335-41
[163]
Roger VL, Pellikka PA, Oh JK, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ..
Identification of multivessel coronary artery disease by exercise echocardiography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 24 (1994), pp. 109-14
[164]
Peteiro J, Monserrat L, Martinez D, Castro-Beiras A..
Accuracy of exercise echocardiography to detect coronary artery disease in left bundle branch block unassociated with either acute or healed myocardial infarction..
Am J Cardiol, 85 (2000), pp. 890-3
[165]
Monserrat L, Peteiro J, Vázquez JM, Vázquez N, Castro-Beiras A..
Valor de la ecocardiografía de ejercicio en el diagnóstico de enfermedad coronaria en pacientes con bloqueo de rama izquierda del haz de His..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 51 (1998), pp. 211-7
[166]
Quiñones MA, Verani MS, Haichin RM, Mahmarian JJ, Suarez J, Zoghbi WA..
Exercise echocardiography versus 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery disease: Analysis of 292 patients..
Circulation, 85 (1992), pp. 1026-31
[167]
Badruddin SM, Ahmad A, Mickelson J, Abukhalil J, Winters WL, Nagueh SF, et al..
Supine bicycle versus post-treadmill exercise echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia: a randomized single-blind crossover trial..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 33 (1999), pp. 1485-90
[168]
Peteiro J, Fabregas R, Monserrat L, Álvarez N, Castro-Beiras A..
Comparison of treadmill exercise echocardiography before and after exercise in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease..
J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 12 (1999), pp. 1073-9
[169]
Sun KT, Czernin J, Krivokapich J, Lau YK, Bottcher M, Maurer G, et al..
Effects of dobutamine stimulation on myocardial blood flow, glucose metabolism and wall motion in normal and dysfunctional myocardium..
Circulation, 94 (1996), pp. 3146-54
[170]
Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Stepanovic J, Djordjevic-Dikic A, Stojkovic S, Nedeljkovic M, et al..
Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Head-to-head comparison of exercise, dobutamine and dipyridamole test..
Circulation, 90 (1994), pp. 1168-76
[171]
Rodríguez García MA, Iglesias-Garriz I, Corral Fernández F, Garrote Coloma C, Alonso-Orcajo N, Branco L, et al..
Evaluación de la seguridad de la ecocardiografía de estrés en España y Portugal..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 54 (2001), pp. 941-8
[172]
McNeill AJ, Fioretti PM, el-Said SM, Salustri A, Forster T, Roelandt JR..
Enhanced sensitivity for the detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography ..
Am J Cardiol, 70 (1992), pp. 41-6
[173]
Frohwein S, Klein L, Lane A, Taylor WR..
Transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography in the evaluation of coronary artery disease..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 25 (1995), pp. 823-9
[174]
Song JK, Park SW, Kang DH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Lee CW, et al..
Safety and clinical impact of ergonovine stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary vasospasm..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 35 (2000), pp. 1850-6
[175]
Atar S, Cercek B, Nagai T, Luo H, Lewin HC, Naqvi TZ, et al..
Transthoracic stress echocardiography with transesophageal atrial pacing for bedside evaluation of inducible myocardial ischemia in patients with new-onset chest pain..
Am J Cardiol, 86 (2000), pp. 12-6
[176]
Atar S, Nagai T, Cercek B, Naqvi TZ, Luo H, Siegel RJ..
Pacing stress echocardiography: an alternative to pharmacologic stress testing..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 36 (2000), pp. 1935-41
[177]
Gould KL, Lipscomb K..
Effects of coronary stenoses on coronary flow reserve and resistance..
Am J Cardiol, 9 (1974), pp. 249-62
[178]
Rossen JD, Quillen JE, Lopez AG, Stenberg RG, Talman CL, Winniford MD..
Comparison of coronary vasodilatation with intravenous dipyridamole and adenosine..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 18 (1991), pp. 485-91
[179]
Donohue TJ, Kern MJ, Aguirre FV, Bach RG, Wolford T, Bell CA, et al..
Assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses: analysis of translesional pressure-flow velocity relations in patients..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 449-58
[180]
Takeuchi M, Miyazaki C, Yoshitani H, Otani S, Sakamoto K, Yoshikawa J..
Assessment of coronary flow velocity with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography during dobutamine stress echocardiography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 38 (2001), pp. 117-23
[181]
Pizzuto F, Voci P, Mariano E, Puddu PE, Sardella G, Nigri A..
Assessment of flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and venous adenosine infusion before and after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 38 (2001), pp. 155-62
[182]
Caiati C, Zedda N, Montaldo C, Montisci R, Iliceto S..
Contrast-enhaced transthoracic second harmonic echo Doppler with adenosine..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 34 (1999), pp. 122-30
[183]
Isaaz K, Bruntz JF, Paris D, Ethevenot G, Aliot E..
Abnormal coronary flow velocity pattern in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, angina pectoris, and normal coronary arteries: A transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic study..
Am Heart J, 128 (1994), pp. 500-10
[184]
Akasaka T, Yoshida K, Yamamuro A, Hozumi T, Takagi T, Morioka S, et al..
Phasic coronary flow characteristics in patients with constrictive pericarditis: comparison with restrictive cardiomyopathy..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 1874-81
[185]
Inoue T, Sakai Y, Morooka S, Hayashi T, Takayanagi K, Yamanaka T, et al..
Coronary flow reserve in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy..
Am Heart J, 125 (1993), pp. 93-8
[186]
Mazur W, Bitar JN, Young JB, Khalil AA, Vardan S, Short BC, et al..
Progressive deterioration of coronary flow reserve after cardiac transplantation..
Am Heart J, 136 (1998), pp. 504-9
[187]
Skalidis EI, Kochiadakis GE, Koukouraki SI, Parthenakis FI, Karkavitsas NS, Vardas PE..
Phasic coronary flow pattern and flow reserve in patients with left bundle branch block and normal coronary arteries..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 33 (1999), pp. 1338-46
[188]
Kaul S, Senior R, Dittrich H, Raval U, Khattar R, Lahiri A..
Detection of coronary artery disease with myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography..
Circulation, 96 (1997), pp. 785-92
[189]
Heinle SK, Noblin J, Goree-Best P, Mello A, Ravad G, Mull S, et al..
Assessment of myocardial perfusion by harmonic power Doppler imaging at rest and during adenosine stress. Comparison with 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging..
Circulation, 102 (2000), pp. 55-60
[190]
Spencer KT, Grayburn PA, Mor-Avi V, Bednarz J, Grimm RA, Furlong K, et al..
Myocardial contrast echocardiography with power Doppler imaging..
Am J Cardiol, 86 (2000), pp. 479-81
[191]
Masugata H, Peters B, Lafitte S, Strachan GM, Ohmori K, DeMaria AN..
Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 37 (2001), pp. 262-9
[192]
Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, Kricsfeld D, Oleary E..
Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 37 (2001), pp. 748-53
[193]
Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F, Kricsfeld D, Iskander S, Gobar L, et al..
Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bycicle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: comparison with single photon emission computed tomography..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 37 (2001), pp. 741-7
[194]
Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J, Coggins M, Moos S, Kaul S..
Noninvasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography..
Circulation, 103 (2001), pp. 2560-5
[195]
Nagy A, Dini Ll, Rovai D..
Added value of contrast echocardiography in assessing viability..
Heart, 82 (1999), pp. 22-6
[196]
Ragosta M, Camarano G, Kaul S, Powers ER, Sarembock IJ, Gimple LW..
Microvascular integrity indicates myocellular viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction..
Circulation, 89 (1994), pp. 2562-9
[197]
Camarano G, Ragosta M, Gimple LW, Powers ER, Kaul S..
Identification of viable myocardium with contrast echocardiography in patients with poor left ventricular systolic function caused by recent or remote myocardial infarction..
Am J Cardiol, 75 (1995), pp. 215-9
[198]
DeFilippi CR, Willett DL, Irani WN, Eichhorn EJ, Velasco CE, Grayburn PA..
Comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography and low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting recovery of left ventricular function after coronary revascularization in chronic heart disease..
Circulation, 92 (1995), pp. 2863-8
[199]
Ito H, Iwakura K, Oh H, Masuyama T, Hori M, Higashino Y, et al..
Temporal changes in myocardial perfusion patterns in patients with reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction: their relation to myocardial viability..
Circulation, 91 (1995), pp. 656-62
[200]
Ito H, Tomooka T, Sakai N, Yu H, Higashino Y, Fujii K, et al..
Lack of myocardial perfusion immediately after successful thrombolysis: a predictor of poor recovery of left ventricular function in anterior myocardial infarction..
Circulation, 85 (1992), pp. 1699-705
[201]
Lepper W, Hoffmann R, Kamp O, Franke A, de Cock CC, Kuhl HP, et al..
Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction..
Circulation, 101 (2000), pp. 2368-74
[202]
El-Shafei A, Chiravuri R, Stikovac MM, El-Badry MA, Donohue TJ, Bach RG, et al..
Comparison of relative coronary Doppler flow velocity reserve to stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease..
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 53 (2001), pp. 193-201
[203]
Gohlke H, Samek L, Betz P, Roskamm H..
Exercise testing provides additional prognostic information in angiographically defined subgroups of patients with coronary artery disease..
Circulation, 68 (1983), pp. 979-85
[204]
Bonow RO, Kent KM, Rosing DR, Lan KK, Lakatos E, Borer JS, et al..
Exercise-induced ischemia in mildly symptomatic patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular function: identification of subgroups at risk of death during medical therapy..
N Engl J Med, 311 (1984), pp. 1339-45
[205]
Candell-Riera J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Castell J, Rius-Davi A, Domingo E, Alvarez-Aunon E, et al..
Uncomplicated first myocardial infarction: Strategy for comprehensive prognostic studies..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 18 (1991), pp. 1207-19
[206]
Iskandrian AS, Chae SC, Heo J, Stanberry CD, Wasserleben V, Cave V..
Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 22 (1993), pp. 665-70
[207]
Olona M, Candell-Riera J, Permanyer-Miralda G, Castell J, Barrabes JA, Domingo E, et al..
Strategies for prognostic assessment of uncomplicated first myocardial infarction: A 5-years follow up study..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 25 (1995), pp. 815-22
[208]
Marie PY, Danchin N, Durand JF, Feldmann L, Grentzinger A, Olivier P, et al..
Long-term prediction of major ischemic events by exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography. Incremental prognostic value compared with clinical, exercise testing, catheterization and radionuclide angiographyc data..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 26 (1995), pp. 879-86
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.