ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 76. Num. 11.
Pages 881-890 (November 2023)

Original article
Clinical profile and prognosis of young patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction managed by the emergency-intervention Codi IAM network

Perfil clínico y pronóstico de pacientes jóvenes con infarto agudo de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST tratados en la red Codi IAM

Eduardo Flores-UmanzoraPedro Cepas-GuillénaXavier FreixaaAnder RegueiroaHelena Tizón-MarcosbcSalvatore BrugalettaaAlbert Ariza-SolédMargarita CalvoaIlana ForadoaXavier CarrilloeMérida CárdenasfSergio Giovanny RojasgJuan Francisco MuñozhJoan García-PicartiRosa María LidónjcManel SabatéaMónica MasottiaMercè Roquéa

Options

Imagen extra
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2023;76:881-90
Abstract
Introduction and objectives

Data on the clinical profile and outcomes of younger patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is scarce. This study compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between patients aged<45 years and those aged ≥ 45 years with STEMI managed by the acute myocardial infarction code (AMI Code) network. Sex-based differences in the younger cohort were also analyzed.

Methods

This multicenter study collected individual data from the Catalonian AMI Code network. Between 2015 and 2020, we enrolled patients with an admission diagnosis of STEMI. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality within 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

Results

Overall, 18 933 patients (23% female) were enrolled. Of them, 1403 participants (7.4%) were aged<45 years. Younger patients with STEMI were more frequently smokers (P<.001) and presented with cardiac arrest and TIMI flow 0 before pPCI (P<.05), but the time from first medical contact to wire crossing was shorter than in the older group (P<.05). All-cause mortality rates were lower in patients aged<45 years (P<.001). Among younger patients, cardiogenic shock was most prevalent in women than in their male counterparts (P=.002), with the time from symptom onset to reperfusion being longer (P<.05). Compared with men aged<45 years, younger women were less likely to undergo pPCI (P=.004).

Conclusions

Despite showing high-risk features on admission, young patients exhibit better outcomes than older patients. Differences in ischemia times and treatment were observed between men and women.

Keywords

STEMI
Younger patients
Coronary artery disease
Sex gap
Acute myocardial infarction
INTRODUCTION

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of death worldwide. Although the overall incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has decreased in developed countries in the last decade, data from several registries have shown that this trend is not equal for all age subgroups, with a stable, even increasing, incidence of ACS being observed in younger patients.1 So far, there has been no standard definition of “young” age in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Several cutoff points appear throughout the literature, with the age of ≤ 45 years being the most consistent.2–4 Moreover, it has been reported that 4% to 10% of AMIs occur before the age of 45 years, while the incidence declines if the age limit is lower.4

Cardiovascular risk factors and clinical presentation differ in older compared with younger patients. The most frequent initial manifestation in the latter is ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).5 Sex differences and predictors of mortality have been described in small cohorts of young patients with ACS.6 The young population with ACS, especially women, has been underrepresented in many clinical trials due to their lower incidence of ACS.7 Considering the above, it is essential to have more data on younger patients presenting with STEMI. Clinical STEMI guidelines recommend regional STEMI networks to organize all key stakeholders so that patients can receive optimal and timely reperfusion treatment (primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), fibrinolysis, or a combination of both).8

Using the database from the Catalonia AMI Code network registry (Codi IAM), this study aimed to analyze and compare clinical characteristics, in-hospital and 2-year outcomes between patients aged<45 years and those aged ≥ 45 years. Given the relevance of a sex bias in diagnosis and the prognostic implications after an ACS in women, we also analyzed sex-based differences in patient characteristics and prognosis.

METHODSPatient selection and follow-up

This observational multicenter retrospective study included all consecutive patients from the registry of the AMI Code diagnosed with STEMI between 2015 and 2020. We excluded patients with a diagnosis different than STEMI (for example, pericarditis, myopericarditis, etc). The flowchart of the study is presented in figure 1 of the supplementary data.

The AMI Code network was launched in 2010 in a region of 7.6 million inhabitants. Ten pPCI hospitals are open 24hours a day, 7 days a week. Updated operating details of the network have been recently published.9 An emergency medical service (EMS) is responsible for coordinating the detection of patients with STEMI and transfer to pPCI hospitals (via EMS ambulances and helicopters). The AMI Code registry includes demographic, clinical, therapeutic, and discharge data collected electronically from patients with STEMI within the previous 12hours. Patient mortality data were obtained from the National Mortality Registry. The quality of the data included in the registry are periodically verified by external audits. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of all participating centers and complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study endpoints and definitions

Standardized definitions of all patient-related variables, clinical diagnoses, and hospital complications and outcomes were used. All patients admitted with an ACS were classified as STEMI according to current clinical practice guidelines10 and the fourth definition of AMI.11 Epicardial coronary flow in the STEMI culprit artery was graded according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade,12 and reperfusion was considered optimal when TIMI 3 flow was obtained at the culprit lesion in less than 120minutes from the first medical contact.

The primary assessment endpoints were all-cause mortality within 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies (percentages), assessing the differences by the chi-square test (or Fisher test when necessary). Continuous variables are presented as mean±standard deviation or median [interquartile range]. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to ensure normal distribution. Continuous variables were compared using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, as appropriate. Survival curves using all available follow-up data were constructed for the time-to-event variables using the Kaplan-Meier method. For all analyses, a 2-tailed P value<.05 was used as the criterion for statistical significance. Follow-up was considered to terminate at the date of the last follow-up. Analyses were performed using STATA software (V 14.0, StataCorp LP, United States).

RESULTSRegistry population

A total of 18 933 patients (23% female) with an admission diagnosis of STEMI were enrolled in the AMI Code registry between January 2015 and December 2020. Of them, 1403 participants (7.4%) were aged<45 years. The proportion of women was higher in the older age group (P<.001). The main baseline characteristics and clinical presentation of the 2 groups are summarized in table 1. A higher proportion of patients younger than 45 years were smokers (P<.001). In contrast, patients>45 years had a higher prevalence of the other common risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes) and other comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, previous cardiovascular events, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic liver disease).

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics

Variable  All patients  Age ≤ 45 y  Age>45 y  P 
  (N=18 933)  (n=1403)  (n=17 530)   
Demographics         
Age, y  64.1±13.2  40.8±4.1  65.9±11.8  <.001 
Women  4357 (23)  174 (12)  4183 (24)  <.001 
Medical history         
Hypertension  9480 (51)  356 (25)  9980 (55)  <.001 
Hyperlipidemia  8709 (46)  448 (32)  8261 (47)  <.001 
Diabetes mellitus  4554 (24)  136 (10)  4418 (25)  <.001 
Smoker  6549 (35)  887 (63)  5662 (32)  <.001 
Chronic kidney disease  280 (2)  5 (0.4)  275 (2)  .001 
Prior stroke  718 (4)  9 (1)  709 (4)  <.001 
COPD  298 (2)  3 (0.2)  295 (2)  <.001 
Chronic liver disease  36 (0.2)  36 (0.2)  .10 
Cardiac disease         
Previous myocardial infarction  2042 (11)  88 (6)  1954 (11)  <.001 
Previous PCI  1887 (10)  86 (6)  1801 (10)  <.001 
Previous CABG  323 (2)  3 (0.2)  322 (2)  <.001 
Previous SAPT  2286 (12)  60 (4)  2226 (13)  <.001 
Previous OAC  694 (4)  11 (0.8)  683 (4)  <.001 
Clinical characteristics at presentation         
Killip presentation        <.001 
15 263 (82)  1230 (89)  14 033 (82)   
II  1339 (8)  65 (4)  1274 (7)   
III  478 (2)  14 (1)  464 (3)   
IV  1482 (8)  69 (6)  1413 (8)   
Cardiac arrest  714 (4)  67 (5)  647 (4)  .04 
LBBB on admission  472 (3)  4 (0.3)  468 (3)  <.001 

CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LBBB, left brunch bundle block; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; OAC, oral anticoagulation; SAPT, single antiplatelet therapy.

Values are expressed as No. (%) or mean±standard deviation.

In the cohort of patients aged<45 years, 111 patients were aged<35 years. The proportion of smokers in this group was even higher. The specific baseline characteristics and clinical presentation of patients aged<35 years are shown in table 1 of the supplementary data.

Younger patients were more frequently in Killip class I than older patients (P<.001). In contrast, cardiac arrest on presentation was more frequent in participants aged<45 years than in older patients (P=.04). The number of STEMI patients during these 6 years (2015-2020) remained stable even in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic occurred (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Number of STEMI patients between 2015-2020.

(0.1MB).

There were no significant differences between symptom onset and first medical contact (FMC) between both groups, but pPCI was more frequently performed in younger patients (P=.028). Compared with older patients, younger patients tended to have a higher rate of TIMI flow 0 before PCI (P=.05), but the time from FMC to wire crossing was shorter in younger patients [92 (72-124) vs 96 (74-130); P=.015]. The postprocedural TIMI flow 3-grade rate was similar in the 2 groups. Table 2 summarizes the times of intervention and procedural characteristics of both groups.

Table 2.

Time of intervention and procedural characteristics

Variable  All patients  Age ≤ 45 y  Age>45 y  P 
  (N=18 933)  (n=1403)  (n=17,530)   
Time from symptom onset to FMC, min  69 [29-169]  65 [29-160]  69 [29-170]  .25 
Time from FMC to wire crossing, min  96 [74-130]  92 [72-124]  96 [74-130]  .015 
Time from symptom onset to reperfusion in primary PCI strategy, min  196 [137-330]  194 [130-320]  196 [137-330]  .06 
Time from symptom onset to reperfusion in fibrinolysis strategy, min*  99 [67-188]  155 [76-225]  99 [66-181.5]  .22 
Multivessel disease (≥ 2 vessel)  8442 (45)  426 (30)  8016 (46)  <.001 
TIMI flow grade before PCI        .050 
11 549 (61)  898 (64)  10 693 (60)   
1514 (8)  84 (6)  1402 (9)   
2650 (14)  194 (15)  2454 (14)   
3218 (17)  210 (15)  2980 (17)   
PCI performed  16 832 (89)  1276 (91)  15 560 (89)  .028 
TIMI flow grade after PCI        .16 
378 (2)  28 (2)  175 (1)   
189 (1)  14 (1)  168 (1)   
567 (3)  42 (3)  701 (4)   
17 797 (94)  1318 (94)  16 478 (94)   

FMC, first medical contact; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.

Values are expressed as No. (%) or median [interquartile range].

*

Fibrinolysis strategy in 358 patients (2%; 25 patients aged ≤ 45years and 333 patients aged>45 years).

Values are expressed as No. (%).

Clinical outcomes

At the 2-year follow-up, 2644 patients had died (14%). Compared with older patients, younger patients showed lower rates of all-cause mortality, both in-hospital and at 1 and 2 years (P<.001). Kaplan-Meier curves are shown in figure 2. Younger patients also had fewer complications after hospital admission, such as heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and atrial fibrillation. As inpatients, no differences were observed in bleeding complications, ventricular arrhythmias, or acute stent thrombosis. A comparison of clinical outcomes between younger and older patients is presented in table 3.

Figure 2.

Kaplan-Meier curve for all-cause mortality according to age.

(0.1MB).
Table 3.

Clinical outcomes

Variable  All patients  Age ≤ 45 y  Age>45 y  P 
  (N=18 933)  (n=1403)  (n=17 530)   
In-hospital complication         
All-cause death  716 (4)  27 (2)  689 (4)  <.001 
Patients without cardiac arrest on admission  549 (3)  15 (1)  534 (3)  <.001 
Acute pulmonary oedema  364 (2)  9 (1)  355 (2)  <.001 
Cardiogenic shock  970 (5)  38 (3)  932 (5)  <.001 
Endotracheal intubation  725 (4)  53 (4)  672 (4)  .93 
Major bleeding  126 (1)  5 (0.3)  121 (0.7)  .14 
Atrial fibrillation  439 (2)  8 (0.5)  431 (3)  <.001 
Ventricular tachycardia  472 (3)  33 (2)  439 (3)  .72 
Ventricular fibrillation  537 (3)  48 (3)  489 (3)  .14 
Stent thrombosis (< 24h post-PCI)  130 (1)  14 (1)  116 (1)  .21 
All-cause death follow-up  1496 (8)  48 (3)  1448 (8)  <.001 
30 d         
1 y  2211 (12)  59 (4)  2152 (12)  <.001 
2 y  2644 (14)  63 (5)  2581 (15)  <.001 

PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

After multivariate analysis, Killip grade IV, cardiac arrest at admission, and multivessel CAD were independent predictors of in-hospital death in patients aged<45 years. Table 4 shows the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality among younger patients.

Table 4.

Predictors of in-hospital death according to characteristics at admission in younger patients

Characteristic  Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
  OR (95%CI)  P  OR (95%CI)  P 
Female sex  1.08 (0.37-3.12)  .89 
Prior myocardial infarction  1.08 (0.25-4.59)  .91 
Diabetes mellitus  0.66 (0.16-2.81)  .58 
Pulmonary edema  10.51 (2.20-50.2)  .003 
Cardiogenic shock  26.93 (11.52-62.95)  <.001  11.97 (4.47-32.02)  <.001 
Ventricular fibrillation prior cardiac catheterization  7.92 (3.72-16.85)  <.001 
Cardiac arrest as clinical presentation  20.37 (9.51-43.63)  <.001  12.66 (5.41-29.62)  <.001 
Multivessel coronary artery disease  2.35 (1.13-4.85)  .02  2.59 (1.16-5.76)  .02 

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Sex-based differences in the younger subgroup

Of the 1403 patients aged<45, a total of 174 (12%) were women. Compared with their male counterparts, younger women were less likely to be current smokers (56% vs 64%; P=.02). Among patients aged<45 years, no significant differences in the prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular risks factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, or diabetes were found between men and women. The baseline characteristics of younger patients stratified by sex are presented in table 5.

Table 5.

Baseline characteristics of younger patients stratified by sex

Variable  Age ≤ 45 y  Men  Women   
  (N=1403)  (n=1229)  (n=174)  P 
Demographics         
Age, y  40.8±4.1  40.8±4.1  40.6±4.1  .34 
Medical history         
Hypertension  356 (25)  270 (22)  36 (21)  .69 
Hyperlipidemia  448 (32)  393 (32)  57 (33)  .55 
Diabetes mellitus  136 (10)  113 (9)  23 (13)  .09 
Smoker  887 (63)  789 (64)  98 (56)  .02 
Chronic kidney disease  5 (0.4)  5 (0.4)  .39 
Prior stroke  9 (0.6)  9 (0.7)  .26 
COPD  3 (0.2)  1 (0.1)  2 (1.1)  .005 
Chronic liver disease  NA 
Cardiac disease         
Previous myocardial infarction  88 (6)  79 (6)  9 (5)  .57 
Previous PCI  86 (6)  77 (6)  9 (5)  .65 
Previous CABG  3 (0.2)  3 (0.2)  .51 
Previous SAPT  60 (4)  54 (5)  6 (4)  .56 
Previous OAC  11 (1)  11 (1)  .21 
Clinical characteristics at presentation         
Killip presentation        .002 
1230 (89)  1084 (89)  146 (87)   
II  65 (4)  59 (5)  6 (3)  .19 
III  14 (1)  14 (1)   
IV  69 (6)  51 (5)  18 (10)   
Mechanical circulatory support during hospitalizationa  16 (2)  12 (2)  4 (4)   
Cardiac arrest  67 (5)  57 (5)  10 (6)  .54 
Hypothermia during hospitalizationb  7 (1)  5 (1)  2 (2)  .25 
Orotracheal intubation  92 (7)  77 (6)  15 (7)  .24 
LBBB on admission  4 (0.4)  4 (0.5)  .89 

CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NA, not applicable; OAC, oral anticoagulation; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SAPT, single antiplatelet therapy.

Values are expressed as No. (%) or mean±standard deviation.

a

Data collected from 2018 (n=748). Mechanical circulatory support on admission and during hospitalization: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, (Impella, ABIOMED United States) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or left ventricular assist device (Levitronix CentriMag, United States).

b

Data collected from 2018 (n=748).

The rate of cardiogenic shock as a complication of STEMI at initial presentation was most prevalent in younger women than in men (10% vs 5%; P=.002). Although there were no significant differences in the time from symptom onset to FMC in either group, the time from symptom onset to myocardial reperfusion, independently of the therapeutic strategy used, was longer in younger women than in their male counterparts (209 [145-345] minutes vs 190 [130-314] minutes; P=.042 in pPCI; and 261 [238-285] minutes vs 109 [65-220] minutes; P=.048 in fibrinolysis strategy, respectively]. Compared with men aged<45 years, younger women were less likely to undergo pPCI (86% vs 92%; P=.004). In addition, women had higher rates of endotracheal intubation during hospital admission than men (7% vs 3%; P=.006). Table 6 shows the intervention times and procedural characteristics of men and women younger than 45 years.

Table 6.

Time of intervention and procedural characteristics between men and women aged ≤ 45 years

Variable  Age ≤ 45  Men  Women  P 
  (N = 1403)  (n = 1229)  (n = 174)   
Time from symptom onset to FMC, min  65 [29-160]  65 [29-160]  61 [26-168]  .700 
Time from FMC to wire crossing, min  92 [72-124]  90 [72-122]  104 [79-135]  .038 
Time from symptom onset to reperfusion in primary PCI strategy, min  194 [130-320]  190 [130-314]  209 [145-345]  .042 
Time from symptom onset to reperfusion in fibrinolysis strategy, mina  155 [76-225]  109 [65-220]  261 [238-285]  .048 
Place performing FMC, % (n = 1391)        .430 
Emergency medical services  433 (31)  385 (32)  48 (28)   
Primary healthcare center  278 (20)  247 (20)  31 (18)   
Non-PCI hospital  489 (35)  419 (34)  70 (40)   
PCI hospital  191 (14)  167 (14)  24 (14)   
Multivessel disease (≥ 2 vessels)  426 (30)  380 (31)  46 (26)  .230 
TIMI flow grade before PCI        .610 
898 (64)  784 (64)  114 (62)   
84 (6)  73 (6)  11 (5)   
194 (15)  163 (14)  31 (18)   
210 (15)  187 (16)  23 (15)   
PCI performed  1272 (91)  1124 (92)b  148 (86)b  .004 
TIMI flow grade after PCI        .070 
28 (2)  28 (2)   
14 (1)  5 (1)  9 (3)   
42 (3)  33 (3)  9 (3)   
1318 (94)  1162 (94)  156 (94)   

FMC, first medical contact; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; SCAD, spontaneous coronary artery dissection; TIMI, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction.

Values are expressed as No. (%) or median [interquartile range].

a

Fibrinolysis strategy in 25 patients (21 men and 4 women).

b

Eleven patients diagnosed with SCAD did not undergo PCI [2 men (0.2%) and 9 women (5%)].

Sex-stratified clinical outcomes in the younger cohort are presented in table 7. At the 2-year follow-up, 63 patients<45 years had died (5%). Overall mortality rates in men and women were similar both in-hospital and at the 2-year follow-up (2% vs 2%; P=.70 and 4% vs 7%; P=.10, respectively). Kaplan-Meier curves are shown in figure 3.

Table 7.

Clinical outcomes stratified by sex in younger patients

Variable  Age ≤ 45  Men  Women  P 
  (N=1403)  (n=1229)  (n=174)   
In-hospital complication         
All-cause death  27 (2)  23 (2)  4 (2)  .70 
Inpatients without pPCI (n=123)  4 (3)  4 (4)  .30 
Acute pulmonary edema  9 (1)  8 (1)  1 (1)  .81 
Cardiogenic shock  38 (3)  30 (2)  8 (4)  .22 
Endotracheal intubation  53 (4)  40 (3)  13 (7)  .006 
Major bleeding  5 (0.3)  4 (1)  1 (1)  .61 
Atrial fibrillation  8 (0.5)  8 (1)  .28 
Ventricular tachycardia  33 (2)  25 (2)  8 (5)  .03 
Ventricular fibrillation  48 (3)  40 (3)  8 (4)  .36 
Stent thrombosis (< 24 h post-PCI)  14 (1)  12 (1)  2 (1)  .84 
All-cause death follow-up         
30 d  48 (3)  41 (3)  7 (4)  .64 
1 y  59 (4)  48 (4)  11 (6)  .14 
2 y  63 (5)  51 (4)  12 (7)  .10 

PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; pPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Values are expressed as No. (%).

Figure 3.

Kaplan-Meier curve for all-cause mortality according to sex in patients aged<45 years.

(0.08MB).
DISCUSSION

The key findings of the present study, comparing clinical characteristics, in-hospital and 1- and 2-year outcomes between patients aged<45 and ≥ 45 years, were as follows: a) younger patients with STEMI were more frequently smokers but had a lower disease burden than older patients; b) younger patients with STEMI were more likely to present with cardiac arrest, but the time frame from FMC to wire crossing was shorter than that in the older group; c) all-cause mortality rates, both in-hospital and at 2 years, were lower in patients aged<45 years; and d) despite recent advancements in STEMI treatments, a significant sex gap was noted in this study. Among patients aged<45 years, the time from symptom onset to reperfusion was longer in younger women than in their male counterparts, and they also received less primary PCI. Additionally, the rate of cardiogenic shock as a complication of STEMI at the initial presentation was more prevalent in younger women than in their male counterparts. The main findings are summarized in figure 4.

Figure 4.

Central Illustration. Summary of the main findings of this study. Clinical profile and prognosis of young patients vs older patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction managed by the emergency-intervention AMI Code Network from 2015 to 2020 in Catalonia, Spain. Despite having high-risk features on admission, patients aged<45 years with STEMI had better outcomes than those aged>45 years. Regarding sex differences among younger patients, women had a higher prevalence of cardiogenic shock, significantly longer times from symptom onset to reperfusion, and were less likely to undergo pPCI than men. FMC, first medical contact; pPCI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

(0.38MB).

In keeping with the findings of others, at least 1 modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, or smoking, was identified in our cohort of patients with premature MI.13,14 In the cohort aged between 35 and 45 years, 1 in 2 patients was an active smoker, increasing to 2 in 3 patients in those aged<35 years. Many studies have analyzed the effect of different cardiovascular risk factors on the pattern and severity of CAD. Of these, the most important was smoking.15–17 Additionally, an association has been established between active and passive smoking and the development of premature CAD.18,19 Smoking accelerates atherosclerosis by increasing the oxidation of low-density lipoprotein and damaging coronary endothelial vasodilation.20 These deleterious changes result in a larger MI size, poor recovery from myocardial injury, and persistent inflammation triggering coronary recurrences, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality.21 Furthermore, inadequate control of cardiovascular risk factors is associated with decreased life expectancy and productivity costs, especially in the younger population.22 Primary and secondary prevention strategies are needed that include education targeting active smoking and lifestyle modification, especially in patients aged<45 years. Evidence demonstrates that smoking cessation is the single most effective intervention for improving long-term outcomes in younger patients, reducing all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by>50%.5 Additionally, a public health policy that embraces zero tolerance of childhood passive tobacco exposure should be pursued as there is sufficient evidence to date demonstrating the detrimental cardiovascular consequences in this group.18

In our cohort, younger patients with STEMI were more likely to have a cardiac arrest on presentation than older patients. Most ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden cardiac arrest are thought to occur in asymptomatic individuals without a pre-existing structural cardiac disease and represent the first manifestation of CAD. The GEVAMI study compared the first STEMI with and without VF and identified several independent risk factors for VF, including younger age.23 This finding could also be related to a higher thrombus burden in this cohort with TIMI flow 0 before pPCI. A possible explanation for this result is likely related to plaque rupture, increased blood coagulability, and greater platelet reactivity with a high propensity for thrombus formation rather than a gradual process, such as atherosclerosis in younger smokers.24 In addition, cocaine and other illicit drug use has been reported in 10% of younger patients with an AMI and associated with cardiac arrest at presentation.25

Current and previous studies have shown that young patients had a better prognosis with lower in-hospital and long-term all-cause death rates than older patients.26,27 In several studies, in-hospital mortality in younger patients with MI ranged from 0% to 4%.28–30 We observed a similar rate of all-cause mortality during hospitalization in our study. This could partially be explained by the fact that younger patients more frequently underwent pPCI and had fewer complications during hospital admission than older patients. In addition, in the present registry, there were no significant differences in major bleeding rates between older and younger patients. This absence of statistical significance could be related to a meager rate of major bleeding in the younger.

In the present study, younger patients also had better long-term outcomes after MI, with a low rate (5%) of all-cause mortality at the 2-year follow-up. This finding highlights the relevance of prompt coronary reperfusion and adequate in-hospital treatment in this group. Although there were no significant differences in the time from symptom onset to myocardial reperfusion, independently of the therapeutic strategy undertaken in younger and older patients, the time from symptom onset to reperfusion with the fibrinolysis strategy was numerically longer in the younger group. This discrepancy could be attributed to the preliminary care received in a rural outpatient clinic and the need to transfer the patient to a health care facility to administer thrombolysis. Additionally, time to diagnosis in young patients was more delayed due to diagnostic doubts in more remote primary care areas, which are less accustomed to diagnosing MI.

We found a significant sex gap regarding symptom onset to reperfusion strategy. Among patients aged<45 years, women underwent fewer pPCI than their male counterparts and had higher rates of cardiogenic shock as a complication of STEMI in the initial presentation. This has been extensively analyzed in previous studies and is attributable to many clinical, social, and economic factors. Among them is a misperception that young women are protected against cardiovascular disease, and misinterpretation of clinical symptoms leads to underestimation of cardiac disease risk with critical prognostic implications31 and reduced or delayed access to invasive treatment strategies. Given the lower proportion of women with STEMI, they are also underrepresented in clinical trials.32 Although many women will experience obstructive CAD, other diseases, such as nonobstructive coronary artery disease, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and coronary vasospasm, are more frequent in women than in men.33 Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is an increasingly recognized cause of AMI, especially in young and middle-aged women. A conservative treatment strategy is recommended in such cases, leading to lower revascularization rates, particularly among younger women.33,34 In our cohort, 11 patients ≤ 45 years were diagnosed with spontaneous coronary artery dissection and did not receive pPCI, which could partially explain the lower revascularization rates primarily seen in younger women.

Despite growing efforts to study cardiovascular disease in women and improve educational and public awareness, a sex disparity in cardiovascular care persists across all age ranges.35,36 Measures to improve the sex gap in AMI diagnosis and access to treatments in women, especially younger women, should be emphasized and improved.

Limitations

This registry did not collect information on family history of CAD, use of illicit drugs, lipid profile values at admission and follow-up, treatment administered during admission or upon discharge, and nonobstructive CAD (for example, vasospasm). Additionally, the registry recently incorporated details related to therapeutic hypothermia and mechanical support in 2018.

Clinical implications

Empowering younger patients to learn and be more actively involved in cardiovascular risk factor prevention, like smoking cessation and awareness of cardiovascular diseases, including ACS, is imperative to prevent and improve clinical outcomes. Additionally, health providers must be competent to mitigate sex disparities and provide accurate diagnosis and treatment in younger women presenting with cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite showing high-risk features on admission, younger (< 45 years) patients with STEMI have better outcomes than their older counterparts. Differences in ischemia times due to the health system and treatment have been observed between men and women.

WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THE TOPIC?

  • -

    The incidence of ACS is a stable, or even increasing, in younger patients (≤ 45 years).

  • -

    Data on the clinical profile and outcomes of younger patients with STEMI is scarce.

WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?

  • -

    Despite having high-risk features on admission, young (< 45 years) patients with STEMI had better outcomes than their older counterparts.

  • -

    Ischemia times and treatment differed between men and women. Health providers must be competent to mitigate sex disparities and provide accurate diagnosis and treatment in younger women presenting with cardiovascular disease.

FUNDING

None.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION

M. Roqué and E. Flores-Umanzor conceived and designed the analysis. E. Flores-Umanzor and P.L. Cepas-Guillen performed the analysis. X. Freixa, A. Regueiro, S. Brugaletta, M. Calvo, I. Forado, M. Sabaté, M. Masotti, H. Tizón-Marcos, A. Ariza, X. Carrillo, S. Rojas, J. Muñoz, J. García, R.M. Lidón and M. Roqué reviewed and edited the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

None.

APPENDIX. SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version, at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2023.03.008

References
[1]
G.A. Roth, G.A. Mensah, C.O. Johnson, et al.
Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2020), 76 pp. 2982-3021
[2]
M. Egred, G. Viswanathan, G.K. Davis.
Myocardial infarction in young adults.
Postgrad Med J, (2005), 81 pp. 741-745
[3]
S. Bangalore, G.C. Fonarow, E.D. Peterson, et al.
Age and gender differences in quality of care and outcomes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Am J Med, (2012), 125 pp. 1000-1009
[4]
M. Doughty, R. Mehta, D. Bruckman, et al.
Acute myocardial infarction in the young--The University of Michigan experience.
Am Heart J, (2002), 143 pp. 56-62
[5]
L.S. Rallidis, I. Xenogiannis, E.S. Brilakis, D.L. Bhatt.
Causes, Angiographic Characteristics, and Management of Premature Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2022), 79 pp. 2431-2449
[6]
D.L. Bhatt, R.D. Lopes, R.A. Harrington.
Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Review.
JAMA, (2022), 327 pp. 662-675
[7]
K.S. Dodd, J.S. Saczynski, Y. Zhao, R.J. Goldberg, J.H. Gurwitz.
Exclusion of older adults and women from recent trials of acute coronary syndromes.
J Am Geriatr Soc, (2011), 59 pp. 506-511
[8]
B. Ibanez, S. James, S. Agewall, et al.
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur Heart J, (2017), 39 pp. 119-177
[9]
M.T. Faixedas, J. Mauri, M.J. Pueyo.
The Codi IAM registry: acute myocardial infarction code registry in Catalonia.
Rev Esp Cardiol, (2022), 75 pp. 291-293
[10]
J.-P. Collet, H. Thiele, E. Barbato, et al.
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur Heart J, (2020), 42 pp. 1289-1367
[11]
K. Thygesen, J.S. Alpert, A.S. Jaffe, et al.
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).
Circulation, (2018), 138 pp. e618-e651
[12]
J.H. Chesebro, G. Knatterud, R. Roberts, et al.
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial. Phase I: A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase. Clinical findings through hospital discharge.
Circulation, (1987), 76 pp. 142-154
[13]
T. Alexander, D.J. Kumbhani, V. Subban, H. Sundar, B.K. Nallamothu, A.S. Mullasari.
Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the Young Compared With Older Patients in the Tamil Nadu STEMI Program.
Heart Lung Circ, (2021), 30 pp. 1876-1882
[14]
J. Lv, L. Ni, K. Liu, et al.
Clinical Characteristics, Prognosis, and Gender Disparities in Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Front Cardiovasc Med, (2021), 8 pp. 720378
[15]
J.P. Collet, M. Zeitouni, N. Procopi, et al.
Long-Term Evolution of Premature Coronary Artery Disease.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2019), 74 pp. 1868-1878
[16]
M. Zeitouni, R.M. Clare, K. Chiswell, et al.
Risk Factor Burden and Long-Term Prognosis of Patients With Premature Coronary Artery Disease.
J Am Heart Assoc, (2020), 9 pp. e017712
[17]
N. Salehi, P. Janjani, H. Tadbiri, M. Rozbahani, M. Jalilian.
Effect of cigarette smoking on coronary arteries and pattern and severity of coronary artery disease: a review.
J Int Med Res, (2021), 49
[18]
G. Raghuveer, D.A. White, L.L. Hayman, et al.
Cardiovascular Consequences of Childhood Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure: Prevailing Evidence, Burden, and Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
Circulation, (2016), 134 pp. e336-e359
[19]
S. Yandrapalli, C. Nabors, A. Goyal, W.S. Aronow, W.H. Frishman.
Modifiable Risk Factors in Young Adults With First Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2019), 73 pp. 573-584
[20]
R. Michael Pittilo.
Cigarette smoking, endothelial injury and cardiovascular disease.
Int J Exp Pathol, (2000), 81 pp. 219-230
[21]
N.G. Frangogiannis.
The inflammatory response in myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling.
Nat Rev Cardiol, (2014), 11 pp. 255-265
[22]
J.L. Rodgers, J. Jones, S.I. Bolleddu, et al.
Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Gender and Aging.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis, (2019), pp. 6
[23]
C. Glinge, S. Sattler, R. Jabbari, J. Tfelt-Hansen.
Epidemiology and genetics of ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction.
J Geriatr Cardiol, (2016), 13 pp. 789-797
[24]
J.F. Bentzon, F. Otsuka, R. Virmani, E. Falk.
Mechanisms of Plaque Formation and Rupture.
Circulation Research, (2014), 114 pp. 1852-1866
[25]
E.M. DeFilippis, A. Singh, S. Divakaran, et al.
Cocaine and Marijuana Use Among Young Adults With Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2018), 71 pp. 2540-2551
[26]
B.W. Tung, Z.Y. Ng, W. Kristanto, et al.
Characteristics and outcomes of young patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: retrospective analysis in a multiethnic Asian population.
Open Heart, (2021), 8 pp. e001437
[27]
A. Alfaddagh, H. Khraishah, W. Rashed, G. Sharma, R.S. Blumenthal, M. Zubaid.
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of young adults with first myocardial infarction: Results from Gulf COAST.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, (2020), 31 pp. 100680
[28]
P.J. Morillas, A. Cabadés, V. Bertomeu, et al.
Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Under 45 Years.
Rev Esp Cardiol, (2002), 55 pp. 1124-1131
[29]
R. Gulati, A. Behfar, J. Narula, et al.
Acute Myocardial Infarction in Young Individuals.
Mayo Clin Proc, (2020), 95 pp. 136-156
[30]
J. Yang, D.W. Biery, A. Singh, et al.
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Very Young Adults Who Experience Myocardial Infarction: The Partners YOUNG-MI Registry.
[31]
A.H. Maas, Y.E. Appelman.
Gender differences in coronary heart disease.
Neth Heart J, (2010), 18 pp. 598-602
[32]
M. Woodward.
Cardiovascular Disease and the Female Disadvantage.
Int J Environ Res Public Health, (2019), pp. 16
[33]
M.B. Minissian, P.K. Mehta, S.N. Hayes, et al.
Ischemic Heart Disease in Young Women: JACC Review Topic of the Week.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2022), 80 pp. 1014-1022
[34]
S.N. Hayes, M.S. Tweet, D. Adlam, et al.
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2020), 76 pp. 961-984
[35]
P.L. Cepas-Guillen, J. Echarte-Morales, E. Flores-Umanzor, et al.
Sex-gender disparities in nonagenarians with acute coronary syndrome.
Clin Cardiol, (2021), 44 pp. 371-378
[36]
E.J. Flores-Umanzor, P.L. Cepas-Guillen, G. Caldentey, et al.
Sex-based differences in chronic total occlusion management and long-term clinical outcomes.
Int J Cardiol., (2020), 319 pp. 46-51

Ambos autores han contribuido por igual a este trabajo.

Copyright © 2023. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?