Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 75. Issue 10.
Pages 847-848 (October 2022)
Not available
Vol. 75. Issue 10.
Pages 847-848 (October 2022)
Scientific letter
Full text access
Which patients could benefit from the use of bempedoic acid in clinical practice?
¿Qué pacientes pueden beneficiarse del ácido bempedoico en la práctica clínica?
Vivencio Barriosa,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author:
, Carlos Escobarb
a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Full Text
To the Editor,

Control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is essential for reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications. Unfortunately, most patients, especially those at high risk (eg, patients with ischemic heart disease), have insufficiently controlled lipid levels.1,2 Although one of the main reasons for nonachievement of LDL-C goals is insufficient use of lipid-lowering treatments, with data showing very low prescribing rates for combination therapy (high-intensity statins and ezetimibe) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors,1,2 data from the DA VINCI study indicates that a significant proportion of patients on optimal lipid-lowering therapy do not achieve their goals.2 New drugs are thus needed for clinical practice settings. Bempedoic acid is a new, first-in-class, oral lipid-lowering drug that reduces intracellular cholesterol by inhibiting adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase, an enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway.3 Determining how many patients might benefit from the addition of bempedoic acid in clinical practice is important. A recent publication providing practical guidance on the use of bempedoic acid according to cardiovascular risk in patients with dyslipidemia offers useful insights into which patients stand to benefit most.3

To estimate the proportion of patients who could derive the greatest benefit from treatment with bempedoic acid, a Spanish study analyzed LDL-C control levels in patients 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome. The patients (n = 6364) were from 20 cardiology departments at secondary and tertiary care hospitals in Spain. (Informed consent was not required as the data were population-based.) The patients had a mean age of 73.3±10.6 years and 61.5% were men. LDL-C levels were >70mg/dL (the target cutoff at the time) in 44.1% of patients and >100mg/dL in 16.1% (28% had a level between 70 and 100mg/dL).4 The lipid-lowering treatments being used in the subgroup of patients with LDL-C >70mg/dL 12 months after the acute coronary syndrome are summarized in table 1.

Table 1.

Lipid-lowering treatments in patients with LDL-C >70mg/dL 12 months after an acute coronary syndrome

  Patients with LDL-C >70mg/dL (n=2806, 44.1%)  All patients (n=6364, 100%) 
No statins  396 (14.12)  396 (6.2) 
High-intensity statins  1372 (48.9)  1372 (21.6) 
High-intensity statins + ezetimibe  1036 (36.9)  1036 (16.3) 
High-intensity statins + PCSK9 inhibitors  1 (0.04)  1 (0.01) 
High-intensity statins + ezetimibe + PCSK9 inhibitors  1 (0.04)  1 (0.01) 

LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.

Data are shown as No. (%) of patients.

According to therapeutic positioning reports published by the Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices (AEMPS), PCSK9 inhibitors are funded by the public health care system when used in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL-C >100mg/dL.5 Accordingly, and even though bempedoic acid can be combined with PCSK9 inhibitors to improve LDL-C control,3 the subgroup of patients who would derive the greatest benefit from bempedoic acid treatment would be those with an LDL-C level above recommended targets (>70mg/dL in our study) but below 100mg/dL.4 Our results show that much remains to be done to optimize lipid-lowering therapy, and we believe that bempedoic acid can contribute to LDL-C goal attainment. Combination therapy with ezetimibe and bempedoic acid might be particularly beneficial in patients not taking statins because of intolerability issues (6% of all patients), with estimates showing an overall reduction of 38% in LDL-C.3 Addition of bempedoic acid to high-intensity statins plus ezetimibe (used in 16% of all patients) could result in an additional 7% reduction (and an overall reduction of 72% from baseline).3Finally, patients on high-intensity statins (22%) would stand to benefit from an additional reduction of 15% if also treated with bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe could be added in certain cases.

Our results show that a significant proportion of patients could benefit from bempedoic acid. Considering that stricter LDL-C goals have now been introduced, the potential reductions are even higher (in the DA VINCI study, LDL-C goal attainment decreased from 45% to 22% in secondary prevention patients).2 Because bempedoic acid is a prodrug that requires activation by long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase 1, which is expressed in the liver but not the muscles, it carries a lower risk of adverse muscle effects and may therefore provide added value as a long-term treatment due to better tolerability.3 While the ongoing CLEAR Outcomes study will clarify the effects of bempedoic acid on cardiovascular events, analysis of secondary outcomes from other studies suggests that this drug is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular complications and new-onset diabetes.6

In brief, bempedoic acid is a new class of agent that will undoubtedly contribute to improved lipid control, especially in patients at higher cardiovascular risk.


No funding was received.

Authors’ Contributions

V. Barrios and C. Escobar analyzed the data and wrote and approved this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

V. Barrios has received consultancy and/or speaker fees from MSD, Amgen, Mylan, Sanofi, Almirall, Recordati, Rovi, Pfizer, and Esteve. C. Escobar had received consultancy and/or speaking fees from MSD, Amgen, Mylan, Sanofi, Almirall, Recordati, and Esteve.

V. Barrios, J. Soronen, A.M. Carter, A. Anastassopoulou.
Lipid management across Europe in the real-world setting: a rapid evidence review.
Curr Med Res Opin., 37 (2021), pp. 2049-2059
K.K. Ray, B. Molemans, W.M. Schoonen, et al.
EU-wide cross-sectional observational study of lipid-modifying therapy use in secondary and primary care: the DA VINCI study.
Eur J Prev Cardiol., 28 (2021), pp. 1279-1289
C. Escobar, V. Barrios, A. Ariza, R. Campuzano, J.M. Gámez, J.M. Mostaza.
Empleo del ácido bempedoico en los pacientes con dislipemia. Una aproximación práctica.
Rev Esp Cardiol Supl., 21 (2021), pp. 1-7
M. Anguita Sánchez, J.J. Gómez Doblas, V. Barrios Alonso.
Grado de control del cLDL tras un síndrome coronario agudo en España. ¿Se utilizan adecuadamente los recursos terapéuticos existentes?.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 74 (2021), pp. 194-196
V. Barrios, C. Escobar, V. Arrarte, et al.
Análisis del proceso de prescripción de inhibidores PCSK9 en los servicios de cardiología de los hospitales españoles y propuesta de optimización. Estudio IKIGAI.
Clin Investig Arterioscler., 33 (2021), pp. 296-305
X. Wang, Y. Zhang, H. Tan, et al.
Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for prevention of cardiovascular events and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cardiovasc Diabetol., 19 (2020), pp. 128
Copyright © 2022. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?