Publish in this journal
Journal Information
Vol. 55. Issue 6.
Pages 689-690 (June 2002)
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 55. Issue 6.
Pages 689-690 (June 2002)
Full text access
Pablo Moriña Vázqueza, Rafael Barba Pichardoa, José Venegas Gameroa
a Unidad de Arritmias y Marcapasos. Servicio de Cuidados Críticos. Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez. Huelva. España.
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Full Text

To the Editor:

We would like to thank Anguera et al for their kind letter and the interest shown in our article. Basically, we agree with all their comments, and find that they do not differ substantially from the contents of our article; nevertheless, we would like to make several points:

1. The aim of our study was simply to demonstrate the possibility of selectively stimulating the His bundle permanently, and for this we selected a very specific patient population, at low risk for developing future disturbances of infrahisian conduction. We have already commented in the limitations section1 that this not yet at well-developed technique, and we noted that the long duration of the procedure and the high failure rate at present limits its general application until such time as electrodes, introducers, and above all specific fixation methods are developed. In any case, all new procedures in medicine are subject to a costly learning curve and should not be abandoned for this reason; the modern ablation techniques that were so costly in time and effort some years ago have since been perfected.

2. In a series of patients subjected to ablation of the AV node,2 later expanded upon by Anguera et al,3 Vanderheyden et al described (by retrospective analysis) clinical deterioration with the appearance of symptoms of congestive cardiac insufficiency in some patients, and found an association with the existence of mitral insufficiency, ventricular dilatation, and previous ventricular malfunction. They attributed this deterioration, among other factors, to the aberrant activation of the left ventricle (LV) after stimulation of the right ventricle (RV) point; they proposed that the proximal stimulation of the His bundle could avoid the changes described.

3. The negative hemodynamic effects associated with the asynchronous activation of the LV, by blocking the left branch or stimulation of the RV apex, has been documented4,5 as occurring independent of the existence of structural disease. The clinical repercussions of these changes obviously depend on the prior state of ventricular function. In the patients described by Anguera et al,3 with data showing prior ventricular dysfunction in the compensated phase, the additional deterioration caused by asynchronous stimulation of the LV after ablation could trigger the development of a decompensated phase with progressive dilatation, an increase in mitral regurgitation, and congestive cardiac insufficiency.

4. We agree with Anguera that the selective stimulation of the His bundle would be more advantageous in the case of patients with structural pathology, in whom there is minimum deterioration of ventricular function associated with stimulation of the RD point, as could occur in the patients described in his article, and this would be more important as it could lead to clinical deterioration. Nevertheless, in this patient population there is a greater incidence and prevalence of changes in infrahisian conduction; for this reason, we believe that the procedure of choice is synchronous biventricular ventricular stimulation in this group of patients with an additional electrode in the coronary vein.

5. Today the importance of asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction is known and early treatment is recommended;6 for this reason, we believe that if a stimulation technique is available that permits activation of the ventricles via a normal conduction system, avoiding the dysfunction associated with asynchronous activation, we must use it even with patients with prior good function in order to avoid the possible long-term deleterious effects of asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction.

6. All these hypotheses need to be confirmed by prospective studies designed for this purpose to establish the true definitive indications for this technique.

Moriña P, Barba R, Venegas J, Álvarez A, Moreno V, Fernández JM, et al..
Estimulación permanente del haz de His tras ablación mediante radiofrecuencia del nodo auriculoventricular y en pacientes con trastorno de la conducción suprahisiana..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 54 (2001), pp. 1385-93
Vanderheyden M, Goethals M, Anguera I, Nellens P, Andries E, Brugada J, et al..
Hemodynamic deterioration following radiofrecuency ablation of the atrioventricular conduction system..
PACE, 20 (1997), pp. 2422-8
Anguera I, Brugada J, Brugada P, Mont L, Valentino M, Aguinaga L, et al..
Deterioro hemodinámico en pacientes sometidos a ablación del nodo auriculoventricular..
Rev Esp Cardiol, 51 (1998), pp. 307-13
Goicolea A..
¿Debemos cambiar el lugar de estimulación ventricular en los marcapasos ventriculares?.
Rev Esp Cardiol, 54 (2001), pp. 1365-6
Leclercq C, Gras D, Le Helloco A, Nicol L, Mabo P, Duabert C..
Hemodynamic importance of preserving the normal sequence of ventricular activation in permanent cardiac pacing..
Am Heart J, 129 (1995), pp. 1133-41
Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, et al..
ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adul. Executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the evaluation and management of Heart Failure)..
J Am Coll Cardiol, 38 (2001), pp. 2101-13
Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Article options
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?