Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 58. Issue 8.
Pages 934-940 (August 2005)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 58. Issue 8.
Pages 934-940 (August 2005)
DOI: 10.1016/S1885-5857(06)60376-9
Full text access
Effect of Maximum Dose of Atorvastatin on Inflammation, Thrombogenesis and Fibrinolysisin High-Risk Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease
Efecto de dosis máximas de atorvastatina en la inflamación, la trombogénesis y la función fibrinolítica en pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica de alto riesgo
Visits
9080
Antonio Telloa, Francisco Marína, Vanessa Roldánb, Ana García-Herolac, Sofía Lorenzod, Vicente E Climenta, Luis de Teresac, Francisco Sogorba
a Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
b Unidad de Hematología, Hospital de San Vicente, Alicante, Spain.
c Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital de San Vicente, Alicante, Spain.
d Servicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
This item has received
9080
Visits
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (5)
TABLE 1. Clinical Characteristics, Lipid Profile, and Biological Markers of Treated Patients and Healthy Controls*
Figure 1. Correlation between F1+2 and HDL-C levels (Spearman, r=­0.52; P=.007; n=27 patients). HDL-C indicates high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; F1+2, prothrombin fragment 1+2.
TABLE 2. Multivariate Analysis by Linear Regression of Variables Associated with C-Reactive Protein Levels (r2=0.245; P=.001)*
TABLE 3. Lipid Profile and Biological Markers of the Patients When Treated with 40 mg of Atorvastatin and 3 Months After Dose Increase to 80 mg (n=24)*
Figure 2. Correlation between the decrease in F1+2 levels and total cholesterol (Spearman, r=0.46; P=.023; n=24 patients). The percentage reduction is expressed in percentage per 1.00 F1+2 indicates prothrombin fragment 1+2.
Show moreShow less
Introduction and objectives. It has been suggestedthat high doses of statins can be more effective in reducing the incidence of new cardiovascular events than con-ventional doses. The present study analyzed the effect ofincreasing the atorvastatin dose to 80 mg/day on indicesof inflammation (C-reactive protein or CRP), thrombogenesis (prothrombin fragment [F 1+2]) and fibrinolysis (tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen, t-PA, and its inhibitor PAI-1) in high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease. Patients and method. We studied 27 patients withhigh-risk coronary heart disease who had lipid levels above those recommended despite treatment with atorvastatin at 40 mg/day. At baseline, patients were compared with 21 normocholesterolemic subjects without arteriosclerotic disease. Twenty-four patients were reevaluated 3months after the atorvastatin dose was increased to 80 mg/day. Results.The CRP, F 1+2, t-PA and PAI-1 levels weresignificantly higher in patients than control subjects (all P<.05). After the atorvastatin dose was increased, significant reductions in CRP, F 1+2, and PAI-1 levels were ob-served ( P<.05). There was a significant positive correla-tion between the reduction in cholesterol level and that in F 1+2 ( r=0.43; P=.023). No other significant correlationswere found. Conclusions. In a group of patient with high-risk heartdisease and elevated lipid levels, increasing the atorvastatin dose led to significant improvements in inflammatory, thrombogenic, and hypofibrinolytic states.
Keywords:
Hypercholesterolemia
C-reactive protein
Fibrinolysis
Thrombosis
Introducción y objetivos. Se ha indicado que la utilización de dosis altas de estatinas podría reducir la aparición de nuevos eventos cardiovasculares en comparación con las dosis convencionales. Nuestro objetivo fue estudiar el efecto del incremento de la dosis de atorvastatina (80 mg/día) en diferentes marcadores del sistema inflamatorio (proteína C reactiva [PCR]), hemostático (fragmento F 1+2 de la protrombina [F 1+2]) y fibrinolítico(activador tisular del plasminógeno antigénico [t-PA] y suinhibidor [PAI-1]). Pacientes y método. Se estudió a 27 pacientes concardiopatía isquémica de alto riesgo que presentaban cifras lipídicas superiores a las recomendadas a pesar del tratamiento con 40 mg/día de atorvastatina. Se compararon con 21 sujetos normocolesterolémicos sin enfermedad arteriosclerótica conocida. Se revaluó a 24 pacientesa los 3 meses del incremento de la dosis. Resultados. Los pacientes presentaron cifras elevadas de PCR, F 1+2, t-PA, y PAI-1 en comparación con el grupo control (en todos, las variables tuvieron un valor de p <0,05). Tras incrementar la dosis de atorvastatina se ob-servó una reducción de las cifras de PCR, F 1+2 y PAI-1 (p< 0,05). Se observó una correlación positiva entre losporcentajes de reducción de colesterol y del F 1+2 (r =0,46; p = 0,023), sin que se hallara otra correlación significativa entre los demás parámetros. Conclusiones. Al incrementar las dosis de atorvastatina a 80 mg/día se consigue una reducción de los estadosinflamatorios, trombógenicos e hipofibrinolíticos en un grupo de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica de altoriesgo y cifras elevadas de lípidos a pesar del tratamientocon dosis de 40 mg/día de atorvastatina.
Palabras clave:
Hipercolesterolemia
Proteína C reactiva
Fibrinólisis
Trombosis
Full Text

INTRODUCTION

The use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in the treatment of dyslipidemia has been shown to improve survival and significantly reduce the appearance of cardiac events, both in primary and secondary prevention.1-5 Given these clinical findings, there are clear guidelines on control of lipid levels with statins,6 but their beneficial effects seem to go beyond lowering cholesterol. Statins also have so-called pleiotropic effects, which improve endothelial function, reduce inflammation, enhance angiogenesis and vasculogenesis, limit oxidative processes, stabilize atherosclerotic plaques, and inhibit the thrombogenic response.7,8

Arteriosclerotic disease has been redefined as a chronic inflammatory disease in which other abnormalities besides lipid deposition occur. These abnormalities range from endothelial cell dysfunction to the formation of plaques and, above all, loss of plaque stability, which may ultimately lead to an acute coronary syndrome.9,10 Evidence of a close relationship between the hemostatic and inflammatory systems is mounting.11

Use of high doses of statins has recently been suggested to help reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and so further limit the appearance of cardiovascular events.12-14 However, apart from the benefit derived by reducing inflammation,15 little information is available on the pleiotropic effects of high doses of statins.

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of an increase in dose of atorvastatin to 80 mg/day on inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP]), thrombogenesis (prothrombin fragment 1+2 [F1+2]), and fibrinolysis (tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen, t-PA, and its inhibitor [PAI-1]) in high-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Patients

A total of 27 high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease from the Secondary Prevention Clinic of the Hospital General Universitario in Alicante, Spain, were included. Patients were enrolled if they met any of the following inclusion criteria: a) diffuse coronary artery disease (2 or more diseased vessels) with coronary bypass surgery ruled out because of poor state of the distal beds; b) exercise-limiting angina after bypass surgery; or c) premature coronary artery disease (age ≤45 years) with 3 or more cardiovascular risk factors, in particular, patients who still smoked.14,16 In addition, all patients had lipid levels above recommended values (LDL-C≤100 mg/dL)6 despite treatment with atorvastatin at doses of 40 mg/day. Lipid-lowering treatment had not been altered in any of the patients in the 3 months prior to inclusion in the study and patients had also been insistently advised to follow a low-fat diet.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: a) hemodynamic instability or deterioration in functional class in the last 3 months; b) acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization in the year before the study; c) chronic or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; d) valve disease of at least moderate severity; e) renal or hepatic impairment; f) neoplastic or inflammatory disease; g) thyroid dysfunction; and h) anticoagulant treatment.

Patients were examined on study entry and 3 months after increasing the atorvastatin dose to 80 mg/day. In all cases, close clinical and analytical monitoring was done (with particular attention paid to aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and creatine kinase levels at 4 and 12 weeks after increasing the atorvastatin dose).

Liver enzymes 3 times greater than the upper limit of normal of our laboratory were considered as an adverse drug reaction. Creatinine kinase levels greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal were also considered as an adverse drug reaction if accompanied by myalgia. Patients with such reactions were withdrawn from the study. Any patient could voluntarily withdraw from the study at any time.

The control group comprised 21 age- and sex-matched subjects with normal cholesterol levels and no known arteriosclerotic disease. All patients and control patients were informed of the aims of the study and signed the informed consent before entering the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board/Independent Ethics Committee of the Hospital General Universitario in Alicante, Spain, and was designed in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Analysis of Blood Samples

Blood samples were taken first thing in the morning after 12 hours of fasting and after the patient had been resting for at least 20 minutes. The samples were taken by qualified personnel without causing bruising or ectasia. Citrated plasma was obtained with syringes prefilled with trisodium citrate to give a final concentration of 0.011 mol/L. Serum was also obtained. The plasma and serum were centrifuged at 4ºC and 2200 g for 15 minutes and stored at -­80°C until subsequent processing.

Serum samples were analyzed for total cholesterol, LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides with a colorimetric enzymatic method (Hitachi® 917). Serum CRP was quantitated by kinetic nephelometry with an immunochemical system (IMMAGE®, Beckman).

Prothrombin fragment 1+2 was measured in citrated plasma as a marker of thrombogenesis by ELISA (Dade Behring®). Fibrinolysis was assessed by measuring t-PA and PAI-1 antigen levels in citrated plasma by ELISA (American Diagnostica®).

Statistical Analysis

Variables were analyzed for a normal distribution with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed variables were presented as means (SD). Variables that did not follow a normal distribution were expressed as medians (interquartile range) and were log-transformed prior to statistical analysis. Qualitative variables were expressed as percentages. The χ² test was used for analysis of the association between qualitative variables, whereas the Student t test was used for the analysis of the association between a qualitative variable and another quantitative one. The Student t test was also used for analysis of paired variables. For analysis of the correlation between 2 quantitative variables, the Pearson test was used. A multivariate analysis with a linear regression model (Enter technique) was used to study the influence of possible confounding variables and independent variables on the quantitative study variables. The statistical analyses were done using the SPSS program, version 11.0. A statistically significant association was defined as when the level of significance was greater than 95%.

RESULTS

The clinical characteristics of the treated patients and control patients, as well as the lipid profile at the time of inclusion in the study, are shown in Table 1.

The high-risk group of patients had higher levels of CRP and F1+2, as well as higher t-PA and PAI-1 antigen levels, compared to the control group (Table 1). A significant inverse correlation was observed between F1+2 and HDL-C levels (r=-­0.52; P=.007) (Figure 1). In contrast, CRP levels did not correlate with the remaining variables analyzed (age, lipid profile, and t-PA and PAI-1 antigen levels).

Figure 1. Correlation between F1+2 and HDL-C levels (Spearman, r=­0.52; P=.007; n=27 patients). HDL-C indicates high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; F1+2, prothrombin fragment 1+2.

In the linear regression analysis, significant association was only found between CRP levels and age and hypertension (r²=0.245; P=.001) (Table 2). No other association was found with the remaining variables (markers studied with sex, age, and cardiovascular risk factors).

Increase in Atorvastatin Dose

Two patients withdrew voluntarily from the study after increasing the atorvastatin dose and 1 patient had no samples at 3 months. Follow-up was therefore completed in a total of 24 patients. No patients presented with cardiovascular events during the course of the study. Treatment was well tolerated by all patients and no adverse drug reactions occurred during the 3 months of follow-up. The pharmacological treatment of the patients remained unchanged during the study and no significant change in blood pressure or weight of the patients was found.

The results of the measurements at 3 months are shown in Table 3. A significant reduction in cholesterol and LDL-C levels were observed, although only 7 patients (37.5%) attained the recommended treatment goals for LDL-C.6 The concentration of HDL-C did not change significantly.

After increasing the dose of atorvastatin, a decrease in CRP levels was detected among treated patients. An improvement in the remaining biological markers was also observed--thrombogenesis was reduced in our patients and fibrinolytic function improved, with a decrease in PAI-1 antigen levels close to the level of significance of t-PA antigen levels (P=.056). A significant correlation was also observed between the decrease in cholesterol levels and the decrease in F1+2 levels (r=0.46; P=.023) (Figure 2). No correlation with the decrease in CRP levels or with the change in the lipid profile was observed.

Figure 2. Correlation between the decrease in F1+2 levels and total cholesterol (Spearman, r=0.46; P=.023; n=24 patients). The percentage reduction is expressed in percentage per 1.00 F1+2 indicates prothrombin fragment 1+2.

DISCUSSION

According to the present study of high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease and lipid levels above recommended values, inflammatory processes are present and thrombogenesis and fibrinolytic dysfunction are increased, despite treatment with 40 mg/day of atorvastatin. It should be emphasized that treatment with 40 mg/day of atorvastatin had been unable to lower lipid levels to recommended target values at the start of the study. After increasing the dose to 80 mg/day, significant improvement was seen, both in the lipid profile and in the state of inflammation, hypercoagulation, and hypofibrinolysis. However, only a third of our patients attained the treatment goals recommended for LDL-C, possibly because of the inclusion criteria applied. Treatment was very well tolerated by all patients, and no adverse reaction was reported.

Interest in the pleiotropic properties of statins has been growing in recent years. The most studied of these properties is probably the effect on the inflammatory system and significant decreases in CPR levels have been shown.17-19 This marker is a consistent independent predictor of future cardiovascular events.20,21 Interestingly, the reduction in risk of cardiovascular events in patients treated with statins is greater in groups of patients with higher CRP levels at the start of the study compared to subgroups of patients with lower levels. We also observed that high-risk patients maintained high CRP levels despite treatment with statins at normal doses. A significant reduction was obtained after increasing the dose. In our study and in previous ones,17-19 CRP levels decreased regardless of changes in the lipid profile.

The hemostatic system is also related to the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis and the triggering of cardiovascular events.22 The polypeptide, F1+2, is derived from prothrombin during conversion to thrombin. Therefore, F1+2 is produced at the end of the process of thrombin formation and, as a result, is a sensitive marker of activation of the thrombin system and of thrombus formation. We observed a significant decrease in the levels of this marker after increasing the atorvastatin dose as far as permissible. The inhibition of the increase in thrombin formation mediated by statins is another effect that has been widely reported in previous studies.23-25 It is interesting to note that this effect seems to be due to the decrease in lipid levels rather than direct action on the hemostatic system. In fact, gemfibrozil, which belongs to another class of lipid-lowering drugs, has also shown such effects, decreasing F1+2 in hyperlipidemic patients when the lipid levels return to normal.26 In agreement with these studies, we also found a significant but weak correlation between the decrease in cholesterol levels and F1+2 level. The elevated levels of this marker of thrombin formation might be explained by higher than recommended lipid levels, despite treatment with standard doses of atorvastatin.

The fibrinolytic system plays a fundamental role in the development of intravascular thrombosis. Fibrinolytic dysfunction has been demonstrated both in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors, in particular, dyslipidemia and hypertension,27,28 and in patients with acute coronary syndrome.29 Analysis of t-PA antigen levels determines the amount of functionally active t-PA and t-PA complexes bound to PAI-1. Slow clearance of these complexes means that t-PA antigen levels are elevated when fibrinolytic dysfunction is present.30 On the other hand, t-PA and PAI-1 could even be considered as markers of endothelial damage, given that endothelial cells release both these substances. Several studies have suggested that statins cause an improvement in fibrinolytic function31-33; however, low or medium doses were almost always used (only occasionally have studies reached a dose of 40 mg/day). In the present study, we found that doses of 80 mg/day of atorvastatin decrease PAI-1 and t -PA antigen levels, which is indicative of an improvement in fibrinolytic function. This reduction did not correlate with lipid levels or with the decrease in lipid levels, and so the two effects appear to be independent, in agreement with most of the studies that have been published.

Aggressive treatment with statins is more effective for controlling lipid levels and can also prevent future ischemic events.5,12-14,34 New studies published recently have suggested that a stricter control of lipid levels is important.35,36 Current therapeutic goals might even have to be revised37 and it might be necessary to consider using statins at high doses. Moreover, some authors have suggested not only changing treatment goals but also basing them on CRP levels38,39 and not just on the lipid profile. Such an approach would be a confirmation of previous findings.17 On the other hand, evidence for the class effect of statins could be based on their differences rather than their ability to decrease CRP levels.38 Our study and others have shown that statin therapy at these doses has pleiotropic effects,15,40 providing further support for beneficial effects of these drugs in addition to their lipid-lowering properties.41,42

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with atorvastatin at a dose of 80 mg reduces inflammation and thrombin formation, and improves fibrinolytic function compared to the 40 mg dose in high-risk patients with ischemic heart disease. This treatment regimen also improves the lipid profile and is well tolerated.




Correspondence: Dr. F. Marín.
Servicio de Cardiología. Hospital General Universitario de Alicante.
Pintor Baeza, s/n. 03002 Alicante. España.
E-mail: fcomarino@hotmail.com

Bibliography
[1]
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group..
Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)..
Lancet, 344 (1994), pp. 1383-9
[2]
Shepherd J, Cobe SM, Ford I, Isles CJ, Lorimer AR, Mcfarlane PW, et al..
Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group..
N Engl J Med, 333 (1995), pp. 1301-7
[3]
Sacks FM, Pfeffer MA, Moye LA, Rouleau JL, Rutherford JD, Cole TG, et al..
The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators..
N Engl J Med, 335 (1996), pp. 1001-9
[4]
Downs GR, Clearfield M, Weiss S, Whithney E, Shaphiro DR, Beere PA, et al..
Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels. Results of AFCAPS/TEXCAPS..
JAMA, 279 (1998), pp. 1615-22
[5]
MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20.5..
536 high-risk individuals: a randomized placebo controlled trial..
[6]
Executive summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detectio.n, evaluatio.n, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)..
JAMA, 285 (2001), pp. 2486-97
[7]
Takemoto M, Liao JK..
Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors..
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 21 (2001), pp. 1712-9
[8]
McFarlane SI, Muniyappa R, Francisco R, Sowers JR..
Pleiotropic effectes of statins: Lipid reduction and beyond..
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 87 (2002), pp. 1451-8
[9]
Ross R..
Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease..
N Engl J Med, 340 (1999), pp. 115-26
[10]
Angiolillo DJ, Biasucci LM, Liuzzo G, Crea F..
La inflamación en los síndromes coronarios agudos: mecanismos e implicaciones clínicas..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 57 (2004), pp. 433-46
[11]
Levi M, van der Poll T, Büller HR..
Bidirectional relation between inflammation and coagulation..
Circulation, 109 (2004), pp. 2698-704
[12]
Schwartz GG, Olsson Ag, Ezekowitz MD, Ganz P, Oliver MF, Waters D, et al..
Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized contolled trial..
JAMA, 285 (2001), pp. 1711-8
[13]
Serruys PWJ.C, de Feyter P, Macaya C, Kokott N, Puel J, Vrolix M, et al..
The Lescol(R) Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the long-term effects of fluvastatin after successful transcatheter therapy in patients with coronary heart disease..
JAMA, 287 (2002), pp. 3215-22
[14]
Colivicchi F, Guido V, Tubaro M, Ammirati F, Montefoschi N, Varveri A, et al..
Effects of atorvastatin 80 mg daily early after onset of unstable angina pectoris or non-Q wave myocardial infarction..
Am J Cardiol, 90 (2002), pp. 872-4
[15]
Kinlay S, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, Rifai N, Sasiela WJ, Szarek M, et al..
Effect of atorvastatin on risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome associated with high soluble CD40 ligand in the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) Study..
[16]
Serrano M, Madoz E, Ezpeleta I, San Julián B, Amézqueta C, Pérez Marco JA, et al..
Abandono del tabaco y riesgo de nuevo infarto en pacientes coronarios: estudio de casos y controles anidado..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 56 (2003), pp. 436-7
[17]
Ridker PM, Rifai N, Clearfield M, Downs JR, Weis SE, Miles JS, et al..
Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statins therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events..
N Engl J Med, 344 (2001), pp. 1959-65
[18]
Albert MA, Danielson E, Rifai N, Ridker PM, PRINCE investigators..
Effect of statin therapy on C-reactive protein levels: the pravastatin inflammation/CRP evaluation (PRINCE): a randomized trial and cohort study..
JAMA, 286 (2001), pp. 64-70
[19]
Gonzálvez M, Ruiz Ros JA, Pérez Paredes M, Lozano ML, Jiménez DM, Martínez Corbalán F, et al..
Efecto de la administración precoz de pravastatina en los valores de proteína C reactiva y de interleucina 6 en la fase aguda del infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 57 (2004), pp. 916-23
[20]
Ridker PM..
Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardiovascular disease detection and prevention..
Circulation, 107 (2003), pp. 363-9
[21]
Bodí V, Sanchís J, Llácer A, Facila L, Nuñez J, Pellicer M, et al..
Valor independiente de la proteína C reactiva para predecir acontecimientos mayores al primer mes y al año en los síndromes coronarios agudos sin elevación del ST..
Med Clin (Barc), 122 (2004), pp. 248-52
[22]
Lee KW, Lip GYH..
Acute coronary syndromes: Virchow's triad revisited..
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 14 (2003), pp. 605-25
[23]
diGarbo V, Cordova R, Avellone G..
Increased thrombin formation and complement activation in patients with type IIA hyperlipoproteinemia: effects of simvastatin treatment..
Curr Therapeut Res, 58 (1997), pp. 706-23
[24]
Szczeklik A, Musial J, Undas A, Gajewski P, Góra P, Swadzba J, et al..
Inhibition of thrombin generation by simvastatin and lack of additive effects of aspirin in patients with marked hypercholesterolemia..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 33 (1999), pp. 1286-93
[25]
Joukhadar C, Klein N, Prinz M, Schrolnberger C, Vukovich T, Wolzt M, et al..
Similar effects of atorvastatin, simvastatin and pravastatin on thrombogenic and inflammatory parameters in patients with hypercholesterolemia..
Thromb Haemost, 85 (2000), pp. 47-51
[26]
Colli S, Eligini S, Lalli M, Camera M, Paoletti R, Tremoli E..
Vastatins inhibit tissue factor in cultured human macrophages. A novel mechanism of protection against atherothrombosis..
Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol, 17 (1997), pp. 265-72
[27]
Jansson JH, Johansson B, Boman K, Nilsson TK..
Hypofibrinolysis in patients with hypertension and elevated cholesterol..
J Intern Med, 229 (1991), pp. 309-16
[28]
Poli K, Tofler GH, Larson MG, Evans JC, Sutherland PA, Lipinska I, et al..
Association of blood pressure and fibrinolytic potential in the Framingham Offspring Study..
Circulation, 101 (2000), pp. 264-9
[29]
Thompson SG, Kienast J, Pyke SD.M, Haverkate F, van der Loo JCW..
Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris..
N Engl J Med, 332 (1995), pp. 635-41
[30]
Marín F, Roldán V, Lip GYH..
Fibrinolytic function in atrial fibrillation..
Thromb Res, 109 (2003), pp. 233-40
[31]
Dangas G, Badimon JJ, Smith DA, Unger AH, Levine D, Shao JH, et al..
Pravastatin therapy in hyperlipidemia: effects on thrombus formation and systemic hemostatic profile..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 33 (1999), pp. 1294-304
[32]
Tekin A, Tekin G, Güzelsoy D, Kaya A, Gürel ÇV, Yigit Z, et al..
Effects of Atorvastatin (10 mg) on hemostatic and inflammatory parameters in hyperlipemic patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease..
Am J Cardiol, 93 (2004), pp. 206-9
[33]
Bruni F, Pasqui AL, Pastorelli M, Bova G, di Renzo M, Cercigani M, et al..
Effect of atorvastatin on different fibrinolysis mechanisms in hypercholesterolemic subjects..
Int J Cardiol, 95 (2004), pp. 269-74
[34]
Kent SM, Taylor AJ..
Usefulness of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to < 70 mg/dL and usefulness of C-reactive protein in patient selection..
Am J Cardiol, 92 (2003), pp. 1224-7
[35]
Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, Brown BG, Ganz P, Vogel RA..
Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis. A randomised controlled trial..
JAMA, 291 (2004), pp. 1071-80
[36]
Cannon CP, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Rader DJ, Rouleau JL, Belder R, et al..
Pravastatin or atorvastatin evaluation and infection therapy-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 22 investigators. Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes..
N Engl J Med, 350 (2004), pp. 1495-504
[37]
Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz NB, Brewer B, Clark LY, Hunninghake DB, et al..
Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines..
[38]
Ridker PM, Cannon CP, Morrow D, Rifai N, Rose LM, McCabe CH, et al..
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy..
N Engl J Med, 352 (2005), pp. 20-8
[39]
Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM Schoenhagen P, Crowe T, Sasiela WJ, Tsai J, et al..
Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease..
N Engl J Med, 352 (2005), pp. 29-38
[40]
Tsimikas S, Witztum JL, Miller ER, Sasiela WJ, Szarek M, Olsson AG, et al..
High-dose atorvastatin reduces total plasma levels of oxidized phospholipids and immune complexes present on apolipoprotein B-100 in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the MIRACL trial..
Circulation, 110 (2004), pp. 1406-12
[41]
Llevadot J, Asahara T..
Efecto de las estatinas en la inducción de angiogénesis y vasculogénesis..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 55 (2002), pp. 838-44
[42]
Tuñón J, Egido J..
Disfunción endotelial, inflamación y estatinas: nuevas evidencias..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 57 (2004), pp. 903-5
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?

es en
Política de cookies Cookies policy
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar nuestros servicios y mostrarle publicidad relacionada con sus preferencias mediante el análisis de sus hábitos de navegación. Si continua navegando, consideramos que acepta su uso. Puede cambiar la configuración u obtener más información aquí. To improve our services and products, we use "cookies" (own or third parties authorized) to show advertising related to client preferences through the analyses of navigation customer behavior. Continuing navigation will be considered as acceptance of this use. You can change the settings or obtain more information by clicking here.