Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 65. Issue 2.
Pages 199-200 (February 2012)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 65. Issue 2.
Pages 199-200 (February 2012)
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2011.10.008
Full text access
Quality Control of Information on Health-Related Content Websites Goes Further on the Internet. Response
El control de la calidad de la información de webs de salud va más allá en internet. Respuesta
Visits
...
Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanuevaa
a Departamento de Ciencias de la Información y la Comunicación, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Related content
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011;64:849-5010.1016/j.rec.2011.06.014
Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:19910.1016/j.rec.2011.09.013
Miguel A. Mayer, Angela Leis
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Full Text

To the Editor,

Health professionals have been concerned about the quality of information on the Internet since the technology was first introduced. In 1998, JAMA published a review of instruments to assess the quality of information on the Internet.1 The article concluded by questioning both the aims of and need for such instruments, given that the most important aspect is the way people use the available information. In that context, it is important to note that there is little scientific evidence on the relationship between health-related information on the Internet and its negative impact on the health of users.2

Subsequent systematic reviews of these instruments have noted both their proliferation and the lack of agreement on how the concept of quality should be defined and measured.3, 4 In addition to these formal difficulties, Adams et al.5 set out a further series of criticisms. First, they questioned whether Internet users are aware of this type of quality control initiative. Second, even if users are aware of such initiatives there is no guarantee that they understand the information provided. Third, they note how easy it is to reproduce or acquire such instruments without the approval of the developers. Fourth, the process of acquiring such instruments has sometimes been criticized for a lack of transparency and for the interests of those involved. Critics suggest that although this type of instrument has made it easier to identify and highlight problems related to the quality of information online, they have not solved the problem because there is no clear evidence that they are effective in that regard.6, 7

There is then a need to develop strategies for quality control which will help healthcare organizations, professionals, and citizens optimize the potential of the Internet as a source of health information.8 These new strategies must take into account the technological and social nature of the Internet9 and focus on the way information is used rather than only focusing on formal aspects.10, 11 The experience gained in developing and applying strategies based on “control” will be very useful in shaping new strategies centered on “use”.

.

Bibliography
[1]
Jadad AR, Gagliardi A..
Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?..
JAMA. , 279 (1998), pp. 611-614
[2]
Bessell TL, McDonald S, Silagy CA, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN..
Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review..
Health Expect. , 5 (2002), pp. 28-37
[3]
Bernstam EV, Shelton DM, Walji M, Meric-Bernstam F..
Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use?..
Int J Med Inform. , 74 (2005), pp. 13-19
[4]
O’Grady L..
Future directions for depicting credibility in health care web sites..
Int J Med Inform. , 75 (2006), pp. 58-65
[5]
Adams SA, De Bont AA..
More than just a mouse click: research into work practices behind the assignment of medical trust marks on the World Wide Web..
Int J Med Inform. , 76 (2007), pp. S14-S20
[6]
Seale C..
New directions for critical internet health studies: representing cancer experience on the web..
Sociol Health Illn. , 27 (2005), pp. 515-540
[7]
Burkell J..
Health information seals of approval: what do they signify?..
Information, Communication & Society. , 7 (2004), pp. 491-509
[8]
Deshpande A, Jadad AR. Trying to measure the quality of health information on the internet: is it time to move on? J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1–3..
[9]
Castells M..
Informacionalismo, redes y sociedad red: una propuesta teórica..
Informacionalismo, redes y sociedad red: una propuesta teórica., pp. 27-78
[10]
Adams SA..
Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: an inter-disciplinary literature and website review..
Int J Med Inform. , 79 (2010), pp. 391-400
[11]
Colledge A, Car J, Donnelly A, Majeed A..
Health information for patients: time to look beyond patient information leaflets..
J R Soc Med. , 101 (2008), pp. 447-453
Idiomas
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?