Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 61. Issue 6.
Pages 654-655 (June 2008)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 61. Issue 6.
Pages 654-655 (June 2008)
Response
DOI: 10.1016/S1885-5857(08)60195-4
Full text access
Response
Respuesta
Visits
...
Surya M Arthama, Hector O Venturaa
a Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

To the Editor:

With great interest, we read Dr Alberto Morales Salinas1 commentsin which he questions the paradoxical association between obesity and prognosis in heart failure.2 Throughout the last decade, numerous cohort studies have been published which detail the so-called "obesity paradox" in the context of both acute and chronic heart failure.3-5. Body mass index (BMI) is not the only conventional cardiovascular (CV) risk factor that has a favorable influence in patients with heart failure, given that high concentrations of low density lipoproteins and total cholesterol, as well as high blood pressure, have also been associated with a survival advantage in heart failure.6-8

We agree with Dr Salinas's ideas and point of view on this controversial topic and recognize the interest of his new hypothesis in as much as most of these studies lack an element of control of the pharmacologic agents used, which could introduce confusion into the final results. We agree that documenting patient height, weight, BMI and kidney function forms part of providing top quality attention and that we need this documentation to avoid dosage errors and unfavorable clinical course.9

This new hypothesis may be more applicable to studies conducted in the acute context—when patients are attended while presenting acute decompensated heart failure or acute coronary syndrome—because this is when medication dosage tends not to be proportionate to weight, height and BMI. However, even in these acute situations, a vast amount of data points to the existence of an inverse relation between obesity and prognosis.3,10,11 In contrast, the opposite occurs in patients with stable coronary disease (CD), or with other chronic conditions—eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), rheumatoid arthritis, and terminal kidney disease (TKD)—and the "obesity paradox" phenomenon, or in older patients, in whom this new hypothesis is less likely to play a role in "reverse epidemiology."12,13

One specific reason that could explain why the "obesity paradox" is observed in such a wide range of diseases —CD, heart failure, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia—could be the more energetic treatment administered to obese patients. In one study of patients with CD, the highest BMI values were associated with better administration of CD treatment according to established guidelines, and led to lower rates of inhospital mortality.14

Many studies document clear evidence of the fact that low weight patients are not the only ones who present a worse prognosis. Moreover, patients with an ideal weight or even slightly overweight have a worse prognosis than those who are slightly obese,4 although many studies have highlighted the fact that prognosis is worse in substantially obese patients than in those who are slightly obese.15 However, Lavie et al5 reported a very good prognosis for patients with intense obesity and those who had a greater quantity of fat—a considerably better prognosis than that of patients with less fat—though it was clear they were far from being considered "cachexic." Logistic regression analysis found the highest percentage of body fat (c2=9.1; P=.002) was the most powerful, independent predictive factor for illness-free survival. In this population, for every 1% absolute increase in percentage body fat we found a >13% reduction in major clinical episodes.5 Various possible explanations exist for the inverse association between BMI and mortality; it is crucial to investigate the differences in pharmacologic agent dosage, secondary effects and tolerability in relation to BMI. This could provide a partial clue to the explanation and, therefore, we think there is a clear need for new clinical studies to clarify fully the mechanism underlying these paradoxical relations, in the hope they lead to new, definitive treatments.

Bibliography
[1]
Morales-Salinas A..
Paradoja de la obesidad o suceptibilidad del bajo peso..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 61 (2008), pp. 653
[2]
Artham SM, Ventura HO..
Insuficiencia cardiaca y la «paradoja de la obesidad»: la historia continúa..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 60 (2007), pp. 1113-7
[3]
Fonarow GC, Srikanthan P, Costanzo MR, ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators..
An obesity paradox in acute heart failure: analysis of body mass index and inhospital mortality for 108.927 patients in the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry..
Am Heart J, 153 (2007), pp. 74-81
[4]
Curtis JP, Selter JG, Wang Y, Rathore SS, Jovin IS, Jadbabaie F, et al..
The obesity paradox: body mass index and outcomes in patients with heart failure..
Arch Intern Med, 165 (2005), pp. 55-61
[5]
Lavie CJ, Osman AF, Milani RV, Mehra MR..
Body composition and prognosis in chronic systolic heart failure: the obesity paradox..
Am J Cardiol, 91 (2003), pp. 891-4
[6]
Horwich TB, Hamilton MA, Maclellan WR, Fonarow GC..
Low serum total cholesterol is associated with marked increase in mortality in advanced heart failure..
J Card Fail, 8 (2002), pp. 216-24
[7]
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Horwich T, Fonarow GC..
Reverse epidemiology of conventional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with chronic heart failure..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 43 (2004), pp. 1439-44
[8]
Uretsky S, Messerli FH, Bangalore S, Champion A, Cooper-Dehoff RM, Zhou Q, et al..
Obesity paradox in patients with hypertension and coronary artery disease..
Am J Med, 120 (2007), pp. 863-70
[9]
Fonarow GC..
The relationship between body mass index and mortality in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure..
Am Heart J, 15 (2007), pp. e21
[10]
Gurm HS, Whitlow PL, Kip KE..
The impact of body mass index on short- and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Insights from the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI)..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 39 (2002), pp. 834-40
[11]
Gruberg L, Weissman NJ, Waksman R, Fuchs S, Deible R, Pinnow EE, et al..
The impact of obesity on the short-term and long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention:the obesity paradox? J Am Coll Cardiol, 39 (2002), pp. 578-84
[12]
Lavie CJ, Mehra MR, Milani RV..
Obesity and heart failure prognosis:paradox or reverse epidemiology? Eur Heart J, 26 (2005), pp. 5-7
[13]
Horwich TB, Fonarow GC..
Reverse epidemiology beyond dialysis patients: chronic heart failure, geriatrics, rheumatoid arthritis, COPD, and AIDS..
[14]
Medical therapies and invasive treatments for coronary artery disease by body mass: the
[15]
Davos CH, Doehner W, Rauchhaus M, Cicoira M, Francis DP, Coats AJ, et al..
Body mass and survival in patients with chronic heart failure without cachexia: the importance of obesity..
J Card Fail, 9 (2003), pp. 29-35
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?