Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 70. Issue 5.
Pages 396-397 (May 2017)
Vol. 70. Issue 5.
Pages 396-397 (May 2017)
Scientific letter
Full text access
The First Experience of Pulmonary Veno-occlusive Disease Treatment With Macitentan and Sildenafil
Experiencia única con macitentán y sildenafilo en el tratamiento de la enfermedad venooclusiva pulmonar
Visits
...
Carlos Israel Chamorro Fernándeza,
Corresponding author
carlosisra75@gmail.com

Corresponding author:
, Pilar Garcés Cabellob, Rosario Pérez Mateosb, Ruth María Sánchez Sorianoa, Carmen Ferrando Siscarc, Carlos Andrés Quezada Loaizad
a Sección de Cardiología, Hospital Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Alicante, Spain
b Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Alicante, Spain
c Sección de Neumología, Hospital Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Alicante, Spain
d Unidad Multidisciplinar de Hipertensión Pulmonar, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table. Prognostic Variables Before and After Treatment With Macitentan and Sildenafil
Full Text
To the Editor,

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare cause of pulmonary arterial hypertension. PVOD shares many characteristics with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, making it very difficult to distinguish between these conditions. Accurate diagnosis is essential because PVOD has a worse prognosis, and treatment with specific vasodilators can trigger acute pulmonary edema. Currently, the only effective treatment is lung transplantation.1

We present the case of a 74-year-old woman who was initially diagnosed with pulmonary arterial hypertension and was treated with macitentan and sildenafil. The patient showed significant improvement with this treatment, even though subsequent diagnosis revealed that she very likely had PVOD.

The patient's medical history included Sjögren syndrome, diagnosed several years previously based on presentation with dry eyes and a positive antinuclear antibody test.

The patient was first admitted in January 2015 with a diagnosis of severe congestive heart and respiratory failure secondary to atrial flutter with a rapid ventricular response. On admission, echocardiography revealed evidence of severe pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction, whereas left cavity dimensions and function were normal (left atrium anteroposterior diameter, 33mm). Symptoms improved substantially with diuretic therapy and reversion to sinus rhythm, and the patient was discharged. She was readmitted 1 month later with similar symptoms, but this time in sinus rhythm. The decision was taken to conduct the battery of diagnostic tests recommended for the study of pulmonary hypertension: abdominal ultrasound, serology for hepatotrophic and human immunodeficiency viruses, respiratory function tests, lung computed tomography with contrast, and ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy.2,3 These tests revealed no major involvement. The study was completed with a right-side catheterization that revealed severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, 7mmHg), with highly elevated pulmonary arterial resistance and severely impaired cardiac output (Table). A nitric oxide vasodilation test conducted during the same catheterization was positive according to current guidelines,2,3 and treatment was therefore commenced with calcium antagonists. The patient showed a good initial response to increasing doses of amlodipine; however, at the end of May she was readmitted with congestive heart failure.

Table.

Prognostic Variables Before and After Treatment With Macitentan and Sildenafil

  WHO-FC  No. admissions  TAPSE  FSRV area  RVEF (MR) 
Before  III  11 mm  7 cm/s  25%   
After  II  22 mm  12 cm/s  47%  47% 
  6MWD  CI  PVR  PAPm  RAP  BNP 
Before  144 m  1.9 L/min/m2  12 WU  36 mmHg  4 mmHg  2791 pg/mL 
After  325 m  3.28 L/min/m2  6.4 WU  42 mmHg  8 mmHg  87 pg/mL 

BNP, brain natriuretic peptide; CI, cardiac index; FSRV area, fractional shortening of right ventricular area; PAPm, mean pulmonary arterial pressure; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; RA, right atrium; RAP, right atrial pressure; RVEF (MR), right ventricular ejection fraction measured by magnetic resonance; S, systolic tricuspid annular velocity measured by Doppler tissue imaging; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; WHO-FC, World Health Organization functional class; WU, Wood units; 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance.

A diagnostic review revealed that the patient had limited systemic sclerosis (calcinosis, telangiectasias, microstomia, Raynaud phenomenon, and positive tests for anti-centromere, anti-sp100, and anti-pM-scl antibodies). The worsening condition was attributed to the nonresponsiveness of patients in this subgroup, and the decision was taken to start treatment with macitentan at 10 mg/d.

The response over the following months was clearly satisfactory, albeit insufficient. In September 2015 sildenafil was added at a dose of 20mg/8h, and a few weeks later the patient was once again admitted with worsening breathlessness and congestive heart failure. A cardiac nuclear magnetic resonance examination showed no signs of left heart disease and indicated acceptable right ventricle function. Repeat right heart catheterization confirmed clear improvement in cardiac output and pulmonary artery resistance (Table). Even after administration of 500mL physiological saline solution, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure remained below 17mmHg at all times, definitively excluding a combination of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

A high-resolution lung computed tomography scan was requested and demonstrated a centrilobular distribution of nodular ground-glass opacities, mediastinal lymphadenopathies of up to 3.8cm diameter, and septal thickening (Figure). In repeat tests, all respiratory functions were normal except for extremely low lung carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) after adjustment for alveolar volume (DLCO/AV 44%) and severe chronic hypoxemia. Together, these findings very strongly suggested that the patient had PVOD associated with systemic sclerosis.

Figure.

High-resolution lung computed tomography. A, Nodular ground-glass opacities with a centrilobular distribution and thickening of interlobular septa. B, Subcarinal mediastinal adenopathy, with a diameter up to 38mm.

(0.23MB).

Today, more than 1 year after symptom onset, the patient is in dyspnea functional class II/IV. Her condition shows no sign of deterioration, her brain natriuretic peptide concentration is normal, her 6-minute walk distance is about 325 m, and her echocardiography-measured right-ventricular function parameters and cavity size are also within the normal range. Her situation is thus stable and satisfactory (Table) and given the risk of complications we have no plans to intensify treatment.

Diagnostic confirmation of PVOD requires histological analysis; however, lung biopsy is contraindicated in most patients. Lung computed tomography is currently considered a major diagnostic tool, and the 3 radiological signs found in our patient together give a specificity of up to 100%.2 In addition, a DLCO below 55% has a specificity of 89.5%, and the diagnosis is further strengthened by the right-side catheterization data and the respiratory failure.

The initiation of specific treatment in PVOD patients carries a recognized risk of acute pulmonary edema. Nonetheless, improvements with these therapies have been documented in small series and individual cases, the vast majority with low dose epoprostenol. To date, only minor and transient improvements have been documented with oral vasodilators,4 and there is only 1 reported positive experience with combined treatment.5 This is thus the first report of a clear improvement with combined oral therapy and a beneficial effect of macitentan in the treatment of PVOD.

References
[1]
D. Montani, L.C. Price, P. Dorfmuller, et al.
Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.
Eur Respir J., 33 (2009), pp. 189-200
[2]
N. Galiè, M. Humbert, J.L. Vachiery, et al.
Guía ESC/ERS 2015 sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión pulmonar.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 69 (2016), pp. 177
[3]
Grupo de Trabajo de la SEC para la guía de la ESC/ERS 2015 sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión pulmonar, revisores expertos para la guía de la ESC/ERS 2015 sobre diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión pulmonar y Comité de Guías de la SEC.
Comentarios a la guía ESC/ERS 2015 sobre el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la hipertensión pulmonar.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 69 (2016), pp. 102-108
[4]
E. Sourla, A. Paspala, A. Boutou, P. Kontou, I. Stanopoulos, G. Pitsiou.
A case of pulmonary veno-occlusive disease: diagnostic dilemmas and therapeutic challenges.
Ther Adv Respir Dis., 7 (2013), pp. 119-123
[5]
T. Kuroda, H. Hirota, M. Masaki, et al.
Sildenafil as adjunct therapy to high-dose epoprostenol in a patient with pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.
Heart Lung Circ., 15 (2006), pp. 139-142
Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?