ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2025 4.2
Vol. 78. Num. 5.
Pages 404-413 (May 2025)

Original article
J-shaped association between apolipoprotein B and CV outcomes in statin-treated patients with chronic coronary syndrome

Asociación en J entre la apolipoproteína B y resultados CV en pacientes con síndrome coronario crónico tratados con estatinas

Jining HeabcZhangyu LinabcChenxi SongabcSheng YuanabcXiaohui BianabcBowen LiabcWenjun MaadKefei Douabce
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2025;78:414-510.1016/j.rec.2024.10.003
Alberto Cordero, Rosa Fernández Olmo
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2024.08.004

Options

Supplementary data
Imagen extra
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2025;78:404-13
Abstract
Introduction and objectives

The association between apolipoprotein B (apoB) and residual cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between apoB levels and CV outcomes in statin-treated CCS patients.

Methods

We enrolled 8641 statin-treated CCS patients at Fuwai Hospital. The patients were divided into 5 groups based on to apoB quintiles (Q1 to Q5). The primary endpoint was 3-year CV events, including CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.

Results

During a median follow-up of 3.17 years, there were 232 (2.7%) CV events. After multivariable adjustment, a restricted cubic spline illustrated a J-shaped relationship between apoB levels and 3-year CV events, with the risk remaining flat until apoB levels exceeded 0.73g/L, after which the risk increased (nonlinear P <.05). Kaplan-Meier curves showed the lowest CV event rate in the Q3 group (0.68-0.78g/L). Compared with the Q3 group, multivariable Cox regression models revealed that both low (Q1, ≤0.57g/L) and high (Q5, >0.93g/L) apoB levels were associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events (all P <.05). Notably, patients with low apoB levels (Q1) had the highest risk of CV death (HR, 2.44; 95%CI, 1.17-5.08).

Conclusions

Our analysis indicates that both low and high levels of apoB are associated with elevated CV risk, with the risk being particularly pronounced at higher levels (> 0.73g/L).

Keywords

Coronary artery disease
Residual atherosclerotic residual risk
Apolipoprotein B
INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular (CV) disease, particularly coronary artery disease (CAD), remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide.1 Since low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major pathogenic factor in CAD and is associated with CAD mortality, current lipid modification guidelines mainly focus on reducing LDL-C concentrations to lower the risk of adverse CV events in patients with established CAD.2,3 However, numerous clinical trials of statins and other LDL-C-lowering medications have demonstrated that residual CV risk persists even with aggressive LDL-C management. This finding has prompted further exploration into determinants of residual CV risk, especially serum-based biomarkers that can be easily measured in clinical settings.4,5

Recently, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) and the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) published guidelines on quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies. They suggest that apolipoprotein B (apoB) could be considered a potential biomarker for assessing residual CV risk in patients receiving optimal LDL-C-lowering treatment.6 Previous Mendelian randomization studies found that reductions in CV risk were associated with genetic variations affecting the clearance and processing of apoB-containing lipoproteins. These studies suggest that apoB may be a more accurate biomarker for assessing CV risk than LDL-C.7,8 However, there is insufficient robust clinical evidence with large sample sizes to support the association between apoB levels and residual CV risk in statin-treated patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). This limitation hinders the clinical application of apoB as a target for lipid-lowering treatment in this population.6

In this study, we aimed to conduct a prospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness of apoB levels in predicting adverse CV outcomes for statin-treated CCS patients.

METHODSStudy design and population

This prospective, observational cohort study was conducted at Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. From January 2017 to December 2018, a total of 10 520 statin-treated CCS patients were consecutively recruited at the hospital. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they met the following criteria: a) age 18 years or older; and b) diagnosed with CCS and treated with statins. The diagnostic criteria for CCS were based on the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CCS.9

Patients were excluded if they met any of the following criteria: a) missing crucial laboratory data; b) severe liver or kidney dysfunction; c) decompensated heart failure; d) malignant tumor; e) event time less than 7 days; or f) lost to follow-up. After applying these criteria, 8 641 eligible patients were included in the study. The details of the enrollment process are illustrated in figure 1.

Figure 1.

Study flowchart. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; CCS, chronic coronary syndrome.

(0.41MB).

The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Fuwai Hospital Ethics Review Committee. All patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.10

Data collection and definitions

All treatments and coronary angiography procedures were performed in accordance with international guidelines and at the discretion of the treating cardiologist. Angiographic and procedural data were independently collected from catheter laboratory records by 2 trained interventional cardiologists. Demographic and clinical data were collected prospectively by independent research personnel using standardized questionnaires.

Diabetes was defined as a prior physician diagnosis of diabetes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126mg/dL (7.0 mmoL/L), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5%, 2-hour blood glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ≥ 200mg/dL (11.1 mmoL/L), or the use of hypoglycemic medications.11 Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 140mmHg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90mmHg, or the use of antihypertensive therapy.12

Laboratory measurements

On admission, venous blood samples were collected from each participant after at least 12hours of fasting. All examinations were conducted at the core laboratory of Fuwai Hospital. Concentrations of apoB, apolipoprotein A1, and lipoprotein(a) were measured using an immunoturbidimetric method. Serum levels of FPG, hemoglobin A1c, creatinine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and lipid profiles (including triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) were assessed using standard laboratory techniques. Non-HDL-C was calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL-C. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chinese-modified MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) equation.13

Follow-up and study endpoints

After discharge, patients were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 months, and then annually until December 2021. Endpoint data were collected by trained investigators through telephone interviews using structured questionnaires and/or from clinical visit records.

The primary endpoint was CV events at the 3-year follow-up, defined as a composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke. Secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (a composite of CV death and nonfatal MI) and CV death. Unless a clear noncardiovascular cause could be established, all deaths were considered CV-related. The diagnosis of MI was determined based on clinical and laboratory criteria according to the fourth universal definition of MI. Stroke was defined as a new focal neurological deficit lasting more than 24hours, confirmed by neurologists using imaging data. All events were independently adjudicated by 2 professional clinicians who were blinded to the study; any disagreements were resolved by consulting a third experienced expert.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as mean±standard deviation or median [interquartile range (IQR)] and were compared using the Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages and were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate.

The cumulative incidence of study endpoints among the 5 groups was illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to investigate the association between apoB levels and study endpoints, with the apoB quintile 3 group serving as the reference. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were reported. Covariates included in the multivariable models were age, male sex, body mass index (BMI), previous MI, previous revascularization, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, triglycerides, HDL-C), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, lipoprotein(a), three-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, aspirin use, clopidogrel use, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker use.

Restricted cubic spline analyses with 5 knots, located at the 5th, 27.5th, 50th, 72.5th, and 95th centiles, were used to explore the association between apoB levels and study endpoints at the 3-year follow-up. These models were adjusted for the same covariates mentioned above. Given that the associations of apoB with study endpoints were approximately log -linear both below and above its median value (0.73g/L in the overall population), we also used a linear model to calculate HRs per standard deviation increase in apoB levels. Additionally, sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of our findings.

Cox logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regressions were used to select variables from the variable pool for the study endpoints. The LASSO Cox model is a regularization technique that enhances the predictive performance and interpretability of the Cox proportional hazards model by imposing a penalty on the absolute size of the regression coefficients.14 This penalty helps to shrink some coefficients to zero, effectively performing variable selection and identifying the most relevant predictors.14

To accurately assess the impact of apoB compared with LDL-C, we followed the following steps. Given the high correlation between apoB and LDL-C, we first performed a regression analysis of apoB on LDL-C.15 The residuals from this regression, representing the portion of apoB not explained by LDL-C, were then included in the multivariable Cox regression models.15 Additional sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the potential impact of non-CV mortality as a competing risk.16

Finally, we analyzed the associations between apoB quintiles and CV events, considering several factors including age (< 65 and ≥ 65 years), sex, diabetes status, hypertension status, and LDL-C levels (≤ median or > median). We calculated P for interaction for all subgroup analyses.

A 2-way P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using R software version 4.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTSBaseline characteristics

A total of 8641 statin-treated CCS patients were included in the study. The mean age of the overall population was 59.38±9.95 years, and 6777 (78.4%) patients were men. Among the included patients, 6250 (72.3%) patients had been diagnosed with hypertension, 3795 (43.9%) had diabetes, and 2446 (28.3%) were current smokers. The study population was subsequently divided into 5 groups based on apoB quintiles: quintile 1 (apoB ≤ 0.57g/L, n=1738), quintile 2 (apoB levels of >0.57-0.68g/L, n=1865), quintile 3 (apoB levels of >0.68-0.78g/L, n=1620), quintile 4 (apoB levels of >0.78-0.93g/L, n=1693), and quintile 5 (apoB levels of >0.93g/L, n=1725) (figure 1).

Baseline characteristics according to apoB quintiles are presented in table 1. Patients in quintile 1 (apoB levels of ≤ 0.57g/L) were older, more likely to be male, and had a higher prevalence of previous MI, previous revascularization, hypertension, diabetes and peripheral artery disease. Patients in quintile 5 (apoB levels of >0.93g/L) had higher BMI and were more likely to have hypertension and diabetes and be current smokers (all P <.05). Moreover, the results of laboratory tests showed that levels of apo A1, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, FPG, hemoglobin A1c, and lipoprotein(a) levels consistently increased with apoB quintiles (all P <.05). Furthermore, 3-vessel lesions and CTO lesions were more frequently observed in patients with higher apoB levels (both P <.05).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics stratified by apoB levels

Characteristicsa  Quintile 1n=1738  Quintile 2n=1865  Quintile 3n=1620  Quintile 4n=1693  Quintile 5n=1725  P 
Age, y  60.08±10.26  59.67±9.85  59.38±9.64  59.26±9.86  58.48±10.02  <.001 
Male  1442 (83.0)  1534 (82.3)  1273 (78.6)  1290 (76.2)  1238 (71.8)  <.001 
BMI  25.64±3.12  26.04±3.21  26.05±3.26  26.16±3.21  26.29±3.36  <.001 
Family history of CAD  189 (10.9)  229 (12.3)  166 (10.2)  191 (11.3)  216 (12.5)  .189 
Previous MI  449 (25.8)  476 (25.5)  370 (22.8)  355 (21.0)  281 (16.3)  <.001 
Previous revascularization  571 (32.9)  601 (32.2)  474 (29.3)  466 (27.5)  371 (21.5)  <.001 
Hypertension  1252 (72.0)  1307 (70.1)  1207 (74.5)  1218 (71.9)  1266 (73.4)  .045 
SBP, mmHg  129.49±16.93  130.53±16.86  131.70±16.68  132.10±17.24  134.00±17.80  <.001 
DBP, mmHg  75.86±10.51  77.21±10.20  77.79±10.76  78.22±11.13  79.14±10.70  <.001 
Diabetes  765 (44.0)  790 (42.4)  730 (45.1)  708 (41.8)  802 (46.5)  .035 
Previous stroke  234 (13.5)  234 (12.5)  197 (12.2)  208 (12.3)  195 (11.3)  .426 
Current smoker  404 (23.2)  520 (27.9)  460 (28.4)  512 (30.2)  550 (31.9)  <.001 
PAD  143 (8.2)  110 (5.9)  110 (6.8)  103 (6.1)  104 (6.0)  .030 
LVEF, %  62.15±6.60  62.27±6.37  62.21±6.29  62.44±6.39  62.58±6.87  .263 
Laboratory tests             
Apo B, g/L  0.49±0.07  0.63±0.03  0.73±0.03  0.85±0.04  1.12±0.18  <.001 
Apo A1, g/L  1.31±0.25  1.36±0.26  1.38±0.26  1.39 (0.26)  1.41±0.28  <.001 
TC, mmoL/L  2.96±0.47  3.45±0.46  3.87±0.48  4.41±0.52  5.53±0.95  <.001 
TG, mmoL/L  1.09 (0.84-1.40)  1.29 (1.01-1.69)  1.46 (1.11-1.97)  1.61 (1.22-2.20)  1.91 (1.41-2.66)  <.001 
LDL-C, mmoL/L  1.50±0.35  1.92±0.34  2.27±0.38  2.74±0.45  3.71±0.84  <.001 
HDL-C, mmoL/L  1.10±0.30  1.11±0.30  1.11±0.28  1.12±0.28  1.13±0.28  .018 
Non-HDL-C, mmoL/L  1.85±0.39  2.35±0.37  2.76±0.40  3.29±0.45  4.40±0.91  <.001 
hsCRP, mg/L  1.17 (0.51-1.74)  1.25 (0.59-2.09)  1.32 (0.66-2.46)  1.39 (0.80-2.78)  1.65 (0.93-3.39)  <.001 
FPG, mmoL/L  6.21±2.05  6.35±2.16  6.48±2.18  6.47±2.40  6.71±2.38  <.001 
HbA1c, %  6.35±1.12  6.39±1.12  6.47±1.15  6.46±1.17  6.61±1.32  <.001 
Serum creatinine, μmol/L  82.79±15.14  82.97±15.55  83.33±17.45  82.76±16.50  82.44±17.35  .615 
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2  86.53±16.48  86.22±16.65  85.57±17.44  85.44±17.22  85.16±17.24  .094 
Lp(a), mg/dL  11.55 (5.40-29.02)  15.83 (6.73-37.40)  18.09 (7.96-45.97)  20.37 (7.96-50.42)  21.70 (8.98-53.01)  <.001 
Angiographic findings             
SYNTAX score  12.56±5.34  12.58±5.56  12.44±5.10  12.79±5.71  12.83±5.66  .135 
Left main disease  135 (7.8)  150 (8.0)  135 (8.3)  147 (8.7)  145 (8.4)  .890 
Three-vessel disease  694 (39.9)  773 (41.4)  740 (45.7)  751 (44.4)  813 (47.1)  <.001 
Type B2/C lesion  1271 (73.1)  1379 (73.9)  1222 (75.4)  1280 (75.6)  1294 (75.0)  .398 
CTO lesion  225 (12.9)  250 (13.4)  204 (12.6)  216 (12.8)  273 (15.8)  .034 
Ostial lesion  216 (12.4)  244 (13.1)  198 (12.2)  216 (12.8)  204 (11.8)  .823 
Medications             
Aspirin  1347 (77.5)  1459 (78.2)  1213 (74.9)  1184 (69.9)  1007 (58.4)  <.001 
Clopidogrel  1490 (85.7)  1649 (88.4)  1430 (88.3)  1539 (90.9)  1617 (93.7)  <.001 
ACEI/ARB  481 (27.7)  529 (28.4)  412 (25.4)  421 (24.9)  371 (21.5)  <.001 
Statins  1738 (100.0)  1865 (100.0)  1620 (100.0)  1693 (100.0)  1725 (100.0) 
Beta-blocker  1532 (88.1)  1650 (88.5)  1466 (90.5)  1491 (88.1)  1528 (88.6)  .163 
Nitrate  1643 (94.5)  1762 (94.5)  1544 (95.3)  1595 (94.2)  1648 (95.5)  .333 

ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ApoA1, apolipoprotein A1; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; CTO, chronic total occlusion; DBP; diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SYNTAX, synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride.

a

Values are expressed as mean±standard deviation or No. (%).

The correlation analyses showed that apoB levels were strongly and positively associated with total cholesterol (correlation coefficient=0.891, P <.001), LDL-C (correlation coefficient=0.901, P <.001), and non-HDL-C levels (correlation coefficient=0.917, P <.001). In addition, apoB levels were positively correlated with BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, apolipoprotein A1, triglycerides, HDL-C, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, FPG, hemoglobin A1c, and lipoprotein(a). Conversely, apoB levels were inversely correlated with age and estimated glomerular filtration rate (table 1 of the supplementary data; all P <.05).

Apolipoprotein B levels and cardiovascular outcomes

The median length of follow-up was 3.17 [3.01 to 3.32] years. In the overall cohort, 232 (2.7%) CV events were recorded, including 105 cases of CV death, 76 cases of nonfatal MI, 37 cases of nonfatal stroke, and 161 (1.9%) fatal events. Rates of study endpoints according to apoB quintiles are listed in table 2 of the supplementary data. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed a significant difference in the incidence of CV events, major adverse cardiac events, and CV death among the 5 groups at 3-year follow-ups, with the lowest rate of adverse clinical events in quintile 3 (figure 2, all P values <.05).

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curves of apoB quintiles for (A) CV events, (B) MACE, and (C) CV death. CV events included CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. MACE included CV death and nonfatal MI. ApoB, apolipoprotein B; CV, cardiovascular; MACE, major adverse cardiac events.

(0.36MB).

Figure 3 illustrates the fully adjusted association between apoB on a continuous scale and the 3-year risk of study endpoints using restricted cubic spline analysis. There were J-shaped associations between apoB and study endpoints at the 3-year follow-up after adjustment for confounding factors (all nonlinear P values <.05). The risks of CV events, major adverse cardiac events and CV death remained relatively flat until apoB levels reached approximately 0.73g/L, after which they began to increase rapidly.

Figure 3.

Restricted cubic spline analysis for apoB levels and (A) CV events, (B) MACE, and (C) CV death. CV events included CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. MACE included CV death and nonfatal MI. All restricted cubic spline analyses were adjusted for age, male sex, body mass index, previous MI, previous revascularization, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, estimated glomerular filtration rate, lipoprotein(a), 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusion lesions, aspirin use, clopidogrel use, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker use. 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; apoB, apolipoprotein B; CV, cardiovascular; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; MI, myocardial infarction; SD, standard deviation.

(0.3MB).

Cox regression analyses were conducted to investigate the relationships between apoB levels and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes, with results detailed in table 2. The fully adjusted models revealed that both apoB quintile 1 and quintile 5 groups had an increased risk of CV events, major adverse cardiac events, and CV death at the 3-year follow-up (all P values <.05).

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazard analyses for apoB quintiles with adverse CV events at 3-year follow-up

Endpointsa  Quintile 1Quintile 2Quintile 3Quintile 4Quintile 5P for trend 
  HR (95%CI)  P  HR (95%CI)  P  HR (95%CI)  P  HR (95%CI)  P  HR (95%CI)  P   
CV eventsb                       
Model 1d  2.01 (1.30-3.09)  .002  1.48 (0.94-2.32)  .090  Reference  1.12 (0.69-1.82)  .659  1.64 (1.05-2.57)  .031  .107 
Model 2e  1.87 (1.21-2.88)  .005  1.43 (0.91-2.25)  .118  Reference  1.14 (0.70-1.85)  .610  1.78 (1.13-2.80)  .012  .394 
Model 3f  1.89 (1.21-2.95)  .005  1.46 (0.93-2.30)  .101  Reference  1.16 (0.71-1.89)  .555  1.80 (1.13-2.85)  .013  .426 
MACEc                       
Model 1  2.15 (1.33-3.47)  .002  1.74 (1.07-2.84)  .027  Reference  0.99 (0.57-1.74)  .986  1.77 (1.08-2.91)  .024  .052 
Model 2  1.99 (1.23-3.22)  .005  1.69 (1.03-2.75)  .037  Reference  1.01 (0.58-1.77)  .966  1.93 (1.18-3.18)  .009  .229 
Model 3  1.95 (1.19-3.19)  .008  1.70 (1.04-2.78)  .035  Reference  1.05 (0.60-1.85)  .857  2.03 (1.22-3.38)  .006  .421 
CV death                       
Model 1  2.81 (1.37-5.74)  .005  2.43 (1.18-5.01)  .016  Reference  1.24 (0.54-2.83)  .605  2.27 (1.08-4.74)  .030  .092 
Model 2  2.47 (1.21-5.07)  .013  2.31 (1.12-4.76)  .023  Reference  1.28 (0.56-2.92)  .557  2.58 (1.23-5.42)  .012  .407 
Model 3  2.44 (1.17-5.08)  .017  2.38 (1.15-4.92)  .019  Reference  1.24 (0.54-2.84)  .609  2.41 (1.13-5.13)  .022  .325 

95%CI, 95% confidence interval; apoB, apolipoprotein B; ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; BMI, body mass index; CTO, chronic total occlusion; CV, cardiovascular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HR, hazard ratio; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a), lipoprotein(a); LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACE, major adverse cardiac events; MI, myocardial infarction; PAD, peripheral artery disease; TG, triglyceride.

a

HRs with 95%CIs were estimated by Cox proportional hazard models.

b

CV events were defined as a composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke.

c

MACE were defined as a composite of CV death, and nonfatal MI.

d

Model 1 unadjusted.

e

Model 2 adjusted for age and male sex.

f

Model 3 adjusted for Model 2+ BMI, previous MI, previous revascularization, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, current smoking, PAD, LVEF, TG, HDL-C, hsCRP, eGFR, Lp(a), 3-vessel disease, CTO lesions, aspirin use, clopidogrel use, and ACEI/ARB use.

Sensitivity analyses

To test the robustness of the J-shaped association between apoB and CV outcomes, we further conducted sensitivity analyses, using Cox LASSO regression to select variables for multivariable adjustment. Consequently, we identified 3 sets of variables for the corresponding 3 study endpoints (table 3 of the supplementary data and figure 1 of the supplementary data). For CV events, we adjusted for age, BMI, previous MI, prior revascularization, peripheral artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, apolipoprotein A1, triglycerides, hemoglobin A1c, creatinine, nitrate use, and clopidogrel use. For major adverse cardiac events, we adjusted for age, BMI, previous MI, prior revascularization, current smoking, peripheral artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, apolipoprotein A1, triglycerides, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, hemoglobin A1c, creatinine, left main disease, nitrate use, and clopidogrel use. For CV death, we adjusted for age, BMI, diastolic blood pressure, previous stroke, peripheral artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, apolipoprotein A1, creatinine, CTO lesions, and clopidogrel use. Consistent with the main findings, restricted cubic spline analyses and multivariable Cox regression models using the variables selected by Cox LASSO regression revealed J-shaped associations between apoB and 3-year adverse clinical events (table 4 of the supplementary data and figure 2 of the supplementary data).

ApoB residuals (representing apoB levels not explained by LDL-C) were significantly associated with CV events and major adverse cardiac events after multivariable adjustment. Both the lowest (quintile 1) and highest (quintile 5) apoB residual quintile groups had an increased risk of CV events and major adverse cardiac events (table 5 of the supplementary data). The results of the competing risk analyses considering risks of non-CV death (table 6 of the supplementary data) were identical to those presented in table 2.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the association between apoB quintiles and CV events in different populations based on age (< or ≥ 65 years), sex, diabetes, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and LDL-C levels (<2.25 mmoL/L or ≥ 2.25 mmoL/L). The association between apoB quintiles and CV events risk was consistent among the different subgroups, with comparable interactions (all P >.05 for interaction) (table 7 of the supplementary data).

DISCUSSION

This large-scale prospective cohort study investigated the association between apoB levels and 3-year CV outcomes in statin-treated CCS patients. Our major findings were as follows: a) the clinical and angiographic profiles of statin-treated CCS patients vary substantially among apoB quintiles, with patients having low apoB levels being more likely to be older males with a higher prevalence of previous MI, hypertension, diabetes, and peripheral artery disease; b) restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a J-shaped association between apoB levels and 3-year CV events, with the risk remaining flat until apoB levels exceed 0.73g/L, after which the risk increased (figure 4); c) in the multivariable Cox regression analysis with quintiles, the results suggested that both low and high levels of apoB are associated with increased risk compared with the middle quintile (figure 4); d) the CV risk associated with low apoB levels was driven mainly by increased CV mortality.

Figure 4.

Central illustration. J-shaped association between apolipoprotein B and cardiovascular outcomes in statin-treated patients with chronic coronay syndrome. 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; ApoB, apolipoprotein B; HR, hazard ratio; SD, standard deviation.

(0.76MB).

Lipid modification targeting LDL-C, such as statins, has been proven to reduce adverse CV events in patients with established CV disease.17 However, even with intensified statin treatments, many individuals still have substantial residual risks for adverse CV events.5,18 Beyond LDL-C, several lipid biomarkers have been developed to evaluate residual CV risk, especially apoB.19,20 Since each atherogenic particle includes 1 molecule of apoB, concentrations of apoB are considered a direct indicator of the total quantity of lipoproteins that contribute to CV disease.3,21 In individuals with low LDL-C levels, LDL-C calculation may be inaccurate, whereas apoB can provide a precise estimate of the total concentration of atherogenic particles in this context.3 Therefore, measuring apoB levels may be suitable for assessing residual CV risk in patients undergoing lipid-lowering therapy.

A few studies have explored the association between apoB and residual CV risk in different populations. For the general population, Johannesen et al.20 recruited 13 015 statin-treated individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study with a median follow-up of 8 years. They found an elevated risk of all-cause death at both low and high apoB concentrations. However, this study included the general population, and the conclusion may not be applicable to the secondary prevention population of CAD. For patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), Hagström et al.19 included 18 924 patients with recent ACS treated with alirocumab or placebo from the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome During Treatment With Alirocumab (ODYSSEY OUTCOMES) trial and evaluated the associations between baseline apoB or apoB at 4 months and major adverse cardiac events. In the placebo group, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events increased as the baseline apoB stratum increased (all P for trend <.05). In the alirocumab group, they found the attainment of apoB levels as low as 35mg/dL could potentially decrease the residual risk associated with lipoproteins following ACS. For CCS patients treated with lipid-lowering medication, however, no study has reported the association between apoB and residual CV events. In our study, we found a J-shaped association between apoB and 3-year CV events in statin-treated CCS patients. Our results differ from those of the above-mentioned studies,19,20 likely due to differences in the study populations.

The mechanisms underlying the link between substantially lowered apoB levels and increased CV events still need to be explored. Some previous reports have linked hypobetalipoproteinemia to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease22,23 and, eventually, to severe end-stage liver disease, such as cirrhosis and hepatocarcinoma.24,25 Previous studies have also found that fatty liver is primarily observed in carriers of APOB loss of function (LoF) variants.26 This might be due to abnormalities in the assembly and secretion of triglyceride and very-low-density lipoprotein, which could lead to hepatic steatosis.27–29Our study, with the largest sample size to date, confirms the J-shaped association between apoB and adverse CV outcomes in statin-treated CCS patients. We found that apoB can be used as an effective biomarker to predict residual CV risk in this population. Future research and clinical practice regarding the management of residual CV risk in statin-treated patients with CCS could consider maintaining apoB levels at a reasonable level (around 0.73g/L) rather than targeting extremely low or high levels. Lipid-lowering regimens designed to address residual CV risk could be more individualized and adjusted based on personal apoB levels.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, the study design was single-center, prospective, and observational, rather than a randomized controlled trial. As a result, it was not feasible to establish a definitive causal relationship between apoB and the incidence of CV events. Second, dynamic changes in apoB levels during follow-up were not presented in our study. Third, due to limitations in data collection, the study could not comprehensively evaluate all lipid-associated factors or other types of lipid-lowering drugs beyond statins. Fourth, although potential confounders were controlled for as covariates in multivariable regression models, the impact of uncollected confounders cannot be completely disregarded. Consequently, larger-scale studies are needed to validate the findings of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicated an elevated CV risk at both low and high levels of apoB, with a more significant CV risk observed at higher levels (> 0.73g/L). Larger multicenter studies should be conducted to evaluate the predictive value of apoB in statin-treated CCS patients. Furthermore, further investigation into the underlying mechanisms is needed.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?

  • Lipid modification targeting LDL-C has been proven to reduce adverse CV events in patients with established CV disease.

  • Beyond LDL-C, several lipid biomarkers have been developed to evaluate residual CV risk, especially apoB.

  • Since each atherogenic particle contains 1 molecule of apoB, concentrations of apoB are considered a direct indicator of the total quantity of lipoproteins contributing to CV disease.

WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?

  • Restricted cubic spline analysis found a J-shaped association between apoB and 3-year CV events, with the risk remaining flat until apoB levels exceed 0.73g/L, after which the risk increases.

  • Multivariable Cox regression models found that both low and high apoB levels were associated with a higher risk of CV events at 3 years of follow-up.

  • The CV risk associated with low apoB was driven mainly by increased CV mortality.

FUNDING

This study was supported by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-008).

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Fuwai Hospital Ethics Review Committee. All study patients provided written informed consent before enrollment. This study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.

STATEMENT ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

No artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of this article.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

J. He and Z. Lin contributed equally to this work. K. Dou, J. He, and Z. Lin performed study design, researched data, contributed to discussion, and wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. J. He and Z. Lin acquired the data and revised the intellectual content of the manuscript. C. Song and S. Yuan curated data and figures. X. Bian and B. Li reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. K. Dou, W. Ma, J. He, and Z. Lin are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

REFERENCES
[1]
G.A. Mensah, V. Fuster, C.J.L. Murray, G.A. Roth.
Global Burden of Cardiovascular D, Risks C. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks, 1990-2022.
J Am Coll Cardiol., (2023), 82 pp. 2350-2473
[2]
S.M. Grundy, N.J. Stone, A.L. Bailey, et al.
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
J Am Coll Cardiol., (2019), 73 pp. e285-e350
[3]
F. Mach, C. Baigent, A.L. Catapano, et al.
2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk.
Eur Heart J., (2020), 41 pp. 111-188
[4]
C.P. Cannon, M.A. Blazing, R.P. Giugliano, et al.
Ezetimibe Added to Statin Therapy after Acute Coronary Syndromes.
N Engl J Med., (2015), 372 pp. 2387-2397
[5]
M.S. Sabatine, R.P. Giugliano, A.C. Keech, et al.
Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.
N Engl J Med., (2017), 376 pp. 1713-1722
[6]
M.R. Langlois, B.G. Nordestgaard, A. Langsted, et al.
Quantifying atherogenic lipoproteins for lipid-lowering strategies: consensus-based recommendations from EAS and EFLM.
Clin Chem Lab Med., (2020), 58 pp. 496-517
[7]
B.A. Ference, J.J.P. Kastelein, H.N. Ginsberg, et al.
Association of Genetic Variants Related to CETP Inhibitors and Statins With Lipoprotein Levels and Cardiovascular Risk.
JAMA., (2017), 318 pp. 947-956
[8]
B.A. Ference, J.J.P. Kastelein, K.K. Ray, et al.
Association of Triglyceride-Lowering LPL Variants and LDL-C-Lowering LDLR Variants With Risk of Coronary Heart Disease.
JAMA., (2019), 321 pp. 364-373
[9]
J. Knuuti, W. Wijns, A. Saraste, et al.
2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.
Eur Heart J., (2020), 41 pp. 407-477
[10]
E. von Elm, D.G. Altman, M. Egger, et al.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
Lancet., (2007), 370 pp. 1453-1457
[11]
Association AD. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022;45(Suppl 1):S17-S38.
[12]
B. Williams, G. Mancia, W. Spiering, et al.
2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension.
J Hypertens., (2018), 36 pp. 1953-2041
[13]
Y.-C. Ma, L. Zuo, J.-H. Chen, et al.
Modified glomerular filtration rate estimating equation for Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol., (2006), 17 pp. 2937-2944
[14]
R. Tibshirani.
The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model.
[15]
A.D. Sniderman, L. Dufresne, K.M. Pencina, S. Bilgic, G. Thanassoulis, M.J. Pencina.
Discordance among apoB, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides: implications for cardiovascular prevention.
Eur Heart J., (2024), 45 pp. 2410-2418
[16]
M. Wang, D. Spiegelman, A. Kuchiba, et al.
Statistical methods for studying disease subtype heterogeneity.
Stat Med., (2016), 35 pp. 782-800
[17]
K.C. Koskinas, G.C.M. Siontis, R. Piccolo, et al.
Effect of statins and non-statin LDL-lowering medications on cardiovascular outcomes in secondary prevention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Eur Heart J., (2018), 39 pp. 1172-1180
[18]
D.D. Waters, C. Brotons, C.W. Chiang, et al.
Lipid treatment assessment project 2: a multinational survey to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals.
Circulation., (2009), 120 pp. 28-34
[19]
E. Hagström, P.G. Steg, M. Szarek, et al.
Apolipoprotein B. Residual Cardiovascular Risk After Acute Coronary Syndrome, and Effects of Alirocumab.
Circulation, (2022), 146 pp. 657-672
[20]
C.D.L. Johannesen, M.B. Mortensen, A. Langsted, B.G. Nordestgaard.
Apolipoprotein B and Non-HDL Cholesterol Better Reflect Residual Risk Than LDL Cholesterol in Statin-Treated Patients.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2021), 77 pp. 1439-1450
[21]
S.M. Grundy, N.J. Stone, A.L. Bailey, et al.
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Circulation, (2019), 139 pp. e1082-e1143
[22]
N. Harada, Y. Soejima, A. Taketomi, et al.
Recurrent familial hypobetalipoproteinemia-induced nonalcoholic fatty liver disease after living donor liver transplantation.
Liver Transpl., (2009), 15 pp. 806-809
[23]
C. Della Corte, D. Fintini, U. Giordano, et al.
Fatty liver and insulin resistance in children with hypobetalipoproteinemia: the importance of aetiology.
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)., (2013), 79 pp. 49-54
[24]
D. Bonnefont-Rousselot, B. Condat, A. Sassolas, et al.
Cryptogenic cirrhosis in a patient with familial hypocholesterolemia due to a new truncated form of apolipoprotein B.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol., (2009), 21 pp. 104-108
[25]
A. Lonardo, S. Lombardini, F. Scaglioni, et al.
Hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance: does etiology make a difference?.
J Hepatol., (2006), 44 pp. 190-196
[26]
F.K. Welty.
Hypobetalipoproteinemia and abetalipoproteinemia: liver disease and cardiovascular disease.
Curr Opin Lipidol., (2020), 31 pp. 49-55
[27]
G.M. Peloso, A. Nomura, A.V. Khera, et al.
Rare Protein-Truncating Variants in APOB, Lower Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, and Protection Against Coronary Heart Disease.
Circ Genom Precis Med, (2019), 12 pp. e002376
[28]
M. Mouzaki, A. Shah, A.C. Arce-Clachar, J. Hardy, K. Bramlage, S.A. Xanthakos.
Extremely low levels of low-density lipoprotein potentially suggestive of familial hypobetalipoproteinemia: A separate phenotype of NAFLD?.
J Clin Lipidol., (2019), 13 pp. 425-431
[29]
P. Tarugi, M. Averna, E. Di Leo, et al.
Molecular diagnosis of hypobetalipoproteinemia: an ENID review.
Atherosclerosis., (2007), 195 pp. e19-e27

J. He and Z. Lin contributed equally to this work.

Copyright © 2024. Sociedad Española de Cardiología