Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Visits
Not available
Vol. 66. Issue 1.
Pages 56-62 (January 2013)
Special article
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2012.07.006
Full text access
Plaque Stability and the Southern European Paradox
Estabilidad de la placa aterosclerótica y la paradoja del sur de Europa
Visits
...
Irene R. Déganoa, Roberto Elosuaa,b, Juan C. Kaskic, Daniel J. Fernández-Bergésd, María Graua, Jaume Marrugata,
Corresponding author
jmarrugat@imim.es

Corresponding author: Grupo de Investigación de Epidemiología y Genética Cardiovascular, Programa de Investigación de Procesos Inflamatorios y Cardiovasculares, IMIM, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
a Grupo de Investigación de Epidemiología y Genética Cardiovascular, Programa de Investigación de Procesos Inflamatorios y Cardiovasculares, IMIM (Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques), Barcelona, Spain
b CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
c Cardiovascular Sciences Research Centre, St. George's University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, United Kingdom
d Unidad de Investigación Don Benito-Villanueva, Programa de Investigación Cardiovascular (PERICLES), Gerencia Área Sanitaria Don Benito-Villanueva, Badajoz, Spain
This item has received
...
Visits
(Daily data update)
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (3)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Percentage of Lipid-rich Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaques in European Countries. Studies Based on Intravascular Ultrasound
Table 2. Percentage of Lipid-rich Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaques in European Countries. Studies Based on Coronary Computed Tomography
Table 3. Percentage of Lipid-rich Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaques in European Countries. Studies Based on Histology
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Differences between European countries in coronary heart disease mortality were initially described in the 20th century, and albeit less dramatic than first reported, these differences remain substantial. Three main hypotheses have been proposed to explain the so-called “Mediterranean paradox”: a) underestimation of coronary heart disease mortality due to methodological flaws; b) the “lag time” hypothesis, and c) the traditional Mediterranean diet and lifestyle. In this manuscript we present and discuss another possible explanation for the Mediterranean paradox related to the higher prevalence and incidence of stable atheromatous plaques in this area.

Keywords:
Coronary heart disease
Mediterranean diet
Atherosclerosis
Vulnerable plaque
Stable plaque
Myocardial infarction
Abbreviations:
CHD
MI
Resumen

Las diferencias en mortalidad por cardiopatía isquémica entre países europeos se describieron inicialmente durante el siglo pasado y, aunque menos espectaculares de lo que al principio se describió, actualmente las diferencias siguen siendo sustanciales. Se han propuesto tres hipótesis principales para explicar la paradoja del Mediterráneo: a) una subestimación de la mortalidad por cardiopatía isquémica debida a deficiencias metodológicas; b) la hipótesis del tiempo insuficiente de latencia/inducción de la enfermedad, y c) el efecto protector de la dieta y el estilo de vida en los países Mediterráneos. En este trabajo se presenta y se desarrolla una posible explicación complementaria de la paradoja del Mediterráneo relacionada con las mayores prevalencia e incidencia de placas ateromatosas estables en esta zona.

Palabras clave:
Cardiopatía isquémica
Dieta mediterránea
Aterosclerosis
Placa vulnerable
Placa estable
Infarto de miocardio
Full Text

.

The Southern European Paradox

Differences between European countries in coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality were initially described in the 20th century. In a comparison of official mortality statistics, it was evident that mortality rates were much lower in Southern European countries than in Northern Europe. At present, the countries in the European region with the highest CHD mortality are Russia and most of the former Soviet Union (Fig. 1A).1 In addition, Northern, Central, and Western European countries have experienced a large decrease in CHD mortality in the last few decades (Fig. 1B).1 However, a substantial difference between the Southern and the Northern and Central European countries is still unexplained, including CHD mortality among the elderly (Figs. 1B, 1C and Fig. 2)2–12.

Figure 1.

Coronary heart disease mortality in Europe from 1968 to 2002 (British Heart Foundation Statistics). A, Former Soviet Union members; B, North European countries; C, South European countries. Left graphs, men; Right graphs, women.

(0.61MB).
Figure 2.

Coronary heart disease mortality in a selection of European countries: specific rates by 5-year age group (2007). CHD, coronary heart disease. Graph data was obtained from the corresponding National Statistical Institute.2–12.

(0.21MB).

In 1980, French epidemiologists generated the concept of the “French paradox,” ie, the paradoxical situation in France of a low CHD mortality rate despite a high intake of dietary saturated fat.13 The French paradox was later extended to other European Mediterranean countries such as Spain, Italy, parts of the former Yugoslavia, and Greece, where differences existed in both cardiovascular mortality and the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) compared to Northern European regions.14,15 These observations have stimulated research during recent years on the role of saturated fat intake in particular, and the Mediterranean diet in general, in the development of CHD.

The Seven Countries Study has provided several relevant observations regarding this apparent paradox. Results for high cholesterol and blood pressure indicated that, although the 25-year relative risk for coronary mortality was similar across different countries, these risk factors were associated with a different absolute risk in Southern Europe compared to the United States and Central or Northern Europe.16,17 Thus, the fundamental difference appears to be in absolute CHD risk, which can differ markedly between countries for a given level of risk factor exposure. These data are consistent with the validity of the recalibration techniques when adapting the Framingham risk function to different regions and countries, supporting the notion that, while the relative risk associated with classical risk factors is similar between these regions, the absolute risk for the same exposure level may differ considerably between countries.18

Three main hypotheses have been proposed to explain the Mediterranean paradox:

  • 1.

    Underestimation of CHD mortality due to methodological flaws, ie, an excessive proportion of deaths in France attributed to “unspecified causes” could underestimate CHD mortality. However, even after correcting for this potential bias, CHD mortality in France was, in 1992, approximately one-third that of Britain, indicating that undercertification cannot completely explain the observed differences.19

  • 2.

    The “lag time” hypothesis. It has been proposed that the differences in CHD mortality between Northern and Southern European populations may be due to a late start in the consumption of animal fat and the delayed appearance of raised serum cholesterol concentrations in Southern regions. However, despite increased exposure to animal fat for the last three decades, no CHD epidemic has occurred in Southern European countries. Moreover, some studies indicate that high cholesterol concentrations, smoking, and hypertension are,20 and have been for as long as 40 years now, highly prevalent in Spain without resulting in the predicted increase in CHD events.21

  • 3.

    The “Mediterranean diet and lifestyle” hypothesis. In the 1950s, Ancel and Margaret Keys published “How to Eat Well and Stay Well the Mediterranean Way,” which encompasses dietary and sociocultural habits common to Mediterranean–specifically Southern European–countries that have been postulated to play a role in this context.22 Initially, the French paradox was attributed at least in part to the consumption of wine (high in polyphenols). However, the Mediterranean diet in general might provide a more comprehensive explanation. Although it varies in different regions, in general it is characterized by high olive oil consumption and low saturated fat intake. Olive oil is rich in oleic acid (55%-80% of total fat), monounsaturated fatty acid and linoleic acid (5%-20% of total fat), polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acid, and several antioxidants such as polyphenols that could explain the cardiovascular benefits associated with its consumption.

In fact, the PREDIMED controlled clinical trial has already shown that a Mediterranean diet supplemented with virgin olive oil or nuts has a positive effect on cardiovascular risk factors in a high cardiovascular risk population. Compared to the nonintervention low-fat control group, subjects who followed any supplemented Mediterranean diet experienced a decrease in blood pressure,23 insulin resistance, and inflammatory biomarkers23, improved their lipid profile23,24 and increased plasma total antioxidant capacity. In addition, an atherosclerotic lesion regression was observed in the PREDIMED participants with the highest carotid intima-media thickness, measured in the far wall of bilateral common carotid arteries after 1 year.25 The PREDIMED results of the 7-year follow-up for clinical cardiovascular events are expected during 2012. Pointing in the same direction, the Lyon Heart Diet Study showed a decrease in the coronary recurrence rate after a first MI in subjects following a Mediterranean diet, compared to controls.26 Moreover, nonadherence to a Mediterranean diet may lead to high cardiovascular mortality rates even in countries located in the Mediterranean basin.27

Is the lower mortality in Southern Europe due to an increased prevalence of stable atheromatous plaques?

A possible explanation for the Southern Mediterranean paradox could be that the population prevalence of coronary artery atherosclerotic lesions would be similar all over Europe but the number of unstable plaques per individual would be higher in Northern and Central European countries, which would result in an increased incidence of acute coronary syndromes in the latter populations.28

Progression beyond the fatty streak stage into advanced atherosclerotic lesions is characterized by subendothelial accumulation of oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Oxidized low-density lipoproteins act as a chemotactic factor for circulating monocytes and also as an antigen capable of activating the cellular immune response, leading to the different stages of chronic inflammatory response in CHD.29

Atherosclerotic plaques can be stable, with little predisposition to disruption and hence not commonly leading to acute CHD events, or unstable, which are associated with acute coronary events. Stable plaques are characterized by a dense fibrous cap, a small lipid core, and low-grade inflammation. Unstable or “vulnerable” plaques, on the contrary, have a thin fibrous cap, high lipid content, and high levels of local inflammatory activity. This local inflammation contributes to the degradation of the fibrous layer, facilitating plaque rupture and acute intracoronary thrombosis that can in turn lead to acute coronary occlusion, with subsequent myocardial ischemia and acute myocardial damage.

It could be speculated that despite a comparable atherosclerosis burden in Southern and Northern European populations, atheromatous plaques in subjects in the South could be more stable and therefore less susceptible to fissure or rupture. Some preliminary and indirect evidences suggest that this could be the case:

  • 1.

    A recent systematic review and meta-analysis using data from 31 countries reported a significant ecological correlation between study-level angina prevalence and country-level MI mortality rates in men and women.30 Thus, it would be expected that countries with higher MI mortality rates would have higher angina prevalence. However, a comparison of European studies with participants of a similar age showed that angina prevalence in Spain is similar to that reported in some Northern European countries with a higher CHD mortality, such as England or Sweden (Fig. 3). This observation suggests that in Mediterranean subjects atherosclerotic lesions may be more stable, yielding the expected number of stable angina cases but a much lower number of major events such as MI.

    Figure 3.

    Association between angina prevalence and myocardial infarction mortality in a selection of European studies with a similar age distribution. Bel78, Belgium 1978; Eng91, England 1991; Eng93, England 1993; Eng94, England 1994; Eng95, England 1995; Ger75, Germany 1975; Ger84, Germany 1984; Ire85, Ireland 1985; MI, myocardial infarction; Spa95, Spain 1995, Swe86, Sweden 1986; Swe94, Sweden 1994. Adapted from Hemingway et al.30

    (0.14MB).
  • 2.

    Differences in plasma concentrations of circulating oxidized low-density lipoprotein particles have also been described in Europe. Plasma oxidized low-density lipoproteins levels are a marker of oxidative stress directly implicated in atherosclerotic plaque formation. This marker has been associated with plaque instability and the development of CHD events.31,32 A South-North gradient in plasma concentrations of oxidized low-density lipoproteins has been observed in patients with stable CHD that parallels the incidence and mortality rates of CHD in Europe.33 This finding concurs with the more prolonged postprandial lipidemic state that leads to the higher oxidative status observed in Northern European populations.34 The oxidized low-density lipoprotein gradient does not correlate with a differential level of total cholesterol1 or different use of lipid-lowering therapy in either primary or secondary prevention in Northern and Southern European countries.35,36 However, in CHD patients, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and a higher percentage of hyperlipidemia was detected in Southern Europe than in the North.33,36,37

  • 3.

    Composition differences in atherosclerotic plaques between European populations have recently been revealed by invasive and noninvasive techniques. Intravascular ultrasound studies in patients with stable and unstable CHD have shown a striking increase in the percentage of lipid-rich plaques from South (8%-16%) to Central (70%-73%) Europe (Table 1).38-45 Computed tomography studies in similar patients point to the same conclusion: an increase in the percentage of lipid-rich plaques from Southern (11%) to Central (34%) European countries (Table 2).40,42,46-52 In addition, two comparable histologic analyses of autopsy plaque samples from CHD patients showed a higher lipid-rich percentage in Germany than in France (Table 3).42,53 Interestingly, while an increasing number of lipid-rich plaques is detected from Southern to Central Europe, an inverse gradient of calcified plaques is found (Table 2). Taking into account that one of the major criteria to classify a plaque as vulnerable is the existence of a thin fibrous cap with a large lipid core, there is preliminary evidence to support a plaque stability gradient in European countries.

    Table 1.

    Percentage of Lipid-rich Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaques in European Countries. Studies Based on Intravascular Ultrasound

    Country/study author  Year of study  Mean age, years  Subjects characteristics  Number of plaques analyzed  Lipid-rich plaques, % 
    Spain
    Alfonso et al38  1994  61  CHD patients  19  16 
    Alfonso et al39  1994  57  Stable and unstable CHD patients  36 
    France
    Caussin et al40  2004  57  ACS patients with no significant stenosis  21  60 
    Iriart et al41  2007  53  ACS patients without ST segment elevationscheduled for coronary angiography  20  40 
    Chopard et al42  2010  64  Fatal CHD patients  83  27 
    Ouldzein et al43  2012  47  ACS patients with stenosis<50%  65  49 
    Germany
    Pohle et al44  2007  59  Stable CHD patients with stenosis>50% scheduled for coronary angiography  252  70 
    Marwan et al45  2011  59  Stable CHD patients scheduled for coronary angiography  55  73 

    ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CHD, coronary heart disease.

    Study selection was based on similarity of subject characteristics and on the plaque classification used (only those studies with the same or a comparable plaque classification were selected).

    Table 2.

    Percentage of Lipid-rich Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaques in European Countries. Studies Based on Coronary Computed Tomography

    Country/study  Year of study  Mean age, years  Subjects characteristics  Number of plaques analyzed  Lipid rich plaques, %  Calcified plaques, % 
    Greece
    Lazoura et al46  2011  61  Patients with atypical chest pain  482  11  41 
    France
    Caussin et al40  2004  57  ACS patients with no significant stenosis  21  21  42 
    Chopard et al42  2010  64  Fatal CHD patients  83  13  24 
    Netherlands
    Pondziute et al47  2008  60  Stable CHD patients scheduledfor coronary angiography  168  29  29 
    Pondziute et al48  2008  59  Stable CHD and ACS patients scheduled for coronary angiography  297  24  30 
    Van Velzen et al49  2009  59  Symptomatic patients with chest pain  227  31  27 
    Germany
    Brodoefel et al50  2008  65  CHD patients referred for angiography  15  34  16 
    Pflederer et al51  2010  63  Stable CHD and ACS patients  110  26  13 
    Belgium
    Sarno et al52  2008  57  Stable and unstable CHD patients  78  28 

    ACS, acute coronary syndrome; CHD, coronary heart disease.

    Study selection was based on similarity of subject characteristics and on the plaque classification used (only those studies with the same or a comparable plaque classification were selected).

    Table 3.

    Percentage of Lipid-rich Atherosclerotic Coronary Plaques in European Countries. Studies Based on Histology

    Country/study  Year of study  Mean age, years  Subjects characteristics  Number of plaques analyzed  Lipid rich plaques, % 
    France
    Chopard et al42  2010  64  Fatal CHD patients  83  24 
    Germany           
    Schroeder et al53  2004  63  Stable CHD deceased patients  17  35 

    CHD, coronary heart disease.

    Study selection was based on similarity of subject characteristics and on the plaque classification used (only those studies with the same or a comparable plaque classification were selected).

The relatively scanty objective information regarding the reasons for the observed differences in nonfatal and fatal acute MI and coronary death in European countries suggests that CHD in Mediterranean subjects appears to follow a less aggressive course that could be related to the presence of more stable atheromatous plaques. This putative plaque type that would be more common in Southern Europe could be at least in part due to environmental, pharmacologic, and/or genetic factors. Environmental factors would include diet and physical activity, among others. Pharmacologic factors could be related to a different use or response to drugs aimed at stabilizing atheromatous plaques, such as statins. On the other hand, genetic variation among European countries could also explain the increased plaque stability in Southern Europe. Although low genetic differentiation has been described among Europeans, there is a correspondence between genetic and geographic distances within Europe.54 This genetic variation could affect the efficacy of statins to decrease low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and also to stabilize the atheromatous plaque.55

Nevertheless, independently of the cause, atherosclerotic plaque composition needs to be analyzed in well-designed multinational studies that include the countries showing the highest and the lowest CHD death rates in Europe. A multinational study would allow a more realistic comparison of plaque composition characteristics between European countries. The challenge is, however, to study the characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques in large groups of asymptomatic individuals across Europe.56 New advances in imaging techniques such as multidetector computed tomography, which allows a complete plaque characterization with extremely high specificity, might make it possible to study asymptomatic individuals. Multidetector computed tomography rules out atherosclerotic lesions safely, at low radiation exposure (0.88-1.0 mSv).57 Intravascular imaging techniques such as virtual histology, intravascular ultrasound, integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography also enable us to observe certain plaque characteristics. However, although optical coherence tomography has much more resolution than intravascular ultrasound and can yield information on inflammation parameters it has not been fully validated to analyze coronary plaques in humans and has important limitations in differentiating lipid-rich and calcified tissue.58,59 But more importantly, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are invasive techniques and thus are not suitable to analyze atheromatous plaque characteristics in nonsymptomatic individuals.

Confirmation of the hypothesis proposed here would have a huge impact in primary prevention and management of CHD, as knowing the atherosclerotic plaque composition in each region's population would improve patient treatment and decrease its associated cost.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Innovation through the Carlos III Health Institute and the European Regional Development Found (Red HERACLES RD06/0009, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública), and by the Catalan Research and Technology Innovation Interdepartmental Commission (SGR 1195).

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

References
[1]
Allender S, Scarborough P, Peto V, Rayner M, Leal J, Luengo-Fernandez R, et al. European cardiovascular disease statistics 2008. Brussels, London: European. Heart Network; 2008. pp. 1-112.
[2]
Statistiska centralbyrån (SCB) [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.scb.se
[3]
General Register Office for Scotland [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics
[4]
CSO-Central Statistics Office Ireland [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.cso.ie
[5]
British Heart Foundation-Heart statistics [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.bhf.org.uk/research/statistics.aspx
[6]
Statistisches Bundesamt [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: https://www.destatis.de
[7]
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (CBS) [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl
[8]
Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.insee.fr
[9]
Istituto Nazionale di Statistica [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.istat.it
[10]
Instituto Nacional de Estatística [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.ine.pt/
[11]
ELSTAT (Hellenic Statistical Authority) [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.statistics.gr
[12]
Instituto Nacional de Estadística [accesed 2012 Jul 20]. Available at: http://www.ine.es
[13]
S.M. Artaud-Wild, S.L. Connor, G. Sexton, W.E. Connor.
Differences in coronary mortality can be explained by differences in cholesterol and saturated fat intakes in 40 countries but not in France and Finland. A paradox.
Circulation, 88 (1993), pp. 2771-2779
[14]
H. Tunstall-Pedoe, K. Kuulasmaa, P. Amouyel, D. Arvelier, A.M. Rajakanjas, A. Pajak.
Myocardial infarction and coronary deaths in the World Health Organization. MONICA Project. Registration procedures, event rates and case-fatality rates in 38 populations from 21 countries in four continents.
Circulation, 90 (1994), pp. 583-612
[15]
J. Ferrières.
The French paradox: lessons for other countries.
Heart, 90 (2004), pp. 107-111
[16]
W.M.M. Verschuren, D.R. Jacobs, B.P.M. Bloemberg, D. Kromhout, A. Menotti, C. Aravanis, et al.
Serum total cholesterol and long-term coronary heart disease mortality in different cultures. Twenty-five-year follow-up of the Seven Countries Study.
JAMA, 274 (1995), pp. 131-136
[17]
P.C. Van den Hoogen, E.J. Feskens, N.J. Nagelkerke, A. Menotti, A. Nissinen, D. Kromhout.
The relation between blood pressure and mortality due to coronary heart disease among men in different parts of the world. Seven Countries Study Research Group.
N Engl J Med, 342 (2000), pp. 1-8
[18]
R.B. D’Agostino Sr., S. Grundy, L.M. Sullivan, P. Wilson, CHD Risk Prediction Group.
Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation.
JAMA, 286 (2001), pp. 180-187
[19]
M. Law, N. Wald.
Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the time lag explanation.
BMJ, 318 (1999), pp. 1471-1480
[20]
M. Grau, I. Subirana, R. Elosua, P. Solanas, R. Ramos, R. Masiá, et al.
Trends in cardiovascular risk factor prevalence (1995-2000-2005) in northeastern Spain.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 14 (2007), pp. 653-659
[21]
L. Tomas-Abadal, C. Varas-Lorenzo, E. Bernades-Bernat, I. Balaguer-Vintro.
Coronary risk factors and a 20-year incidence of coronary heart disease and mortality in a Mediterranean industrial population. The Manresa Study, Spain.
Eur Heart J, 15 (1994), pp. 1028-1036
[22]
A. Keys.
Mediterranean diet and public health: personal reflections.
Am J Clin Nutr, 61 (1995), pp. S1321-S1323
[23]
R. Estruch.
Anti-inflammatory effects of the Mediterranean diet: the experience of the PREDIMED study.
Proc Nutr Soc, 69 (2010), pp. 333-340
[24]
M. Fitó, M. Guxens, D. Corella, G. Sáez, R. Estruch, R. De la Torre, PREDIMED Study Investigators, et al.
Effect of a traditional Mediterranean diet on lipoprotein oxidation: a randomized controlled trial.
Arch Intern Med, 167 (2007), pp. 1195-1203
[25]
M. Murie-Fernandez, P. Irimia, E. Toledo, E. Martínez-Vila, P. Buil-Cosiales, M. Serrano-Martínez, PREDIMED Investigators, et al.
Carotid intima-media thickness changes with Mediterranean diet: a randomized trial (PREDIMED-Navarra).
Atherosclerosis, 219 (2011), pp. 158-162
[26]
P. Kris-Etherton, R.H. Eckel, B.V. Howard, S. St Jeor, T.L. Bazzarre, Nutrition Committee Population Science Committee and Clinical Science Committee of the American Heart Association.
AHA Science Advisory: Lyon Diet Heart Study. Benefits of a Mediterranean-style, National Cholesterol Education Program/American Heart Association Step I Dietary Pattern on Cardiovascular Disease.
Circulation, 103 (2001), pp. 1823-1825
[27]
E. Helsing.
Traditional diets and disease patterns of the Mediterranean, circa 1960.
Am J Clin Nutr, 61 (1995), pp. S1329-S1337
[28]
M. Naghavi, P. Libby, E. Falk, S.W. Casscells, S. Litovsky, J. Rumberger, et al.
From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I.
Circulation, 108 (2003), pp. 1664-1672
[29]
G.K. Hansson.
Atherosclerosis—an immune disease: The Anitschkov Lecture 2007.
[30]
H. Hemingway, C. Langenberg, J. Damant, C. Frost, K. Pyorala, E. Barrett-Connor.
Prevalence of angina in women versus men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of International variations across 31 countries.
Circulation, 117 (2008), pp. 1526-1536
[31]
S. Tsimikas, E. Brilakis, E. Miller, J.P. McConnell, R.J. Lennon, K.S. Kornman, et al.
Oxidized phospholipids, lp(a) lipoprotein, and coronary artery disease.
N Engl J Med, 353 (2005), pp. 46-57
[32]
C. Meisinger, J. Baumert, N. Khuseyinova, H. Loewel, W. Koenig.
Plasma oxidized low-density lipoprotein, a strong predictor for acute coronary heart disease events in apparently healthy, middle-aged men from the general population.
Circulation, 112 (2005), pp. 651-657
[33]
M. Grau, M. Guxens, I. Subirana, M. Fitó, M.I. Covas, B. Jacquemin, et al.
South-to-North gradient in lipid peroxidation in men with stable coronary artery disease in Europe.
Eur Heart J, 28 (2007), pp. 2841-2849
[34]
A. Zampelas, H. Roche, J.M.P. Knapper, M. Jackson, M. Tornaritis, C. Hatzis.
Differences in postprandial lipaemic response between Northern and Southern Europeans.
Atherosclerosis, 139 (1998), pp. 83-93
[35]
H. Tolonen, U. Keil, M. Ferrario, A. Evans.
Prevalence, awareness and treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in 32 populations: results from the WHO MONICA Project.
Int J Epidemiol, 34 (2005), pp. 181-192
[36]
K. Kotseva, M. Stagmo, D. De Bacquer, G. De Backer, D. Wood, the EUROASPIRE.
Treatment potential for cholesterol management in patients with coronary heart disease in 15 European countries: findings from the EUROASPIRE II survey.
Atherosclerosis, 197 (2008), pp. 710-717
[37]
K. Kotseva, D. Wood, G. De Backer, D. De Bacquer, K. Pyörälä, U. Keil, EUROASPIRE Study Group.
EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries.
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 16 (2009), pp. 121-137
[38]
F. Alfonso, C. Macaya, J. Goicolea, A. Iñiguez, R. Hernandez, J. Zamorano, et al.
Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary segments in patients with coronary artery disease.
Am Heart J, 127 (1994), pp. 536-544
[39]
F. Alfonso, C. Macaya, J. Goicolea, R. Hernandez, J. Segovia, J. Zamorano, et al.
Determinants of coronary compliance in patients with coronary artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound study.
J Am Coll Cardiol, 23 (1994), pp. 879-884
[40]
C. Caussin, A. Ohanessian, S. Ghostine, L. Jacq, B. Lancelin, G. Dambrin, et al.
Characterization of vulnerable nonstenotic plaque with 16-slice computed tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound.
Am J Cardiol, 94 (2004), pp. 99-104
[41]
X. Iriart, S. Brunot, P. Coste, M. Montaudon, P. Dos-Santos, L. Leroux, et al.
Early characterization of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multidetector computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound.
Eur Radiol, 17 (2007), pp. 2581-2588
[42]
R. Chopard, L. Boussel, P. Motreff, G. Rioufol, A. Tabib, P. Douek, et al.
How reliable are 40MHz IVUS and 64-slice MDCT in characterizing coronary plaque composition? An ex vivo study with histopathological comparison.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 26 (2010), pp. 373-383
[43]
H. Ouldzein, M. Elbaz, J. Roncalli, R. Cagnac, D. Carrié, J. Puel, et al.
Plaque rupture and morphological characteristics of the culprit lesion in acute coronary syndromes without significant angiographic lesion: analysis by intravascular ultrasound.
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris), 61 (2012), pp. 20-26
[44]
K. Pohle, S. Achenbach, B. Macneill, D. Ropers, M. Ferencik, F. Moselewski, et al.
Characterization of non-calcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by multi-detector row CT: comparison to IVUS.
Atherosclerosis, 190 (2007), pp. 174-180
[45]
M. Marwan, M.A. Taher, K. El Meniawy, H. Awadallah, T. Pflederer, A. Schuhbäck, et al.
In vivo CT detection of lipid-rich coronary artery atherosclerotic plaques using quantitative histogram analysis: a head to head comparison with IVUS.
Atherosclerosis, 215 (2011), pp. 110-115
[46]
O. Lazoura, M. Vlychou, K. Vassiou, A. Kelekis, T. Kanavou, P. Thriskos, et al.
128-detector-row computed tomography assessing differences in morphology and distribution of atherosclerotic plaques between patients with and without pre-test probability of significant coronary artery disease.
Eur J Radiol, 77 (2011), pp. 123-130
[47]
G. Pundziute, J.D. Schuijf, J.W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P.K. Vanhoenacker, et al.
Head-to-head comparison of coronary plaque evaluation between multislice computed tomography and intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 1 (2008), pp. 176-182
[48]
G. Pundziute, J.D. Schuijf, J.W. Jukema, I. Decramer, G. Sarno, P.K. Vanhoenacker, et al.
Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: non-invasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ulrasound radiofrequency data analysis.
Eur Heart J, 29 (2008), pp. 2373-2381
[49]
J.E. Van Velzen, J.D. Schuijf, F.R. De Graaf, G. Nucifora, G. Pundziute, J.W. Jukema, et al.
Plaque type and composition as evaluated non-invasively by MSCT angiography and invasively by VH IVUS in relation to the degree of stenosis.
Heart, 95 (2009), pp. 1990-1996
[50]
H. Brodoefel, A. Reimann, M. Heuschmid, I. Tsiflikas, A.F. Kopp, S. Schroeder, et al.
Characterization of coronary atherosclerosis by dual-source computed tomography and HU-based color mapping: a pilot study.
Eur Radiol, 18 (2008), pp. 2466-2474
[51]
T. Pflederer, M. Marwan, T. Schepis, D. Ropers, M. Setmann, G. Muschiol, et al.
Characterization of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes using coronary dual-source CT angiography.
Atherosclerosis, 211 (2010), pp. 437-444
[52]
G. Sarno, P. Vanhoenacker, I. Decramer, J.D. Schuijf, G. Pundziute, P. Margolis, et al.
Characterisation of the “vulnerable” coronary plaque by multi-detector computed tomography: a correlative study with intravascular ultrasound-derived radiofrequency analysis of plaque composition.
EuroIntervention, 4 (2008), pp. 318-323
[53]
S. Schroeder, A. Kuettner, M. Leitritz, J. Janzen, A.F. Kopp, C. Herdeg, et al.
Reliability of differentiating human coronary plaque morphology using contrast-enhanced multislice spiral computed tomography: a comparison with histology.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 28 (2004), pp. 449-454
[54]
J. Novembre, T. Johnson, K. Bryc, Z. Kutalik, A.R. Boyko, A. Auton, et al.
Genes mirror geography within Europe.
Nature, 456 (2008), pp. 98-101
[55]
D.I. Chasman, F. Giulianini, J. MacFadyen, B.J. Barratt, F. Nyberg, P.M. Ridker.
Genetic determinants of statin-induced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction: the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial.
Circ Cardiovasc Genet, 5 (2012), pp. 257-264
[56]
S. Lekakis, A. Synetos, K. Toutouzas, M. Vavuranakis, E. Tsiamis, C. Stefanadis.
Imaging of the vulnerable plaque: Noninvasive and invasive techniques.
Am J Med Sci, 336 (2008), pp. 342-348
[57]
H. Alkadhi, S. Leschka.
Radiation dose of cardiac computed tomography – what has been achieved and what needs to be done.
Eur Radiol, 21 (2011), pp. 505-509
[58]
K. Kato, M. Yasutake, T. Yonetsu, S.J. Kim, L. Xing, C.M. Kratlian, et al.
Intracoronary imaging modalities for vulnerable plaques.
J Nihon Med Sch, 78 (2011), pp. 340-351
[59]
T. Soeda, S. Uenary, Y. Morikawa, K. Ishigami, S. Okayama, S.J. Hee, et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: comparison with intravascular optical coherence tomography.
Int J Cardiol, 148 (2011), pp. 313-318
Copyright © 2012. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.