Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 69. Issue 3.
Pages 356 (March 2016)
Letter to the Editor
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.11.016
Full text access
Degree of Anticoagulation Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation in Spain: Need to Minimize Biases and Contextualize Results. Response by Anguita Sánchez et al.
Grado de control de la anticoagulación en pacientes con fibrilación auricular en España: necesidad de minimizar sesgos y contextualizar resultados. Respuesta de Anguita Sánchez et al.
Manuel Anguita Sáncheza,b,?
Corresponding author
, Vicente Bertomeu Martíneza,c, Angel Cequier Fillata,d, on behalf of the investigators of the CALIFA study
a Agencia de Investigación, Sociedad Española de Cardiología, Madrid, Spain
b Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
c Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario San Juan, San Juan de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
d Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2016;69:35510.1016/j.rec.2015.11.007
Eva Rocío Alfaro-Lara, Raúl García-Estepa, Teresa Molina-López
This item has received
(Daily data update)
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Full Text
To the Editor,

We have carefully read the comments of Alfaro-Lara et al. on the results of our study CALIFA,1 as well as on those of the PAULA2 and ANFAGAL3 studies. These studies provided information on the quality of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists in Spain and in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the “real-life” setting. The 3 studies agreed that about 40% to 50% of these patients had a time in therapeutic range (TTR) < 65% in the 6 to 12 months prior to the analysis, that is, that they lacked adequate anticoagulation. This datum would be even worse if the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology were being followed, which establishes a TTR > 70% as a criterion of good control with vitamin K antagonists.4 These results are in accordance with those of another Spanish study also published in 2015, the FANTASIIA study.5 This study found an even higher percentage (54%) of “poorly” anticoagulated patients (TTR < 65% by the Rosendaal method).

Alfaro-Lara et al. point out that these studies, with the exception of ANFAGAL (which largely randomly selected patients and investigators), may provide biased estimates due to the nonrandomized selection of investigators and the consecutive, nonrandomized, inclusion of the patients; we agree with this comment and discussed this aspect as a limitation in our study. However, most real-life registries of various diseases share this or a similar bias, without diminishing their results. Their veracity is particularly evident when the results are consistent across all studies, as is the case here, with similar results obtained in an even more methodologically correct study such as ANFAGAL. Alfaro-Lara et al. also note that the TTR (TTR percentage) of these studies (69% and 63.8% by the Rosendaal method) are similar to or even better than those found in other countries, with which we agree. However, they are always inferior to those of Australian and Northern European studies, where the TTR exceeds 70%,6 as in some Spanish centers.7 In the latter study, conducted in Murcia, Spain, the TTR reached 79.7% in patients with a SAMe-TT2R2 score of 0 and even reached 72.3% in patients with a SAMe-TT2R2 score of 5. These findings indicate that vitamin K antagonists can achieve better quality anticoagulation than usually obtained. Moreover, to us, it seems more important that the simple TTR value—the percentage of patients with a low TTR (< 65%)—lies between 40% and 54% in these 3 Spanish registries. It also seems arbitrary to argue, as Alfaro-Lara et al. have done, that the TTRs are better if an INR (International Normalized Ratio) range between 1.8 and 3.2 is considered adequate. And why not consider a range between 1.7 and 3.5 to be “adequate”? We believe that we should be strict and adhere to the recommendations of the clinical practice guidelines, which define an INR between 2 and 3 to be appropriate, and even believe that the TTR of a patient should be increased to>70% to be considered adequate. Unfortunately, even with the above qualifications, we believe that our conclusion—that patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who receive vitamin K antagonists in Spain are poorly controlled—is sound.

M. Anguita, V. Bertomeu, A. Cequier, Investigadores del estudio CALIFA.
Calidad de la anticoagulación con antagonistas de la vitamina K en España: prevalencia de mal control y factores asociados.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 68 (2015), pp. 761-768
V. Barrios, C. Escobar, L. Prieto, G. Osorio, J. Polo, J.M. Lobos, et al.
Control de la anticoagulación en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular asistidos en atención primaria en España. Estudio PAULA.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 68 (2015), pp. 769-776
S. Cinza-Sanjurjo, D. Rey-Aldana, E. Gestal-Pereira, C. Calvo-Gómez.
Evaluación del grado de anticoagulación de pacientes con fibrilación auricular en el ámbito de atención primaria de Galicia. Estudio ANFAGAL.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 68 (2015), pp. 753-760
R. de Caterina, S. Husted, L. Wallentin, F. Andreotti, H. Arnesen, F. Bachmann, et al.
Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: current status and perspectives (section III). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis.
Thromb Haemost., 110 (2013), pp. 1087-1107
V. Bertomeu-González, M. Anguita, J. Moreno-Arribas, A. Cequier, J. Muñiz, J. Castillo-Castillo, FANTASIIA Study Investigators, et al.
Quality of anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists.
Clin Cardiol., 38 (2015), pp. 357-364
H.G.C. van Spall, L. Wallentin, S. Yusuf, J.W. Eikelboom, R. Nieuwlaat, S. Yang, et al.
Variation in warfarin dose adjustment practice is responsible for differences in the quality of anticoagulation control between centers and countries: an analysis of patients receiving warfarin in the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy (RE-LY) trial.
Circulation., 126 (2012), pp. 2309-2316
P. Gallego, V. Roldán, F. Marín, J. Gálvez, M. Valdés, V. Vicente, et al.
SAMe-TT2R2 score, time in therapeutic range and outcomes in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation.
Am J Med., 127 (2014), pp. 1083-1088
Copyright © 2015. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.