Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 75. Issue 3.
Pages 281-282 (March 2022)
Visits
Not available
Vol. 75. Issue 3.
Pages 281-282 (March 2022)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Fever and Brugada electrocardiographic pattern
Fiebre y patrón electrocardiográfico de Brugada
Visits
581
Andrés Felipe Miranda-Arboledaa,b, Juan María Farinac, Adrian Baranchuka,
Corresponding author
barancha@kgh.kari.net

Corresponding author:
a Division of Cardiology, Electrophysiology and Pacing, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
b Departamento de Cardiología, Hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
c Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Related content
Rebeca Santiago-Cortés, Marcos Clavero-Adell, Daniel Palanca-Arias, Lorenzo Jiménez-Montañés, Marta López-Ramón, Ariadna Ayerza-Casas
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2022;75:28210.1016/j.rec.2021.11.017
Rebeca Santiago-Cortés, Marcos Clavero-Adell, Daniel Palanca-Arias, Ariadna Ayerza-Casas
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text
To the Editor,

We have read with interest the scientific letter published by Santiago-Cortés et al.1 The distinction between Brugada phenocopies and Brugada syndrome can sometimes be a complex diagnostic challenge. This differential diagnosis requires restraint and precision, as these entities differ not only in their etiology, but also in the potential prognostic implications for patients.1,2

The scientific letter by Santiago-Cortés et al. describes the case of a 12-year-old adolescent with a type 1 Brugada electrocardiographic pattern in the context of febrile syndrome (pediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2) that resolved after stabilization and improvement of the infectious-inflammatory condition.3 Outpatient provocation testing with flecainide and genetic testing were both negative and, therefore, Brugada phenocopy was diagnosed.3

First, we agree with the authors that the overall findings were consistent with Brugada phenocopy, namely, a Brugada electrocardiographic pattern induced by a clearly identifiable condition that reverts after correction, low pretest probability of Brugada syndrome, and negative results in induction and genetic tests.1 However, in this particular patient, we believe that the fact that inflammatory syndrome plus fever were considered a potential reversible condition when diagnosing Brugada phenocopy deserves special attention. The clinical conditions traditionally reported to exhibit Brugada pattern in phenocopies are related to: a) metabolic conditions; b) mechanical compression; c) ischemia and pulmonary embolism; d) myocardial and pericardial disease, and e) electrocardiogram-amplitude modulation.4 Fever is not usually listed among the conditions, as elevated body temperature outside the physiologic range is considered a genuine trigger for uncovering true Brugada patterns because the arrhythmogenic potential of cardiac sodium channels is increased at high temperatures.5,6 Additionally, from a clinical rather than pathophysiologic standpoint, numerous reports and case series have shown that patients with fever that induced a Brugada-like electrocardiogram have later experienced malignant arrhythmia.7

Induction and genetic tests were used in this patient to support the Brugada phenocopy diagnosis. However, the sensitivity of induction tests is only 70% to 80%, and this specific patient experienced slight QRS widening after flecainide administration, although with no clear ST-segment changes.8 Only a few Brugada syndrome cases are due to known gene mutations, and patients who have exhibited Brugada pattern in the context of fever could later experience malignant arrhythmia despite no genetic predisposition.7,9 Therefore, in the event of an unusual predisposing factor for the diagnosis of Brugada phenocopy, as seen on this occasion, the ability of these tests to define the condition is somewhat debatable, as negative results are not too useful. An alternative diagnostic approach could include serial tests with increasing doses of sodium channel blockers to improve the diagnostic accuracy of provocation tests if there is diagnostic uncertainty.

Accurate differentiation between Brugada syndrome and Brugada phenocopies has major prognostic implications for patients. The diagnostic process should include a careful assessment of all established criteria for both entities while considering that the current information available seems to indicate that triggering factors of Brugada-like electrocardiographic pattern seem to have varying molecular and pathophysiologic consequences as well as different implications for the clinical prognosis. This will ensure an appropriate approach to therapy and follow-up for each individual patient.10

FUNDING

No funding.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

A.F. Miranda-Arboleda and J.M. Farina participated in the article text and subsequent corrections. A. Baranchuk had the idea for the article and reviewed the final version.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

References
[1]
R. Santiago-Cortés, M. Clavero Adell, D. Palancas Arias, L. Jiménez Montañés, M. López Ramón, A. Ayerza Casas.
Brugada phenocopy in a child with pediatric inflammatory multisystemic syndrome caused by SARS-CoV-2.
Rev Esp Cardiol., 75 (2022), pp. 188-189
[2]
B.H. Gottschalk, D.D. Anselm, J. Brugada, et al.
Expert cardiologists cannot distinguish between Brugada phenocopy and Brugada syndrome electrocardiogram patterns.
Europace., 18 (2016), pp. 1095-1100
[3]
D.D. Anselm, J.M. Evans, A. Baranchuk.
Brugada phenocopy: A new electrocardiogram phenomenon.
World J Cardiol., 6 (2014), pp. 81-86
[4]
D.D. Anselm, A. Baranchuk.
Brugada phenocopy: redefinition and updated classification.
Am J Cardiol., 111 (2013), pp. 453
[5]
R. Dumaine, J.A. Towbin, P. Brugada, et al.
Ionic mechanisms responsible for the electrocardiographic phenotype of the Brugada syndrome are temperature dependent.
Circ Res., 85 (1999), pp. 803-809
[6]
A. Baranchuk, C.S. Simpson.
Brugada syndrome coinciding with fever and pandemic (H1N1) influenza.
CMAJ., 183 (2011), pp. 582
[7]
M.J. Junttila, M. Gonzalez, E. Lizotte, et al.
Induced Brugada-type electrocardiogram, a sign for imminent malignant arrhythmias.
Circulation., 117 (2008), pp. 1890-1893
[8]
M.N. Obeyesekere, G.J. Klein, S. Modi, et al.
How to perform and interpret provocative testing for the diagnosis of Brugada syndrome, long-QT syndrome, and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol., 4 (2011), pp. 958-964
[9]
G. Sarquella-Brugada, O. Campuzano, E. Arbelo, J. Brugada, R. Brugada.
Brugada syndrome: clinical and genetic findings.
Genet Med., 18 (2016), pp. 3-12
[10]
A. Baranchuk.
Brugada Phenocopy: The Art of Recognizing the Brugada ECG Pattern.
1. a ed., United Kingdom Academic Press, Elsevier, (2018),
Copyright © 2021. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

View newsletter history
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?